XBRL and ESEF Tagging Plan Template (iXBRL, SEC Inline XBRL)
Regime and taxonomy version, tagging scope, Annex II elements, extensions and anchoring, tag review, validation, auditor review, filing timeline
Anleitung: Use it when a listed issuer plans its ESEF or SEC Inline XBRL annual filing. Fill the regime and taxonomy row first, then the extension list. The main pitfall is tagging against last year's taxonomy or adding extensions for items the core taxonomy already covers.
Vorschau
XBRL and ESEF Tagging Plan: [Issuer name], [Financial year]
Working plan for preparing the annual financial report in the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF), or an Inline XBRL filing with the US SEC: taxonomy version, tagging scope, extension and anchoring policy, review, validation, sign-off and filing. Based on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 (ESEF RTS) as amended, the ESMA ESEF Reporting Manual and, for US filers, SEC Inline XBRL rules (Release No. 33-10514, 2018) and the EDGAR Filer Manual. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a documentation format, not legal, audit or financial advice; check the current official text and a qualified professional.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [XBRL-YYYY-NNN] Example: XBRL-2026-001 |
| Issuer and LEI | [Name, LEI] Example: Tarnwick Components SE, LEI [20-character LEI] |
| Regime | [ESEF / SEC Inline XBRL / UK DTR] Example: ESEF |
| Financial year | [YYYY] Example: FY2026, year ending 2026-12-31 |
| Taxonomy | [Version] Example: ESEF taxonomy 2025 (package esef_taxonomy-2025_12_31), check the version required for FY2026 |
| Tagging tool or vendor | [Name] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / Approved / Filed] |
| Owner | [@group-reporting-lead] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@group-financial-controller], [@external-auditor-contact] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group reporting lead | [@name] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Group financial controller | [@name] | [Approve] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Chief financial officer | [@name] | [Approve filing] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | First plan for the year |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | Example: Extension list approved |
1. Regulatory basis and taxonomy
Under the ESEF RTS, issuers on EU regulated markets prepare the whole annual financial report in XHTML and mark up IFRS consolidated financial statements with Inline XBRL using the ESEF taxonomy. ESMA updates the RTS each year to bring in the latest IFRS Accounting Taxonomy; the Commission then adopts the amendment. ESMA publishes the consolidated RTS, the ESEF Reporting Manual (latest edition listed 2025-10-14, reference ESMA32-60-254), the taxonomy package and a conformance suite on its electronic reporting page. Confirm which taxonomy is mandatory for your financial year, as adoption dates of annual updates vary.
| Regime | Rule source | Taxonomy | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESEF (EU) | Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as amended; ESEF Reporting Manual | ESEF taxonomy based on the IFRS Accounting Taxonomy | Detailed tagging of primary statements; block tagging of notes since financial years from 2022 |
| SEC (US) | Release No. 33-10514 (2018-06-28); EDGAR Filer Manual | US GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (2026 version accepted by the SEC in March 2026), SEC Reporting Taxonomy, DEI; or IFRS taxonomy for foreign private issuers | Cover page tagging on 10-K, 10-Q, 20-F, 40-F and 8-K |
| UK | FCA Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, DTR 4.1 structured reporting rules; FCA technical note on taxonomies | UK-approved ESEF and FRC taxonomies | Check the current FCA Handbook and technical note |
2. Tagging scope
Tag the primary statements in detail: every number in the statement of financial position, profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows. Tag each note with a text block at the level of detail the RTS requires, and the accounting policies as separate blocks. Tag the mandatory entity information listed in Annex II of the RTS.
| Area | Tagging level | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statement of financial position (Example) | Detailed | [@name] | Done |
| Statement of profit or loss and OCI (Example) | Detailed | [@name] | Done |
| Statement of changes in equity (Example) | Detailed, with equity component dimensions | [@name] | In progress |
| Statement of cash flows (Example) | Detailed | [@name] | Done |
| Notes 1 to 34 (Example) | Text blocks per note and per policy | [@name] | In progress |
| Annex II mandatory elements (Example) | Detailed | [@name] | Done |
| Sustainability statement (Example) | Not tagged until marking-up rules apply | [@name] | Not applicable |
3. Extensions and anchoring
Create an extension element only when no core element has the right accounting meaning. Anchor each extension in the primary statements to the core element with the closest wider meaning, and to narrower elements where they exist. Give each extension a standard label in the language of the report.
