Cloud Service Controls Template (ISO/IEC 27017:2026)
Cloud customer and provider controls: role determination, shared responsibility matrix, implementation table, extra cloud controls, disclosures, monitoring
Anleitung: Use it when cloud services are in the ISMS scope and you must show, control by control, what you do as a cloud customer, what providers do, and what you do as a provider. Fill the role determination and the shared responsibility matrix first. The main pitfall is copying a provider's responsibility diagram or the 2015 edition instead of recording your own split against ISO/IEC 27017:2026.
Vorschau
Cloud Service Controls (ISO/IEC 27017): [Organization name]
Records how [Organization name] applies cloud-specific information security controls as a cloud service customer, a cloud service provider, or both: role determination, a shared responsibility matrix per control area, a customer and provider implementation table, the additional cloud controls, provider disclosures and cloud service monitoring. It supports ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (6.1.3 and Annex A, in particular A.5.19 to A.5.23) using the guidance of ISO/IEC 27017:2026, the new edition that replaced the 2015 edition, and ISO/IEC 27002:2022. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | DOC-ISMS-102 |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded] |
| Owner | [@isms-manager] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@cto], [@head-of-cloud-platform], [@security-lead], [@dpo] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal; provider disclosures in section 7 may be shared with customers] |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (6.1.3, A.5.19 to A.5.23); ISO/IEC 27017:2026; ISO/IEC 27002:2022 |
| Next scheduled review | YYYY-MM-DD (at least every 12 months, and after a new cloud provider, a new cloud product or a major cloud incident) |
| Cloud role(s) | [Cloud service customer / Cloud service provider / Both] |
| Cloud services covered | [List from the cloud service register in DOC-ISMS-044 section 12] |
| Parent documents | Cloud services security policy DOC-ISMS-044; Statement of Applicability DOC-ISMS-011 |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Document owner | [@isms-manager] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Top management sponsor | [@cto] | [Approved / Approved with changes] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Cloud platform lead | [@head-of-cloud-platform] | [Reviewed] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Privacy | [@dpo] | [Reviewed] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | First draft |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | Approved for issue |
| [x.y] | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | [Change summary] |
Contents
- 1. Purpose, scope and role determination
- 2. About ISO/IEC 27017:2026
- 3. Cloud services and parties in scope
- 4. Shared responsibility matrix by control area
- 5. Implementation table
- 6. Additional cloud-specific controls
- 7. Provider disclosures to customers
- 8. Cloud service monitoring
- 9. Statement of Applicability and risk integration
- 10. Assurance, attestation and certification
- 11. Size tiers
- 12. Records and evidence
- 13. References
- Standard and licence note
1. Purpose, scope and role determination
This document shows how [Organization name] implements information security controls for cloud services within the ISMS scope (DOC-ISMS-002). It applies the cloud services security policy (DOC-ISMS-044) at control level and records the responsibilities split between the organization and each cloud provider or cloud customer.
Two roles are possible. As a cloud service customer, the organization uses services provided by others and remains accountable for its own information, identities and configuration. As a cloud service provider, the organization delivers a service to its own customers and must both protect that service and tell customers enough for them to meet their own obligations. Many organizations hold both roles at once. Suppliers that support either party (for example a managed service provider operating a tenant, or an auditor of the cloud service) are treated as cloud service partners and handled through the supplier process (DOC-ISMS-066, DOC-ISMS-068).
