ISMS Learning Path Template (ISO/IEC 27001 Manager and Auditor)
12 modules from beginner to ISMS manager and internal auditor, outcomes, templates in study order, hours, self-checks, 5 role tracks, learner log
Mode d'emploi: Use it when onboarding an ISMS manager, control owner or internal auditor, or to plan your own study of ISO/IEC 27001. Fill the tracks your people need and the learner log first. The main pitfall is reading templates without producing a reviewed work product on your own organisation.
Aperçu
ISMS Learning Path: [Organization name]
A structured learning path that takes a person from no prior knowledge of information security management systems (ISMS) to working as an ISMS manager or an internal auditor against ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024. It sets out twelve modules with learning outcomes, the library templates to study in each module and in which order, time estimates, a self-check per module and role-based tracks. It supports competence planning under clause 7.2 (competence) and clause 7.3 (awareness) of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | LRN-ISMS-01 |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded] |
| Owner | [@isms-manager] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@ciso], [@hr-learning-lead] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, clauses 7.2 and 7.3 |
| Audience | [ISMS team, control owners, internal auditors, top management] |
| Tracks in use | [T1 top management / T2 control owner / T3 ISMS manager / T4 internal auditor / T5 risk owner] |
| Linked competence record | DOC-ISMS-026 (competence and training matrix) |
| Next scheduled review | YYYY-MM-DD |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISMS manager | [@isms-manager] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| CISO or security lead | [@ciso] | [Approved / Approved with changes] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| HR or learning lead | [@hr-learning-lead] | [Reviewed] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 (Example) | 2026-11-01 | [@isms-manager] | First learning path, twelve modules and five tracks |
| 1.1 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@isms-manager] | Hours adjusted after the first cohort; module 9 extended with a practice audit |
Contents
- Purpose and scope
- How the path is built
- Learning levels and outcomes
- Role-based tracks
- Module overview
- Modules in detail
- Study methods and practical outputs
- Size tiers: how the path changes
- Assessment and sign-off
- Maintaining the path
- Learner log
- Records and evidence
- References
1. Purpose and scope
This learning path serves three purposes:
- Self-study. A person who wants to understand ISO/IEC 27001 can work through the modules in order, using the templates in this library as course material and their own organisation as the case study.
- Onboarding. A new ISMS manager, control owner or internal auditor gets a defined set of modules with outcomes, so their manager knows what "ready" means.
- Competence evidence. Completed modules, self-check results and
reviewed work products feed the competence and training matrix
(
isms/isms-competence-training-matrix, DOC-ISMS-026), which is the record clause 7.2 expects.
The path covers the requirements standard ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (clauses 4 to 10 and Annex A), the guidance that supports it (ISO/IEC 27002:2022, ISO/IEC 27005:2022, ISO/IEC 27003:2017) and the audit and certification context (ISO 19011:2026, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024). It does not replace an accredited personnel certification course, and it does not reproduce any ISO text: learners need licensed copies of the standards listed in section 13.
Out of scope: deep technical training (secure coding, forensics, cloud
engineering), privacy management under ISO/IEC 27701:2025 beyond an
introduction, and sector extensions. Those are covered by the templates
named in module 5 and by isms/iso-27000-family-map.
2. How the path is built
The path follows the life of an ISMS: learn the language, decide and start, frame the system, assess and treat risk, implement controls, run the system, check it, audit it and certify it. Each module has the same parts:
| Part | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Outcomes | Three to five things the learner can do at the end, written as actions |
| Study order | Templates in this library, read in the order given |
| Standard reading | The clauses or sections of the official standards to read alongside |
| Practical output | A work product on the learner's own organisation, reviewed by a mentor |
| Self-check | Three questions answered without notes, plus the matching section of isms/isms-self-test |
| Time estimate | Hours for an average learner, Example values to adjust |
Entry rule: a learner who already holds relevant experience takes the self-check of a module first. Three correct answers without notes, plus a mentor's look at an existing work product of the same kind, lets the learner skip the module. Record the skip and its basis in the learner log (section 11).
