Network Security Standard Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.20 to A.8.23)
Network zones and flow matrix, firewall rule lifecycle, remote access, wireless, DNS and web filtering, network service agreements, monitoring, evidence
Mode d'emploi: Use it when A.8.20 to A.8.23 are applicable and you need one standard for zones, rules, remote access and web filtering. Fill the zone model and inter-zone flow matrix first. The main pitfall is a generic statement that auditors cannot test against real rules and contracts.
Aperçu
Network Security Standard: [Organization name]
Organization-wide standard for protecting networks and the information that crosses them: network zones and segmentation, rule management for firewalls and cloud security groups, remote and administrative access, wireless, DNS and web filtering, agreements for network services, and network monitoring. It supports ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 Annex A controls A.8.20 (network security), A.8.21 (security of network services), A.8.22 (network segregation) and A.8.23 (web filtering, new in 2022), with implementation guidance from ISO/IEC 27002:2022 and the network security series ISO/IEC 27033. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | DOC-ISMS-063 |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved] |
| Owner | [@network-owner] ([Head of Infrastructure or Network Engineering lead]) |
| Approvers / reviewers | [CISO or ISMS manager], [Head of IT Operations], [OT engineering lead, if OT is in scope] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] (the zone diagram and address plan annex: [Confidential]) |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, Annex A A.8.20 to A.8.23; ISO/IEC 27002:2022 |
| Next scheduled review | YYYY-MM-DD (at least annually and after any major network change) |
| Scope | [Offices, data centres, colocation, cloud tenancies, OT networks, remote access services] |
| Zone model version | [ZM-1.0, approved YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Parent policy | Information security policy (DOC-ISMS-001) |
| Related documents | Access control policy (DOC-ISMS-041), Secure configuration baseline (DOC-ISMS-060), Security monitoring procedure (DOC-ISMS-064), Supplier security agreement (DOC-ISMS-068) |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature or record | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner, network | [Name] | [Reference] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| CISO or ISMS manager | [Name] | [Reference] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Head of IT Operations | [Name] | [Reference] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | First draft from the zone workshop |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | Approved; web filtering (A.8.23) and network services agreements added |
Contents
- Purpose and scope
- Control mapping
- Roles and responsibilities
- Standard statements
- Network zones and segregation
- Rule management for network security controls
- Remote and administrative access
- Wireless networks
- DNS, web filtering and egress control
- Network services and suppliers
- Device hardening and network monitoring
- Exceptions
- Size tiers
- Records and evidence
- References
- Standard and licence note
1. Purpose and scope
This standard sets the minimum requirements for designing, operating and monitoring the networks that carry [Organization name] information. Its aims are to:
- keep untrusted traffic out of trusted zones and limit how far an attacker can move after an initial compromise;
- make every permitted flow deliberate, owned, justified and reviewed;
- protect the confidentiality and integrity of information in transit and the availability of network services that the business depends on;
- reduce exposure to malicious and unwanted web content;
- give the security monitoring function the network telemetry it needs.
The standard applies to every network inside the ISMS scope (DOC-ISMS-002): office local area networks, wireless networks, data centre and colocation networks, public cloud virtual networks and their security groups, software-defined WAN links, remote access services, and operational technology (OT) networks where present. It applies to employees, contractors and suppliers who design, change or operate those networks.
Out of scope: networks of customers and suppliers that [Organization name] does not control, except where a contract gives it responsibilities (section 10), and home networks of remote workers, which are covered by the remote working policy (DOC-ISMS-054) through device-level controls.
2. Control mapping
| Annex A control | Short label used here | Where this standard implements it |
|---|---|---|
| A.8.20 | Network security | Sections 4, 6, 7, 8 and 11 |
| A.8.21 | Security of network services | Section 10 |
| A.8.22 | Network segregation | Section 5 |
| A.8.23 | Web filtering (new in 2022) | Section 9 |
Related controls that this standard relies on but does not own:
A.5.14 information transfer (DOC-ISMS-043), A.8.2 privileged access rights
(security/privileged-access-standard), A.8.9 configuration management
(DOC-ISMS-060), A.8.15 logging and A.8.16 monitoring (DOC-ISMS-064),
A.8.24 use of cryptography (security/cryptography-standard) and A.8.32
change management (ops/change-enablement-policy).
