Markdown Editor

PIMS Scope and Roles Template (ISO/IEC 27701:2025)

PIMS framing for ISO/IEC 27701:2025: privacy context, role per processing activity, scope statement, policy links, ISMS relationship, certification route

SMSI & ISO/IEC 27001CompletISO/IEC 27701:2025 (cited only); ISO/IEC 27706:2025; ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015; ISO/IEC 29100:2024pims27701scoperoles

Mode d'emploi: Use it when the organization builds a privacy information management system, alone or next to an ISMS, before writing the PIMS SoA. Fill the processing inventory and role determination first. The main pitfall is declaring one role for the whole company and missing controller activities such as HR, contacts and telemetry.

Aperçu

PIMS Scope and Roles: [Organization name]

Defines the context, the PII controller and PII processor roles, the scope and the governance of a privacy information management system (PIMS) under ISO/IEC 27701:2025, the second edition, which is a stand-alone management system standard that can be certified without ISO/IEC 27001. It also records how the PIMS relates to an ISMS under ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 when both are run, and the route to certification by a body that meets ISO/IEC 27706:2025. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example. This is a documentation format, not legal advice.

Document control

FieldValue
Document IDDOC-ISMS-100
Version[1.0]
Status[Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded]
Owner[@privacy-lead]
Approvers/reviewers[@dpo], [@isms-manager], [@legal-counsel], [@ceo]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD
Classification[Internal]
Standard and editionISO/IEC 27701:2025; ISO/IEC 27706:2025 (certification bodies); ISO/IEC 29100:2024 (privacy framework); ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 where an ISMS is also run
Next scheduled reviewYYYY-MM-DD (at least every 12 months and after any change of role, service or jurisdiction)
PIMS model[Stand-alone PIMS / PIMS integrated with ISMS / PIMS added to a certified ISMS]
Roles in scope[PII controller / PII processor / both]
Related documentsISMS scope DOC-ISMS-002, context and interested parties DOC-ISMS-003, roles and RACI DOC-ISMS-006, PIMS SoA DOC-ISMS-101

Approvals

RoleNameDecisionDate
PIMS owner[@privacy-lead][Prepared]YYYY-MM-DD
Data protection officer[@dpo][Reviewed]YYYY-MM-DD
ISMS manager (if an ISMS is run)[@isms-manager][Reviewed]YYYY-MM-DD
Top management[@ceo][Approved / Approved with changes]YYYY-MM-DD

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange
0.1 (Example)YYYY-MM-DD[@privacy-lead]First draft after the processing inventory workshop
1.0 (Example)YYYY-MM-DD[@privacy-lead]Approved for the certification application
[x.y]YYYY-MM-DD[@author][Change summary]

Contents

  1. Purpose and use of this document
  2. ISO/IEC 27701:2025 at a glance
  3. Context of the organization for privacy
  4. Processing inventory and role determination
  5. PIMS scope statement
  6. Privacy policy framework
  7. Relationship with the ISMS
  8. Leadership, roles and responsibilities
  9. Certification route
  10. Size tiers
  11. Records and evidence
  12. Review and maintenance
  13. References

1. Purpose and use of this document

This document records the decisions that frame the PIMS of [Organization name]: the internal and external issues that affect privacy, the interested parties and their privacy requirements, the role the organization plays for each processing activity, the boundaries of the PIMS and the people accountable for it. It is the reference point for the PIMS Statement of Applicability (DOC-ISMS-101), the privacy risk assessment, the record of processing activities and the certification application.

Use it in three situations:

  • Design: when the PIMS is first planned, to agree scope and roles before controls are selected.
  • Change: when a new service, a new customer type, a new country or an acquisition changes the processing landscape.
  • Audit: as the first document shown to internal auditors and to the certification body at Stage 1.

2. ISO/IEC 27701:2025 at a glance

ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is the second edition of the PIMS standard. The first edition (2019) was written as an extension to ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002, so an organization could only certify its PIMS together with an ISMS. The 2025 edition is a stand-alone management system standard: it contains its own requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving a PIMS, and an organization can be certified to it without holding an ISO/IEC 27001 certificate.

