Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Template (Scope 1, 2, 3)
Scope 1, 2, 3 inventory: boundaries, base year and recalculation, activity data and factors, dual Scope 2, Scope 3 screening, controls, disclosure mapping
Cara menggunakan: Use it when you build or refresh an organisation's annual greenhouse gas inventory for ESRS, ISSB or customer reporting. Fill the boundary, base year policy and factor table first, then the scope sections. The main pitfall is presenting a factor or method change as a real reduction.
Pratinjau
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory: [Organisation name] [Reporting year]
An inventory management plan and annual inventory report for an organisation's Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The structure is aligned with the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition, 2004), the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance (2015) and the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard (2011), and with ISO 14064-1:2018. GHG Protocol is revising its standards (the Scope 2 consultation ran from 2025-10-20 to 2026-01-31), so check which editions are in force for your period. The outputs map to ESRS E1 and IFRS S2 climate metrics. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a documentation format, not legal, financial, accounting or assurance advice: check the current official texts and a qualified professional.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [GHG-YYYY] Example: GHG-2026 |
| Organisation | [Legal name of the reporting parent] Example: Quillfen Packaging Group N.V. and subsidiaries |
| Reporting period | [YYYY-01-01 to YYYY-12-31] Example: FY2026, aligned with the financial statements |
| Base year | [YYYY] Example: 2024, recalculated for the 2026 acquisition (section 4) |
| Consolidation approach | [Operational control / Financial control / Equity share] Example: Financial control |
| Standards applied | [GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, Scope 2 Guidance, Scope 3 Standard / ISO 14064-1:2018 / both] |
| Disclosure frameworks served | [ESRS E1 / IFRS S2 or a jurisdictional version / UK SECR / other] |
| GWP source | [IPCC AR5 / AR6, 100-year values] Example: AR6 100-year values (illustrative figures in this example) |
| Assurance | [None / Limited / Reasonable; ISSA 5000, ISAE 3410 or ISO 14064-3] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved] |
| Owner | [@ghg-inventory-lead] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@head-of-sustainability], [@cfo], [@audit-committee-chair] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal until published] |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| GHG inventory lead | [@name] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Head of sustainability | [@name] | [Reviewed method and boundary] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Chief Financial Officer | [@name] | [Confirmed consistency with financial consolidation] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Audit committee | [@name] | [Approved for publication] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | First draft of the inventory management plan |
| 0.2 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | FY data loaded, base year recalculated |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | Approved after assurance |
Contents
- Reporting basis and frameworks
- Organisational boundary
- Operational boundary and scopes
- Base year and recalculation policy
- Activity data and emission factors
- Scope 1 emissions
- Scope 2 emissions
- Scope 3 emissions
- Inventory summary, intensity and trend
- Data quality, uncertainty and controls
- Verification and assurance
- Disclosure mapping
- Glossary and references
1. Reporting basis and frameworks
The inventory serves several users at once: the annual sustainability statement, investor and lender reporting, customer questionnaires and the tracking of the targets in the climate transition plan. One set of boundaries and methods should feed all of them, with a mapping table (section 12) where a framework asks for a different cut.
| Driver | Instrument (as of 2026-10, check the current text) | Applies? |
|---|---|---|
| EU sustainability reporting | CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) as amended by Directive (EU) 2026/470; ESRS E1 in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 as amended by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 | [Yes / No / Voluntary] Example: Voluntary for FY2026; Quillfen expects to be in scope from FY2027 (above 1,000 employees and EUR 450 million net turnover, check the transposing law) |
| ISSB-based disclosure | IFRS S2 (June 2023) and the amendments on GHG emissions issued 2025-12-11, effective 2027-01-01, or a jurisdictional version | [Yes / No] Example: Lender reporting on an IFRS S2 basis |
| UK energy and carbon reporting | Companies (Directors' Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and Carbon Report) Regulations 2018 (SECR) | [Yes / No] Example: Yes, for the UK subsidiary as a large unquoted company |
| US state law | California Health and Safety Code section 38532 (SB 253, as amended), Scope 1, 2 and later Scope 3 reporting for entities with total annual revenue above USD 1 billion doing business in California | [Yes / No] Example: Not in scope (group revenue below the threshold) |
| Targets | Climate Transition Plan targets; SBTi validation if sought | [Yes / No] Example: Yes, base year 2024 |
| Customers | Questionnaires and product carbon footprint requests | [List] |
Accounting standards applied: [GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (revised edition), Scope 2 Guidance (2015), Scope 3 Standard (2011)] and [ISO 14064-1:2018]. Where a jurisdiction requires a different method for part of the inventory, record it here and show the bridge in section 12.