| Ext ID | Extension element | Reason | Anchored to | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXT-001 (Example) | tarn:ToolingRecoveriesFromCustomers | Line item specific to the business model | Wider: ifrs-full:Revenue | [@name] |
| EXT-002 (Example) | tarn:RestructuringProvisionFactoryConsolidation | Separate line in the balance sheet | Wider: ifrs-full:OtherProvisions | [@name] |
Example: 2 extensions out of 412 tagged facts in the primary statements (0.5%), down from 5 in FY2025.
4. Quality review
Review every tag for accounting meaning, sign, period, scale, dimensions and calculation consistency. Review a rendered view of the XHTML against the signed report for layout and text. Track each issue to closure.
| Check | Method | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Element meaning | Reviewer compares each tag with the taxonomy definition | [@name] |
| Sign and scale | Values positive unless the element meaning is reversed; scale matches the presentation | [@name] |
| Period and context | Instant versus duration, comparative period | [@name] |
| Calculation consistency | Totals add up in the calculation linkbase | Tool |
| Text blocks | Each block starts and ends at the right note | [@name] |
| Visual fidelity | XHTML matches the approved PDF | [@name] |
5. Validation, sign-off and filing
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Taxonomy and extension plan approved (Example) | 2026-10-15 |
| Dry run on Q3 interim figures (Example) | 2026-11-30 |
| Full tagging of draft annual report (Example) | 2027-02-20 |
| Auditor review complete (Example) | 2027-03-10 |
| Filing (Example) | 2027-03-18 |
Check whether the auditor issues an opinion on ESEF compliance under national law, and agree the format and timing early. For SEC filers, test the submission in the EDGAR test environment and confirm cover page tags match the cover page.
6. References
| Reference | Version or date |
|---|---|
| Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 (ESEF RTS), as amended | Consolidated version and annual amendments on ESMA's electronic reporting page: https://www.esma.europa.eu/issuer-disclosure/electronic-reporting |
| ESEF Reporting Manual, ESMA32-60-254 | Edition listed 2025-10-14 |
| ESEF taxonomy package 2025 | esef_taxonomy-2025_12_31, listed 2026-04-21 |
| SEC Inline XBRL, Release No. 33-10514 | Adopted 2018-06-28: https://www.sec.gov/data-research/structured-data/inline-xbrl |
| FASB 2026 GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy | Released December 2025, accepted by the SEC March 2026 |
Standard and licence note
Based on Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as amended, the ESMA ESEF Reporting Manual, SEC Inline XBRL rules and the EDGAR Filer Manual, cited by name and summarised in original words. XBRL and Inline XBRL are specifications of XBRL International; taxonomy element names are shown only as examples. Check the current official texts and taxonomy versions before use. Tarnwick Components SE and every figure are fictional. This template is original text and is not legal, audit or financial advice; check the current official text and a qualified professional. Template licence: MIT.
Ähnliche Vorlagen
Climate Transition Plan Template
Climate transition plan: governance, baseline, targets, Scope 1-3 levers and pathway, capex, locked-in emissions, assumptions, workforce, risks, KPIs
Finanzen, Anlage & RechnungswesenContingency Funding Plan Template (Bank Liquidity, CRD Art. 86)
Bank CFP: early-warning indicators, stress stages, survival horizon, counterbalancing capacity, central bank readiness, playbook, testing
Finanzen, Anlage & RechnungswesenCSDDD Due Diligence Plan Template (EU 2024/1760, Omnibus I)
Applicability test, policy, scoping exercise, in-depth assessment, prioritisation, action plans, remediation, engagement, complaints, monitoring