3. Learning levels and outcomes
The path uses four working levels. They are the library's levels, not an official scheme. ISO/IEC 27021:2017 + Amd 1:2021 describes competence requirements for ISMS professionals in more depth and is worth reading for anyone designing a formal competence framework.
| Level | Description | Typical roles | Modules |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 Aware | Understands why the ISMS exists, the main terms and their own duties | All staff, top management (short form) | M0, M1 |
| L2 Contributor | Can fill and maintain the documents for their area and produce evidence | Control owners, risk owners, site coordinators | M0 to M1 plus the modules of their track |
| L3 Practitioner | Can run an ISMS process end to end (risk assessment, internal audit, measurement) | ISMS manager, security team, internal auditors | Full track for the role |
| L4 Lead | Can design and lead an ISMS, defend it at a certification audit and coach others | ISMS manager after one full cycle, CISO | All modules plus one completed certification or surveillance cycle |
Overall outcomes for a learner who completes the ISMS manager track (T3):
- Explain each clause of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 in plain language and name the records it requires.
- Define scope, context and interested parties for a real organisation.
- Run a risk assessment with the 5 x 5 scale used in this library and produce a risk treatment plan and a Statement of Applicability.
- Select and justify Annex A controls and link each to evidence.
- Plan and run measurement, an internal audit and a management review.
- Prepare the organisation for a two-stage certification audit and the three-year cycle that follows.
4. Role-based tracks
| Track | For | Modules | Hours (Example) | Target level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 Top management | Directors, executive sponsor, steering committee members | M0, M2, M8 | 11 | L1 plus decision skills |
| T2 Control owner | Owners of Annex A controls, IT and facilities leads | M0, M1, M5, M7 | 24 | L2 |
| T3 ISMS manager | ISMS manager, deputy, security team members | M0 to M11 (all) | 77 | L3, then L4 after a cycle |
| T4 Internal auditor | Staff who will audit the ISMS | M0, M1, M3, M4, M5, M8, M9, M11 | 57 | L3 for audit |
| T5 Risk owner | Managers who own risks and accept residual risk | M0, M1, M4 | 16 | L2 |
How the totals are built (Example): T1 is 2 + 4 + 5 = 11 hours; T2 is 2 + 4 + 12 + 6 = 24 hours; T3 is the sum of all twelve modules, 77 hours; T4 is 2 + 4 + 6 + 10 + 12 + 5 + 10 + 8 = 57 hours; T5 is 2 + 4 + 10 = 16 hours.
Internal auditors need an extra condition that study cannot meet: they must not audit their own work (under clause 9.2.2 an auditor checking their own work is not independent). When you assign T4, record which areas each auditor may not audit.
5. Module overview
| Module | Title | Clauses and areas | Hours (Example) | Practical output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | Orientation | Family of standards, how certification works in outline | 2 | Personal reading list |
| M1 | Vocabulary and structure | Harmonized structure, clauses 4 to 10, Annex A themes | 4 | Glossary of 20 terms in your organisation's words |
| M2 | Deciding and starting | Business case, project set-up, gap assessment | 4 | One-page gap summary |
| M3 | Context, scope and leadership | Clauses 4 and 5 | 6 | Draft scope statement and interested parties list |
| M4 | Risk assessment and treatment | Clauses 6.1, 8.2, 8.3 | 10 | Five assessed risks with treatment and owners |
| M5 | Annex A controls | Annex A, ISO/IEC 27002:2022 | 12 | Draft Statement of Applicability for one theme |
| M6 | Support processes | Clause 7 | 5 | Competence matrix rows and a communication plan entry |
| M7 | Operation and evidence | Clause 8.1, evidence, operational registers | 6 | Evidence matrix rows for ten controls |
| M8 | Measurement and management review | Clauses 9.1 and 9.3 | 5 | Three measures with targets and a review agenda |
| M9 | Internal audit | Clause 9.2, clause 10, ISO 19011:2026 | 10 | Audit checklist and report for one process |
| M10 | Certification | ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024 | 5 | Stage 1 readiness self-assessment |
| M11 | Capstone and self-test | All | 8 | Walkthrough completed and self-test scored |
| Total | 77 |
6. Modules in detail
6.1 M0 Orientation (2 hours)
Outcomes. Name the requirements standard and the main guidance standards. Explain what certification is and who grants it. Describe what an ISMS is in two sentences.