Example: Quillfen applies the three GHG Protocol documents and reports its conformity with ISO 14064-1:2018 categories as a secondary view, because two retail customers ask for it.
2. Organisational boundary
The organisational boundary decides which operations are in the inventory and at what percentage. The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (chapter 3) offers an equity share approach and two control approaches (financial and operational); ISO 14064-1:2018 (clause 5.1) offers control or equity share. ESRS E1 as amended in 2026 takes financial control as the starting point and allows equity share or operational control as alternatives, with Scope 1 and 2 split between the consolidated accounting group and other operations: check the adopted text of the disclosure requirement on gross emissions.
| Entity ID | Legal entity | Country | Ownership | Financial control? | Operational control? | Inclusion | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENT-01 (Example) | Quillfen Packaging Group N.V. | Netherlands | Parent | Yes | Yes | 100% | Head office and Zwolle plant |
| ENT-02 (Example) | Quillfen Polska sp. z o.o. | Poland | 100% | Yes | Yes | 100% | Lodz corrugated plant |
| ENT-03 (Example) | Quillfen UK Ltd | UK | 100% | Yes | Yes | 100% | Leeds flexible packaging plant |
| ENT-04 (Example) | Quillfen Packaging Inc. | US | 100% | Yes | Yes | 100% | Ohio plant |
| ENT-05 (Example) | Quillfen Iberia S.L. | Spain | 100% from 2026-07-01 | Yes | Yes | 100% from acquisition date | Zaragoza plant, see RC-001 |
| ENT-06 (Example) | Pulpwick Recovery Joint Venture B.V. | Netherlands | 40% | No | No | 0% in Scopes 1 and 2; equity share in Scope 3 category 15 | Joint venture, equity accounted |
Leased assets: [state whether leased buildings and vehicles are treated as owned (Scope 1 and 2) or as Scope 3 category 8 or 13, consistent with the chosen approach]. Example: Leased warehouses under the control of Quillfen are in Scopes 1 and 2.
Consistency check with the financial statements: [list differences between the GHG boundary and the consolidation perimeter and why]. Example: None, apart from the joint venture which is equity accounted in both.
3. Operational boundary and scopes
The operational boundary assigns each source to Scope 1 (direct), Scope 2 (purchased electricity, steam, heat and cooling) or Scope 3 (other indirect value-chain emissions). The Corporate Standard covers this in chapter 4; ISO 14064-1:2018 uses six categories in clause 5.2 (direct; indirect from imported energy; transportation; products used by the organisation; use of products from the organisation; other sources), which map onto the three scopes.
| Source ID | Source | Gases | Scope | ISO 14064-1 category | Included? | Reason if excluded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRC-01 (Example) | Natural gas in boilers and dryers | CO2, CH4, N2O | 1 | 1 | Yes | |
| SRC-02 (Example) | Diesel in owned delivery fleet | CO2, CH4, N2O | 1 | 1 | Yes | |
| SRC-03 (Example) | LPG in forklifts | CO2, CH4, N2O | 1 | 1 | Yes | |
| SRC-04 (Example) | Refrigerant leakage from chillers | HFCs | 1 | 1 | Yes | |
| SRC-05 (Example) | Fire suppression system | HFCs | 1 | 1 | No | No discharge in the year; below 0.1% when tested |
| SRC-06 (Example) | Purchased electricity | CO2 (factor basis) | 2 | 2 | Yes | |
| SRC-07 (Example) | Purchased paperboard, polymer films, inks | All | 3 (cat. 1) | 4 | Yes | |
| SRC-08 (Example) | End-of-life of sold packaging | CO2, CH4 | 3 (cat. 12) | 5 | Yes |
Biogenic CO2 from burning wood residues: [report separately outside the scopes, as the GHG Protocol and ESRS E1 expect]. Example: Not applicable; no biomass combustion on site.
Exclusion threshold: [state the materiality rule]. Example: A source may be excluded only if it is estimated below 0.5% of total Scope 1 and 2, the total of exclusions stays below 2%, and the estimate is documented each year.
