Markdown Editor

PIMS Statement of Applicability Template (ISO/IEC 27701:2025)

PIMS SoA for ISO/IEC 27701:2025: controller, processor and security control matrices, decision rules, exclusions, GDPR article mapping example

ISMS 및 ISO/IEC 27001전체ISO/IEC 27701:2025 (cited only); GDPR as example mappingpims27701statementapplicability

사용법: Use it after the PIMS scope and roles are approved and the privacy risk assessment is done. Fill the column rules first, then copy every control reference from the official standard. The main pitfall is excluding controller controls because the organization is mainly a processor.

미리보기

PIMS Statement of Applicability: [Organization name]

Statement of Applicability (SoA) for a privacy information management system (PIMS) under ISO/IEC 27701:2025. It records, for every control in the standard's control sets for PII controllers, PII processors and information security for PII, whether the control applies, why, its implementation status, its owner and its evidence, with an example mapping to GDPR articles. Control references are left as [27701 control ref] placeholders: fill them from your copy of the standard. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example. This is a documentation format, not legal advice.

Document control

FieldValue
Document IDDOC-ISMS-101
Version[1.0]
Status[Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded]
Owner[@privacy-lead]
Approvers/reviewers[@dpo], [@isms-manager], [@legal-counsel], [@ceo]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD
Classification[Internal / Confidential]
Standard and editionISO/IEC 27701:2025
Next scheduled reviewYYYY-MM-DD (at least every 12 months and after any scope, role or risk change)
PIMS scope referenceDOC-ISMS-100, PIMS scope and roles, version [x.y]
Roles covered[PII controller / PII processor / both]
Privacy risk assessment reference[Risk register DOC-ISMS-016, assessment dated YYYY-MM-DD]
ISMS SoA reference (if any)[DOC-ISMS-011, version x.y / Not applicable]

Approvals

RoleNameDecisionDate
PIMS owner[@privacy-lead][Prepared]YYYY-MM-DD
Data protection officer[@dpo][Reviewed]YYYY-MM-DD
ISMS manager[@isms-manager][Reviewed]YYYY-MM-DD
Top management[@ceo][Approved / Approved with changes]YYYY-MM-DD

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange
1.0 (Example)YYYY-MM-DD[@privacy-lead]First approved PIMS SoA for Stage 1
1.1 (Example)YYYY-MM-DD[@privacy-lead]Controller row CTL-ROW-004 changed to Applicable after telemetry purpose was approved (RISK-044)
[x.y]YYYY-MM-DD[@author][Change summary]

Contents

  1. Purpose and scope
  2. How the ISO/IEC 27701:2025 control sets are organized
  3. Decision rules
  4. Columns and values
  5. Summary
  6. PII controller controls
  7. PII processor controls
  8. Information security controls for PII
  9. Justification of exclusions
  10. Example mapping to GDPR articles
  11. Size tiers
  12. Records and evidence
  13. Review and maintenance
  14. References

1. Purpose and scope

This SoA records the decision on every control in ISO/IEC 27701:2025 for the PIMS of [Organization name] defined in DOC-ISMS-100. For each control it gives the decision, the reason, the implementation status, the owner and where the evidence is kept. It is used to:

  • show the certification body which controls the organization claims to operate and why others are excluded;
  • give control owners one list of what they must keep running;
  • connect privacy risks, legal duties and customer commitments to concrete controls;
  • support customer and regulator questions about privacy practice.

In-scope roles: [controller for PA-002, PA-003, PA-004, PA-005; processor for PA-001] (Example, activity IDs from DOC-ISMS-100).

2. How the ISO/IEC 27701:2025 control sets are organized

The 2025 edition groups its controls by the role in which PII is processed, plus a set of information security controls that apply to all PII processing:

Control setApplies whenSection of this SoAReference in the standard
PII controller controlsThe organization decides purposes and means for at least one activity6[27701 annex ref]
PII processor controlsThe organization processes PII on behalf of a customer or another controller7[27701 annex ref]
Information security controls for PIIAny PII processing in scope, whatever the role8[27701 annex ref]

Write the official control reference in the "27701 ref" column and a short label of your own in the "Label" column. Do not copy control titles or control text into this document. Where the standard gives implementation guidance for a control, read it before deciding applicability, and record in the justification column how your implementation meets the intent.

3. Decision rules

A control is applicable when at least one basis applies to a processing activity in scope. A control is not applicable only when no basis applies, and the reason is written in section 9.

CodeBasisTypical source
RTreats an assessed privacy or security riskRisk register ID, for example RISK-044
LLegal or regulatory requirementLegal register row in DOC-ISMS-014
CContractual requirementCustomer data processing agreement, joint controller arrangement
BBusiness decision or adopted good practicePolicy decision, management review minute
ROLEApplies because of the role determined in DOC-ISMS-100Activity ID, for example PA-001

The PIMS owner proposes decisions. The DPO reviews every exclusion and every controller decision that affects data subjects. Top management approves the SoA as a whole.

