Compliance Management System Manual Template (ISO 37301)
CMS manual: scope, obligations register, compliance risk assessment, policy and roles, controls, concerns and investigations, KPIs, audit, review
Cara menggunakan: Use it to set up or document an organisation-wide compliance management system, with or without ISO 37301 certification. Fill the scope and the obligations register first, because every risk, control and indicator should trace back to an obligation. The main pitfall is a list of law names with no link to the activities, owners and controls that make them happen.
Pratinjau
Compliance Management System Manual: [Organisation name]
Manual for an organisation-wide compliance management system (CMS): scope and context, the register of compliance obligations, the compliance risk assessment, governance and the compliance function, controls and procedures, raising concerns and investigations, indicators, reporting, audit, review and improvement. Structure aligned with ISO 37301:2021, Compliance management systems, Requirements with guidance for use (first edition, April 2021, with Amendment 1:2024 on climate action changes), a certifiable standard that replaced the ISO 19600 guidance. Clause numbers are cited; the wording is original and the standard's text is not reproduced. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a documentation format, not legal advice; check the current official texts and consult a qualified professional.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [CMS-MAN-001] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / Approved / Under revision] |
| Owner | [@chief-compliance-officer] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [Governing body or its committee], [@ceo], [@general-counsel] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
| Organisation and entities in scope | [Legal entities] |
| Standard edition | ISO 37301:2021 with Amd 1:2024 |
| Certification status | [Not certified / Certification planned YYYY / Certified by [body], certificate [number]] |
| Next review | YYYY-MM-DD |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief compliance officer | [@cco] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Top management | [@ceo] | [Approved] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Governing body (audit and risk committee) | [Chair] | [Approved compliance policy, section 4.2] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@cco] | First draft from obligations and risk workshops |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@cco] | Approved by the governing body |
Contents
- Context and scope (clause 4.1 to 4.4)
- Compliance obligations (clause 4.5)
- Compliance risk assessment (clause 4.6)
- Leadership, policy and roles (clause 5)
- Planning (clause 6)
- Support (clause 7)
- Operation (clause 8)
- Performance evaluation (clause 9)
- Improvement (clause 10)
- Traceability matrix
- Glossary and references
1. Context and scope (clause 4.1 to 4.4)
1.1 Issues
| Issue ID | Internal or external | Issue | Effect on compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISS-01 (Example) | External | Expansion into markets with high perceived corruption risk through sales agents | Bribery and sanctions exposure |
| ISS-02 (Example) | External | Tighter enforcement of road transport working-time rules | Driver hours and tachograph compliance |
| ISS-03 (Example) | Internal | Driver telematics project collecting location data | Data protection obligations |
| ISS-04 (Example) | External | Climate change: customer emissions reporting requests and low-emission zone rules | New contractual and regulatory obligations |
| [ISS-NN] | [Internal / External] | [issue] | [effect] |
1.2 Interested parties
| Party | Relevant needs and expectations | Will the CMS address them? |
|---|---|---|
| Regulators and enforcement bodies (Example) | Lawful operation, cooperation, self-reporting where required | Yes |
| Customers (Example) | Supplier code of conduct, audit rights, emissions data | Yes, through contracts |
| Employees and drivers (Example) | Safe working hours, fair treatment, safe channels to raise concerns | Yes |
| Lenders and insurers (Example) | Sanctions and anti-corruption covenants | Yes |
| [Party] | [needs] | [Yes / No, reason] |
1.3 Scope statement
[Organisation] applies this CMS to [entities, sites, activities and business relationships], covering the compliance obligations in section 2. Excluded: [exclusions and reasons].
Example: Orlinde Logistics Group applies this CMS to all group companies, their road freight, warehousing and freight forwarding activities, and to sales agents and subcontracted hauliers acting for the group. No exclusions.
1.4 Elements of the CMS
The CMS consists of this manual, the obligations register (section 2), the compliance risk register (section 3), the compliance policy (section 4.2), the procedures listed in section 7, and the records listed in section 6.5. Good governance principles guide it: the compliance function has direct access to the governing body, works independently of operational management, and has the authority and resources to do its job.