4. Base year and recalculation policy
The base year is the reference against which targets and trends are measured. Chapter 5 of the Corporate Standard and the base-year provisions of ISO 14064-1:2018 (clause 6) expect a documented recalculation policy covering structural changes (acquisitions, divestments, outsourcing and insourcing), changes in calculation method or in the accuracy of factors, and the discovery of significant errors. The significance threshold is a choice of the organisation: write it down.
| Policy element | Decision |
|---|---|
| Base year | [YYYY and reason] Example: 2024, the first year with complete Scope 3 data |
| Type | [Fixed / rolling] Example: Fixed |
| Triggers | [Structural change / methodology or factor change / error] |
| Significance threshold | [Percentage and measure] Example: 5% of base-year Scope 1 and 2 (market-based) or 5% of base-year Scope 3, cumulative per trigger type |
| Organic growth or decline | Never a trigger |
| Acquired operations with no base-year data | [Estimate method] Example: Seller's metered energy data for 2024 plus Quillfen factor set |
| Change ID | Date | Description | Type | Effect on base year | Above threshold? | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC-001 (Example) | 2026-07-01 | Acquisition of the Zaragoza plant (ENT-05) | Structural | Scope 1 +2,100; Scope 2 market +1,320, location +1,050; Scope 3 +15,400 tCO2e | Yes: 3,420 of 58,700 = 5.8% of Scope 1 and 2; 15,400 of 291,000 = 5.3% of Scope 3 | Recalculate 2024 |
| RC-002 (Example) | 2026-12-31 | Annual update of the factor set | Factor update | Below 1% in every scope | No | No recalculation; disclose |
| RC-003 (Example) | 2026-12-31 | Supplier-specific data replaces average-data factors for 35% of board tonnage in category 1 | Method and accuracy | About 6,000 tCO2e, 2.0% of recalculated base-year Scope 3 (supplier data for 2024 not available) | No | No recalculation; disclose as a method change |
| Base year 2024, tCO2e | Originally reported | RC-001 | Recalculated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 (Example) | 26,800 | 2,100 | 28,900 |
| Scope 2 market-based (Example) | 31,900 | 1,320 | 33,220 |
| Scope 2 location-based (Example) | 34,700 | 1,050 | 35,750 |
| Scope 3 (Example) | 291,000 | 15,400 | 306,400 |
| Scope 1 and 2 market-based (Example) | 58,700 | 3,420 | 62,120 |
5. Activity data and emission factors
Emissions are activity data multiplied by an emission factor, or direct measurement where a source is continuously monitored. Record each factor's source and vintage, the GWP set, and whether the factor is on a gross or net calorific value basis. Common public factor sets include national government conversion factors (for example the UK DESNZ greenhouse gas conversion factors and the US EPA emission factors hub), IEA electricity factors (licensed) and supplier-specific data; name the edition used.
| Data ID | Source ID | Activity data | Unit | Data owner | System | Factor source and year | Factor (illustrative) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAT-01 (Example) | SRC-01 | Gas invoices and meters | MWh (gross CV) | Site energy managers | Energy portal | [National factor set, edition] | 0.183 tCO2e/MWh |
| DAT-02 (Example) | SRC-02 | Fuel card data | litre | Fleet manager | Fuel card export | [National factor set, edition] | 0.00266 tCO2e/litre |
| DAT-03 (Example) | SRC-03 | LPG deliveries | litre | Site managers | Purchase ledger | [National factor set, edition] | 0.00156 tCO2e/litre |
| DAT-04 (Example) | SRC-04 | Service logs of top-ups | kg | Maintenance | CMMS | GWP of R-410A from the selected IPCC report (AR6 100-year, blend of HFC-32 and HFC-125) | 2.256 tCO2e/kg |
| DAT-05 (Example) | SRC-06 | Electricity invoices | MWh | Site energy managers | Energy portal | Grid average (location) and supplier or residual mix (market) | Section 7 |
| DAT-06 (Example) | SRC-07 | Purchase volumes by material | tonne and EUR | Procurement | ERP | Supplier-specific where available, otherwise average-data | Section 8 |
Estimation rules: [how gaps are filled, for example missing months extrapolated from the same month of the prior year, adjusted for production]. Example: Two missing gas invoices at Leeds were estimated from meter photos; estimate share of Scope 1: 0.6%.
