Study Preregistration Template
Preregistration of hypotheses, design, sampling plan and stopping rule, variables, analysis plan, exclusions and deviations log
Anleitung: Use before collecting or examining data for a confirmatory study, then copy into a registry such as OSF. Write hypotheses and the matching analyses first. Main pitfall: vague analysis plans that leave room for flexible choices after seeing the data.
Vorschau
Study Preregistration: [Study title]
Preregistration template for a confirmatory study: hypotheses, design, sampling, variables and analysis plan, written and time-stamped before data are collected or examined. The topics follow the concepts used in common open-science preregistration forms (such as those offered on the Open Science Framework), written in original words for this collection. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every line marked Example.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Registration ID | [PREREG-2026-001] |
| Registry | [OSF Registries / AsPredicted / institutional repository] |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / Submitted / Registered / Embargoed until YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Authors | [@name], [@name] |
| Date of registration | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Linked protocol or ethics | [Reference] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
1. Study information
This section states what the study asks and what the authors predict.
1.1 Research questions
[State the research question or questions in one or two sentences each.]
1.2 Hypotheses
| ID | Hypothesis | Direction | Linked analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Example: Participants who receive spaced practice will score higher on the delayed test than those who receive massed practice | One-sided, spaced > massed | AN-01 |
| H2 | [Hypothesis] | [Direction or two-sided] | AN-02 |
| H3 | [Interaction hypothesis] | [Direction] | AN-03 |
1.3 Existing data
Select one and explain:
- Registration prior to creation of data
- Registration prior to any human observation of the data
- Registration prior to accessing the data
- Registration prior to analysis of the data
- Registration following analysis of the data
Explanation: [What data exist, who has seen them and what, and why this does not bias the confirmatory tests.]
2. Design plan
The design plan defines the study type, conditions and assignment.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Study type | [Experiment / Observational / Meta-analysis / Other] |
| Blinding | Example: Participants unaware of hypotheses; experimenter blind to condition during scoring |
| Design | [Between-subjects 2 x 2 factorial / within-subjects / mixed] |
| Factors and levels | [Practice schedule: spaced, massed; Test delay: 1 day, 7 days] |
| Randomisation | [Simple randomisation via survey platform, equal allocation] |
| Counterbalancing | [Order of materials counterbalanced with a Latin square] |
3. Sampling plan
This section explains who will be sampled, how many and when collection stops.
3.1 Data collection procedures
[Population, recruitment source, inclusion and exclusion criteria, payment, and the timeline of data collection.]
3.2 Sample size
[Target number of participants or observations after exclusions.]
3.3 Sample size rationale
Example: To detect with 90% power at one-sided in a two-group comparison, the required sample is:
We will recruit 145 per group to allow for about 9% exclusions.
3.4 Stopping rule
[State when data collection ends. Example: Data collection stops when 290 complete responses meeting inclusion criteria are recorded or on YYYY-MM-DD, whichever comes first. No interim analyses will be run.]
4. Variables
The variables section defines what is manipulated, measured and computed.
| ID | Variable | Role | Measurement | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAR-01 | Practice schedule | Manipulated | Random assignment | Binary |
| VAR-02 | Example: Delayed test score | Outcome | 40-item multiple-choice test, number correct | 0-40 |
| VAR-03 | [Prior knowledge] | Covariate | [10-item pre-test] | [0-10] |
| VAR-04 | [Attention check] | Exclusion | [2 embedded items] | [Pass / fail] |
Indices: [How composite measures are computed, for example the mean of items 1-8 after reverse-scoring items 3 and 6.]
5. Analysis plan
This section describes the confirmatory analyses and how results will be judged.
5.1 Statistical models
| ID | Hypothesis | Model or test | Covariates |
|---|---|---|---|
| AN-01 | H1 | Example: Welch's t-test on delayed test score | None |
| AN-02 | H2 | [Linear regression] | [Prior knowledge] |
| AN-03 | H3 | [Two-way ANOVA, interaction term] | [None] |
5.2 Transformations
[Planned transformations, centring or recoding, and the coding of categorical predictors.]
5.3 Inference criteria
[Decision rule, for example one-sided for H1; Holm correction across H2 and H3; equivalence test with bounds of to interpret null results; Bayes factor thresholds if used.]
5.4 Data exclusion
[Rules for excluding participants or observations, decided now. Example: Exclude participants who fail either attention check, complete the study in under 5 minutes, or report having taken the test before. Exclude reaction times more than 3 SD from the participant mean.]
5.5 Missing data
[How missing data will be handled, for example listwise deletion if under 5% missing, otherwise multiple imputation with 20 imputations using all study variables.]
5.6 Exploratory analyses
[Analyses you may run that are not confirmatory. List them so readers can see they were anticipated, and state that they will be reported as exploratory.]
6. Other
Additional information and links:
| Item | Link or note |
|---|---|
| Materials | [Repository link] |
| Analysis script | [Link to script run on simulated data] |
| Pilot data | [Whether used, and only for feasibility] |
| Ethics approval | [Reference] |
7. Timestamps and deviations
This log records when the plan was frozen and every later change.
| Event | Date | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Plan frozen and registered | YYYY-MM-DD | [Registry DOI or URL] |
| Data collection started | YYYY-MM-DD | |
| Data collection ended | YYYY-MM-DD | [Stopping rule met] |
| Deviation DEV-01 | YYYY-MM-DD | Example: Recruitment platform changed after outage; same eligibility screen used |
| Analysis completed | YYYY-MM-DD |
Standard and licence note
Based on common open-science practice for study preregistration, with topics similar to widely used preregistration forms such as those on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/registries). This template is original text written for this collection and reproduces no form text. Template licence: MIT.
Ähnliche Vorlagen
Animal Research Report Template (ARRIVE 2.0)
In vivo study report covering ARRIVE 2.0 Essential 10 and Recommended Set: design, sample size, blinding, welfare, results
WissenschaftRandomised Controlled Trial Report Template (CONSORT 2025)
Randomised trial report following the 30 CONSORT 2025 items: open science, PPI, methods, flow diagram, results, harms
WissenschaftExperiment Protocol Template
Protocol – materials, controls, KaTeX stats