I-PASS Shift Handover Template
Shift handover by I-PASS: unit overview, illness severity, patient summary, action list, contingencies, receiver synthesis, completion checks
Anleitung: Use it for end-of-shift or team handover of a group of patients. Fill the illness severity and the action list with owners and times first. The main pitfall is skipping the receiver's synthesis and read-back.
Vorschau
I-PASS Shift Handover: [Unit, date, shift]
Structured written and verbal shift handover using I-PASS: Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, Synthesis by receiver. I-PASS was evaluated in Starmer AJ et al., "Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program", N Engl J Med 2014;371(19):1803-1812, where a handoff bundle across nine paediatric residency programmes was associated with fewer medical errors and preventable adverse events. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a communication format, not medical advice; follow local policy and clinical judgement. Use fictional data in examples, and keep real handover lists inside your clinical system.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [HO-YYYY-MM-DD-UNIT-SHIFT] |
| Unit / team | [Ward, service, team] |
| Shift | [Day / evening / night / weekend] |
| Giver | [Name, role, contact] |
| Receiver | [Name, role, contact] |
| Date / time of handover | YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM |
| Number of patients | [N] |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Prepared / Handed over / Read back confirmed] |
| Owner | [Giver] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [Not applicable for one shift / unit lead for a change to the sheet] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM |
| Classification | [Confidential: patient information] |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | Sheet prepared for handover |
| 1.1 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | Updated after receiver read-back |
1. Unit overview
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Staffing and gaps | [Who is on, who is missing, escalation contact] |
| Beds and expected admissions | [Free beds, expected arrivals] |
| Watchers and unstable patients | [Count, bed numbers] |
| Outstanding unit tasks | [Equipment, audits, safety issues] |
2. Illness severity
| Category | Meaning | What the receiver should expect |
|---|---|---|
| Stable | Expected to stay well over the shift | Routine review |
| Watcher | Uncertain, at risk of getting worse | Planned check at a stated time, low threshold to escalate |
| Unstable | Getting worse or needs active intervention now | Immediate review, senior aware |
Order the patient list below as unstable first, then watchers, then stable patients.
3. Patient handover entries
Patient [bed or identifier]
| I-PASS element | Content |
|---|---|
| Illness severity | [Stable / watcher / unstable] |
| Patient summary | [Age, reason for admission, key problems, current treatment, relevant history, code or escalation status, allergies] |
| Action list | [Task, owner, time due; mark each done or not done at the end of shift] |
| Situation awareness and contingency planning | [What is happening now, and if [change], then [action]] |
| Synthesis by receiver | [Receiver's summary, questions asked, actions read back] |
Example: fictional patient, bed 14, Ward 5, Halvermoor District Hospital.
| I-PASS element | Content |
|---|---|
| Illness severity | Watcher |
| Patient summary | 81 years old, admitted yesterday with community-acquired pneumonia, on intravenous antibiotics day 2 and 2 L oxygen. Background of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Penicillin allergy (rash). For full escalation. |
| Action list | 1. Check potassium result from 18:00 sample, receiver, by 20:00. 2. Review fluid balance at 22:00, receiver. 3. Antibiotic level due 06:00, phlebotomy requested, giver has done the form. |
| Situation awareness and contingency planning | Breathing better than this morning. If oxygen need rises above 4 L or respiratory rate above 25, call the medical registrar and repeat chest X-ray. If potassium is above 6.0, follow the hyperkalaemia protocol and call the registrar. |
| Synthesis by receiver | Receiver repeated: watcher, check potassium by 20:00, fluid balance at 22:00, escalate if oxygen above 4 L or respiratory rate above 25. Asked whether diuretics were held today: yes, held at 08:00. Giver confirmed. |
Copy the block for each patient.
4. Verbal handover sequence
The giver leads the first five steps; the receiver leads the synthesis, and the giver closes the loop before moving to the next patient.
5. Handover completion
| Check | Done |
|---|---|
| All patients on the list handed over | [Yes / no: which remain] |
| Every unstable and watcher patient read back by the receiver | [Yes / no] |
| Action list transferred with owners and times | [Yes / no] |
| Interruptions | [None / emergency, handover resumed at HH:MM] |
| Giver available after handover until | HH:MM, contact [number] |
6. Quality checks for the unit
| ID | Observation item | Target (Example) |
|---|---|---|
| HQ-01 | Illness severity stated for every patient | 100% of observed patients |
| HQ-02 | Every contingency written as "if, then" | 90% of watcher and unstable patients |
| HQ-03 | Receiver synthesis observed | 100% of watcher and unstable patients |
| HQ-04 | Handover finished without non-urgent interruption | 80% of observed handovers |
To test an improvement in these items, use a PDSA cycle
(healthcare/pdsa-cycle).
References
| Reference | Status | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med 2014;371(19):1803-1812, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1405556 | Citation checked on PubMed (PMID 25372088), 2026-10-30 | Mnemonic and evidence: errors 24.5 to 18.8 per 100 admissions, preventable adverse events 4.7 to 3.3 per 100 admissions |
| I-PASS Patient Safety Institute, https://www.ipassinstitute.com/ | Checked 2026-10-30 | Developer's training and written handoff tool. Official materials: I-PASS Patient Safety Institute, licensed access via the same site |
| AHRQ TeamSTEPPS 3.0, Tool: I-PASS, https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/curriculum/communication/tools/ipass.html | Not re-checked (site blocked automated access) | I-PASS as a team communication tool |
Standard and licence note
Based on the public I-PASS mnemonic as published by Starmer et al. (N Engl J Med, 2014). This template is original text written for this collection and does not reproduce the I-PASS curriculum or the developer's written handoff tool, which are available from I-PASS Patient Safety Institute. All names, wards and clinical details in examples are fictional. This is a communication format, not medical advice; follow local policy and clinical judgement, and check the current official pages. Template licence: MIT.
Ähnliche Vorlagen
Nursing Care Plan Template (ADPIE)
Nursing care plan by the nursing process: assessment, diagnoses (problem, etiology, signs), SMART goals, interventions, evaluation
GesundheitClinical Audit Report Template
Clinical audit report by the audit cycle: standards and targets, method, compliance % vs standards, action plan, re-audit
GesundheitClinical Case Report Template
Case report by CARE topics: de-identified patient information, timeline, diagnostic reasoning, outcomes, patient perspective, consent