3. Roles and responsibilities
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Network owner ([Head of Infrastructure]) | Owns this standard and the zone model, approves zone changes, accepts network risks as risk owner within the DOC-ISMS-010 limits (Low alone, Medium with the department head) |
| Network engineers | Design and implement changes, keep diagrams and configuration backups current, run the rule review |
| Rule owners (service or application owners) | Request rules, justify them, confirm them at each review, request removal when a service retires |
| Security team or ISMS manager | Reviews high-risk rule requests, sets web filtering categories, receives network alerts, audits compliance |
| Change advisory or change approver | Approves normal changes under the change enablement process |
| Supplier manager | Holds network service agreements and the supplier register entry (DOC-ISMS-066) |
| OT engineering lead | Approves any change touching OT zones together with the network owner |
4. Standard statements
| ID | Statement |
|---|---|
| NET-001 | Every network in scope MUST belong to exactly one zone defined in section 5. |
| NET-002 | Traffic between zones MUST be denied by default and allowed only by a rule listed in the inter-zone flow matrix or the rule base. |
| NET-003 | Every rule MUST have an owner, a business justification, a change reference and, when temporary, an expiry date. |
| NET-004 | Rules that allow "any" source, destination or service MUST NOT be used between zones, except the documented internet egress rules in section 9. |
| NET-005 | Administrative interfaces of network devices and cloud network services MUST be reachable only from the management zone or through the privileged access path. |
| NET-006 | Remote access to internal services MUST use multi-factor authentication and a managed, compliant device. |
| NET-007 | Wireless networks MUST use current enterprise-grade authentication; guest wireless MUST be separated from corporate zones. |
| NET-008 | DNS resolution for corporate devices MUST use the approved protective resolver; web access MUST pass the web filtering service. |
| NET-009 | Network services from suppliers MUST be covered by an agreement that states security features, service levels and management rights. |
| NET-010 | Network devices MUST follow the secure configuration baseline (DOC-ISMS-060), with configuration backups and firmware within vendor support. |
| NET-011 | Boundary devices, VPN gateways, DNS resolvers and web gateways MUST send logs to the central log platform defined in DOC-ISMS-064. |
| NET-012 | Rule bases MUST be reviewed at the cadence in section 6.3 and the review recorded. |
| NET-013 | Information in transit across untrusted networks MUST be encrypted as set by the cryptography standard. |
| NET-014 | Network diagrams and the address plan MUST be kept current, version controlled and classified as Confidential. |
5. Network zones and segregation
5.1 Zone model
| Zone ID | Zone | Holds | Trust level | Typical implementation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z0 | Internet | Untrusted external networks | Untrusted | n/a |
| Z1 | Edge and DMZ | Public load balancers, reverse proxies, web application firewall, mail relays | Low | Dedicated subnet or cloud public subnet with WAF |
| Z2 | Production application | Application servers, containers, internal APIs | Medium | Private subnets, security groups per service |
| Z3 | Production data | Databases, object storage with customer data, key management | High | Private subnets, private endpoints, no route to Z0 |
| Z4 | Management | Bastion hosts, privileged access workstations, network device management, backup control | High | Separate subnet or virtual network, reachable only through the privileged access path |
| Z5 | Corporate user | Staff laptops and desktops, printers on a separate segment | Medium | Office LAN and VLANs, ZTNA for remote users |
| Z6 | Guest and untrusted devices | Visitor Wi-Fi, IoT and building systems | Untrusted | Separate SSID or VLAN with internet-only access |
| Z7 | Non-production | Development, test and staging without real customer data | Low | Separate cloud account or subscription |
| Z8 | OT (where present) | Controllers, HMIs, historians, engineering workstations | High (safety) | Layered OT zones with an industrial DMZ between IT and OT |
Rules for the zone model:
- Separate production from non-production at the account or subscription level where the platform allows it, not only by subnet.
- Place systems that store or process information classified Confidential or above in Z3 or behind Z3 controls.
- Treat OT as its own family of zones. Traffic between IT and OT passes through an industrial DMZ; no direct route from Z5 to Z8 is allowed.
- Use micro-segmentation (security groups per service, Kubernetes network policies) inside Z2 and Z3 where the platform supports it.