4. Columns and values

ColumnContentAllowed values or format
Row IDStable ID for this SoA rowCTL-ROW-NNN (controller), PRC-ROW-NNN (processor), SEC-ROW-NNN (security)
27701 refOfficial control reference from the standard[27701 control ref] until filled
LabelShort description written by youUp to about eight words
ApplicableDecisionYes / No
BasisWhy it appliesR, L, C, B, ROLE (one or more)
JustificationShort, testable reason for the decision and how it is metOne or two sentences
StatusImplementation statusImplemented / Partial / Planned / Not applicable
OwnerAccountable control owner[@role]
EvidenceRecord that proves operationRecord name and location, linked in DOC-ISMS-033
LinksRisks, ROPA activities, ISMS controls, external mappingIDs

Status meanings: Implemented means operating with evidence for at least one full cycle; Partial means designed and partly operating, with the remaining work in the risk treatment plan (DOC-ISMS-013); Planned means approved but not yet operating, with a due date; Not applicable means excluded with a reason in section 9.

5. Summary

Control setControls in the standardApplicableNot applicableImplementedPartialPlanned
PII controller controls[n from the standard][n][n][n][n][n]
PII processor controls[n from the standard][n][n][n][n][n]
Information security controls for PII[n from the standard][n][n][n][n][n]
Total[n][n][n][n][n][n]

Check: for each set, Applicable plus Not applicable equals the controls in the standard, and Implemented plus Partial plus Planned equals Applicable.

6. PII controller controls

Row ID27701 refLabelApplicableBasisJustificationStatusOwnerEvidenceLinks
CTL-ROW-001 (Example)[27701 control ref]Purposes identified and documentedYesL, ROLEEach controller activity in the ROPA states its purposeImplemented[@privacy-lead]ROPA controller partPA-002 to PA-005
CTL-ROW-002 (Example)[27701 control ref]Lawful basis determined per purposeYesLBasis recorded per activity and reviewed annuallyImplemented[@dpo]ROPA lawful basis columnGDPR Art. 6
CTL-ROW-003 (Example)[27701 control ref]Consent obtained and recorded where relied onYesLMarketing consent captured with timestamp and wording versionPartial[@head-of-marketing]Consent log exportPA-005, RISK-041
CTL-ROW-004 (Example)[27701 control ref]Privacy impact assessed for high-risk processingYesL, RDPIA screening for every new purpose, full DPIA when screening says soImplemented[@dpo]DPIA register, compliance/dpiaPA-004, RISK-044
CTL-ROW-005 (Example)[27701 control ref]Information provided to data subjectsYesLPublic notice and staff notice approved and versionedImplemented[@dpo]Notice versionsGDPR Art. 13, 14
CTL-ROW-006 (Example)[27701 control ref]Rights requests handled within deadlinesYesLRequests logged and answered within the legal periodImplemented[@privacy-lead]Request logcompliance/data-subject-request-procedure
CTL-ROW-007 (Example)[27701 control ref]Collection limited to what is neededYesL, RForm and schema reviews in designPartial[@head-of-product]Privacy by design reviewscompliance/privacy-by-design-review
CTL-ROW-008 (Example)[27701 control ref]Cross-border transfers assessed and documentedYesLTransfer mechanism and assessment per destinationPlanned[@legal-counsel]Transfer assessmentscompliance/transfer-impact-assessment
[CTL-ROW-NNN][27701 control ref][Label][Yes / No][Codes][Reason][Status][@owner][Record][IDs]

7. PII processor controls

Row ID27701 refLabelApplicableBasisJustificationStatusOwnerEvidenceLinks
PRC-ROW-001 (Example)[27701 control ref]Processing agreement with each customerYesC, L, ROLEStandard DPA signed before production data is acceptedImplemented[@legal-counsel]Contract registerlegal-lite/dpa, GDPR Art. 28
PRC-ROW-002 (Example)[27701 control ref]Processing only on documented instructionsYesC, ROLEService terms and DPA define instructions; new uses need customer agreementImplemented[@cto]DPA, change recordsPA-001
PRC-ROW-003 (Example)[27701 control ref]Customer assisted with rights and DPIAsYesCSupport runbook for rights requests forwarded by customersImplemented[@head-of-support]Ticket recordsGDPR Art. 28(3)
PRC-ROW-004 (Example)[27701 control ref]Sub-processors disclosed and changes notifiedYesCPublic sub-processor list, 30 days notice (Example) before changesImplemented[@legal-counsel]Sub-processor list historyDOC-ISMS-066
PRC-ROW-005 (Example)[27701 control ref]Return or deletion at end of serviceYesC, LExport on request, deletion within the period stated in the DPAPartial[@cto]Deletion certificatesRISK-047
PRC-ROW-006 (Example)[27701 control ref]Customer informed of legally binding disclosure requestsYesCRequests reviewed by legal, customer told unless prohibitedImplemented[@legal-counsel]Disclosure request logisms/cloud-pii-27018-processor
[PRC-ROW-NNN][27701 control ref][Label][Yes / No][Codes][Reason][Status][@owner][Record][IDs]