| Service | Our role | Counterparty | Service model | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Production platform] | [Customer] | [Public cloud provider] | [IaaS and PaaS] | [We run our product on it] |
| [Product name] | [Provider] | [Our business customers] | [SaaS] | [We sell it as a hosted service] |
| [Collaboration suite] | [Customer] | [SaaS provider] | [SaaS] | [Mail, files and chat for staff] |
2. About ISO/IEC 27017:2026
ISO/IEC 27017 is a guidance standard: it gives guidance, not management system requirements. It supplements ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific implementation guidance for both customers and providers, and adds a small number of cloud-specific controls. Facts relied on in this template:
| Item | Status as of 2026-11-01 | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Current edition | ISO/IEC 27017:2026, second edition, publication date July 2026 in the ISO catalogue (some secondary summaries say August 2026, and European adoption followed in August 2026); it replaces ISO/IEC 27017:2015 | Cite the 2026 edition in new documents |
| Basis | Aligned with the ISO/IEC 27002:2022 control structure (organizational, people, physical and technological themes) according to the ISO abstract and published summaries | Map to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A numbers in section 5 |
| Guidance layout | Published summaries report guidance written side by side for customers and providers | Mirror this with the two columns in section 5 |
| Additional controls | At least two independent published summaries report four cloud-specific controls added to the 93 in ISO/IEC 27002:2022 (see section 6); one reports that only 5.38 and 5.39 are visible in the free ISO preview | Verify numbers and wording against the 2026 text, especially 8.35 and 8.36 |
| Annexes | Published summaries report an annex mapping the 2015 edition to the 2026 edition and an annex on cloud service monitoring | Use the mapping when migrating older SoA entries prefixed CLD |
| Certifiability | Not a certification standard on its own | See section 10 |
Organizations that implemented the 2015 edition should run a short transition: map each old entry (including the extended controls with the CLD prefix) to the 2026 structure using the mapping annex, update the SoA extension table (section 9), and tell customers who receive provider disclosures that the reference has changed. Record the transition in the ISMS change plan (DOC-ISMS-025) if it changes scope, contracts or customer commitments.
3. Cloud services and parties in scope
| ID | Service | Role | Model | Regions | Contract or terms | Provider responsibility statement | Register ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSV-001 (Example) | Public cloud IaaS and PaaS, production | Customer | IaaS, PaaS | Primary and DR region | Enterprise agreement and DPA | Provider shared responsibility page, version captured YYYY-MM-DD | CLD-001 |
| CSV-002 (Example) | Collaboration suite | Customer | SaaS | Tenant region | Online terms and DPA | Provider trust documentation | CLD-002 |
| CSV-003 (Example) | Analytics platform sold to business customers | Provider | SaaS | Same two regions as CSV-001 | Master agreement, customer security addendum (DOC-ISMS-117), DPA | Our responsibility statement, section 7 | Product catalogue |
| [CSV-004] | [Service] | [Role] | [Model] | [Regions] | [Contract] | [Statement] | [Ref] |
Parties and partners relevant to cloud security:
| Party | Type | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| [Public cloud provider] | Provider to us | Infrastructure, physical and hypervisor security |
| [Managed service partner] | Cloud service partner | Operates part of our tenant under contract (DOC-ISMS-068) |
| [Business customers] | Customers of our service | Rely on our disclosures and notifications |
| [Sub-processors of our service] | Suppliers in our chain | Listed in the supplier register DOC-ISMS-066 |
4. Shared responsibility matrix by control area
Legend: C customer, P provider, S shared (both parties hold duties, detailed in section 5). The table shows the organization's default view; record differences per service in section 3.
