Threat and Vulnerability Catalogue Template (ISO/IEC 27005, ATT&CK)
12 threat sources, 24 threat events and 18 vulnerabilities linked to Annex A controls and ATT&CK v20 tactics, scenario building, OT entries, update route
उपयोग कैसे करें: Use it before the first risk assessment and keep it live for every workshop. Fill the relevant threat sources first, then prune and extend the threat event and vulnerability examples from your incidents, audits and threat intelligence. The main pitfall is a catalogue copied once from a public list and never updated.
प्रीव्यू
Threat and Vulnerability Catalogue: [Organization name] ISMS
A maintained catalogue of threat sources, threat events and vulnerabilities that risk assessors use to build risk scenarios, so that every assessment starts from the same, current list instead of a blank page. Each entry is linked to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A controls (by number with a short label) and, for adversarial events, to MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise tactics (names only). It supports risk identification under ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 clause 6.1.2 c and clause 8.2, follows the event-based and asset-based approaches described in ISO/IEC 27005:2022, and takes input from threat intelligence (Annex A control A.5.7). Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | DOC-ISMS-018 |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded] |
| Owner | [@isms-manager] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@ciso], [@security-operations-lead], [@it-operations-lead] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (clauses 6.1.2 c, 8.2; Annex A); ISO/IEC 27005:2022; ISO/IEC 27002:2022 |
| External taxonomy | MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v20 (October 2026), tactic names only |
| Inputs | Threat intelligence procedure (DOC-ISMS-045), incident register (DOC-ISMS-021), vulnerability remediation tracker (DOC-ISMS-072), audit findings register (DOC-ISMS-086) |
| Used by | DOC-ISMS-010, DOC-ISMS-016, DOC-ISMS-017 |
| Number of entries | [Sources: 12 / Threat events: 24 / Vulnerabilities: 18] |
| Next scheduled review | YYYY-MM-DD |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISMS manager | [@isms-manager] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| CISO or security lead | [@ciso] | [Approved] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| IT or OT operations representative | [@it-operations-lead] | [Reviewed] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@isms-manager] | First issue for the baseline risk assessment |
| 1.1 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@isms-manager] | Added THR-022 after threat intelligence on data leakage into public AI services; ATT&CK tactic names updated to v20 |
| [x.y] | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | [Change summary and trigger] |
Contents
- 1. Purpose and scope
- 2. How the catalogue is used
- 3. Structure, fields and identifiers
- 4. Threat sources
- 5. Threat events
- 6. Vulnerabilities and conditions
- 7. Building risk scenarios
- 8. Operational technology and sector additions
- 9. Keeping the catalogue current
- 10. Size tiers
- 11. Records and evidence
- 12. References
- Standard and licence note
1. Purpose and scope
The catalogue gives risk assessors a shared, maintained vocabulary of what can go wrong (threat sources and events) and why it could succeed (vulnerabilities and conditions). It makes risk identification under clause 6.1.2 c systematic and repeatable, and means two assessors looking at the same situation reach similar scores (clause 6.1.2 b).
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Covers | [All information, systems, processes, sites, people and suppliers in the ISMS scope (DOC-ISMS-002)] |
| Excludes | [Pure financial and market risks; product quality defects without a security dimension] |
| Who may propose entries | Any risk assessor, control owner, security operations analyst or internal auditor |
| Who approves changes | ISMS manager; CISO for retirements of adversarial events |
| Relationship to the register | Catalogue entries are referenced by ID in risk scenarios; the catalogue holds no scores |
2. How the catalogue is used
| Approach (ISO/IEC 27005:2022) | Starting point | How the catalogue helps | Typical use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Event-based | Risk sources and the events they can cause, at a strategic level | Assessors pick relevant sources (section 4) and events (section 5) and describe the consequences for the business | Annual cycle, first assessment, management workshops |
| Asset-based | Assets from the inventory (DOC-ISMS-012), then threats and vulnerabilities per asset | Assessors pair events (section 5) with vulnerabilities (section 6) that exist on each asset | Critical systems, new services, detailed technical assessments |
Workshop routine (Example):
- Before the workshop, the facilitator filters the catalogue to the asset types and processes in scope.