6. Scope 1 emissions
| Source ID | Source | Activity | Unit | Factor (illustrative) | tCO2e FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-01 (Example) | Natural gas, boilers and dryers | 112,000 | MWh | 0.183 | 20,496 |
| S1-02 (Example) | Diesel, owned delivery fleet | 1,450,000 | litre | 0.00266 | 3,857 |
| S1-03 (Example) | LPG, forklifts | 209,700 | litre | 0.00156 | 327 |
| S1-04 (Example) | Refrigerant R-410A top-ups | 102.4 | kg | 2.256 | 231 |
| Total Scope 1 | 24,911 |
Gas breakdown: [by gas where required, CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3]. Process emissions: [describe or state none]. Percentage of Scope 1 from regulated emissions trading schemes: [EU ETS, UK ETS or none; an ESRS E1 datapoint in the 2023 set, check the revised set]. Example: None of the plants is above the EU ETS or UK ETS capacity thresholds; check annually.
7. Scope 2 emissions
The Scope 2 Guidance (2015) requires dual reporting: a location-based figure from grid-average factors and a market-based figure from contractual instruments (energy attribute certificates, supplier-specific factors, power purchase agreements) and, without them, a residual mix. Chapter 7 of the guidance sets quality criteria for instruments. The revision under way discusses hourly matching and deliverability for the market-based method; record which rules you apply for this period.
| Site | MWh | Location factor (illustrative) | Location tCO2e | Instrument | Market factor (illustrative) | Market tCO2e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NL Zwolle (Example) | 30,000 | 0.27 | 8,100 | Supplier tariff backed by guarantees of origin | 0 | 0 |
| PL Lodz (Example) | 28,000 | 0.66 | 18,480 | None, residual mix | 0.74 | 20,720 |
| UK Leeds (Example) | 12,000 | 0.21 | 2,520 | REGO-backed supplier tariff | 0 | 0 |
| US Ohio (Example) | 16,000 | 0.37 | 5,920 | None, grid factor used as proxy | 0.37 | 5,920 |
| ES Zaragoza, from 2026-07-01 (Example) | 5,000 | 0.11 | 550 | Guarantees of origin | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 91,000 | 35,570 | 26,640 |
| Instrument ID | Type | Site | MWh | Vintage | Same market? | Retired on behalf of Quillfen? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INS-01 (Example) | Guarantees of origin | NL Zwolle | 30,000 | 2026 | Yes | Yes, registry statement held |
| INS-02 (Example) | REGOs | UK Leeds | 12,000 | 2026 | Yes | Yes, supplier fuel mix disclosure |
| INS-03 (Example) | Guarantees of origin | ES Zaragoza | 5,000 | 2026 | Yes | Yes, registry statement held |
Share of renewable electricity (market-based): 47,000 of 91,000 MWh = 51.6% (Example).
8. Scope 3 emissions
The Scope 3 Standard (2011) defines 15 categories, eight upstream and seven downstream. Screen each one for size, influence, risk and stakeholder relevance, then choose a method per category (supplier-specific, hybrid, average-data or spend-based) and record the data quality. GHG Protocol is also revising the Scope 3 Standard; check the status for your period.