| Control area (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) | IaaS | PaaS | SaaS | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policies, roles and segregation (A.5.1 to A.5.4) | S | S | S | Each party governs its own side; roles agreed in writing (section 6) |
| Asset inventory and classification (A.5.9 to A.5.13) | C | C | S | Customer classifies its data; SaaS provider inventories platform assets |
| Information transfer (A.5.14) | C | S | S | Provider secures its interfaces; customer decides what is transferred |
| Identity and access (A.5.15 to A.5.18, A.8.2, A.8.5) | C | C | S | Customer manages users and roles; provider secures its admin access and authentication features |
| Supplier and cloud management (A.5.19 to A.5.23) | C | C | C | Each party manages its own suppliers; provider manages sub-processors |
| Incident management (A.5.24 to A.5.28) | S | S | S | Notification paths both ways; evidence handling agreed |
| Continuity and ICT readiness (A.5.29, A.5.30, A.8.13, A.8.14) | S | S | S | Provider resilience plus customer backup and region choice |
| Legal, privacy and records (A.5.31 to A.5.34) | S | S | S | Data location, processor duties, lawful access requests |
| People controls (A.6.1 to A.6.8) | S | S | S | Each party screens, trains and binds its own staff |
| Physical controls (A.7.1 to A.7.14) | P | P | P | Customer relies on provider assurance; disposal of provider media is provider work |
| Endpoints and malware (A.8.1, A.8.7) | C | S | S | Customer endpoints always customer; provider protects its hosts |
| Vulnerability and configuration (A.8.8, A.8.9) | C | S | S | Guest OS on IaaS is customer; managed runtime is provider |
| Deletion, masking and leakage (A.8.10 to A.8.12) | S | S | S | Customer requests and configures; provider deletes and confirms |
| Logging, monitoring and time (A.8.15 to A.8.17) | S | S | S | Provider supplies logs and time source; customer collects and reviews |
| Network security and segregation (A.8.20 to A.8.22) | S | S | P | Tenant network rules are customer on IaaS; tenant isolation is provider |
| Cryptography (A.8.24) | S | S | S | Key ownership model recorded per service |
| Development and change (A.8.25 to A.8.34) | C | S | P | Provider change affecting customers needs notice |
5. Implementation table
Columns: Customer side is what the organization does when it consumes a cloud service. Provider side is what the organization does when it delivers its own cloud service. Evidence names the record an auditor can sample. Control labels are short descriptions, not the official titles.
5.1 Organizational controls
| ID | Control | Customer side | Provider side | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLC-001 (Example) | A.5.2 security roles | Named business and technical owner per cloud service | Named service owner, security contact published to customers | Cloud service register, RACI DOC-ISMS-006 | Implemented |
| CLC-002 (Example) | A.5.9 asset inventory | Tenant resources tagged with owner and classification, exported monthly | Platform asset inventory includes customer-facing components and their locations | Tag compliance report, CMDB export | Implemented |
| CLC-003 (Example) | A.5.12 classification | Data stores labelled by classification before production use | Customer data treated as Confidential by default, regardless of customer labels | Data store list, classification standard | Implemented |
| CLC-004 (Example) | A.5.14 information transfer | Approved transfer methods into and out of the tenant | Encrypted APIs and export functions documented for customers | Architecture notes, API documentation | Implemented |
| CLC-005 (Example) | A.5.15 to A.5.18 access | SSO with the corporate identity provider, roles by group, quarterly review of admin roles | Customer admins manage their own users; our staff access to customer tenants only by ticket and time-limited role | Access review records, privileged access logs | Implemented |
| CLC-006 (Example) | A.5.19 to A.5.22 suppliers | Provider assessed and contracted under DOC-ISMS-067 and DOC-ISMS-068 | Sub-processors listed, assessed and flowed down; customers notified before changes | Supplier register, sub-processor list | Implemented |
| CLC-007 (Example) | A.5.23 cloud service use | Every service registered, owned, reviewed and given an exit route under DOC-ISMS-044 | Not applicable to the provider side (covered by sections 6 and 7) | Cloud service register | Implemented |
| CLC-008 (Example) | A.5.24 to A.5.26 incidents | Provider notifications received in a monitored mailbox and triaged under DOC-ISMS-020 | Customer notification process with stated time, contact list per customer, status page | Incident register DOC-ISMS-021, notification log | Implemented |
| CLC-009 (Example) | A.5.28 evidence | Provider log export and snapshot procedure for investigations | Procedure to preserve and supply evidence for a customer on request, without exposing other tenants | Forensic procedure, request log | Partially implemented |
| CLC-010 (Example) | A.5.30 ICT readiness | Recovery in the DR region tested twice a year | Service resilience design and recovery objectives stated in customer documentation | DR test report, service description | Implemented |