2. Compliance obligations (clause 4.5)
| Obligation ID | Source (dated) | Type | Activity concerned | Obligation owner | Change monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OB-001 (Example) | Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), applies from 25 May 2018 | Requirement | Processing of employee, driver and customer contact data, telematics | [@dpo] | Supervisory authority and EDPB publications, monthly |
| OB-002 (Example) | Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 on driving times, breaks and rest periods, as amended (including by Regulation (EU) 2020/1054) | Requirement | Scheduling and driving in EU operations | [@head-of-fleet] | Commission transport pages, quarterly |
| OB-003 (Example) | UK Bribery Act 2010, section 7 (failure of a commercial organisation to prevent bribery) | Requirement | Sales agents, customs brokers, public contracts | [@cco] | Legal counsel bulletin, quarterly |
| OB-004 (Example) | Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law, as transposed in each Member State | Requirement | Internal reporting channel and protection from retaliation | [@cco] | National transposition tracker, yearly |
| OB-005 (Example) | EU, UK and US sanctions lists and the regulations behind them | Requirement | Customer, consignee and agent onboarding, shipments | [@trade-compliance-lead] | Screening tool list updates, daily |
| OB-006 (Example) | Customer supplier codes of conduct (key accounts) | Commitment | All services to those customers | [@key-account-director] | Contract review at renewal |
| OB-007 (Example) | Group commitment to report scope 1 and 2 emissions to customers | Commitment | Fleet and warehouse energy data | [@sustainability-lead] | Annual |
| [OB-NNN] | [source and date] | [Requirement / Commitment] | [activity] | [@owner] | [how and how often] |
For each obligation, keep the analysis of what it means for the
organisation (the specific duties, deadlines and records) in the legal
register (compliance/legal-register) or in the policy that implements
it. When an obligation changes, record the change, assess its effect on
section 3 and update controls in section 7 (clause 6.3, planning of
changes).
3. Compliance risk assessment (clause 4.6)
3.1 Method
The scale is an example written for this template. Replace it with the
method in compliance/risk-methodology where one exists.
| Score | Likelihood (next 12 months) | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rare | Negligible: no regulatory interest, no harm |
| 2 | Unlikely | Minor: local finding, quick fix |
| 3 | Possible | Moderate: regulator inquiry, customer complaint, limited harm |
| 4 | Likely | Major: penalty, contract loss, harm to people |
| 5 | Almost certain | Severe: prosecution, licence loss, debarment, serious harm |
Risk score = likelihood x consequence. Bands: 1 to 5 low, 6 to 12 medium, 15 to 25 high. High residual risks need a treatment plan approved by top management; medium residual risks need an owner and monitoring.
3.2 Compliance risk register
| Risk ID | Obligation | Risk (cause and event) | Inherent L x C | Inherent score | Key controls | Residual L x C | Residual score | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR-01 (Example) | OB-003 | Sales agent pays a customs official to clear goods faster | 3 x 5 | 15 high | CTL-01, CTL-02, CTL-07 | 2 x 5 | 10 medium | [@cco] |
| CR-02 (Example) | OB-001 | Telematics data used to monitor drivers beyond the stated purpose | 3 x 4 | 12 medium | CTL-03, CTL-07 | 2 x 3 | 6 medium | [@dpo] |
| CR-03 (Example) | OB-002 | Schedules force drivers to exceed daily driving limits | 4 x 4 | 16 high | CTL-04 | 2 x 4 | 8 medium | [@head-of-fleet] |
| CR-04 (Example) | OB-005 | Shipment for a consignee linked to a sanctioned person | 2 x 5 | 10 medium | CTL-05 | 1 x 5 | 5 low | [@trade-compliance-lead] |
| CR-05 (Example) | OB-006 | Subcontracted haulier breaches customer labour standards | 2 x 4 | 8 medium | CTL-06 | 1 x 4 | 4 low | [@procurement-lead] |
| CR-06 (Example) | OB-004 | Reporter suffers retaliation after raising a concern | 2 x 3 | 6 medium | CTL-08 | 1 x 3 | 3 low | [@cco] |
| [CR-NN] | [OB-NNN] | [risk] | [L x C] | [score] | [controls] | [L x C] | [score] | [@owner] |
In the example, two inherent risks are high (CR-01 at 15 and CR-03 at 16). After controls, no residual risk is high; three are medium and need monitoring (CR-01, CR-02, CR-03) and three are low.