What you can rely on when planning, subject to checking your copy:

ElementWhat it means for this PIMS
Management system requirementsFollow the harmonized structure used by ISO management system standards (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement), so the PIMS can share processes with an ISMS or another ISO system
Control set for PII controllersApplies to processing where the organization decides purposes and means
Control set for PII processorsApplies to processing carried out on behalf of customers or other controllers
Information security controls for PIISecurity controls that apply to all PII processing, so that a stand-alone PIMS covers the security of PII without depending on ISO/IEC 27001
Implementation guidanceGuidance that supports each control
Informative mappingsCorrespondence to other frameworks, such as ISO/IEC 29100 principles, the GDPR, ISO/IEC 27018 and ISO/IEC 29151, and to the 2019 edition (as described in published summaries; confirm in your copy)

Record here the clause and annex references you confirmed in your copy, so later documents cite them consistently:

TopicReference in ISO/IEC 27701:2025Confirmed byDate
Requirement to determine controller and processor roles[27701 clause ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
Requirement for a Statement of Applicability[27701 clause ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
Controller control set[27701 annex ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
Processor control set[27701 annex ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
Security controls for PII[27701 annex ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD
Mapping to the 2019 edition[27701 annex ref][@privacy-lead]YYYY-MM-DD

Organizations certified to the 2019 edition should agree a transition plan with their certification body. Published summaries report a transition period of about three years, ending in October 2028, but the exact dates come from the accreditation framework and your body: ask it for its transition deadline and audit approach rather than assuming one.

3. Context of the organization for privacy

3.1 Internal and external issues

IDIssueTypeEffect on the PIMSOwner
CTX-P-001 (Example)Customers in the EU, UK and US send personal data of their users to the platformExternalSeveral privacy laws apply; processor terms differ by customer[@dpo]
CTX-P-002 (Example)Product roadmap adds machine learning features that use customer dataInternalNew purposes must be checked against customer instructions and assessed in a DPIA[@head-of-product]
CTX-P-003 (Example)Customer security questionnaires increasingly ask for a privacy certificateExternalCertification is a commercial driver; scope must cover the services customers buy[@ceo]
CTX-P-004 (Example)Marketing team uses several SaaS tools that hold prospect dataInternalController processing in scope; tool inventory needed[@head-of-marketing]

3.2 Interested parties and their privacy requirements

Interested partyPrivacy requirementsSourceAddressed in
Data subjects (customer end users)Transparency, rights handling, security of their dataLaw, customer privacy noticesProcessor assistance procedure, compliance/data-subject-request-procedure
Customers acting as controllersProcessing only on instructions, sub-processor control, breach notice, deletion at end of contractData processing agreementslegal-lite/dpa, isms/cloud-pii-27018-processor
Employees and candidatesLawful, limited HR processing, noticeEmployment law, privacy lawStaff privacy notice, HR retention rules
Supervisory authoritiesRecords of processing and cooperation (controllers and processors), breach notification to the authority where the organization is controllerPrivacy law (for example GDPR Articles 30, 31, 33)compliance/gdpr-ropa, compliance/personal-data-breach-assessment
Sub-processorsClear instructions and security termsContractsSupplier security agreement DOC-ISMS-068

Keep the legal and contractual obligations themselves in the legal register (DOC-ISMS-014), with one row per law or contract type, and reference those rows here instead of repeating them.

4. Processing inventory and role determination

The role decides which control set applies. Use the decision flow below for each processing activity in the record of processing activities (compliance/gdpr-ropa), then record the result in the table.

Activity IDProcessing activityData subjectsRoleReasoningControl sets
PA-001 (Example)Hosting and analysing customer event data in the SaaS platformCustomer end usersProcessorCustomer decides what data to send and why; the organization follows the service termsProcessor and security
PA-002 (Example)Customer account administration and billingCustomer staff contactsControllerThe organization decides to collect contact and billing data to run its contractsController and security
PA-003 (Example)Payroll and HR administrationEmployees, contractorsControllerEmployer obligationsController and security
PA-004 (Example)Product usage telemetry to improve the serviceCustomer end users (pseudonymous)ControllerThe organization chooses this purpose itself; needs a lawful basis and customer transparencyController and security
PA-005 (Example)Co-marketing campaign with a partnerProspectsJoint controllerBoth parties define the audience and purposeController and security

PA-004 shows the typical trap: analytics on customer data for the provider's own purposes turns a processor into a controller for that activity. Decide it consciously, document the lawful basis and tell customers, or stop the processing.

5. PIMS scope statement

Scope statement (Example): "The privacy information management system of [Organization name] covering the processing of personally identifiable information as PII processor in the provision of the [service name] SaaS platform, and as PII controller for customer account, employee and marketing data, operated from [office location] and remote locations, with production hosted in [cloud regions]."