| CLC-011 (Example) | A.5.31 legal requirements | Data location rules checked for each region | Applicable law, region list and lawful access request handling disclosed | Legal register DOC-ISMS-014, disclosure page | Implemented |
| CLC-012 (Example) | A.5.34 privacy and PII | Processor terms in place; transfer assessment where needed | Processor duties under customer DPAs; see isms/cloud-pii-27018-processor | DPA, records of processing | Implemented |
5.2 People and physical controls
| ID | Control | Customer side | Provider side | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLC-013 (Example) | A.6.3 awareness and training | Cloud administrators trained on the platform baseline and shared responsibility | Support and operations staff trained on customer data handling and tenant isolation | Training records DOC-ISMS-026 | Implemented |
| CLC-014 (Example) | A.6.6 confidentiality | Not applicable beyond normal staff agreements | Staff with access to customer environments sign confidentiality terms covering customer data | Signed agreements DOC-ISMS-051 | Implemented |
| CLC-015 (Example) | A.7.1 to A.7.8 physical | Reliance on provider assurance reports, reviewed each year | Physical security inherited from the IaaS provider; reliance stated to customers | Assurance report review notes | Implemented |
| CLC-016 (Example) | A.7.14 disposal of equipment | Provider media sanitization covered by its assurance report | Same reliance, disclosed to customers; no own data centre equipment | Assurance report extract reference | Implemented |
5.3 Technological controls
| ID | Control | Customer side | Provider side | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLC-017 (Example) | A.8.2 privileged access | Admin roles held by named people, phishing-resistant MFA, break-glass accounts sealed | Operations access to production through a bastion with session recording | Role assignment export, session logs | Implemented |
| CLC-018 (Example) | A.8.6 capacity | Quotas and cost alerts monitored | Capacity planning per region, customer-facing limits documented | Capacity plan, alert configuration | Implemented |
| CLC-019 (Example) | A.8.8 vulnerabilities | Container images and guest systems scanned, patched to isms/vulnerability-remediation-tracker timelines | Vulnerabilities affecting customers communicated through security advisories | Scan reports, advisory log | Implemented |
| CLC-020 (Example) | A.8.9 configuration | Infrastructure as code with policy checks against the baseline | Secure default settings for new customer tenants, documented | Policy check results, tenant defaults document | Implemented |
| CLC-021 (Example) | A.8.10 deletion | Deletion of retired resources verified; provider deletion confirmation kept | Customer data deleted within a stated period after contract end, confirmation on request | Deletion log, confirmation letters | Partially implemented |
| CLC-022 (Example) | A.8.13 backup | Backups copied to the DR region, restore tested quarterly | Backup scope and retention for customer data stated in the service description | Restore test log DOC-ISMS-071 | Implemented |
| CLC-023 (Example) | A.8.15 logging | Provider audit logs exported to the central log store, 365 days | Customers can export their own audit logs; retention stated | Log source inventory, product documentation | Implemented |
| CLC-024 (Example) | A.8.16 monitoring | Posture findings and alerts reviewed under DOC-ISMS-064 | Service monitoring for abuse and unauthorized use, see section 8 | Monitoring tickets, monthly report | Implemented |
| CLC-025 (Example) | A.8.17 clock synchronization | Provider time service used by all workloads | Time source for logs disclosed so customers can correlate events | Configuration evidence, disclosure page | Implemented |
| CLC-026 (Example) | A.8.20 to A.8.22 networks | Private networking, security groups reviewed quarterly, production separated from non-production | Tenant isolation at application and data layers, tested in each penetration test | Firewall rule review, penetration test report | Implemented |
| CLC-027 (Example) | A.8.24 cryptography | Customer-managed keys for production data stores | Encryption at rest and in transit for all customer data; key ownership model disclosed | Key register DOC-ISMS-070 | Implemented |
| CLC-028 (Example) | A.8.32 change management | Platform changes through the change process | Customers notified of changes that affect security or their obligations, with notice period | Change records, release notes | Implemented |
6. Additional cloud-specific controls
Published summaries of ISO/IEC 27017:2026 (at least two independent secondary sources as of 2026-11-01) report four additional cloud-specific controls, numbered after the last ISO/IEC 27002:2022 control in each theme. One summary describes 8.36 as mainly a customer concern. Use the mapping annex of the 2026 edition to see which 2015 extended controls (CLD prefix) each one replaces. Treat the numbering as provisional until checked against the standard.
