Beta Program Plan Template
Beta programme plan: learning questions, cohorts and size caps, entry criteria, feedback loop, consent and privacy questions, exit criteria, closure
Anleitung: Use it before opening a feature to beta testers ahead of general availability. Fill the learning questions and the exit criteria first, and agree them before the first participant joins. The main pitfall is running a beta with no decision at the end, so it turns into an early launch.
Vorschau
Beta Program Plan: [Product or feature name]
A plan for running a beta programme before general availability (GA): what the beta must prove, who takes part in which cohort, how people join and leave, how feedback flows back into the backlog, how participants give informed consent, and the exit criteria that decide whether the feature ships, changes or stops. Based on common product-management practice; the privacy section names EU, UK and US rules as dated examples with official links. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a planning format, not legal advice: check the current official texts and a qualified professional for your own case.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [BETA-PRODUCT-NNN] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / Approved / Running / Closed] |
| Owner | [@product-manager] |
| Approvers | [Product lead, engineering lead, privacy or legal contact, support lead] |
| Beta type | [Closed (invite only) / Open (opt-in) / Internal (staff only)] |
| Planned dates | YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product lead | [@name] | [Approved / Changes requested] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Privacy or legal contact | [@name] | [Approved / Changes requested] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@owner] | First draft |
1. Objectives and learning questions
| ID | Learning question | Evidence that answers it | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| LQ-01 (Example) | Can technicians finish a full day of jobs with no signal and lose no updates? | Sync success rate, zero lost-update reports | [@eng-lead] |
| LQ-02 (Example) | Do dispatchers trust the data after a technician reconnects? | Interview themes, support tickets tagged "offline" | [@pm] |
| LQ-03 (Example) | Is conflict handling understandable without training? | Task success in moderated sessions | [@designer] |
| [LQ-NN] | [Question] | [Metric or qualitative signal] | [@name] |
Out of scope for this beta: [What the beta will not test, for example pricing or scale beyond the cohort size]
2. Cohorts and selection
| Cohort | Who | Size cap | Selection | Answers | Opens when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 (Example) | Internal staff (support, sales engineers) | 40 users | Volunteers from each team | LQ-01 | Feature complete behind a flag |
| C2 (Example) | Design-partner customers | 12 accounts, 180 users | Invited, mix of rural and urban field teams | LQ-01, LQ-02, LQ-03 | C1 gate passed |
| C3 (Example) | Open beta for existing customers | 1,500 users | Opt-in from settings, first come | LQ-01, LQ-02 | C2 gate passed |
| Total | 1,720 users |
Selection rules:
- Diversity of conditions: [Example: device models, network quality, team size, languages]
- Exclusions: [Example: accounts in a contract renewal month, accounts with a regulated-data addendum not yet reviewed]
- Accessibility: include at least [N] participants who use assistive technology, or record why not.
3. Entry criteria and onboarding
Before any cohort opens:
- Feature flag allows enabling and disabling per account and per user (see the feature flag policy)
- Rollback tested: [time to disable for all users, Example: under 5 minutes]
- Known issues list published to participants
- Support team briefed, macro replies and escalation path ready
- Beta terms and consent text approved (section 6)
- Telemetry for the metrics in section 7 verified in a test account
Onboarding steps for participants:
- Invitation with what the beta is, what is expected of them, the time commitment and how to leave.
- Acceptance of beta terms and, where consent is the lawful basis for any data use, a separate consent step.
- Welcome message with the feedback channel, the known issues link and the support contact.
- Optional kickoff session for design partners.
4. Feedback loop
| Channel | Used for | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-app feedback button (Example) | Bugs and quick reactions | Continuous | [@pm] |
| Survey (Example) | Satisfaction and task difficulty, target 30% response (516 of 1,720) | End of each cohort | [@researcher] |
| Interviews (Example) | Depth on LQ-02 and LQ-03 | 8 to 10 per cohort | [@designer] |
| Beta update note (Example) | What we fixed and what we decided | Every two weeks | [@pm] |
5. Support, communication and roles
| Role | Person | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Beta owner | [@pm] | Plan, cohort gates, final recommendation |
| Engineering lead | [@eng-lead] | Fixes, flag control, rollback |
| Support lead | [@support] | First response target [Example: 1 working day], escalation |
| Research lead | [@researcher] | Surveys, interviews, synthesis |
| Privacy or legal contact | [@privacy] | Beta terms, consent wording, data review |
Communication: [channels, for example a private community space, email updates, design-partner calls].