- Participants confirm which threat events are credible for the scope, add missing ones and say which vulnerabilities exist today.
- The facilitator writes each credible combination as a scenario (section 7) and passes it to scoring under DOC-ISMS-010 and the criteria in DOC-ISMS-015.
- New entries proposed in the workshop go through the change route in section 9.
3. Structure, fields and identifiers
| Prefix | Entry type | Key fields |
|---|---|---|
| SRC-NN | Threat source (who or what causes harm) | Type, capability or nature, motivation where adversarial, relevance |
| THR-NNN | Threat event (what happens) | Source type, typical targets, ATT&CK tactics (adversarial only), properties affected, related Annex A controls, likelihood drivers |
| VUL-NNN | Vulnerability or condition (why it can succeed) | Category, threat events that exploit it, related Annex A controls, how it is detected |
| SCN-NNN | Scenario (combination used in an assessment) | Source, event, vulnerability, asset, consequence, link to risk register ID |
Properties use C (confidentiality), I (integrity) and A (availability).
Annex A references use the control number with a short label written
for this library, consistent with the Statement of Applicability
(compliance/statement-of-applicability). ATT&CK references use tactic
names from ATT&CK Enterprise v20; check the current version on the
MITRE ATT&CK site, because tactic names and counts change between
releases (v20 lists 15 Enterprise tactics, with Stealth (TA0005) and
Defense Impairment (TA0112) where earlier versions had a single
Defense Evasion tactic; map older scenarios accordingly).
4. Threat sources
| ID | Source | Type | Capability or nature | Motivation | Relevant? (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRC-01 | Organised cybercriminal groups | Adversarial, external | High; ransomware and access-broker ecosystems | Financial gain | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-02 | State-sponsored or state-aligned actors | Adversarial, external | Very high; persistent | Espionage, disruption | Yes for Quillmere Group (manufacturing IP); low for others |
| SRC-03 | Hacktivists | Adversarial, external | Low to moderate | Ideology, publicity | Yes: public-facing websites |
| SRC-04 | Malicious insiders (staff, contractors) | Adversarial, internal | Moderate; legitimate access | Grievance, gain | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-05 | Compromised or malicious suppliers | Adversarial, third party | Varies; trusted access | Financial gain, espionage | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-06 | Staff error | Accidental, internal | Everyday mistakes | None | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-07 | Privileged user error | Accidental, internal | High impact per mistake | None | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-08 | Hardware and software failure | Structural | Component faults, defects | None | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-09 | Supplier and cloud service failure | Structural, third party | Outage, insolvency, withdrawal of service | None | Yes: all tiers |
| SRC-10 | Natural hazards and climate-related events | Environmental | Flood, storm, heat, wildfire, earthquake | None | Yes where sites or providers are exposed (see DOC-ISMS-003) |
| SRC-11 | Utility failure | Environmental, structural | Power, cooling, telecommunications | None | Yes: own sites and colocation |
| SRC-12 | Loss of key people | Structural, internal | Departure, illness, single points of knowledge | None | Yes: especially small organisations |
5. Threat events
| ID | Threat event | Source type | Typical targets | ATT&CK tactics (v20, names) | C I A | Related Annex A controls | Likelihood drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THR-001 (Example) | Phishing that captures staff credentials or session tokens | SRC-01, SRC-02 | E-mail, identity provider, SaaS suite | Initial Access, Credential Access | C, I | A.6.3 awareness, A.8.5 secure authentication, A.8.23 web filtering, A.5.17 authentication information | Volume of mail, MFA type, training completion |
| THR-002 (Example) | Ransomware encrypts servers and endpoints | SRC-01 | File servers, virtual machines, backups | Execution, Impact | I, A | A.8.7 malware protection, A.8.13 backup, A.8.8 vulnerability management, A.5.29 security during disruption | Patch latency, backup isolation, EDR coverage |