Reassessment triggers: new market or business line, acquisition, new obligation or significant change to one, a compliance failure, a substantiated report under section 7.3, and at least once a year.
4. Leadership, policy and roles (clause 5)
4.1 Leadership, culture and governance (clause 5.1)
| Expectation | How it is met | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Governing body oversees the CMS | Audit and risk committee receives the compliance report each quarter and approves the policy yearly | Committee minutes |
| Top management shows commitment | CEO sponsors training, signs the compliance policy, includes compliance in leadership objectives | Signed policy, objectives |
| Compliance culture | Annual staff survey questions on speaking up; compliance behaviour in performance reviews | Survey results, review form |
| Independence and access of the compliance function | CCO reports to the CEO with a direct line to the committee chair; private session with the committee yearly | Organisation chart, minutes |
4.2 Compliance policy (clause 5.2)
The compliance policy is a short document, approved by the governing body, that:
- states the organisation's commitment to meet its compliance obligations and to continually improve the CMS;
- sets the framework for compliance objectives (section 5);
- describes the authority and independence of the compliance function;
- explains how to raise concerns and the protection against retaliation;
- states the consequences of not complying with the policy and procedures.
Location: [link to the controlled policy document].
4.3 Roles and responsibilities (clause 5.3)
| Activity | Governing body | Top management | Compliance function | Managers | All personnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approve compliance policy | A | R | C | I | I |
| Maintain obligations register | I | A | R | C | I |
| Assess compliance risk | I | A | R | R | C |
| Operate controls in business processes | I | A | C | R | R |
| Raise concerns | I | I | R (receive) | R | R |
| Report CMS performance | I (receives) | A | R | C | I |
R responsible, A accountable, C consulted, I informed.
Compliance function: [name and role], with [n] staff, budget [amount], access to all records and people needed, and authority to stop or escalate an activity that would breach an obligation.
5. Planning (clause 6)
5.1 Actions on risks and opportunities (clause 6.1)
| Action ID | Risk or opportunity | Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA-01 (Example) | CR-01 | Re-run due diligence on all agents in new markets with enhanced questionnaire | [@cco] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| PA-02 (Example) | CR-03 | Integrate driving-time rules into the route planning tool so plans that breach them cannot be issued | [@head-of-fleet] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| PA-03 (Example) | Opportunity: shared screening tool for sanctions and agent checks | Consolidate tools | [@trade-compliance-lead] | YYYY-MM-DD |
5.2 Compliance objectives (clause 6.2)
| Objective ID | Objective | Indicator | Target | Owner | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBJ-01 (Example) | All high-risk third parties have current due diligence | Share of agents with due diligence under 24 months old | 100 percent | [@cco] | Quarterly |
| OBJ-02 (Example) | Reduce driving-time infringements | Infringements per 1,000 driver days from tachograph analysis | Below [target] | [@head-of-fleet] | Monthly |
| OBJ-03 (Example) | People know how to raise concerns | Share of staff survey respondents who know the reporting channel | 90 percent or more | [@cco] | Yearly |
5.3 Planning of changes (clause 6.3)
Before changing the CMS (new procedure, new tool, reorganisation of the compliance function), record the purpose, the consequences, the resources needed and who is responsible, and confirm that controls stay in place during the change.
6. Support (clause 7)
6.1 Resources (clause 7.1)
[Budget, headcount, external advisers, tools for screening, case management and training.]
6.2 Competence, employment process and training (clause 7.2)
| Role group | Exposure | Employment controls | Training | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales and agent managers (Example) | High: bribery, sanctions | Background check before hire; compliance objective in reviews | Anti-bribery and sanctions, face to face with case studies | Yearly |
| Fleet planners and drivers (Example) | High: driving time | Licence and infringement history check | Driving-time rules, fatigue | Yearly, and on rule change |
| Data and telematics staff (Example) | Medium: data protection | Confidentiality undertaking | Data protection by design | Yearly |
| All staff (Example) | General | Acknowledge code of conduct | Code of conduct, speaking up | At hire and yearly |
Disciplinary consequences for breaches of the compliance policy follow [the disciplinary procedure], applied consistently at every level.