Study order.
isms/iso-27000-family-map: which standards exist, which are certifiable.- This learning path, sections 1 to 5.
isms/isms-glossary, section 3 (core terms only).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27000:2026 overview sections; the introduction and clause 1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Practical output. A personal reading list: which standards your organisation owns, which you need to buy, and where licensed copies are kept.
Self-check.
- Which standard in the family contains the requirements an organisation is certified against?
- Who makes the certification decision?
- What did Amendment 1:2024 add to ISO/IEC 27001?
6.2 M1 Vocabulary and structure (4 hours)
Outcomes. Use the core ISMS terms correctly. Describe the seven requirement clauses (4 to 10) and the four Annex A themes with their control counts. Explain the difference between a requirement and a control.
Study order.
isms/isms-glossary, all sections.isms/iso-27001-clauses-explained, sections 1 to 3 (overview and the structure).compliance/iso-map: how 27001 sits next to other management system standards.
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 0 to 3 and the Annex A headings.
Practical output. A glossary of 20 terms written in your organisation's words, for example what "asset owner" or "risk owner" means in your structure.
Self-check.
- How many controls does Annex A contain, and in which four themes?
- Name the clause that deals with planning of changes, new in 2022.
- Is Annex A a list of mandatory controls? Explain in one sentence.
6.3 M2 Deciding and starting (4 hours)
Outcomes. Write a business case for an ISMS. Set up the project with a sponsor, a team and a roadmap. Run a gap assessment against the clauses.
Study order.
isms/isms-business-case(DOC-ISMS-029).isms/isms-project-charter(DOC-ISMS-009).compliance/iso-27001-gap-assessment(DOC-ISMS-098).isms/isms-implementation-roadmap(DOC-ISMS-030).isms/isms-budget-resource-plan(DOC-ISMS-031).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27003:2017 (general guidance on implementation; a revision is in progress, check for a newer edition).
Practical output. A one-page gap summary: clauses met, partly met and not met, with the three largest gaps and an owner for each.
Self-check.
- What three things must a business case make clear to top management?
- Why run a gap assessment before writing policies?
- Which clause makes top management accountable for the ISMS?
6.4 M3 Context, scope and leadership (6 hours)
Outcomes. Identify external and internal issues, including whether climate change is relevant. List interested parties, their requirements and which of them the ISMS will address. Write a scope statement with interfaces and dependencies. Draft the information security policy and the role assignments.
Study order.
isms/iso-27001-clauses-explained, sections on clauses 4 and 5.isms/isms-context-interested-parties(DOC-ISMS-003).compliance/ms-scope(DOC-ISMS-002).isms/isms-process-map(DOC-ISMS-004).compliance/information-security-policy(DOC-ISMS-001).isms/isms-policy-framework(DOC-ISMS-005).isms/isms-roles-raci(DOC-ISMS-006).isms/isms-steering-committee-charter(DOC-ISMS-007).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 clauses 4 and 5.
Practical output. A draft scope statement and a list of interested parties with their requirements, reviewed by the mentor.
Self-check.
- What must a scope statement consider besides the organisational units inside it?
- Name two places where Amendment 1:2024 touches clause 4.
- Under clause 5.3, which two responsibilities must top management assign explicitly, besides assigning and communicating ISMS roles?
6.5 M4 Risk assessment and treatment (10 hours)
Outcomes. Define risk criteria and acceptance rules. Identify, analyse and evaluate risks with the 5 x 5 scale (likelihood 1 to 5 times impact 1 to 5, bands Low 1-4, Medium 5-9, High 10-16, Critical 17 to 25, which in practice means 20 and 25). Choose treatment options, compare controls against Annex A and produce a Statement of Applicability. Record acceptance of residual risk by risk owners.
Study order.
compliance/risk-methodology(DOC-ISMS-010).isms/isms-risk-appetite-criteria(DOC-ISMS-015).compliance/asset-inventory(DOC-ISMS-012).isms/isms-threat-vulnerability-catalogue(DOC-ISMS-018).compliance/risk-register(DOC-ISMS-016).isms/isms-risk-assessment-report(DOC-ISMS-017).compliance/risk-treatment-plan(DOC-ISMS-013).isms/isms-risk-acceptance-record(DOC-ISMS-019).compliance/statement-of-applicability(DOC-ISMS-011).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 6.1, 8.2 and 8.3; ISO/IEC 27005:2022 (event-based and asset-based approaches); ISO 31000:2018 for general risk principles.