| THR-003 (Example) | Password spraying or credential stuffing against internet-facing logins | SRC-01 | VPN, admin portals, customer portal | Credential Access, Initial Access | C | A.8.5 secure authentication, A.5.17 authentication information, A.8.16 monitoring | Exposed logins without MFA, reuse of breached passwords |
| THR-004 (Example) | Exploitation of a vulnerability in a public-facing application | SRC-01, SRC-02, SRC-03 | Web applications, APIs, edge devices | Initial Access, Execution | C, I, A | A.8.8 vulnerability management, A.8.26 application security requirements, A.8.29 security testing | Exposure, time to patch, listing in vulnerability catalogues of known exploitation |
| THR-005 (Example) | Business e-mail compromise leading to payment fraud | SRC-01 | Finance staff, supplier master data | Initial Access, Collection, Impact | I | A.6.3 awareness, A.5.3 segregation of duties, A.5.14 information transfer | Payment approval process, mailbox security |
| THR-006 (Example) | Exfiltration of data by a malicious insider | SRC-04 | Customer datasets, source code, designs | Collection, Exfiltration | C | A.6.1 screening, A.5.18 access rights, A.8.12 data leakage prevention, A.8.16 monitoring | Breadth of access, offboarding speed, monitoring of bulk export |
| THR-007 (Example) | Accidental disclosure through misaddressed e-mail or public sharing links | SRC-06 | E-mail, file sharing, collaboration tools | Not applicable (accidental) | C | A.5.14 information transfer, A.5.12 classification, A.8.12 data leakage prevention | Default sharing settings, labelling |
| THR-008 (Example) | Cloud storage or service exposed by misconfiguration | SRC-06, SRC-07 | Object storage, databases, cloud consoles | Discovery, Collection, Exfiltration (when found by an attacker) | C, I | A.8.9 configuration management, A.5.23 cloud service use, A.8.16 monitoring | Infrastructure as code coverage, posture monitoring |
| THR-009 (Example) | Compromise through a supplier or software supply chain | SRC-05 | Build pipeline, third-party libraries, managed service providers | Resource Development, Initial Access | C, I, A | A.5.19 supplier relationships, A.5.21 ICT supply chain, A.5.22 supplier monitoring, A.8.28 secure coding | Supplier access level, dependency management |
| THR-010 (Example) | Regional outage of the cloud service provider | SRC-09 | Production platform | Not applicable | A | A.5.23 cloud service use, A.5.30 ICT readiness, A.8.14 redundancy | Single-region design, failover testing |
| THR-011 (Example) | Failure, withdrawal or insolvency of a critical SaaS supplier | SRC-09 | Ticketing, payroll, CRM, identity provider | Not applicable | A, C | A.5.19 supplier relationships, A.5.22 supplier monitoring, A.5.30 ICT readiness | Concentration, exit plan, data export capability |
| THR-012 (Example) | Distributed denial of service against public services | SRC-01, SRC-03 | Websites, APIs, DNS | Impact | A | A.8.20 network security, A.8.6 capacity management, A.8.14 redundancy | Upstream protection, capacity headroom |
| THR-013 (Example) | Misuse of standing administrator privileges | SRC-04, SRC-07 | Directory, cloud tenant, databases | Privilege Escalation, Persistence | C, I, A | A.8.2 privileged access, A.8.18 privileged utility programs, A.8.15 logging | Number of standing admins, review frequency |
| THR-014 (Example) | Lateral movement after an endpoint compromise | SRC-01, SRC-02 | Internal network, servers | Discovery, Lateral Movement | C, I, A | A.8.22 network segregation, A.8.1 user endpoint devices, A.8.16 monitoring | Flat network, local admin rights |
| THR-015 (Example) | Theft or loss of a laptop or mobile device | SRC-06, SRC-01 | Laptops, phones, removable media | Not applicable | C | A.7.9 assets off-premises, A.8.1 user endpoint devices, A.8.24 cryptography | Travel, remote work, encryption coverage |
| THR-016 (Example) | Hardware or storage failure in an own facility | SRC-08 | On-premises servers, storage arrays, plant controllers | Not applicable | A, I | A.7.13 equipment maintenance, A.8.13 backup, A.8.14 redundancy | Equipment age, maintenance contracts |
| THR-017 (Example) | Fire, flood or extreme weather affecting a site | SRC-10 | Offices, plants, data centre | Not applicable | A | A.7.5 physical and environmental threats, A.5.30 ICT readiness, A.7.11 supporting utilities | Site location, climate exposure in DOC-ISMS-003 |