| ID | Reported number and topic (own label) | Customer side | Provider side | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLX-001 (Example) | 5.38: shared roles in a cloud environment | Responsibility split documented per service (section 4) and assigned to named owners | Responsibility statement published to customers, kept current, version-controlled | Section 4 matrix, published statement with version date | Implemented |
| CLX-002 (Example) | 5.39: agreed roles with a cloud service partner | Managed service partner duties written into the contract and its security schedule | Partners supporting the service (support providers, resellers) bound by written duties | Contracts, DOC-ISMS-068 clause selection | Partially implemented |
| CLX-003 (Example) | 8.35: separation of virtual environments | Production, staging and development in separate accounts with no shared credentials | Tenants separated logically at compute, storage and network layers; separation tested | Account structure diagram, penetration test results | Implemented |
| CLX-004 (Example) | 8.36: detecting and preventing unauthorized cloud service use | Shadow IT detection and unauthorized resource alerts under DOC-ISMS-044 section 11 | Abuse detection on the service (account takeover, fraud, resource misuse), with response steps | Detection reports, abuse case log | Planned |
If your copy of the standard shows a different set, update this table, section 9 and the SoA extension at the same time.
7. Provider disclosures to customers
As a provider, the organization keeps the following information current and makes it available to customers under the stated channel.
| ID | Disclosure topic | Content we provide | Channel | Owner | Last reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIS-001 (Example) | Responsibility statement | Split between us and the customer per control area, matching section 4 | Trust centre page | ISMS manager | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-002 (Example) | Certifications and reports | Certificate scope, issuing body accreditation, report periods | Trust centre, under NDA for reports | ISMS manager | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-003 (Example) | Data location | Regions for storage, processing and support access | Service description | Head of Engineering Operations | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-004 (Example) | Sub-processors | List with purpose and location; change notice period | Sub-processor page | DPO | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-005 (Example) | Incident notification | Notification commitment, contact route, information included | Customer security addendum DOC-ISMS-117 | Security lead | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-006 (Example) | Logging available to customers | Log types, retention, export method | Product documentation | Product owner | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-007 (Example) | Backup and recovery | Scope, frequency, retention, recovery objectives | Service description | Head of Engineering Operations | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-008 (Example) | Encryption and keys | Algorithms in use, key ownership options | Security whitepaper | Security lead | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-009 (Example) | Data return and deletion | Export formats, deletion period after contract end, confirmation | Master agreement and help centre | Legal counsel | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-010 (Example) | Changes affecting security | Notice period and channel for material changes | Release notes and e-mail notice | Product owner | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-011 (Example) | Vulnerability information | Advisory process, coordinated disclosure contact | Security page | Security lead | YYYY-MM-DD |
| DIS-012 (Example) | Lawful access requests | How government requests for customer data are handled and reported | Transparency statement | Legal counsel | YYYY-MM-DD |
Incident notification between the provider and its customers follows the sequence below. The same pattern applies in reverse when the organization is the customer of an upstream provider.