6.3 Awareness (clause 7.3)
Personnel should know the compliance policy, how their work affects compliance obligations, the consequences of not complying, and how to raise a concern. Measure awareness through OBJ-03 and spot checks.
6.4 Communication (clause 7.4)
| What | Who to | How | When | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance policy and code | All personnel, agents | Intranet, agent onboarding pack | At hire or appointment, yearly | [@cco] |
| Compliance report | Governing body | Committee paper | Quarterly | [@cco] |
| Supplier expectations | Hauliers and agents | Contract clauses, supplier code | At contract | [@procurement-lead] |
| [What] | [audience] | [channel] | [timing] | [@owner] |
6.5 Documented information (clause 7.5)
| Record | System | Retention | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obligations register | [GRC tool] | Current plus [n] years of versions | [@cco] |
| Risk register and assessments | [GRC tool] | [n] years | [@cco] |
| Due diligence files | [Case system] | [n] years after relationship ends | [@cco] |
| Concerns and investigation files | [Case system, restricted] | [n] years, subject to data protection law | [@cco] |
| Training records | [Learning platform] | [n] years | [@people-lead] |
Control documents through compliance/controlled-document.
7. Operation (clause 8)
7.1 Operational planning and control (clause 8.1)
Compliance controls are built into the processes that create the risk: agent appointment, route planning, data projects, onboarding of customers and consignees, and supplier contracting. Outsourced processes stay under the organisation's control through contract clauses and monitoring.
7.2 Controls and procedures (clause 8.2)
| Control ID | Control | Type | Frequency | Owner | Evidence | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTL-01 (Example) | Risk-based due diligence and approval before appointing any sales agent or customs broker | Preventive | Per appointment, refreshed every 24 months | [@cco] | Due diligence file, approval record | CR-01 |
| CTL-02 (Example) | Anti-bribery clauses with audit and termination rights in agent contracts | Preventive | Per contract | [@general-counsel] | Contract register | CR-01 |
| CTL-03 (Example) | DPIA and purpose limitation settings before telematics data use | Preventive | Per project and change | [@dpo] | DPIA, configuration record | CR-02 |
| CTL-04 (Example) | Route planning blocks plans that breach driving-time limits; weekly tachograph infringement review | Preventive and detective | Continuous; weekly | [@head-of-fleet] | Tool configuration, review log | CR-03 |
| CTL-05 (Example) | Sanctions screening of customers, consignees and agents at onboarding and on list update | Preventive | Per onboarding; daily rescreen | [@trade-compliance-lead] | Screening logs, alert dispositions | CR-04 |
| CTL-06 (Example) | Supplier code acceptance and risk-based audits of subcontracted hauliers | Preventive and detective | Per contract; yearly audits | [@procurement-lead] | Signed codes, audit reports | CR-05 |
| CTL-07 (Example) | Quarterly compliance monitoring of payments to agents and of telematics access logs | Detective | Quarterly | [@cco] | Monitoring report | CR-01, CR-02 |
| CTL-08 (Example) | Confidential reporting channel with anti-retaliation monitoring of reporters for 12 months | Preventive and detective | Continuous | [@cco] | Case system, monitoring notes | CR-06 |
| [CTL-NN] | [control] | [type] | [frequency] | [@owner] | [evidence] | [CR-NN] |
7.3 Raising concerns (clause 8.3)
| Element | Design |
|---|---|
| Channels | [Web and phone channel run by an independent provider, email to the compliance function, in person] |
| Who can report | Personnel, agents, suppliers, customers, and others in a work-related relationship |
| Anonymity and confidentiality | [Anonymous reports accepted; identity shared only on a need-to-know basis] |
| Protection | No retaliation; reported retaliation is itself investigated (CTL-08) |
| Acknowledgement and feedback | [Timelines set by the applicable whistleblowing law and the policy in compliance/whistleblowing-policy] |
7.4 Investigation processes (clause 8.4)
- Triage each concern within [n] working days: in scope, urgency, conflicts of interest of potential investigators.
