Pipeline and Forecast Review Template
Stage exit criteria and probabilities, forecast categories, roll-up by seller, coverage, deal inspection, decisions, forecast accuracy
Cara menggunakan: Use it for the weekly or monthly forecast call of a sales team. Agree the stage exit criteria and forecast categories once for the whole organisation before filling the roll-up. The main pitfall is advancing stages on time spent instead of verifiable buyer actions.
Pratinjau
Pipeline and Forecast Review: [Team] [Quarter]
The working document for a sales team's weekly or monthly forecast call: shared stage definitions with exit criteria, forecast categories (closed, commit, best case, pipeline, omitted), the roll-up by seller, coverage, deal inspection and a record of forecast accuracy over time. Based on common sales operations practice. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Review ID | [FCR-YYYY-QN-WNN] |
| Team | [Team name] |
| Quarter | [Q4 2026] (Example) |
| Review date | 2026-11-13 (Example, week 7 of 13) |
| CRM cut-off | [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM] |
| Owner | [@sales-manager] |
| Attendees | [@sellers], [@sales-operations] |
| Currency and measure | [New ARR, EUR] |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 (Example) | 2026-11-13 | Sales manager | Week 7 review |
1. Stage definitions and exit criteria
| Stage | Name | Exit criteria (buyer-verified) | Evidence in CRM | Probability (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Qualify | Buyer confirms a problem, a sponsor and a timeframe | Qualification record (business/opportunity-qualification) | 10% |
| S2 | Discover | Buyer shares requirements, decision process and budget range | Discovery notes, named decision makers | 20% |
| S3 | Solution | Buyer agrees the solution fits, after demo or pilot | Demo or pilot outcome, success criteria | 40% |
| S4 | Proposal | Buyer has the proposal and agrees a mutual action plan to decision | Proposal sent, sales/mutual-action-plan shared | 60% |
| S5 | Negotiate | Buyer's procurement and legal are working on contract terms | Redlines, approval path confirmed | 80% |
| Won | Closed won | Contract signed by both parties and booked | Signed order | 100% |
| Lost | Closed lost | Buyer chose another option or no decision | Loss reason coded (sales/win-loss-analysis) | 0% |
2. Forecast categories
| Category | Meaning | Test |
|---|---|---|
| Closed | Booked this period | Signed and approved |
| Commit | Seller expects it to close this period and will be held to it | Would you bet your own money on it? Signature date inside the period agreed with the buyer, path to signature written down |
| Best case | Could close this period if open items go well | Named items that must happen, each with a date |
| Pipeline | Open, expected to close in a later period or not yet qualified for this one | Real opportunity, but not this period |
| Omitted | Excluded from the forecast | Stalled, duplicate or kept for reference only |
Forecast call = Closed + Commit. Upside = Closed + Commit + Best case.
3. Forecast roll-up
| Seller | Quota | Closed | Commit | Best case | Pipeline | Call (Closed + Commit) | Call vs quota |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seller 1 (Example) | 300,000 | 120,000 | 100,000 | 80,000 | 160,000 | 220,000 | 73.3% |
| Seller 2 (Example) | 300,000 | 90,000 | 120,000 | 40,000 | 200,000 | 210,000 | 70.0% |
| Seller 3 (Example) | 300,000 | 140,000 | 60,000 | 90,000 | 120,000 | 200,000 | 66.7% |
| Seller 4 (Example) | 300,000 | 70,000 | 100,000 | 50,000 | 160,000 | 170,000 | 56.7% |
| Team (Example) | 1,200,000 | 420,000 | 380,000 | 260,000 | 640,000 | 800,000 | 66.7% |
Example: the team call is 800,000 (66.7% of quota) and the upside is 1,060,000 (88.3%). The manager's call to leadership may differ from the sum of seller calls; record it and the reason in section 6.
4. Coverage
| Measure | Value (Example) |
|---|---|
| Quota still to close (1,200,000 minus 420,000) | 780,000 |
| Open this-period pipeline (commit + best case + pipeline) | 1,280,000 |
| Coverage | 1.64 times |
| Coverage needed from history | [Value from your win rates] |
5. Deal inspection
| Deal | Seller | Value | Stage | Category | Exit evidence | Next buyer action and date | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEAL-101 (Example) | Seller 2 | 120,000 | S5 | Commit | Redlines received | Legal sign-off, 2026-11-27 | Low |
| DEAL-102 (Example) | Seller 1 | 80,000 | S3 | Best case | Pilot passed | Proposal review with CFO, 2026-11-20 | Budget not confirmed |
| DEAL-103 (Example) | Seller 4 | 100,000 | S4 | Commit | Mutual action plan agreed | Budget approval, 2026-12-04 | Signature 2026-12-18, close to period end |
| [ID] | [Seller] | [Value] | [Stage] | [Category] | [Evidence] | [Action, date] | [Risk] |
Inspection checklist for each commit deal:
- Signature date agreed with the buyer, not assumed.
- Economic buyer named and engaged.
- Paper process known: procurement, legal, security reviews and their dates.
- Price and terms inside discount authority, or approval obtained.
- Stage and category consistent, or the difference explained.
6. Decisions and actions
| Item | Record |
|---|---|
| Call submitted to leadership | [800,000] (Example) |
| Change since last review | [Movements in and out of commit, with reasons] |
| Deals moved to omitted | [IDs and reasons] |
| ID | Action | Owner | Due |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACT-01 (Example) | Confirm CFO meeting for DEAL-102 | Seller 1 | 2026-11-16 |
| ACT-[NN] | [Action] | [Owner] | YYYY-MM-DD |
7. Forecast accuracy
| Quarter | Quota | Week 7 call | Actual | Error vs call | Attainment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2026 (Example) | 1,000,000 | 820,000 | 870,000 | +6.1% | 87.0% |
| Q2 2026 (Example) | 1,050,000 | 900,000 | 840,000 | -6.7% | 80.0% |
| Q3 2026 (Example) | 1,100,000 | 960,000 | 1,010,000 | +5.2% | 91.8% |
Error vs call = (actual minus call) divided by call. Related templates:
Rolling Forecast (finance/rolling-forecast), Strategic Account Plan
(sales/account-plan), Sales Compensation Plan
(sales/sales-compensation-plan) for the booking definition.
Standard and licence note
Based on common sales operations practice for pipeline stages and forecast categories. No standard governs this document; the stage names, probabilities and figures are illustrative. All text and examples are original. Template licence: MIT.
Templat terkait
Strategic Account Plan Template
Account snapshot, customer goals, stakeholder map, whitespace grid, mutual goals, weighted opportunities vs revenue gap, risks, actions, review log
PenjualanMutual Action Plan Template
Buyer and seller close plan: why-now date, success criteria, dated steps with owners on both sides, Gantt, risks and open questions
PenjualanSales Compensation Plan Template
Eligibility, pay mix and OTE, quota, rates and accelerators, crediting rules, payment timing, clawbacks, SPIFFs, employment changes, disputes, legal checkpoints