Markdown Editor

Business Impact Analysis Template (ISO 22301, MTPD, RTO, RPO)

Stand-alone BIA: impact criteria, impact over time, MTPD, RTO, RPO, MBCO, prioritized activities, resources, dependencies, gaps, links to BCP and DR

ISO y cumplimientoCompletaISO 22301:2019 + Amd 1:2024 cl. 8.2.2; ISO/TS 22317:2021 (cited only); NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1businessimpactanalysis

Cómo usar: Use it before choosing continuity strategies, to decide which activities must be resumed first, how fast and at what minimum level. Fill the impact scale and its approval first, then interview activity owners per time point. The main pitfall is copying IT's current backup and restore times into the RPO and RTO columns instead of deriving them from business impact.

Vista previa

Business Impact Analysis: [Organization or scope name]

A stand-alone business impact analysis (BIA) that identifies the organization's prioritized activities, assesses how the impact of a disruption grows over time, and sets the maximum tolerable period of disruption (MTPD), recovery time objective (RTO), recovery point objective (RPO) and minimum business continuity objective (MBCO) for each activity, together with the people, information, ICT, facilities and suppliers each one needs. Structure aligned with ISO 22301:2019 with Amd 1:2024 (clause 8.2.2) and ISO/TS 22317:2021, with NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 as a free alternative method. The results feed the business continuity plan, the disaster recovery plan and the risk assessment. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example.

Document control

FieldValue
Document ID[BIA-2026-001]
Version[0.1]
Status[Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded]
Owner[@business-continuity-manager]
Approvers/reviewers[@coo], [@cio], [@cfo], [@head-of-risk], [activity owners]
Scope of this BIA[Legal entities, sites, products and services covered]
BIA cycle[Annual / After significant change], reference date YYYY-MM-DD
Linked management system[ISO 22301 BCMS / ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS / None]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD
Next scheduled reviewYYYY-MM-DD
Classification[Confidential]

Approvals

RoleNameDecisionDate
Top management sponsor[@name][Approve / Approve with conditions / Reject]YYYY-MM-DD
Chief information officer[@name][Decision]YYYY-MM-DD
Chief financial officer (impact criteria)[@name][Decision]YYYY-MM-DD
Business continuity manager[@name][Decision]YYYY-MM-DD

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange summary
0.1YYYY-MM-DD[@name]First draft, impact criteria agreed
0.2YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Interviews with five activity owners recorded
1.0YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Approved, objectives handed to BCP and DR owners

Contents

  1. Purpose, scope and method
  2. Impact categories and criteria
  3. Products, services and activities
  4. Impact over time
  5. Time objectives
  6. Prioritized activities
  7. Dependencies and resources
  8. Gap analysis
  9. Outputs and traceability
  10. Review and maintenance
  11. Glossary and references

1. Purpose, scope and method

1.1 Purpose

This BIA determines which activities of [Organization] must be resumed first after a disruption, how quickly, at what minimum level, and with which resources. Its results are the basis for the continuity strategies and solutions in [BCP reference] and the recovery design in [DR plan reference].

1.2 Scope

ItemIn scopeOut of scope (with reason)
Legal entities[Entity names][Entity, reason]
Sites[Sites][Site, reason]
Products and services[List][List, reason]
Time horizon assessed[4 hours to 2 weeks]
Example: Tervane LogisticsHead office, two cross-dock warehouses, customs brokerage, freight forwardingLeased truck fleet (operated by a contractor under its own continuity plan)

1.3 Method

The method follows the steps that ISO 22301:2019 clause 8.2.2 sets for a BIA, written here in original wording:

  1. Define the impact types and the criteria that describe each level of impact (section 2).
  2. Identify the activities that support the delivery of products and services (section 3).
  3. Assess the impacts of not performing each activity over time (section 4).
  4. Find the point at which the impact of not resuming an activity becomes unacceptable, and set the prioritized timeframe for resuming it at a specified minimum capacity (section 5).
  5. Use the results to identify prioritized activities (section 6).
  6. Determine the resources needed to support prioritized activities, and the dependencies, including partners and suppliers, and interdependencies between activities (section 7).

ISO/TS 22317:2021 gives guidance on running the BIA as a programme, scoping it, and analysing at the level of products and services, processes, activities and resources. NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 (section 3.2) gives a free alternative for information systems in three steps: determine mission and business processes and recovery criticality, identify resource requirements, and identify recovery priorities for system resources.