6. Consent, privacy and beta terms
Questions to settle with your privacy or legal contact:
- Which data does the beta collect beyond normal product use (extra telemetry, session recordings, interview recordings), and on which lawful basis for each?
- If consent is used, is it separate from the beta terms, specific to each purpose, recorded, and as easy to withdraw as to give?
- Do participants include children or people in a dependent relationship (for example the customer's employees asked by their manager to join)? If so, is participation genuinely voluntary?
- How long is beta-only data kept, and what happens to it when the beta closes?
- Is a data protection impact assessment needed for any new processing?
- Do confidentiality terms apply (for example a non-disclosure clause for unreleased features), and do they conflict with any right of the participant?
Dated examples of rules to check (check the current official text):
- EU: General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Articles 6 (lawful bases), 7 (conditions for consent) and 13 (information to give at collection): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
- UK: UK GDPR and the ICO guidance on valid consent: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/lawful-basis/consent/what-is-valid-consent/
- US: Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 41 to 58, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices; claims made to beta participants about data use must be accurate: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/statutes/federal-trade-commission-act
| Item | Decision | Approved by |
|---|---|---|
| Lawful basis for extra telemetry | [Basis, with reason] | [@privacy] |
| Interview and recording consent | [Separate consent form, see the research consent form template] | [@privacy] |
| Retention of beta-only data | [Example: deleted 90 days after the beta closes] | [@privacy] |
7. Metrics and exit criteria
| ID | Metric | Threshold (example) | C1 result | C2 result | C3 result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EX-01 (Example) | Crash-free sessions | at least 99.5% | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] |
| EX-02 (Example) | Sync conflicts per 100 synced jobs | under 0.5 | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] |
| EX-03 (Example) | Task success in moderated sessions (LQ-03) | at least 85% | n/a | [Value] | n/a |
| EX-04 (Example) | Lost-update reports | 0 | [Value] | [Value] | [Value] |
| [EX-NN] | [Metric] | [Threshold] |
Possible outcomes at the final gate:
- Go to GA: all exit criteria met; hand over to the launch checklist.
- Extend or change: some criteria missed with a clear fix; state the new date and what changes.
- Stop: the learning questions show the feature does not solve the problem; plan the removal with the feature sunset plan.
8. Timeline and closure
| Milestone | Date | Gate decision by |
|---|---|---|
| C1 opens (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@pm] |
| C1 gate, C2 opens | YYYY-MM-DD | [@pm, @eng-lead] |
| C2 gate, C3 opens | YYYY-MM-DD | [@pm, @eng-lead] |
| Final gate and recommendation | YYYY-MM-DD | [Product lead] |
At closure:
- Participants told the outcome and what happens to the feature on their account
- Beta-only data deleted or kept as agreed in section 6
- Thank-you and recognition sent (for example a credit in release notes, if participants agree)
- Findings summarised and linked from the PRD and the decision log
Related templates and references
- Launch checklist, release plan, PRD, A/B test plan
- Feature sunset plan (
product/feature-sunset-plan) if the outcome is to stop - Feature flag policy, known issues
- Research consent form, UX research plan
- DPIA, privacy policy, terms of service, NDA
- Decision log
Standard and licence note
Based on common product-management practice for staged beta programmes; it follows no single published standard. The privacy section names Regulation (EU) 2016/679, the UK GDPR with ICO guidance and the US Federal Trade Commission Act as examples only, checked on 2026-10-30; laws and guidance change, so check the current official text and a qualified professional before relying on it. All wording is original. This is not legal advice. Template licence: MIT.
Ähnliche Vorlagen
A/B Test Plan Template
Pre-registered A/B test: hypothesis, randomisation unit, metrics, Lehr sample size, SRM and peeking rules, novelty, privacy and consent, decision rule, results
Produkt & ProjektFeature Sunset Plan Template
Customer-facing feature retirement plan: decision, impact by segment, dated milestones, replacement mapping, data export and deletion, comms sequence, exceptions
Produkt & ProjektRelease Plan Template (Agile Release Planning)
Agile release plan: release goal, MoSCoW scope, sprint mapping, velocity range forecast, milestones, dependencies, risks, communication