| Cat. | Name | Relevant? | Method | Data quality (1 high to 5 low) | tCO2e FY2026 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purchased goods and services | Yes | Hybrid: supplier-specific for 35% of board tonnage, average-data otherwise | 3 | 182,400 (Example) | 65.5% |
| 2 | Capital goods | Yes | Spend-based | 4 | 9,300 (Example) | 3.3% |
| 3 | Fuel- and energy-related activities | Yes | Average-data (well-to-tank, transmission losses) | 2 | 8,150 (Example) | 2.9% |
| 4 | Upstream transportation and distribution | Yes | Distance-based | 3 | 21,600 (Example) | 7.8% |
| 5 | Waste generated in operations | Yes | Waste-type specific | 2 | 3,900 (Example) | 1.4% |
| 6 | Business travel | Yes | Distance-based from travel agency | 2 | 640 (Example) | 0.2% |
| 7 | Employee commuting | Yes | Survey extrapolation | 4 | 2,350 (Example) | 0.8% |
| 8 | Upstream leased assets | No | Leased assets are in Scopes 1 and 2 | 0 | ||
| 9 | Downstream transportation and distribution | Yes | Distance-based, customer-collected loads | 4 | 11,800 (Example) | 4.2% |
| 10 | Processing of sold products | No | Packaging is filled, not processed; screened below 0.5% | 0 | ||
| 11 | Use of sold products | No | Passive packaging has no direct use-phase emissions | 0 | ||
| 12 | End-of-life treatment of sold products | Yes | Average-data by country waste mix | 4 | 38,200 (Example) | 13.7% |
| 13 | Downstream leased assets | No | None leased out | 0 | ||
| 14 | Franchises | No | No franchises | 0 | ||
| 15 | Investments | Yes, below threshold | Equity share of ENT-06 emissions | 3 | Below 0.1%, reported as nil | |
| Total Scope 3 | 278,340 (Example) | 100% |
Supplier engagement: [share of category 1 emissions covered by supplier-specific data, target for next year]. Example: 35% of board tonnage, target 60% for FY2027 (lever S3-L2 in the transition plan).
9. Inventory summary, intensity and trend
| tCO2e | Base year 2024 (recalculated) | FY2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 (Example) | 28,900 | 24,911 | -13.8% |
| Scope 2 location-based (Example) | 35,750 | 35,570 | -0.5% |
| Scope 2 market-based (Example) | 33,220 | 26,640 | -19.8% |
| Scope 1 and 2 market-based (Example) | 62,120 | 51,551 | -17.0% |
| Scope 3 (Example) | 306,400 | 278,340 | -9.2% |
| Total, market-based (Example) | 368,520 | 329,891 | -10.5% |
| Intensity | Base year 2024 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 and 2 market-based per EUR million revenue (Example) | 110.9 (EUR 560 million) | 84.5 (EUR 610 million) |
| Scope 1 and 2 market-based per tonne of packaging sold (Example) | 0.157 (395,000 t) | 0.126 (410,000 t) |
| Total market-based per EUR million revenue (Example) | 658.1 | 540.8 |
Drivers of change: [explain by lever and by external factor]. Example: The fall in Scope 2 market-based comes mainly from the guarantees of origin at Zwolle and Zaragoza contracted from 2025; Scope 1 fell after the heat recovery project at Zwolle; about 6,000 tCO2e of the Scope 3 fall comes from supplier-specific data replacing average factors for 35% of board tonnage, a method change disclosed under RC-003 and not presented as a physical reduction.
10. Data quality, uncertainty and controls
Chapter 7 of the Corporate Standard and clause 8 of ISO 14064-1:2018 cover inventory quality management. Assess uncertainty qualitatively for every source and quantitatively for the largest ones, and keep evidence for each number.
| Control ID | Risk | Control | Frequency | Owner | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCTL-01 (Example) | Missing or duplicated invoices | Reconcile energy MWh to accounts payable | Quarterly | Site controller | Signed reconciliation |
| GCTL-02 (Example) | Wrong factor or GWP | Factor table locked, change log, four-eyes review | Annually | GHG inventory lead | Factor change log |
| GCTL-03 (Example) | Boundary drift after acquisitions | Entity list reconciled to the consolidation perimeter | Quarterly | Group reporting | Perimeter tie-out |
| GCTL-04 (Example) | Double counting of certificates | Registry statements matched to MWh claimed | Annually | Energy buyer | Registry exports |
| GCTL-05 (Example) | Spend mapping errors in Scope 3 | Sample review of top 50 spend lines | Semi-annually | Procurement analyst | Review sheet |
| Source | Uncertainty rating | Main cause | Improvement action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural gas (Example) | Low | Metered | None |
| Category 1 (Example) | High | Average-data factors | Supplier-specific data programme |
| Category 12 (Example) | High | Country waste mix assumptions | Customer data on recycling rates |
11. Verification and assurance
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Assurance provider | [Name] |
| Standard | [ISSA 5000 / ISAE 3410 / ISO 14064-3:2019 / national standard] |
| Level | [Limited / Reasonable] |
| Scope covered | [Scopes and categories] Example: Scope 1, Scope 2 (both methods) and Scope 3 categories 1, 4 and 12 |
| Materiality used by the assurer | [Percentage] |
| Findings | [Summary] |
| Finding ID | Finding | Management response | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AF-01 (Example) | Leeds estimates not documented at source | Store meter photos in the evidence folder | Leeds site manager | YYYY-MM-DD |
ISO 14064-1:2018 clause 10 describes the organisation's role in verification activities; the verification itself is described in ISO 14064-3:2019.