DimensionIn scopeOut of scopeReason for exclusion
Legal entities[Entity A][Entity B, dormant][No processing]
Services[SaaS platform, support][Legacy on-premises product][Retired YYYY-MM-DD, no PII retained]
Locations[Head office, remote staff, cloud regions][None]
RolesController and processor[None]
Interfaces[Payment provider, cloud provider, parent group HR system]Processing inside those partiesCovered by contracts and supplier assessment

An exclusion is acceptable only when it does not affect the ability to protect PII that is in scope. Record the effect of each interface in the supplier register (DOC-ISMS-066).

6. Privacy policy framework

DocumentPurposeOwnerLink
Privacy policy (internal)Top management commitments for PII processing, objectives framework, roles[@dpo][Policy ID]
Information security policySecurity commitments that also protect PII[@isms-manager]DOC-ISMS-001
Public privacy noticeInformation for data subjects where the organization is controller[@dpo]legal-lite/privacy-policy
Data processing agreement templateProcessor commitments to customers[@legal-counsel]legal-lite/dpa
Data subject request procedureHandling and assisting with rights requests[@privacy-lead]compliance/data-subject-request-procedure
DPIA procedureAssessing high-risk processing[@dpo]compliance/dpia
Breach assessmentDeciding on notification of personal data breaches[@dpo]compliance/personal-data-breach-assessment
Retention and deletion standardRetention periods and deletion methods[@data-governance-lead]data/data-retention-deletion-standard
Transfer assessmentCross-border transfers[@legal-counsel]compliance/transfer-impact-assessment

Manage all of them under the documented information rules in DOC-ISMS-028 so versions, approvals and distribution are consistent.

7. Relationship with the ISMS

Choose the model that fits:

ModelWhen it fitsWhat is sharedWhat stays separate
Stand-alone PIMSNo ISMS, or privacy is the main customer demandNothing required; the PIMS carries its own security controls for PIIAll processes
Integrated PIMS and ISMSBoth systems built togetherDocument control, internal audit, management review, corrective action, competence, supplier managementPrivacy risk criteria, privacy controls, DPIA, rights handling
PIMS added to a certified ISMSISMS already certified, privacy added laterAs for integrated; the existing ISMS SoA covers most security controls for PIIPIMS SoA for privacy controls; scope may differ from the ISMS scope

When the PIMS and ISMS both run:

  • Keep one risk process (DOC-ISMS-010) with two lenses: risks to the organization and risks to data subjects. Privacy risks score impact on individuals, not only on the business.
  • Keep one internal audit programme (DOC-ISMS-082) with PIMS topics planned explicitly, and one management review (DOC-ISMS-085) with a standing privacy agenda item.
  • Map the security controls for PII in the PIMS SoA to the ISMS SoA (DOC-ISMS-011) so evidence is collected once.
  • Align scopes or explain the difference. A PIMS that covers a service the ISMS excludes needs its own security evidence for that service.

8. Leadership, roles and responsibilities

RoleResponsibilities in the PIMSHolder
Top managementApproves privacy policy and scope, provides resources, chairs or attends management review[@ceo]
PIMS owner (privacy lead)Runs the PIMS day to day, maintains this document and the SoA, reports performance[@privacy-lead]
Data protection officer (where required or appointed)Advises, monitors compliance, contact point for authorities and data subjects; stays independent of operational decisions[@dpo]
ISMS managerOwns shared processes and security controls for PII[@isms-manager]
Process and system ownersOperate controls for their processing activities and keep ROPA entries current[@owners]
Legal counselContract terms, transfer mechanisms, legal register[@legal-counsel]
All staffFollow privacy rules, report suspected breachesAll

Record the full RACI in DOC-ISMS-006 and the competence requirements in DOC-ISMS-026.

9. Certification route

Certification bodies for PIMS work to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 together with ISO/IEC 27706:2025, which replaced ISO/IEC TS 27006-2:2021. When you select a body (DOC-ISMS-090):

  1. Confirm it is accredited for ISO/IEC 27701:2025 by an accreditation body that is a signatory of the Global ACI MRA (formerly the IAF MLA). Global ACI replaced IAF and ILAC on 2026-01-01 and existing recognition continues. Check the certificate scope in the IAF CertSearch database (still operating at the time of writing; check).
  2. Ask whether it can run combined or integrated audits with your ISO/IEC 27001 certification and how it calculates audit time for each.
  3. Ask how it handles a scope that differs between the ISMS and the PIMS.