1.4 Data collection

TechniqueUsed forParticipants
Structured interviewImpact over time, minimum capacity, workaroundsActivity owners and deputies
WorkshopCalibrating scores across departmentsHeads of department, BC manager
Document reviewContracts, SLAs, regulatory deadlines, historic incidentsBC manager, legal, procurement
System dataTransaction volumes, peak periods, backup schedulesIT operations, finance

2. Impact categories and criteria

Score each impact category from 1 to 5. The overall impact at a point in time is the highest score in any category, not the average, so that one severe consequence is never diluted by mild ones.

ScoreFinancial (cumulative loss)Customers and serviceLegal and regulatoryReputationPeople and safety
1 MinimalUnder [10,000]Minor delay, no complaintsNo breachNo external attentionNo effect
2 Minor[10,000] to under [50,000]Delays noticed by some customersMinor breach, self-correctableLocal complaintsOvertime needed
3 Moderate[50,000] to under [150,000]Service levels missed for key customersBreach reportable to a regulatorTrade press coverageStaff welfare affected
4 Severe[150,000] to under [500,000]Key customers lost or penalties triggeredStatutory deadline missed, sanctions likelyNational media coverageInjury risk or loss of key staff
5 Critical[500,000] or moreService cannot be delivered, contracts terminatedLicence or authorisation at riskSustained national coverageSerious harm

Define the unacceptable level: an activity reaches its MTPD at the earliest time point where its overall impact score is 4 or higher. Record the threshold the sponsor approved: [threshold and approval reference].

ISO 22301:2019 Amd 1:2024 added a requirement to determine whether climate change is a relevant issue when the organization determines its context. Where climate related events (heat, flood, storms) could affect sites or suppliers, note them in the risk assessment and check whether they change peak periods or dependencies recorded here.

3. Products, services and activities

3.1 Products and services

IDProduct or serviceCustomersContractual or legal commitmentsPeak periods
PS-01 (Example)Import customs brokerageImporters, retailersDeclarations within statutory deadlines, customer SLA 4 hoursWeekdays, pre-holiday season
PS-02 (Example)Freight forwarding and warehousingRetail and industrial shippersDispatch within 24 hours of order, SLA creditsOctober to December
PS-03 (Example)Shipment visibilityAll customersPortal availability 99.5% monthlyContinuous
[PS-NN][Product or service][Customers][Commitments][Peaks]

3.2 Activities

IDActivitySupportsOwnerNormal headcountMain applications
ACT-01 (Example)Customs declaration filingPS-01[@customs-lead]15Customs gateway (CGW)
ACT-02 (Example)Shipment booking and carrier allocationPS-02[@ops-lead]12Transport management system (TMS)
ACT-03 (Example)Warehouse dispatchPS-02[@warehouse-lead]40Warehouse management system (WMS)
ACT-04 (Example)Customer track-and-trace portalPS-03[@cx-lead]6Portal, TMS
ACT-05 (Example)PayrollAll (internal)[@payroll-lead]3Payroll SaaS
[ACT-NN][Activity][PS-NN][@owner][n][Applications]

4. Impact over time

4.1 Time points

Use the same time points for every activity: 4 hours, 24 hours, 72 hours, 1 week (168 hours) and 2 weeks (336 hours). Add shorter points (for example 1 hour) for activities with real-time obligations.

4.2 Detailed assessment (one table per activity)

Example: ACT-01 Customs declaration filing, assessed for the peak season.

Time pointFinancial loss (EUR, cumulative)Financial scoreCustomersLegal and regulatoryReputationOverall (highest)
4 hours6,00012112
24 hours48,00023434
72 hours210,00044545
1 week640,00055545
2 weeks1,350,00055555

Rationale recorded at interview: goods held at the border start to accrue storage and demurrage charges after the first day; declarations not lodged within the statutory window expose customers and the broker to penalties, which drives the legal score to 4 at 24 hours.

4.3 Summary of overall scores

Activity4 h24 h72 h1 week2 weeksPeak period assessed
ACT-01 (Example)24555Pre-holiday season
ACT-02 (Example)13455October to December
ACT-03 (Example)23455October to December
ACT-04 (Example)12345Continuous
ACT-05 (Example)11234Payroll run (day 25 of the month)

5. Time objectives

5.1 Definitions used in this BIA

ObjectiveMeaning in this documentSet by
MTPDTime after which the impact of not resuming the activity becomes unacceptable (first score of 4 or higher)Section 4 results, approved by the sponsor
RTOTarget time to resume the activity at its MBCO after a disruption startsActivity owner, within the MTPD rule below
RPOMaximum age of the data the activity can restart from, measured back from the disruptionActivity owner with the information owner
MBCOMinimum level of output, as a share of normal volume, acceptable during the disruptionActivity owner, agreed with customers where contracts apply

NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 uses maximum tolerable downtime (MTD), which plays the role of MTPD for an information system, and splits it into RTO plus work recovery time (WRT): the time to verify data and bring the process back after the system is restored. Plan so that RTO plus WRT stays within the MTPD.