Practical output. Five risks on your own organisation, each with likelihood, impact, score, band, owner, treatment option and the Annex A controls compared.
Self-check.
- A risk has likelihood 4 and impact 4. What is the score and the band, and who may accept it under the library's default rules?
- Which four elements must the Statement of Applicability contain for each control?
- Why must risk assessments be repeatable and produce comparable results?
6.6 M5 Annex A controls (12 hours)
Outcomes. Explain the purpose of each of the four Annex A themes and of the 11 controls that are new in 2022. Use the ISO/IEC 27002:2022 attributes to group controls. Judge whether a control is applicable and justify an exclusion.
Study order.
isms/annex-a-organizational-controls-guide(A.5, 37 controls).isms/annex-a-people-physical-controls-guide(A.6, 8 controls, and A.7, 14 controls).isms/annex-a-technological-controls-guide(A.8, 34 controls).- Sample policies, one per theme:
isms/access-control-policy(DOC-ISMS-041),isms/remote-working-policy(DOC-ISMS-054),isms/physical-security-policy(DOC-ISMS-055),isms/secure-configuration-baseline(DOC-ISMS-060). isms/control-framework-crosswalk(DOC-ISMS-106) if you also work with SOC 2, NIST CSF or sector frameworks.
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A; ISO/IEC 27002:2022 for the guidance and attributes.
Practical output. A draft Statement of Applicability for one theme, with applicability, justification and current status for every control in that theme.
Self-check.
- Name four of the 11 controls new in 2022.
- What is wrong with "Not applicable: we do not have this problem" as a justification?
- What are the five attributes in ISO/IEC 27002:2022, and which values does the cybersecurity concepts attribute use?
6.7 M6 Support processes (5 hours)
Outcomes. Determine competence needs and keep evidence. Plan awareness and communication. Control documented information: identify, format, review, approve, distribute, protect, retain and dispose.
Study order.
isms/iso-27001-clauses-explained, clause 7 section.isms/isms-competence-training-matrix(DOC-ISMS-026).security/security-awareness-program.isms/isms-communication-plan(DOC-ISMS-027).isms/isms-documented-information-register(DOC-ISMS-028).compliance/controlled-document.
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 7.
Practical output. Competence matrix rows for three ISMS roles and one communication plan entry covering the message, its timing, its audience and its channel (the clause 7.4 points), plus who communicates, which is good practice rather than a 2022 requirement).
Self-check.
- What must the organisation keep as evidence for competence?
- Name three things every person under the organisation's control must be aware of.
- What is the difference between documented information the standard requires and documented information the organisation decides it needs?
6.8 M7 Operation and evidence (6 hours)
Outcomes. Plan and control ISMS operation, including externally provided processes. Link every applicable control to the record that proves it operates. Run the recurring registers that auditors sample.
Study order.
isms/control-evidence-matrix(DOC-ISMS-033).isms/isms-annual-calendar(DOC-ISMS-032).isms/isms-manual(DOC-ISMS-008).isms/isms-change-plan(DOC-ISMS-025).isms/security-event-reporting-procedure(DOC-ISMS-023) andcompliance/incident-response-plan(DOC-ISMS-020).isms/vulnerability-remediation-tracker(DOC-ISMS-072).isms/backup-restore-test-log(DOC-ISMS-071).compliance/supplier-security-assessment(DOC-ISMS-067).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 6.3 and 8.
Practical output. Ten rows of the control evidence matrix for your organisation: control, owner, record, location, frequency, last sample.
Self-check.
- What does clause 8.1 expect for processes provided by external parties?
- When must the risk assessment be repeated, apart from planned intervals?
- Why is "we do it but do not record it" a weak position at audit?
6.9 M8 Measurement and management review (5 hours)
Outcomes. Decide what to monitor and measure, how, when and by whom, and who analyses the results. Write measures with targets. Prepare and minute a management review that covers every required input.
Study order.
isms/isms-measurement-programme(DOC-ISMS-080).compliance/objectives-register(DOC-ISMS-024).isms/isms-performance-report(DOC-ISMS-081).compliance/management-review(DOC-ISMS-085).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 6.2, 9.1 and 9.3; ISO/IEC 27004:2016 (under revision; check for a newer edition).