The cycle follows ISO/IEC 17021-1: a two-stage initial audit, a three-year certificate, surveillance audits at least once each calendar year outside recertification years (the first no later than 12 months after the certification decision), and recertification before expiry. Audit time is set by the certification body; any figure in your plan is an Example.

10. Size tiers

TopicSmall: Quillmere Analytics LtdMedium: Quillmere Health SystemsLarge: Quillmere Group
Profile46 staff (38 employees, 8 contractors), B2B SaaS analytics, processor for customer data320 staff, clinical scheduling software and managed service, two offices and a colocation suite2,400 staff, 6 sites in 4 countries, manufacturing and services, OT and IT
Main rolesProcessor for customer data; controller for staff and customer contactsProcessor for hospitals; controller for staff and marketing dataMainly controller (staff, customers, suppliers); processor for some group service centre activities
PIMS modelPIMS processes designed into the ISMS being built (ISO/IEC 27001 target 6 months); PIMS certification a later option (Example)PIMS added to the ISMS the year after ISO/IEC 27001 certification (27001 target 10 months)Integrated management system with ISO 9001 and ISO 22301; PIMS phased by site after the group ISMS (27001 target 15 months) (Example)
OwnershipISMS manager (0.5 FTE, Head of Engineering Operations) also acts as privacy lead; external DPO serviceFull-time ISMS manager, 3-person security team, appointed DPO, privacy lead in legalCISO with a 14-person security office, group DPO, privacy coordinators per country
Inventory sizeAbout 10 to 15 processing activities (Example)About 40 to 60 activities (Example)Several hundred activities, inventoried per site (Example)
Typical pitfallTreating telemetry use as processor activityHospital contracts with different instructions per customerDifferent national laws and works council rules across 4 countries

11. Records and evidence

RecordProvesOwnerLocationRetention
Approved versions of this documentScope and roles are controlled[@privacy-lead][Document system]Current plus [3] years (Example)
ROPA with role per activityRoles determined per activity[@privacy-lead][Register]Current plus [3] years (Example)
Context and interested parties review minutesIssues and requirements reviewed[@privacy-lead][Meeting records][3] years (Example)
DPO appointment and contact publicationRole assigned[@ceo][HR file, website]Duration of appointment plus [3] years (Example)
Management review minutes with privacy itemLeadership oversight[@isms-manager]DOC-ISMS-085[3] years (Example)
Certification body correspondenceAudit planning and scope agreed[@privacy-lead][Audit folder]Certificate cycle plus [3] years (Example)

Add each record to the control evidence matrix (isms/control-evidence-matrix, DOC-ISMS-033) so internal audit and the certification body find it in one place. Set retention periods in line with data/data-retention-deletion-standard.

12. Review and maintenance

Review this document at least every 12 months and when any of these happens:

  • a new product, feature or customer segment that processes PII;
  • entry into a new country or a change of hosting region;
  • a merger, acquisition or divestment;
  • a change in a privacy law that applies to the organization;
  • a significant personal data breach or an audit finding about scope or roles;
  • a new edition or amendment of ISO/IEC 27701.

Record the review outcome in the revision history, even when nothing changes.

13. References

ReferenceEditionUse
ISO/IEC 27701:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/85819.htmlSecond edition, 2025PIMS requirements and controls
ISO/IEC 27706:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/82894.html2025Requirements for PIMS certification bodies
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, https://www.iso.org/standard/61651.html2015Certification audit process
ISO/IEC 29100:2024, https://www.iso.org/standard/85938.html2024Privacy framework, actors and principles
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html and https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.htmlCurrentISMS requirements when both systems run
ISO/IEC 27018:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/88150.html2025Public cloud PII processors
GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679As amended; check the consolidated textExample of a privacy law with controller and processor duties
Related templatesisms/pims-27701-statement-of-applicability, compliance/gdpr-ropa, compliance/dpia, compliance/ms-scope, isms/isms-context-interested-parties, isms/isms-roles-raci, isms/certification-body-selection, isms/cloud-pii-27018-processor, isms/control-evidence-matrix

Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27706:2025 and ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, with links to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 and ISO/IEC 29100:2024. The tables, decision flow, scope wording and examples are original text; no text, control wording or tables from ISO/IEC standards are reproduced, and clause and annex references are left for you to confirm in the official standard, which you need to implement the requirements. Check the current edition of each standard and any transition rules of your certification body before use. GDPR is cited as an example only.

Template licence: MIT.

Modèles associés