5.2 Rules

  1. RTO is no more than 50% of MTPD, leaving the remainder for detection, decision, invocation and work recovery. [Adjust the percentage and record the approval.]
  2. The RTO of every application and supplier an activity depends on is no longer than the activity's RTO.
  3. The RPO is no longer than the period of transactions the activity can re-enter or reconstruct from other sources within its RTO.
  4. MBCO is stated as a measurable volume, not as "reduced service".

5.3 Objectives

ActivityMTPDRTORTO as share of MTPDRPOMBCOReasoning
ACT-01 (Example)24 h8 h33%1 h60% of declarationsLegal score reaches 4 at 24 h
ACT-02 (Example)72 h24 h33%4 h50% of bookingsCustomer score reaches 4 at 72 h
ACT-03 (Example)72 h24 h33%1 h70% of dispatchesSLA credits at 72 h in peak season
ACT-04 (Example)1 week72 h43%24 h40% of tracking queries answeredCustomers can phone in the interim
ACT-05 (Example)2 weeks1 week50%24 h100% of the payroll run on its due dateLate pay harms staff and breaches contracts

6. Prioritized activities

RankActivityRTORecovery tierMust restart together with
1 (Example)ACT-01 Customs declaration filing8 hTier 1 (under 24 h)None
2 (Example)ACT-03 Warehouse dispatch24 hTier 2 (24 to 72 h)ACT-02
3 (Example)ACT-02 Shipment booking and carrier allocation24 hTier 2 (24 to 72 h)ACT-03
4 (Example)ACT-04 Customer track-and-trace portal72 hTier 3 (72 h to 1 week)ACT-02 data feed
5 (Example)ACT-05 Payroll1 weekTier 4 (over 1 week)None, but date-driven
[n][Activity][RTO][Tier][Dependencies]

ACT-03 ranks above ACT-02 with the same RTO because its RPO is shorter and its peak-season impact at 72 hours is driven by contractual credits that start sooner.

Activities not listed as prioritized are resumed after the tiers above, in the order set by [BC manager] at the time, unless their MTPD changes at the next review.

7. Dependencies and resources

7.1 People

ActivityNormal headcountMBCOMinimum headcount at MBCOKey skills or authorisationsSingle points of failure
ACT-01 (Example)1560%9Licensed customs declarantsTwo staff hold the gateway signing certificate
ACT-02 (Example)1250%6Carrier contract knowledgeNone identified
ACT-03 (Example)4070%28Forklift licences, dangerous goods trainingOne shift supervisor per site
ACT-04 (Example)640%3 (2.4 rounded up)Portal admin rightsNone identified
ACT-05 (Example)3100%2 (one preparer and one approver can run the full payroll)Payroll system approverOne approver for bank file release

7.2 Information and ICT

Application or data setSupportsRequired RTO (from activity)Required RPOCurrent RTO capabilityCurrent RPO capabilityHosting
Customs gateway (CGW) (Example)ACT-018 h1 h12 h (supplier contract)15 minSaaS, [Supplier A]
TMS (Example)ACT-02, ACT-0424 h4 h12 h1 hPrivate cloud
WMS (Example)ACT-0324 h1 h12 h4 hOn-premises, site 1
Payroll SaaS (Example)ACT-051 week24 h48 h24 hSaaS, [Supplier B]
[Application][ACT-NN][RTO][RPO][Capability][Capability][Hosting]

7.3 Facilities and equipment

ActivityNormal locationAlternative locationEquipment needed at MBCOTime to ready alternative
ACT-01 (Example)Head officeRemote working with VPN9 laptops, signing certificates on hardware tokens2 h
ACT-03 (Example)Cross-dock site 1Cross-dock site 2 (spare capacity 30%)Handheld scanners, label printers12 h
[Activity][Location][Alternative][Equipment][Time]

7.4 Suppliers and partners

SupplierServiceSupportsContractual recovery commitmentHas own continuity plan seenAlternative supplier
[Supplier A] (Example)Customs gateway SaaSACT-01RTO 12 h, RPO 15 minYes, summary onlyManual filing via the authority portal
[Supplier C] (Example)Contracted truck fleetACT-03Replacement vehicles within 24 hYesSpot market carriers
[Supplier][Service][ACT-NN][Commitment][Yes / No][Alternative]

7.5 Interdependencies between activities

Arrows point from the provider of an input to the activity that needs it. A disruption of the TMS therefore affects ACT-02 and ACT-04 directly and ACT-03 through the booking feed.

