Public Consultation Plan Template (Questions, Audiences, Analysis)

Consultation plan: scope, numbered questions, audiences and channels, accessibility, timeline, response analysis, publication, UK, EU and US practice

公共部門標準UK Consultation Principles 2018; EU Better Regulation Toolbox Chapter 7; 5 U.S.C. 553public consultation plan更新 2026/10/29

エディタで開く.mdをダウンロード

使い方: Use it when a public body consults on a policy or regulatory proposal while it can still change. Fill the questions and audiences together, and agree the analysis method before opening. The main pitfall is treating responses as votes or a representative survey instead of evidence.

プレビュー

Public Consultation Plan: [Proposal title]

A plan for consulting the public and stakeholders on a policy or regulatory proposal: the purpose, the questions, who to reach and how, accessibility, timing, how responses will be analysed and how the result will be published. The structure is neutral, with dated national practice as examples: the UK Consultation Principles (2018), Chapter 7 "Stakeholder consultation" of the European Commission Better Regulation Toolbox (December 2025 edition), and US notice-and-comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example. Whether you have a legal duty to consult, and how, depends on your law: check the current official texts and ask your lawyers. This is not legal advice.

Plan control

Field	Value
Plan ID	[CONS-2026-001]
Proposal	[Title and link]
Owner	[@policy-lead]
Approvers	[@senior-official], [@legal], [@communications]
Legal duty to consult	[Yes, under (law) / No / Unclear, advice requested]
Opens / closes	YYYY-MM-DD / YYYY-MM-DD
Response published by	YYYY-MM-DD
Version	[0.1]
Last updated	YYYY-MM-DD

1. Purpose and scope

Item	Detail
What we want to learn	[Evidence, views, costs, alternatives]
What is open to change	[Options, design details, timing]
What is not open to change	[Fixed elements and why]
Decision the consultation informs	[Decision and date]
Supporting documents	[Impact assessment, draft text, evidence]

Example: the department wants evidence on the cost of uploading inspection records and on whether owners of five or fewer lifts should be exempt. The decision to create a register is open; the 12-month inspection interval is set by other law and is not.

2. Questions

ID	Question	Type	Audience	Analysis use
Q1 (Example)	Do you agree that lift inspection records should be uploaded to a national register?	Agree scale and free text	All	Support and reasons
Q2 (Example)	How long would it take you to upload one inspection record?	Number	Owners, inspectors	Cost assumption in the impact assessment
Q3 (Example)	Should owners of five or fewer lifts be exempt for the first three years?	Yes, no, unsure and free text	Owners	Small business option
Q4 (Example)	What support would help you comply?	Free text	Owners	Implementation design
Q5	[Question]	[Type]	[Audience]	[Use]

3. Audiences and channels

Audience	Why they matter	How we reach them	Format
[Group]	[Interest]	[Channel]	[Online form / Meeting / Interviews / Workshop]
Building owners with few lifts (Example)	Most affected by cost per lift	Letters via the business register, trade associations	Short online form, phone line
Lift users with disabilities (Example)	Most affected by lift failures	Disabled people's organisations	Accessible events, easy read version
Lift inspectors (Example)	Upload records in practice	Professional body	Workshop

4. Accessibility and inclusion

Formats: [accessible HTML, easy read, large print, other languages, sign language video].
Ways to respond: [online, email, post, phone, events].
Timing: [avoid holiday periods or extend; allow more time for small organisations and charities].
Data protection: [privacy notice; how names and organisations are published; link to the DPIA].

5. Timeline

Milestone	Date
Plan and documents approved	YYYY-MM-DD
Consultation opens	YYYY-MM-DD
Events and workshops	YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD
Consultation closes	YYYY-MM-DD
Analysis complete	YYYY-MM-DD
Government response published	YYYY-MM-DD

Example: 10 weeks, extended from 8 because the period includes a national holiday and trade associations asked for time to survey their members.

6. Response analysis

Step	Method
Intake and deduplication	[Log, flag campaign responses]
Coding of free text	[Codebook, double-coding of n% sample]
Counting closed questions	[By respondent type; campaign responses reported separately]
Weighting	[None: responses are evidence, not votes]
Using evidence	[Each relevant point is checked against the impact assessment]
Quality check	[Second analyst review]

7. Publication and feedback

Item	Plan
Where the response is published	[Same page as the consultation]
Contents	[Number of responses, summary per question, changes made, reasons for not changing]
Deadline	[Date and rule]
Feedback to participants	[Email, events]

8. National practice examples

Jurisdiction	Source and date	Key points (paraphrased)
United Kingdom	Consultation Principles, Cabinet Office, updated 2018-03-19	11 principles: clear and concise, purposeful, informative, part of wider engagement, proportionate length, targeted, suited to the groups consulted, agreed before publication, open to scrutiny, response published within 12 weeks or an explanation given, generally not during election periods; no legal force in itself
European Union	Better Regulation Toolbox, December 2025 edition, Chapter 7	Tool #51 consulting stakeholders, #52 consultation strategy, #53 conducting activities, #54 analysing data, #55 publication, data protection and transparency register
United States (federal rulemaking)	5 U.S.C. 553	General notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, opportunity to submit written data, views or arguments, a concise statement of basis and purpose with the final rule, and in general at least 30 days before a substantive rule takes effect

References

Reference	Date	Link
Consultation Principles: guidance, Cabinet Office	2018	https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consultation-principles-guidance
Better Regulation Toolbox, European Commission	December 2025	https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en
5 U.S.C. 553, Rule making	Current	https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section553

Standard and licence note

Based on the UK Consultation Principles (2018), the European Commission Better Regulation Toolbox (December 2025 edition, Chapter 7) and 5 U.S.C. 553, all official public sources, paraphrased in original wording. Duties to consult also come from specific statutes and case law; check the current official texts and take legal advice for your proposal. This is not legal advice.

Template licence: MIT.