Practical output. Three measures linked to objectives, each with a formula, source, frequency, target and owner, and a management review agenda that maps to the required inputs.
Self-check.
- Name four inputs a management review must consider.
- What is the difference between monitoring and measurement?
- Which outputs of a management review must be recorded?
6.10 M9 Internal audit (10 hours)
Outcomes. Plan an audit programme based on importance of processes and previous results. Prepare a checklist, sample evidence, write findings that state requirement, evidence and gap, and grade them. Follow nonconformities through correction, root cause and corrective action.
Study order.
compliance/internal-audit-program(DOC-ISMS-082).isms/isms-internal-audit-checklist(DOC-ISMS-083).isms/isms-internal-audit-report(DOC-ISMS-084).isms/audit-findings-register(DOC-ISMS-086).compliance/capa-nonconformity(DOC-ISMS-087).isms/continual-improvement-register(DOC-ISMS-088).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 9.2 and 10; ISO 19011:2026 (principles of auditing and managing an audit programme); ISO/IEC 27007:2020 (ISMS auditing guidance, under revision).
Practical output. A checklist and a short report for one process, for example access rights review, with at least one finding written in the requirement, evidence, gap format. A mentor reviews it.
Self-check.
- What makes an auditor objective and impartial in practice?
- What is the difference between a correction and a corrective action?
- Write a one-line finding for "no evidence that leavers' accounts were removed within the defined time".
6.11 M10 Certification (5 hours)
Outcomes. Explain Stage 1 and Stage 2, surveillance and recertification in the three-year cycle. Select an accredited certification body. Prepare a Stage 1 pack and a Stage 2 evidence index. Respond to nonconformities.
Study order.
isms/certification-audit-explained(LRN-ISMS-07).isms/certification-body-selection(DOC-ISMS-090).isms/stage-1-readiness-pack(DOC-ISMS-091).isms/stage-2-audit-evidence-index(DOC-ISMS-092).isms/certification-findings-action-plan(DOC-ISMS-093).isms/certification-cycle-plan(DOC-ISMS-094).isms/surveillance-readiness-health-check(DOC-ISMS-096).
Standard reading. ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 audit stages; ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024 for how certification bodies set audit time and handle multi-site organisations.
Practical output. A Stage 1 readiness self-assessment for your organisation with open gaps and dates.
Self-check.
- What does Stage 1 check that Stage 2 does not?
- How often are surveillance audits held, and when is the first one due?
- Who sets the audit time, and on what basis?
6.12 M11 Capstone and self-test (8 hours)
Outcomes. Apply the whole path to a case from start to certificate. Score at least the pass mark set in section 9 on the self-test.
Study order.
isms/isms-worked-walkthrough(LRN-ISMS-09): a full ISMS built for one of the library's fictional organisations.isms/isms-self-test(LRN-ISMS-08): all sections, without notes.- Review any question you got wrong in the matching module.
Practical output. The completed walkthrough exercises and a scored self-test entered in the learner log.
Self-check. The self-test is the self-check for this module.
7. Study methods and practical outputs
Use these methods together:
- Read, then do. Read the template, read the clauses, then fill the template for your own organisation in a sandbox copy. Mark the copy "training" so it is not mistaken for a controlled document.
- Mentor review. Each practical output is reviewed by a mentor who holds the target level or higher (L3 for most modules). The mentor records "accepted" or "rework" with one line of feedback.
- Shadowing. Internal auditors in training shadow at least one audit before leading one. ISMS managers in training sit in on one management review and one risk workshop.
- Peer explanation. The learner explains one clause or control to a colleague in five minutes without notes. If they cannot, they repeat the reading.
- Real records. Where safe, practical outputs become real drafts: a good scope statement from M3 can become the first version of DOC-ISMS-002 after the normal review and approval.