| THR-018 (Example) | Power or cooling failure | SRC-11 | Server rooms, colocation, data centre | Not applicable | A | A.7.11 supporting utilities, A.8.14 redundancy | Generator and UPS testing, cooling redundancy |
| THR-019 (Example) | Unauthorised physical entry to secure areas | SRC-01, SRC-04 | Offices, comms rooms, plant control rooms | Not applicable | C, I | A.7.1 physical perimeters, A.7.2 physical entry, A.7.4 physical monitoring | Tailgating, visitor process |
| THR-020 (Example) | Erroneous change breaks production or corrupts data | SRC-06, SRC-07 | Applications, infrastructure, databases | Not applicable | I, A | A.8.32 change management, A.8.31 environment separation, A.8.29 security testing | Change volume, automated testing |
| THR-021 (Example) | Disabling or tampering with security tools and logs | SRC-01, SRC-04 | EDR agents, logging pipeline, SIEM | Stealth, Defense Impairment | I | A.8.15 logging, A.8.16 monitoring, A.8.7 malware protection | Tamper protection, log integrity, admin separation |
| THR-022 (Example) | Confidential data entered into public generative AI services | SRC-06 | Customer data, source code, contracts | Not applicable (accidental) | C | A.5.10 acceptable use, A.8.12 data leakage prevention, A.5.23 cloud service use | Approved AI tools, policy awareness |
| THR-023 (Example) | Unauthorised remote access to an OT control network | SRC-01, SRC-02, SRC-05 | Plant remote access, engineering workstations | Initial Access, Lateral Movement | I, A | A.8.22 network segregation, A.8.20 network security, A.8.5 secure authentication, A.5.21 ICT supply chain | Vendor remote access, IT and OT connectivity |
| THR-024 (Example) | Loss of a key person who alone runs a critical process | SRC-12 | Release process, key management, OT engineering | Not applicable | A | A.5.37 documented operating procedures, A.5.2 roles and responsibilities, A.6.3 awareness and training | Team size, documentation, cross-training |
6. Vulnerabilities and conditions
| ID | Vulnerability or condition | Category | Exploited by | Related Annex A controls | How detected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VUL-001 (Example) | Password-only authentication on remote, admin or SaaS access | Technology | THR-001, THR-003, THR-013 | A.8.5 secure authentication | Identity provider reports, access review |
| VUL-002 (Example) | Internet-facing systems not patched within target times | Technology | THR-002, THR-004 | A.8.8 vulnerability management | Vulnerability scans, remediation tracker DOC-ISMS-072 |
| VUL-003 (Example) | Staff not trained to recognise phishing and fraud | People | THR-001, THR-005, THR-007 | A.6.3 awareness, education and training | Training records, phishing simulation results |
| VUL-004 (Example) | Standing privileged access without periodic review | Process | THR-013, THR-014 | A.8.2 privileged access, A.5.18 access rights | Access reviews, privileged account inventory |
| VUL-005 (Example) | Endpoint disks not encrypted on some devices | Technology | THR-015 | A.8.24 cryptography, A.8.1 user endpoint devices | MDM compliance report |
| VUL-006 (Example) | Backups reachable from production credentials or not restore-tested | Technology, process | THR-002, THR-016 | A.8.13 backup | Backup restore test log DOC-ISMS-071 |
| VUL-007 (Example) | Flat internal network without segmentation | Technology | THR-014, THR-023 | A.8.22 network segregation | Network diagrams, firewall rule review |
| VUL-008 (Example) | Logs not collected centrally or not reviewed | Technology | THR-006, THR-021 | A.8.15 logging, A.8.16 monitoring | Log source coverage report |
| VUL-009 (Example) | Cloud and server configuration not baselined, drift undetected | Technology | THR-008, THR-020 | A.8.9 configuration management | Posture management findings |
| VUL-010 (Example) | Supplier engaged without security assessment or contract clauses | Supplier | THR-009, THR-011 | A.5.19 supplier relationships, A.5.20 supplier agreements | Supplier register DOC-ISMS-066 |
| VUL-011 (Example) | Production in a single region or site without tested failover | Technology | THR-010, THR-017, THR-018 | A.8.14 redundancy, A.5.30 ICT readiness | Architecture review, DR test reports |
| VUL-012 (Example) | No data leakage controls on e-mail, sharing or AI services | Technology | THR-006, THR-007, THR-022 | A.8.12 data leakage prevention | DLP coverage report, sharing audit |