12. Disclosure mapping
| Inventory output | ESRS E1 (as amended 2026) | IFRS S2 | ISO 14064-1:2018 | UK SECR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope 1 total and share in ETS | Gross emissions disclosure (E1-8 in the revised numbering; E1-6 in the 2023 set) | Paragraph 29(a) | Category 1 | UK energy use and emissions |
| Scope 2 location and market | Same | Paragraph 29(a), location-based with contractual instrument information | Category 2 | Location-based required |
| Scope 3 by category | Same, significant categories | Paragraph 29(a), with measurement framework | Categories 3 to 6 | Optional |
| Intensity | Intensity per net revenue (check whether retained in the revised set) | Not required as such; industry-based metrics may apply | Optional | At least one intensity ratio |
| Base year and recalculation | Targets disclosure (E1-6 revised) | Paragraphs 33 to 36 on targets | Clause 6 | Prior-year comparison |
Paragraph numbers are pointers: check the official text of each standard and the jurisdictional version you apply.
13. Glossary and references
| Term | Meaning in this template |
|---|---|
| Scope 1 | Direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the organisation |
| Scope 2 | Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heat and cooling |
| Scope 3 | All other indirect emissions in the value chain, in 15 categories |
| Location-based | Scope 2 method using average grid emission factors |
| Market-based | Scope 2 method using contractual instruments and residual mix |
| Base year | Reference year for tracking emissions over time |
| GWP | Global warming potential, the factor converting a gas to CO2 equivalent |
| tCO2e | Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent |
| Residual mix | Grid factor after removing claimed attributes |
References:
- GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, revised edition (WRI and WBCSD, 2004); GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance (2015); Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (2011). Names and chapter numbers only. Official text: GHG Protocol, free download under its terms of use: https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard
- GHG Protocol, Scope 2 public consultation 2025-10-20 to 2026-01-31 and the market-based method update of 2026-10-16 (standards under revision): https://ghgprotocol.org/public-consultations
- ISO 14064-1:2018 "Greenhouse gases, Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals", second edition. Official text: ISO, purchase or licensed access: https://www.iso.org/standard/66453.html
- ISO 14064-3:2019 (verification and validation of GHG statements), number and title only.
- ESRS E1 "Climate change" in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/1563 of 3 July 2026 (check EUR-Lex for the consolidated text).
- IFRS S2 "Climate-related Disclosures" (June 2023) and Amendments to IFRS S2 on greenhouse gas emissions disclosures (issued 2025-12-11, effective 2027-01-01), names and paragraph numbers only.
- UK SECR: SI 2018/1155; California Health and Safety Code section 38532 (check the California Air Resources Board for current deadlines).
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (revised edition), Scope 2 Guidance (2015) and Scope 3 Standard (2011), and with ISO 14064-1:2018, cited by name, chapter, clause and category number only. The GHG Protocol standards are published by WRI and WBCSD under terms of use that restrict reproduction and derivative works, and ISO 14064-1 is a paid standard, so no text, table or figure is copied from either; this template does not imply any association with or endorsement by GHG Protocol or ISO. EU and UK legal texts are referred to by number and paraphrased in original words. All factors, figures and the Quillfen Packaging Group example are fictional and illustrative. Check the current official versions, including the GHG Protocol revisions in progress, before use. Template licence: MIT.
Templat terkait
13-Week Cash Flow Forecast Template (Direct Method)
Direct-method weekly cash forecast: opening cash and facilities, receipts and disbursements by category, weekly roll, headroom vs minimum, variance and bridge, levers
Keuangan, Investasi & AkuntansiBalance Sheet Account Reconciliation Template
GL versus independent source, reconciling items with type, age and owner, unexplained difference threshold, roll-forward, evidence index, preparer and reviewer sign-off
Keuangan, Investasi & AkuntansiAccounting Policy Manual Template (IFRS, US GAAP, IFRS 18)
Group accounting policies by area with IFRS and ASC references, thresholds, judgements register, elections register, IFRS 18 presentation, local GAAP bridges