Practical outputs by module, with the mentor role that reviews them:
| Module | Output | Reviewed by |
|---|---|---|
| M3 | Draft scope and interested parties | ISMS manager or CISO |
| M4 | Five assessed risks | Risk owner and ISMS manager |
| M5 | SoA draft for one theme | ISMS manager |
| M7 | Ten evidence matrix rows | Control owners named in the rows |
| M9 | Audit checklist and report | Audit programme manager |
| M10 | Stage 1 self-assessment | ISMS manager or CISO |
8. Size tiers: how the path changes
The tiers are the library's working tiers (small under 50 people, medium 50 to 500, large or multi-site over 500 or several sites), not official definitions.
| Aspect | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems | Large: Quillmere Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting | B2B SaaS analytics, 46 staff (38 employees, 8 contractors), part-time ISMS manager (0.5 FTE, Head of Engineering Operations), certification target 6 months | Clinical scheduling, 320 staff, full-time ISMS manager plus a 3-person security team, 27001 target 10 months, 27701 the year after | Manufacturing and services, 2,400 staff, 6 sites in 4 countries, CISO with a 14-person security office, ISO 9001 and ISO 22301 already certified, target 15 months phased by site |
| Who studies what (Example) | ISMS manager: T3; 4 control owners: T2; CEO and CTO: T1; internal audit outsourced, so no T4 | ISMS manager: T3; security team (3): T3; 12 control owners: T2; 2 internal auditors from quality: T4; executive team: T1 | Security office (14): T3 for 4 leads, T2 for 10; 6 site coordinators: T2; internal audit pool of 8: T4; board and site directors: T1 |
| Pace (Example) | 77 hours over 10 weeks, about 8 hours a week alongside the day job | ISMS manager 77 hours in 6 weeks, about 13 hours a week; others over 8 weeks | Cohorts per site wave; each cohort finishes before its site joins the scope |
| Mentor | External adviser or a peer from another certified company, because no internal L3 exists yet | ISMS manager mentors the team after finishing T3 | CISO office runs the path as a programme with named mentors per site |
| Special focus | M4 and M5 on cloud controls; M10 early, because the timeline is short | M5 on privacy and supplier controls; A.5.34 and processor duties | M3 on multi-site scope and integration with the existing management system; M10 on multi-site sampling |
Worked example of the small-tier study plan (Example dates in 2027):
The plan runs ten weeks: 1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 10 weeks, from 2027-01-04 to 2027-03-14.
9. Assessment and sign-off
A module is complete when all three conditions are met:
- The learner answered the module self-check correctly without notes, or corrected their answers after review and passed a second attempt.
- The practical output was accepted by the mentor.
- The learner log entry is filled and dated.
A track is complete when every module in it is complete and, for T3 and
T4, the learner scored at least the pass mark on isms/isms-self-test.
| Track | Pass mark on the self-test (Example) | Signed off by |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | Not required; briefing attendance and one decision exercise | ISMS manager |
| T2 | 70% on sections relevant to their controls | ISMS manager |
| T3 | 80% overall | CISO or executive sponsor |
| T4 | 80% overall and one shadowed audit | Audit programme manager |
| T5 | 70% on the risk section | ISMS manager |
Effectiveness check: three to six months after sign-off, the mentor looks at one real work product of the learner (a risk assessment, an audit report, an evidence record) and confirms it meets the standard expected. Record the result in the competence matrix.
10. Maintaining the path
Review the path:
- once a year, at the same time as the competence and training matrix;
- when a standard it relies on changes edition (watch ISO/IEC 27003, ISO/IEC 27004 and ISO/IEC 27007, which are under revision as of 2026-11-01);
- when the organisation's ISMS changes materially (new scope, new site, new certification standard such as ISO/IEC 27701:2025);
- after each cohort, using learner feedback and self-test results.
Keep a short change note in the revision history: what changed, why and which learners are affected. Learners who completed a module that changed substantially take the updated self-check.