| VUL-013 (Example) | Joiner, mover and leaver steps incomplete or late | Process | THR-006, THR-013 | A.5.16 identity lifecycle, A.5.18 access rights | Access review exceptions, HR and IT reconciliation |
| VUL-014 (Example) | Continuity and recovery plans not tested | Process | THR-002, THR-010, THR-017 | A.5.30 ICT readiness, A.5.29 security during disruption | Exercise records, DR test reports |
| VUL-015 (Example) | Weak change control and shared development and production environments | Process | THR-020, THR-009 | A.8.32 change management, A.8.31 environment separation | Change records sample, pipeline review |
| VUL-016 (Example) | Inadequate physical entry control at an office or plant | Physical | THR-019 | A.7.2 physical entry, A.7.4 physical monitoring | Site walk-through, badge log review |
| VUL-017 (Example) | Legacy OT systems that cannot be patched or run unsupported software | Technology (OT) | THR-023, THR-016 | A.8.8 vulnerability management, A.8.22 network segregation | OT asset inventory, vendor support status |
| VUL-018 (Example) | Critical procedures undocumented and known by one person | People, process | THR-024, THR-020 | A.5.37 documented operating procedures | Process maturity review, absence test |
7. Building risk scenarios
| Scenario | Source | Event | Vulnerability | Asset or process | Consequence | Register ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCN-001 (Example) | SRC-01 | THR-001 | VUL-001, VUL-003 | Customer database via staff SaaS accounts | Customer personal data disclosed (C) | R-001 |
| SCN-002 (Example) | SRC-01 | THR-002 | VUL-002, VUL-006 | Production platform and backups | Service unavailable for days, data loss (A, I) | R-006 |
| SCN-003 (Example) | SRC-06 | THR-015 | VUL-005 | Laptop fleet | Local files with customer extracts exposed (C) | R-003 |
| SCN-004 (Example) | SRC-09 | THR-010 | VUL-011 | Analytics platform in the primary region | Platform unavailable beyond contractual service level (A) | R-008 |
| SCN-005 (Example) | SRC-02 | THR-023 | VUL-007, VUL-017 | Plant control network at one site | Production stop and safety risk (I, A) | R-014 |
Rules for scenario writing:
- One scenario per credible combination; merge combinations that would receive the same treatment and owner.
- If no catalogue entry fits, write the scenario anyway and propose the new entry through section 9; do not force a poor match.
- Keep the scenario ID in the register so that a catalogue change can be traced to the risks it affects.
8. Operational technology and sector additions
Where the scope includes operational technology (OT), add or adapt entries for:
- vendor remote access to controllers and engineering workstations (THR-023);
- unsupported operating systems on control systems that cannot be patched without a plant shutdown (VUL-017);
- loss of view or loss of control of a process, with safety consequences that use the safety column of the impact scale in DOC-ISMS-015;
- removable media used to move files into isolated networks;
- dependence on a small number of engineers (THR-024).
MITRE also publishes ATT&CK for ICS, a separate matrix for industrial control systems. Use its tactic names for OT entries if your team already works with it, and record the version used.
Sector extensions in this library: energy (isms/energy-27019-controls),
telecom (isms/telecom-27011-controls), health
(isms/health-27799-controls) and IoT (isms/iot-27400-security).
9. Keeping the catalogue current
| Input | Route | Frequency (Example) |
|---|---|---|
| Threat intelligence items (DOC-ISMS-045) | Triage log; relevant items become new or updated entries | Monthly, and within 5 working days for urgent advisories |
| Incidents and near misses (DOC-ISMS-021) | Post-incident review proposes entries | After each incident review |
| Vulnerability management (DOC-ISMS-072) | Recurring weakness classes become VUL entries | Quarterly |
| Internal and external audit findings (DOC-ISMS-086) | Systemic weaknesses become VUL entries | After each audit |
| Public catalogues of exploited vulnerabilities (for example the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog) and scoring systems (FIRST CVSS v4.0) | Inform likelihood drivers and VUL detection | Continuous through vulnerability management |
| New ATT&CK release | Tactic names checked and updated | At each release (MITRE has issued major versions about twice a year, in April and October) |
Maintenance rules:
- Review the full catalogue at least every [12] months, before the annual risk assessment.