- Payment card environments, if any, follow the scoping and segmentation
method in
compliance/pci-dss-scoping-segmentationin addition to this standard.
The diagram shows every permitted flow in the matrix in 5.2, in the direction in which connections are initiated. Return traffic of an allowed session is permitted by stateful inspection; no other flow exists unless listed in 5.2.
5.2 Inter-zone flow matrix
Read the matrix as "source row may initiate to destination column". "Rule" means allowed only by a specific owned rule; "No" means denied.
| Source / destination | Z0 | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | Z4 | Z5 | Z6 | Z7 | Z8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z0 Internet | n/a | Rule (published services) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Z1 Edge | Rule (updates) | n/a | Rule | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Z2 Production application | Rule (via egress proxy) | No | n/a | Rule | No | No | No | No | No |
| Z3 Production data | No | No | No | n/a | No | No | No | No | No |
| Z4 Management | Rule (vendor updates) | Rule | Rule | Rule | n/a | No | No | Rule | Rule (via industrial DMZ) |
| Z5 Corporate user | Rule (web filtering) | No | No | No | Rule (privileged access path) | n/a | No | Rule | No |
| Z6 Guest | Rule (internet only) | No | No | No | No | No | n/a | No | No |
| Z7 Non-production | Rule (via egress proxy) | No | No | No | No | No | No | n/a | No |
| Z8 OT | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | n/a |
Z3 initiates nothing to other zones: backups are pulled by the backup service from Z4. Database replication between the primary and DR regions stays inside Z3, runs over provider private links and is recorded as intra-zone rules owned by the database team.
6. Rule management for network security controls
6.1 Rule requirements
Every rule records: rule ID, source, destination, service and port, action, owner, business justification, data classification of the flow, change reference, date created, expiry date (if temporary) and date last reviewed. Rules are written as narrowly as the service allows: named hosts or groups, named ports, and logging enabled on deny rules and on allow rules between zones.
| Rule ID | Source | Destination | Service | Owner | Justification | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FW-RULE-001 (Example) | Z1 load balancer group | Z2 web service group | TCP 443 | Product platform lead | Publish customer web application | None (permanent, reviewed) |
| FW-RULE-002 (Example) | Z2 reporting service | Z3 analytics database | TCP 5432 | Data engineering lead | Read replica queries for reports | None (permanent, reviewed) |
| FW-RULE-003 (Example) | Z4 bastion group | Supplier support IP range | TCP 443 | IT operations lead | Vendor remote support session for storage upgrade | 2027-03-31 |
6.2 Rule lifecycle
- The rule owner raises a change request (
ops/change-request) with the fields in 6.1. - A network engineer checks the request against the flow matrix. Flows that the matrix marks "No" are rejected or go to the exception process (section 12).
- The security team reviews requests that open inbound access from Z0, reach Z3, Z4 or Z8, or use broad ranges.
- The change approver approves; the engineer implements, preferably as code through a reviewed pull request.
- The engineer tests the rule and records the change reference on it.
- Temporary rules are removed automatically or by ticket on expiry.
- Rules are confirmed or removed at each periodic review.
6.3 Review cadence
| Rule base | Review frequency (Example) | Record |
|---|---|---|
| Internet edge firewalls and WAF policies | Every 6 months | security/firewall-rule-review |
| Cloud security groups for Z1 to Z4 | Every 6 months, plus automated daily drift detection | security/firewall-rule-review and posture tool report |
| Internal segmentation and Kubernetes network policies | Annually | security/firewall-rule-review |
| OT boundary and industrial DMZ | Every 6 months, jointly with OT engineering | security/firewall-rule-review |
Set the frequency from risk and from any contract or regulation that demands a shorter interval (for example PCI DSS for card environments). Rules with no hits in the review period are flagged for removal unless the owner documents a reason, such as a disaster recovery path.
7. Remote and administrative access
User remote access. Staff reach internal applications through
[zero trust network access (ZTNA) / an identity-aware proxy / a VPN
gateway] that enforces single sign-on with multi-factor authentication
and checks device compliance (managed, encrypted, EDR running, operating
system supported) before each session. Access is per application, not to
whole subnets, where the service supports it. The design principles
follow security/zero-trust-architecture.