11. Learner log
| Log ID | Learner | Track | Module | Started | Completed | Self-check | Output reviewed by | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRN-LOG-001 (Example) | [@isms-manager] | T3 | M4 | 2027-01-18 | 2027-01-29 | 3 of 3 | [@ciso] | Accepted | Five risks on the analytics platform; one moved from Medium to High after review |
| LRN-LOG-002 (Example) | [@platform-lead] | T2 | M5 | 2027-02-01 | 2027-02-12 | 2 of 3, second attempt 3 of 3 | [@isms-manager] | Accepted | Rework on the A.8.9 justification |
| LRN-LOG-003 (Example) | [@quality-auditor] | T4 | M9 | 2027-03-01 | 2027-03-12 | 3 of 3 | [@audit-programme-manager] | Rework | Findings did not state the requirement; redo with the access review audit |
| [LRN-LOG-NNN] | [@learner] | [T1 to T5] | [M0 to M11] | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | [n of 3] | [@mentor] | [Accepted / Rework / Skipped with basis] | [notes] |
12. Records and evidence
| Record | Proves | Kept by | Where | Retention (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learner log (section 11) | Who completed which module and when | ISMS manager | [Learning system or ISMS workspace] | Employment plus 2 years |
| Self-check and self-test scores | Knowledge was checked, not only attended | ISMS manager | [Same as above] | Employment plus 2 years |
| Reviewed practical outputs | Learner can apply the knowledge | Mentor, filed by ISMS manager | [Training folder, marked training] | Until next competence review |
| Competence and training matrix (DOC-ISMS-026) | Required competence is determined and met per role (clause 7.2) | ISMS manager with HR | [HR system or ISMS workspace] | Current version plus previous 3 years |
| Effectiveness check notes | Actions to build competence were evaluated | Mentor | [Competence matrix comments] | As the matrix |
| External course certificates | Formal training where used | HR | [HR file] | Employment plus legal retention period |
Map these records in isms/control-evidence-matrix (DOC-ISMS-033) against
clause 7.2, clause 7.3 and control A.6.3 (awareness, education and
training).
13. References
Standards (editions checked 2026-11-01):
| Standard | Edition | Link |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27000 | 2026 | https://www.iso.org/standard/84257.html |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | 2022 + Amd 1:2024 | https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html and https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.html |
| ISO/IEC 27002 | 2022 | https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html |
| ISO/IEC 27003 | 2017 (revision in progress) | https://www.iso.org/standard/63417.html |
| ISO/IEC 27004 | 2016 (revision in progress) | https://www.iso.org/standard/64120.html |
| ISO/IEC 27005 | 2022 | https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html |
| ISO/IEC 27006-1 | 2024 | https://www.iso.org/standard/82908.html |
| ISO/IEC 27007 | 2020 (revision in progress) | https://www.iso.org/standard/77802.html |
| ISO/IEC 27021 | 2017 + Amd 1:2021 | https://www.iso.org/standard/61003.html |
| ISO 19011 | 2026 | https://www.iso.org/standard/88984.html |
| ISO/IEC 17021-1 | 2015 | https://www.iso.org/standard/61651.html |
| ISO 31000 | 2018 | https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html |
Related templates: isms/isms-glossary, isms/iso-27001-clauses-explained,
isms/annex-a-organizational-controls-guide,
isms/annex-a-people-physical-controls-guide,
isms/annex-a-technological-controls-guide,
isms/certification-audit-explained, isms/isms-self-test,
isms/isms-worked-walkthrough, isms/iso-27000-family-map,
isms/isms-competence-training-matrix, isms/control-evidence-matrix,
security/security-awareness-program.
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 clauses 7.2 and 7.3, and informed by the competence themes of ISO/IEC 27021:2017 + Amd 1:2021. The modules, tracks, levels, hours, self-checks and learner log are original text. No ISO or IEC text, clauses, controls or definitions are reproduced; you need the official standards to study and implement them. Editions change: check the current edition of each standard on iso.org before you rely on this path. Hours, pass marks and retention periods are Example values, not requirements. This is a learning plan, not a personnel certification scheme, and completing it does not certify a person or an organisation. Template licence: MIT.
Modèles associés
Access Control Policy Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.15)
Access principles, role catalogue, joiner mover leaver SLAs, MFA and NIST SP 800-63B-4 password rules, privileged and service accounts, reviews, metrics
SMSI & ISO/IEC 27001Annex A Organizational Controls Guide Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5)
A.5.1 to A.5.37 in own words: intent, typical implementation, tier notes, evidence auditors sample, pitfalls, linked templates, self-check, study record
SMSI & ISO/IEC 27001Annex A People and Physical Controls Guide Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.6, A.7)
A.6.1 to A.6.8 and A.7.1 to A.7.14 in own words: intent, tier notes, evidence, pitfalls, physical boundary decision for cloud and colocation, self-check, study record