8. Cloud service monitoring
| ID | What is monitored | Role | Source | Frequency (Example) | Response route |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MON-001 (Example) | Administrative activity in the tenant | Customer | Provider audit log exported to central log store | Continuous, alerting on high-risk actions | DOC-ISMS-064 alert triage |
| MON-002 (Example) | Configuration drift against baseline | Customer | Posture management tool | Daily scan, weekly review | Ticket to technical owner |
| MON-003 (Example) | Provider service health and security bulletins | Customer | Provider status feed | Continuous subscription | Change or incident record |
| MON-004 (Example) | Unusual usage or cost spikes | Customer | Billing and usage alerts | Daily | Check for compromised credentials |
| MON-005 (Example) | Customer account takeover indicators | Provider | Product authentication logs | Continuous | Lock account, notify customer admin |
| MON-006 (Example) | Abuse of the service (scraping, resource misuse) | Provider | Rate limiting and anomaly detection | Continuous | Abuse case procedure |
| MON-007 (Example) | Tenant isolation failures | Provider | Automated isolation tests in the release pipeline | Every release | Block release, incident if in production |
| MON-008 (Example) | Sub-processor status and incidents | Provider | Supplier notifications | Continuous | DOC-ISMS-020, customer notice if affected |
9. Statement of Applicability and risk integration
- Keep the Annex A rows in the SoA (DOC-ISMS-011) as the master list. For controls with a cloud angle, reference the CLC rows in section 5 in the SoA "where implemented" column.
- Add an extension table to the SoA for the additional controls in section 6, with inclusion decision, justification and status, exactly as for Annex A controls.
- Link each cloud risk in the risk register (DOC-ISMS-016) to the CLC or CLX rows that treat it. Typical cloud risks: tenant misconfiguration, provider outage in one region, compromised administrator credentials, unclear deletion at exit, unexpected data location change, and concentration on one provider.
- When a control is shared (S in section 4), the risk owner checks both halves: the organization's own implementation and the evidence that the other party performs its part (assurance report, contract clause, test).
| SoA extension row (Example) | Included | Justification | Status | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27017:2026 5.38 shared roles | Yes | Customer and provider roles both held; contracts require a responsibility split | Implemented | CLX-001 |
| ISO/IEC 27017:2026 8.35 separation of virtual environments | Yes | Multi-tenant SaaS on shared infrastructure | Implemented | CLX-003 |
| ISO/IEC 27017:2026 8.36 unauthorized cloud use | Yes | Risk RISK-044 (Example), account takeover and shadow IT | Planned, due YYYY-MM-DD | CLX-004 |
10. Assurance, attestation and certification
- ISO/IEC 27017 contains guidance and controls, not management system requirements, so it is not certified on its own. Some certification bodies assess the cloud controls as part of an ISO/IEC 27001 audit and state this in the certificate scope, an annex or a separate statement. The certification body decides what it can verify and how it records it; ask before you plan the audit (DOC-ISMS-090).
- Customer assurance depends on the scope: check that the certificate scope names the cloud service, and that any reference to ISO/IEC 27017 names the 2026 edition once your audit has covered it.
- As a customer, accept provider statements of alignment only with evidence: certificate scope, assurance report, or contractual commitment, reviewed under DOC-ISMS-067.
- Cloud-related questionnaires (for example the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix
and CAIQ, cited by name only) can be answered from sections 5 to 8. Map
them in
isms/control-framework-crosswalk.
11. Size tiers
| Aspect | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd (46 staff) | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems (320 staff) | Large: Quillmere Group (2,400 staff, 6 sites) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roles held | Customer of one public cloud provider (two regions, primary and DR); provider of its SaaS analytics platform | Customer of one public cloud plus a colocation suite; provider of a managed clinical scheduling service | Mainly customer of several providers across 4 countries; internal platform team acts as provider to business units |
| Matrix depth | One matrix for the platform, one for the collaboration suite | Matrix per Tier 1 service, hospital-specific variations recorded | Matrix per provider and region, plus an internal matrix for the platform team |
| Implementation table owner | 0.5 FTE ISMS manager (Head of Engineering Operations) with two platform engineers | ISMS manager and the 3-person security team | CISO office (14 people) with regional cloud owners |