Administrative access. Administrators reach Z2, Z3, Z4 and network
device management only through the privileged access path: a privileged
access workstation or bastion in Z4, with phishing-resistant MFA, just in
time elevation and session recording as set in
security/privileged-access-standard. Cloud console and API access to
network resources uses the same identity controls.
Supplier remote access. Suppliers connect only through a brokered, logged session to named systems, approved per session or for a fixed period, with the account disabled between sessions. The supplier's access is recorded in the supplier register (DOC-ISMS-066).
Session controls. Idle remote sessions time out after [15 minutes] (Example). Split tunnelling is [allowed for named SaaS traffic only / not allowed]; web traffic of remote devices still passes the web filtering service (section 9) through the endpoint agent.
8. Wireless networks
| SSID | Users | Authentication | Zone | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [CORP] (Example) | Staff on managed devices | WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X with certificates) | Z5 | Certificates issued by device management |
| [GUEST] (Example) | Visitors | Captive portal with daily rotating code, WPA3-Personal or OWE | Z6 | Internet only, client isolation, bandwidth limited |
| [IOT] (Example) | Building systems, meeting room devices | WPA2/WPA3 with per-device keys where supported | Z6 | No route to corporate zones |
Requirements:
- Change any pre-shared key when a person who knew it leaves or at least every [12 months] (Example).
- Run a rogue access point scan [quarterly] (Example) at each office and record the result.
- Manage access points centrally; disable local administrative interfaces and keep firmware within vendor support.
- Do not extend corporate wireless to production or OT zones.
9. DNS, web filtering and egress control
Protective DNS. Corporate devices and servers resolve names through the approved resolver, which blocks known malicious and newly registered domains and logs queries. Direct outbound DNS (port 53 and DNS over HTTPS to unapproved resolvers) from Z2, Z3, Z5 and Z7 is blocked at the boundary or by the endpoint agent.
Web filtering. Web traffic from Z5, and from remote corporate devices through the endpoint agent, passes a secure web gateway or filtering service with the category policy below. Filtering is applied to protect users and systems from malicious content, not to monitor individuals; the acceptable use policy (DOC-ISMS-040) tells staff that filtering and logging exist.
| Category | Action (Example) | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Malware, phishing, command and control, cryptomining | Block | Direct threat |
| Newly registered and uncategorized domains | Warn or block | Frequent phishing infrastructure |
| Anonymizers and unapproved proxies | Block | Bypass of controls |
| Unapproved file sharing and personal webmail | Warn; block upload of files | Data leakage (coordinated with DOC-ISMS-062) |
| Illegal content and content barred by policy | Block | Legal and conduct |
| Generative AI services not approved | Warn, with link to the approved list | See ai-data/ai-usage-policy |
| Business categories | Allow | Normal work |
Users request access to a wrongly blocked site through the service desk. The security team decides within [2 business days] (Example) and records the decision. TLS inspection, if used, excludes categories such as health and banking, and its use is assessed for privacy and labour law in each country of operation.
Server egress. Z2 and Z7 reach the internet only through an egress proxy or NAT with an allow list of destinations (package repositories, supplier APIs). Z3 has no internet egress.
10. Network services and suppliers
For each network service, the supplier manager records the service in the supplier register (DOC-ISMS-066) and makes sure the agreement or service description (DOC-ISMS-068) covers:
- security features provided (encryption, DDoS protection, filtering, redundancy) and which are switched on;
- service levels for availability and incident response, with credits;
- notification of security incidents and planned changes, with time limits;
- management access: who may change the configuration, how changes are approved and logged, and whether [Organization name] can see logs;
- right to audit or to receive independent assurance reports;
- data location for any logs or traffic data the supplier keeps;
- exit support, including handover of configurations.
| Service ID | Service | Supplier type | Security features in use | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSV-001 (Example) | Primary internet link, office | Telecom carrier | DDoS scrubbing, 99.9% availability target | Annual |
| NSV-002 (Example) | Cloud virtual networking and load balancing | Public cloud provider | Security groups, flow logs, managed WAF | Annual, using the provider assurance report |
| NSV-003 (Example) | Protective DNS and web filtering | Security service provider | Category filtering, DNS logging, endpoint agent | Annual |
11. Device hardening and network monitoring
Hardening. Network devices and cloud network services follow the
secure configuration baseline (DOC-ISMS-060): default credentials changed,
unused services disabled, management on dedicated interfaces in Z4,
SNMPv3 or equivalent, time synchronized to approved sources, and
configuration backed up after every change and at least [weekly]
(Example). Edge devices are patched under the vulnerability management
policy (security/vulnerability-management-policy); a vulnerability in a
boundary device that is listed in the CISA Known Exploited
Vulnerabilities catalog is treated with the highest priority.