- Appoint an investigator who is independent of the area concerned and competent for the subject.
- Plan the investigation: questions, evidence, interviews, legal privilege, data protection, preservation of records.
- Report findings to the decision maker named in the investigation procedure, and record the outcome and remediation.
- Feed root causes into section 9 (corrective action) and section 3 (risk reassessment).
- Report numbers and themes, without identifying reporters, to the governing body (section 8.2).
Use compliance/fraud-investigation-report for the investigation
report format.
8. Performance evaluation (clause 9)
8.1 Monitoring and indicators (clause 9.1)
| Indicator ID | Indicator | Source of feedback | Type | Threshold | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPI-01 (Example) | Agents with due diligence under 24 months old | Due diligence system | Leading | Below 100 percent triggers escalation | [@cco] |
| KPI-02 (Example) | Driving-time infringements per 1,000 driver days | Tachograph analysis | Lagging | Above [target] for two months | [@head-of-fleet] |
| KPI-03 (Example) | Concerns raised per 100 employees, and share substantiated | Case system | Lagging | Sharp fall or rise investigated | [@cco] |
| KPI-04 (Example) | Sanctions alerts cleared within service level | Screening tool | Leading | Below 95 percent | [@trade-compliance-lead] |
| KPI-05 (Example) | Overdue corrective actions | CAPA log | Leading | Any action more than 30 days overdue | [@cco] |
8.2 Compliance reporting (clause 9.1)
The compliance function reports to top management monthly and to the governing body quarterly. Each report covers: changes to obligations, risk register movements, indicator results against thresholds, concerns and investigations (anonymised), noncompliance and corrective actions, training completion and resource needs. Material noncompliance is escalated to the committee chair without waiting for the quarterly report.
8.3 Internal audit (clause 9.2)
Audit the CMS against this manual and ISO 37301 on a risk-based
programme so that each clause and each high inherent risk is covered at
least every [n] years. Keep auditors independent of the areas they
audit. Use compliance/internal-audit-program for the programme.
8.4 Management review (clause 9.3)
Top management reviews the CMS at least yearly and the governing body
reviews the results. Inputs: status of previous actions, changes in
issues and obligations, performance against objectives and indicators,
audit results, concerns and investigations, nonconformities and
corrective actions, adequacy of resources, opportunities for
improvement. Outputs: decisions on improvement, changes to the CMS and
resources. Record it with compliance/management-review.
9. Improvement (clause 10)
9.1 Continual improvement (clause 10.1)
Sources of improvement: indicator trends, audit findings, investigation root causes, regulatory enforcement in the sector, feedback from interested parties and benchmarking. Improvements are prioritised in the management review.
9.2 Nonconformity, noncompliance and corrective action (clause 10.2)
| NC ID | Source | Description | Immediate correction | Root cause | Corrective action | Owner | Due | Effectiveness check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-01 (Example) | Internal audit | Two agents in a new market appointed without completed due diligence | Payments suspended pending due diligence | Regional office unaware of CTL-01 | Block agent set-up in the supplier system until approval is recorded | [@cco] | YYYY-MM-DD | KPI-01 at 100 percent for two quarters |
| [NC-NN] | [source] | [description] | [correction] | [cause] | [action] | [@owner] | YYYY-MM-DD | [check] |
Record details in compliance/capa-nonconformity.
10. Traceability matrix
| Obligation | Risk | Controls | Indicators or monitoring | Objective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OB-001 (Example) | CR-02 | CTL-03, CTL-07 | CTL-07 quarterly report | [None yet] |
| OB-002 (Example) | CR-03 | CTL-04 | KPI-02 | OBJ-02 |
| OB-003 (Example) | CR-01 | CTL-01, CTL-02, CTL-07 | KPI-01 | OBJ-01 |
| OB-004 (Example) | CR-06 | CTL-08 | KPI-03 | OBJ-03 |
| OB-005 (Example) | CR-04 | CTL-05 | KPI-04 | [None yet] |
| OB-006 (Example) | CR-05 | CTL-06 | Haulier audit results | [None yet] |
| OB-007 (Example) | [Not yet assessed] | [None yet] | [None yet] | [None yet] |
In the example, OB-007 (the emissions reporting commitment) has no risk assessment yet: add it at the next reassessment.