- Retire entries that are no longer credible by setting status "Retired" with a reason; never reuse an ID.
- Record the source of each new entry (advisory, incident, audit).
- When an entry changes, list the affected scenarios and tell their risk owners.
10. Size tiers
| Aspect | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd (Example) | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems (Example) | Large or multi-site: Quillmere Group (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size of catalogue | About 30 entries; OT entries removed | About 45 entries, including clinical data and colocation entries | Group catalogue of about 80 entries plus plant-specific OT annexes |
| Maintainer | Part-time ISMS manager (0.5 FTE) | ISMS manager with the 3-person security team | CISO's security office (14 people); site security coordinators propose additions |
| Intelligence input | Free advisories, cloud provider bulletins, sector mailing lists | Commercial feed plus health sector information sharing | Commercial feeds, sector information sharing, OT vendor advisories |
| Main approach | Event-based for the annual cycle | Event-based plus asset-based for the scheduling platform | Event-based at group level, asset-based per plant and for the data centre |
| Review frequency | Annual, plus after incidents | Semi-annual | Quarterly at group level |
11. Records and evidence
| Record | Proves | Owner | Location (Example) | Retention (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approved catalogue versions | Systematic risk identification (6.1.2 c) | ISMS manager | Document management system, DOC-ISMS-018 | All versions for 3 years |
| Threat intelligence triage log | A.5.7 operating and feeding the catalogue | Security operations lead | Ticketing system | 3 years |
| Change requests for entries | Controlled updates with sources | ISMS manager | Ticketing system | 3 years |
| Scenario lists in assessment reports | Catalogue used in assessments (8.2) | ISMS manager | DOC-ISMS-017 | 3 years |
| Notifications to risk owners | Affected risks reassessed | ISMS manager | E-mail or ticket records | 3 years |
12. References
| Reference | Edition or version | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 | 3rd edition 2022; Amd 1 2024-02-23 | Clauses 6.1.2 c, 8.2; Annex A control numbers |
| ISO/IEC 27002:2022 | 3rd edition | Control purpose and guidance, including A.5.7 threat intelligence |
| ISO/IEC 27005:2022 | 4th edition | Event-based and asset-based approaches, risk sources |
| MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise | v20, October 2026 | Tactic names for adversarial events |
| NIST SP 800-30 Rev. 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments | September 2012 | Free reference for threat source types |
| FIRST Common Vulnerability Scoring System | Version 4.0 | Vulnerability severity input |
| CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | Live catalogue, checked November 2026 | Evidence of active exploitation |
Related templates: compliance/risk-methodology,
isms/isms-risk-appetite-criteria, compliance/risk-register,
isms/isms-risk-assessment-report, isms/threat-intelligence-procedure,
compliance/asset-inventory, isms/vulnerability-remediation-tracker,
security/threat-model, compliance/statement-of-applicability.
Official text: https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html, https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html, https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html.
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (clauses 6.1.2 c and 8.2, Annex A control numbers), ISO/IEC 27002:2022 and ISO/IEC 27005:2022. All entries, descriptions, short control labels and examples are original text written for this template; no ISO or IEC text is reproduced, and you need the official standards to interpret the requirements. MITRE ATT&CK tactic names are cited as names only; ATT&CK is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation. NIST, CISA and FIRST publications are cited by name and version. Check the current editions and versions before use.
Template licence: MIT.
संबंधित टेम्पलेट
Threat Intelligence Procedure Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.7)
Threat intelligence for A.5.7: strategic, tactical, operational levels, requirements, sources, lifecycle, prioritisation, TLP, actions, log, metrics
ISMS और ISO/IEC 27001Vulnerability Remediation Tracker Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.8)
Remediation service levels from CVSS v4.0, EPSS and CISA KEV, tracker fields, finding register, lifecycle, exceptions, on-time metrics
ISMS और ISO/IEC 27001Access Control Policy Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.15)
Access principles, role catalogue, joiner mover leaver SLAs, MFA and NIST SP 800-63B-4 password rules, privileged and service accounts, reviews, metrics