Monitoring. The following network sources feed the central log
platform defined in DOC-ISMS-064 and the security logging standard
(security/security-logging-standard):
| Source | Events | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Boundary firewalls and security groups | Allowed and denied flows between zones, admin logons, configuration changes | Detect scanning, lateral movement, unauthorized changes |
| VPN, ZTNA and bastion | Session start and end, device posture result, failed MFA | Detect account compromise and unusual locations |
| Protective DNS | Queries, blocked lookups | Detect malware beaconing and phishing clicks |
| Web gateway | Blocked and warned requests, uploads | Detect phishing and data leakage |
| Cloud flow logs | Accepted and rejected flows for Z1 to Z4 | Investigation and baselining |
| Wireless controllers | Rogue access point alerts, authentication failures | Detect unauthorized devices |
| OT sensors (where present) | Connections across the industrial DMZ | Detect IT to OT movement |
Alert use cases for these sources, triage and escalation are defined in the security monitoring procedure (DOC-ISMS-064).
12. Exceptions
A deviation from a MUST statement requires a security exception request
(security/security-exception-request, DOC-ISMS-122) that records the
statement affected, the business reason, compensating controls, the risk
score on the 5 x 5 scale of the risk methodology (DOC-ISMS-010), the risk
owner and an expiry date. Each exception is approved at the authority
the risk methodology (DOC-ISMS-010 section 2.4) sets for the residual
risk: the risk owner for Low; the risk owner and department head for
Medium (top management if the risk category is Averse, DOC-ISMS-015
section 9 rule 1); top management with a treatment decision for High,
recorded in the risk acceptance record (DOC-ISMS-019). Critical residual
risk is not approvable as an exception: treat it or stop the activity.
Maximum duration is 12 months for Low or Medium and 6 months for High;
at expiry the exception is reassessed, and a renewal is a new decision
(DOC-ISMS-122 section 7).
| Exception ID | Statement | Reason | Compensating control | Score | Expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXC-NET-001 (Example) | NET-004 | Legacy file transfer appliance needs a broad source range from a partner | Partner range limited at the ISP edge, IPS signature set, monitoring use case MON-UC-007 | 3 x 3 = 9 (Medium) | 2027-06-30 |
13. Size tiers
| Topic | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd (46 staff, one office plus remote, one cloud provider in two regions) | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems (320 staff, two offices, one colocation suite) | Large: Quillmere Group (2,400 staff, 6 sites in 4 countries, IT and OT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zones in use | Z1 to Z4 and Z7 in the cloud tenancy; Z5 and Z6 at the office and for remote devices; no Z8 | Z0 to Z7 across offices, colocation and cloud | All zones including Z8 and an industrial DMZ per plant |
| Segmentation | Separate cloud accounts for production and non-production, security groups per service | VLANs and next-generation firewalls in offices and colocation, security groups in cloud | Site firewalls, SD-WAN with central policy, layered OT zones |
| Rule management | Security groups as code, peer-reviewed pull requests, review every 6 months by the part-time ISMS manager and one engineer | Change advisory approval, rule review by network team with the 3-person security team | Central network operations, tooling for rule analysis, reviews per site and per OT boundary |
| Remote access | ZTNA or identity-aware proxy from the identity provider, no VPN | ZTNA for staff, brokered access for hospital support suppliers | ZTNA for IT, brokered and recorded vendor access for OT, regional gateways |
| Web filtering | Protective DNS and endpoint agent on all laptops | Secure web gateway for offices and endpoint agent for remote staff | Secure web gateway per region with TLS inspection where lawful |
| Network services | Cloud provider and one internet link, provider assurance reports | Two carriers, colocation provider, DDoS protection | Multiple carriers per country, managed SD-WAN, colocation and own data centre |
| Monitoring | Logs to a managed SIEM through an MDR provider | SIEM run by the security team with MDR out of hours | SIEM and SOC in the 14-person security office, OT sensors at plants |
14. Records and evidence
| Record | Proves | Owner | Location | Retention (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved zone model and network diagrams | NET-001, NET-014, A.8.22 | Network owner | [Document repository] | Current plus 3 previous versions |