11. Glossary and references
11.1 Glossary
| Term | Meaning in this template |
|---|---|
| Compliance obligation | A requirement the organisation must meet, or a commitment it chooses to meet |
| Compliance requirement | An obligation the organisation has no choice about, such as a law |
| Compliance commitment | An obligation the organisation chooses, such as a contract term or voluntary code |
| Compliance risk | The likelihood and consequences of not meeting compliance obligations |
| Noncompliance | Not meeting a compliance obligation |
| Nonconformity | Not meeting a requirement of the CMS itself |
| Compliance function | The people with responsibility and authority for operating the CMS |
| Governing body | The board or equivalent group with ultimate accountability |
11.2 Clause map
| ISO 37301:2021 clause | Topic (short paraphrase) | Section here |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 to 4.4 | Context, interested parties, scope, the CMS | 1 |
| 4.5 | Compliance obligations | 2 |
| 4.6 | Compliance risk assessment | 3 |
| 5.1 | Leadership and commitment, culture, governance | 4.1 |
| 5.2 | Compliance policy | 4.2 |
| 5.3 | Roles, responsibilities and authorities | 4.3 |
| 6.1 to 6.3 | Risks and opportunities, objectives, planning of changes | 5 |
| 7.1 to 7.5 | Resources, competence, awareness, communication, documented information | 6 |
| 8.1 to 8.4 | Operational control, controls and procedures, raising concerns, investigations | 7 |
| 9.1 to 9.3 | Monitoring and reporting, internal audit, management review | 8 |
| 10.1 to 10.2 | Continual improvement, nonconformity and corrective action | 9 |
11.3 References
| Reference | Edition or date | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 37301, Compliance management systems, Requirements with guidance for use | First edition, 2021-04; Amendment 1:2024 (climate action changes); ISO lists it as reviewed and confirmed in 2026 | Structure and clause references |
| ISO 37001, Anti-bribery management systems | 2025 | Anti-bribery detail, see compliance/iso-37001-anti-bribery |
| ISO 37002, Whistleblowing management systems | 2021 | Guidance for section 7.3 |
| Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) | Applies from 25 May 2018 | Example obligation OB-001 |
| Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, as amended | Check the consolidated text on EUR-Lex | Example obligation OB-002 |
| UK Bribery Act 2010 | Section 7 | Example obligation OB-003 |
| Directive (EU) 2019/1937 | 23 October 2019, transposition deadline 17 December 2021 | Example obligation OB-004 |
| US Department of Justice, Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs | Check the current version on justice.gov | Optional benchmark for programme effectiveness questions |
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO 37301:2021, Compliance management systems, Requirements with guidance for use (first edition, April 2021, with Amendment 1:2024, climate action changes). ISO lists the standard as reviewed and confirmed in 2026. Clause numbers and topics are cited from public summaries and the ISO catalogue; confirm subclause numbering in your licensed copy. This template is original text written for this collection and reproduces no text from the standard. The laws in the example are dated EU, UK and US illustrations, not a statement of what applies to any organisation; check the current official texts. The organisation, people and figures are fictional. This is a documentation format, not legal advice; consult a qualified professional.
Official text: ISO, purchase or licensed access: https://www.iso.org/standard/75080.html (also available from national standards bodies).
Template licence: MIT.
Templat terkait
DORA ICT Risk Management Framework Template
DORA ICT risk management framework: Article 5 governance, Article 6(8) strategy, risk tolerance, RTS 2024/1774 policy map, review report, traceability
ISO & KepatuhanICFR Management Assessment Template (SOX 404(a), Item 308)
SOX 404(a) ICFR assessment: filer status, framework, materiality, scoping, entity-level controls, ITGC, SOC 1, testing plan, deficiencies, management report
ISO & KepatuhanManagement Review Minutes Template
Management review minutes: inputs mapped to ISO 9001:2026, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and 42001:2023, conclusions, results, action log