8. Gap analysis

Gap IDActivityRequirementCurrent capabilityShortfallProposed treatmentOwnerTarget date
GAP-01 (Example)ACT-01CGW RTO 8 hSupplier contract RTO 12 h4 hNegotiate RTO 6 h at renewal, document manual filing fallback[@procurement]YYYY-MM-DD
GAP-02 (Example)ACT-03WMS RPO 1 hBackups every 4 h3 hEnable log shipping to site 2[@it-ops]YYYY-MM-DD
GAP-03 (Example)ACT-019 declarants able to sign2 certificate holdersConcentration of signing authorityIssue certificates to 3 more declarants[@customs-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
GAP-04 (Example)ACT-05Two bank file approversOne approverSingle point of failureAppoint deputy approver[@cfo]YYYY-MM-DD
[GAP-NN][ACT-NN][Requirement][Capability][Shortfall][Treatment][@owner]YYYY-MM-DD

Record each gap in the risk register (compliance/risk-register) so that its treatment is tracked with other risks, and reference the risk ID here once assigned.

9. Outputs and traceability

BIA outputConsumer documentSection or fieldStatus
Prioritized activities and RTO (section 6)Business continuity planRecovery sequence[Linked / Pending]
ICT RTO and RPO (section 7.2)Disaster recovery planRecovery tiers and backup schedule[Linked / Pending]
Supplier commitments (section 7.4)Supplier security assessment, contractsContinuity clauses[Linked / Pending]
Gaps (section 8)Risk registerRisk entries and treatment plans[Linked / Pending]
Resources at MBCO (section 7)Continuity strategies and solutionsResource requirements[Linked / Pending]
Impact criteria (section 2)Risk methodologyConsequence scale alignment[Linked / Pending]

Traceability matrix:

ActivityMTPDRTOBCP procedureDR tierExercise that validated it
ACT-01 (Example)24 h8 hBCP-PROC-01Tier 1EX-2026-02 tabletop
ACT-03 (Example)72 h24 hBCP-PROC-03Tier 2EX-2026-04 site switch test
[ACT-NN][MTPD][RTO][Procedure][Tier][Exercise]

10. Review and maintenance

Review the BIA at least [annually] and also when any of these triggers occurs:

  • a new product, service, site, legal entity or major customer contract;
  • a change of a critical supplier or of a core application;
  • a merger, acquisition, restructuring or outsourcing decision;
  • an exercise or real disruption showing that an objective was wrong;
  • a change in legal or regulatory deadlines that affect impact scores.
ReviewDateTriggerChanges madeApproved by
[R-01]YYYY-MM-DD[Annual / Trigger][Summary][@name]

Report the BIA status, open gaps and any changed objectives to the management review (compliance/management-review).

11. Glossary and references

11.1 Glossary

TermMeaning in this document
ActivityA set of tasks that produces or supports a product or service
Prioritized activityAn activity given precedence after a disruption to limit impact
MTPDMaximum tolerable period of disruption, see section 5.1
RTORecovery time objective, see section 5.1
RPORecovery point objective, see section 5.1
MBCOMinimum business continuity objective, see section 5.1
MTDMaximum tolerable downtime, the NIST SP 800-34 term close to MTPD
WRTWork recovery time, the time after system restoration to verify data and resume the process
BCMSBusiness continuity management system

11.2 References

ReferenceEdition or dateUse
ISO 22301, Security and resilience, Business continuity management systems, Requirements2019 with Amd 1:2024; a revision is at committee draft stage (ISO/CD 22301), check the current statusClause 8.2.2 method steps, cited by clause number
ISO/TS 22317, Security and resilience, Business continuity management systems, Guidelines for business impact analysis2021, second editionBIA programme and levels of analysis
NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information SystemsMay 2010, updated 11 November 2010Free BIA method, MTD, RTO, RPO, WRT

Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO 22301:2019 with Amd 1:2024 (clause 8.2.2) and ISO/TS 22317:2021, cited by name, edition and clause number only, and based on NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1, a US government publication. This template is original text written for this collection and reproduces no wording, tables or definitions from the ISO documents. Check the current editions before use, including the status of the ISO 22301 revision.

Official text: ISO, purchase or licensed access: https://www.iso.org/standard/75106.html (ISO 22301:2019), https://www.iso.org/standard/88412.html (Amd 1:2024) and https://www.iso.org/standard/79000.html (ISO/TS 22317:2021), also available from national standards bodies. NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 is free at https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/34/r1/upd1/final.

Template licence: MIT.

Plantillas relacionadas