| Rule base export with owners and justifications | NET-002 to NET-004 | Network engineers | [Configuration repository] | 3 years |
| Change records for network rules | NET-003, A.8.32 link | Change approver | [Service management tool] | 3 years |
Firewall rule review records (security/firewall-rule-review) | NET-012 | Network owner | [Document repository] | 3 years |
| Remote access configuration and MFA enforcement report | NET-006 | IT operations | [Identity provider reports] | 1 year of monthly exports |
| Rogue access point scan results | NET-007 | Network engineers | [Ticketing tool] | 2 years |
| Web filtering category policy and unblock decisions | NET-008, A.8.23 | Security team | [Filtering console export] | 2 years |
| Network service agreements and assurance reports | NET-009, A.8.21 | Supplier manager | [Contract repository] | Contract term plus 6 years |
| Device configuration backups and firmware inventory | NET-010 | Network engineers | [Backup store] | 1 year |
| Log source coverage report for network sources | NET-011 | Security team | [SIEM] | 1 year |
| Exception records | Section 12 | ISMS manager | Risk acceptance record (DOC-ISMS-019) | Life of exception plus 3 years |
Set retention from the legal register (DOC-ISMS-014) and the retention
standard (data/data-retention-deletion-standard). Report compliance
metrics, such as the share of rules with an owner and the number of
expired temporary rules found, through the measurement programme
(isms/isms-measurement-programme).
15. References
| Reference | Edition | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 | 2022, Amd 1 published 2024-02-23 | Annex A A.8.20 to A.8.23 (cited by number) |
| ISO/IEC 27002:2022 | 2022 | Control guidance and attributes |
| ISO/IEC 27033-1:2015 | 2015 | Network security concepts and overview |
| NIST SP 800-41 Rev. 1, Guidelines on Firewalls and Firewall Policy | September 2009 | Firewall policy and rule management practice |
| NIST SP 800-207, Zero Trust Architecture | August 2020 | Remote access and per-application access design |
| CIS Controls v8.1 | Current version as published by CIS; check the current release | Control 12 (network infrastructure management) and 13 (network monitoring and defense), cited by number |
| CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog | Continuously updated, cisa.gov | Priority for boundary device vulnerabilities |
Official pages: ISO/IEC 27001 https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html, Amd 1 https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.html, ISO/IEC 27002 https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html, ISO/IEC 27033-1 https://www.iso.org/standard/63461.html.
Related templates: security/firewall-rule-review,
security/zero-trust-architecture, security/privileged-access-standard,
security/security-logging-standard, security/cryptography-standard,
isms/secure-configuration-baseline, isms/security-monitoring-procedure,
isms/remote-working-policy, isms/supplier-register,
isms/supplier-security-agreement-27036, isms/control-evidence-matrix,
compliance/statement-of-applicability, compliance/pci-dss-scoping-segmentation.
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (including Amd 1:2024) Annex A controls A.8.20 to A.8.23 and the guidance in ISO/IEC 27002:2022. Only control numbers are used, with short labels in the style of the Statement of Applicability; the requirements, zone model, examples and guidance are original wording, and no ISO/IEC text is reproduced. ISO and IEC standards are copyrighted: obtain the official standards from ISO, IEC or your national standards body to implement and audit them (https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html). Check the current edition and amendments before use. Certification decisions belong to the accredited certification body. Template licence: MIT.
Modèles associés
Cloud Services Security Policy Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.23)
Cloud policy for A.5.23: shared responsibility, tiers, due diligence, contract terms, configuration, monitoring, exit, shadow IT, cloud register
SMSI & ISO/IEC 27001Customer Security Addendum Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.20)
Order of precedence, certifications upkeep, personnel, sub-processors, data location, incident notification, audit rights, testing, deletion, liability pointer, negotiation playbook
SMSI & ISO/IEC 27001Data Masking and DLP Standard Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.11, A.8.12)
Masking and pseudonymisation techniques, test data, re-identification risk, DLP channels, rule catalogue, tuning, alert handling, staff privacy