| Provider disclosures | Trust centre page and security whitepaper | Customer-specific disclosures for hospitals, contractual notice periods | Internal service catalogue disclosures to business units, external only for group services |
| Monitoring | Provider-native posture tool and audit log export | Posture tool and SIEM across cloud and colocation | Central posture management and security operations centre across all tenants |
| Additional controls | All four adopted, CLX-004 provider side planned | All four adopted, partner control used for the managed service provider | All four adopted; separation of virtual environments extends to OT data platforms |
| Typical effort (Example) | 6 to 8 person-days to build, 1 day per quarter to maintain | 15 to 20 person-days to build, 2 days per month to maintain | 40 or more person-days to build, part of a full-time role to maintain |
12. Records and evidence
| Record | Proves | Owner | Location | Retention (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Role determination and service list (sections 1 and 3) | Scope and roles are decided per service | ISMS manager | [Document repository] | Current plus previous version |
| Shared responsibility matrices with provider statement versions | The split is known and agreed | Cloud platform lead | [Architecture repository] | Life of service plus 3 years |
| Implementation evidence per CLC and CLX row | Controls operate on both sides | Control owners | [GRC tool or evidence folders] | 3 years |
| Provider assurance report reviews | Reliance on providers is justified | ISMS manager | [Supplier folder] | 3 years |
| Published provider disclosures with version history | Customers receive current information | ISMS manager, product owner | [Trust centre source repository] | 6 years |
| Monitoring outputs and tickets | Monitoring in section 8 runs | Security team | [SIEM, ticketing tool] | 1 to 2 years per logging standard |
| Customer incident notifications | Notification commitments were met | Security lead | [Incident register DOC-ISMS-021] | 6 years |
| SoA extension table | Additional controls are decided and justified | ISMS manager | DOC-ISMS-011 | Life of the ISMS |
Link each record to its controls in isms/control-evidence-matrix.
13. References
| Reference | Edition | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html and https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.html | Current | Requirements, 6.1.3 and Annex A |
| ISO/IEC 27002:2022, https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html | Current | Control structure and guidance |
| ISO/IEC 27017:2026, https://www.iso.org/standard/82878.html | Second edition, July 2026; replaces 2015 | Cloud-specific guidance and additional controls |
| ISO/IEC 27018:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/88150.html | Current | PII protection by public cloud processors |
| ISO/IEC 27036-4:2016, https://www.iso.org/standard/59689.html | Current | Security of cloud services in supplier relationships |
| CSA Cloud Controls Matrix v4.1 and CAIQ v4.1 | Names only | Questionnaire mapping |
| Related templates | isms/cloud-services-security-policy, isms/cloud-pii-27018-processor, isms/cloud-exit-plan, isms/supplier-register, isms/supplier-security-agreement-27036, compliance/supplier-security-assessment, compliance/statement-of-applicability, security/cloud-security-posture-review, isms/secure-configuration-baseline, isms/security-monitoring-procedure, isms/control-framework-crosswalk, isms/control-evidence-matrix |
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (6.1.3 and Annex A controls A.5.19 to A.5.23), ISO/IEC 27002:2022 and ISO/IEC 27017:2026. Control numbers are cited with original short labels; the matrices, tables, examples and guidance are original text, and no text from ISO/IEC standards is reproduced. Details of the 2026 edition of ISO/IEC 27017 (additional control numbers and annexes) are taken from the ISO catalogue entry and published summaries and must be checked against the official text. Obtain the official standards from ISO, IEC or your national standards body to implement them. The CSA Cloud Controls Matrix and CAIQ are cited by name only. Check the current edition of each standard before use.
Template licence: MIT.
Ähnliche Vorlagen
Annex A Organizational Controls Guide Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5)
A.5.1 to A.5.37 in own words: intent, typical implementation, tier notes, evidence auditors sample, pitfalls, linked templates, self-check, study record
ISMS und ISO/IEC 27001Annex A People and Physical Controls Guide Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.6, A.7)
A.6.1 to A.6.8 and A.7.1 to A.7.14 in own words: intent, tier notes, evidence, pitfalls, physical boundary decision for cloud and colocation, self-check, study record
ISMS und ISO/IEC 27001Annex A Technological Controls Guide Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.8)
A.8.1 to A.8.34 in own words: intent, tier notes, evidence tools and exports, pitfalls, secure development lifecycle map, self-check, study record