Decision Journal: [decision] – YYYY-MM-DD
Decision + reasoning logged for review
Anleitung: Consequential choices. Confidence must be a number, not a feeling – calibration only works that way.
Vorschau
Decision Journal: [decision] – YYYY-MM-DD
Record the decision AND your reasoning at the time – so review reveals whether your process was good, not just the outcome. Convention from Farnam Street's decision journal.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Decision | [the choice, stated precisely] |
| Date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Decided by | @name |
| Review date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Reversible? | Yes / No / Costly |
The decision
[What is being decided, in one sentence.]
Options considered
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| [chosen option] | ||
| [alternative] | ||
| Do nothing |
What I believe right now
- Expected outcome: [what you predict happens]
- Confidence: [N% – put a number on it]
- Key assumption: [the thing that must be true]
- What could go wrong: [pre-mortem items]
Context & state
- Mood / energy: [honest – state affects judgment]
- Information quality: [solid / thin / biased?]
- Who I consulted: [@names]
Chosen
[Option], because [the actual reason – not the polished one].
Review (fill at review date)
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What happened? | |
| Was the outcome as predicted? | |
| Was the process sound? | |
| What would I do differently? | |
| What did I learn? |
Track record
Running tally: N decisions logged, N reviewed, calibration notes: [where you're systematically over/under-confident]