8. Information security controls for PII

Row ID27701 refLabelApplicableBasisJustificationStatusOwnerEvidenceLinks
SEC-ROW-001 (Example)[27701 control ref]Access to PII restricted by roleYesRRole-based access with quarterly reviewsImplemented[@isms-manager]Access review recordsISMS A.5.15, DOC-ISMS-041
SEC-ROW-002 (Example)[27701 control ref]PII encrypted in transit and at restYesR, CCryptography standard applied to all PII storesImplemented[@cto]Configuration evidenceISMS A.8.24, security/cryptography-standard
SEC-ROW-003 (Example)[27701 control ref]Logging of access to PIIYesRAccess logs kept and reviewedPartial[@security-lead]Log review recordsISMS A.8.15
SEC-ROW-004 (Example)[27701 control ref]Personal data breaches managedYesL, CIncident process includes breach assessment and notificationImplemented[@dpo]Incident register DOC-ISMS-021ISMS A.5.24 to A.5.28
SEC-ROW-005 (Example)[27701 control ref]Test data does not use live PII without approvalYesRMasked data sets for test environmentsPlanned[@head-of-engineering]Test data approvalsISMS A.8.33, DOC-ISMS-062
[SEC-ROW-NNN][27701 control ref][Label][Yes / No][Codes][Reason][Status][@owner][Record][IDs]

9. Justification of exclusions

Row IDReason for exclusionFact that supports itApproved byDateRevisit trigger
PRC-ROW-0NN (Example, controller-only organization)Processor role not performedDOC-ISMS-100 lists no processor activity[@dpo]YYYY-MM-DDAny new service for customers
CTL-ROW-0NN (Example)No processing of children's dataTerms restrict users to adults; product does not target children[@dpo]YYYY-MM-DDNew consumer product
[Row ID][Reason][Fact][@approver]YYYY-MM-DD[Trigger]

An exclusion is not a way to accept risk. If a control applies but the organization chooses not to implement it fully, keep it Applicable with status Partial or Planned and record the risk acceptance in DOC-ISMS-019.

10. Example mapping to GDPR articles

Privacy topicSoA rowsGDPR articles (example)Supporting template
Principles and accountabilityCTL-ROW-001, CTL-ROW-007Art. 5, Art. 24compliance/gdpr-ropa
Lawful basis and consentCTL-ROW-002, CTL-ROW-003Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 9compliance/gdpr-ropa
TransparencyCTL-ROW-005Art. 12, Art. 13, Art. 14legal-lite/privacy-policy
Data subject rightsCTL-ROW-006, PRC-ROW-003Art. 15 to Art. 22compliance/data-subject-request-procedure
Privacy by design and by defaultCTL-ROW-007Art. 25compliance/privacy-by-design-review
Processor contracts and instructionsPRC-ROW-001, PRC-ROW-002, PRC-ROW-004Art. 28, Art. 29legal-lite/dpa
Records of processingCTL-ROW-001Art. 30compliance/gdpr-ropa
Security of processingSEC-ROW-001 to SEC-ROW-005Art. 32compliance/statement-of-applicability
Breach notificationSEC-ROW-004Art. 33, Art. 34compliance/personal-data-breach-assessment
Impact assessmentCTL-ROW-004Art. 35, Art. 36compliance/dpia
International transfersCTL-ROW-008Art. 44 to Art. 49compliance/transfer-impact-assessment
Return and deletionPRC-ROW-005Art. 28(3)(g)data/data-retention-deletion-standard

A control can support several articles, and an article can need several controls. Mapping a control to an article does not prove compliance with that article: compliance depends on how the control is operated.

11. Size tiers

TopicSmall: Quillmere Analytics LtdMedium: Quillmere Health SystemsLarge: Quillmere Group
Roles coveredProcessor for customer data, controller for 46 staff (38 employees, 8 contractors) and customer contactsProcessor for hospitals, controller for 320 staff and marketing dataMainly controller across 6 sites in 4 countries, processor for some group services
SoA formatOne spreadsheet or Markdown file, rows grouped by setOne SoA with a sheet per control set, linked to the ISMS SoA prepared for the 27001 auditGroup SoA plus site annexes listing local variations and owners
Typical exclusionsFew: controller set mostly applies to HR and contactsChildren's data in its own controller activities (staff and marketing), with patient data handled under the processor set (Example)Rare; each site justifies local differences
ApprovalHead of Engineering Operations (0.5 FTE ISMS manager) and CEO, external DPO reviewsISMS manager, DPO, executive committeeCISO, group DPO, group executive with site sign-off
TimingWith the ISMS SoA, 6-month ISO/IEC 27001 targetIn the year after the 27001 certificate (27001 target 10 months)Phased by site after the group ISMS (27001 target 15 months) (Example)

12. Records and evidence

RecordProvesOwnerLocationRetention
Approved SoA versionsDecisions controlled and approved[@privacy-lead][Document system]Current plus [3] years (Example)
Exclusion approvalsEach exclusion reviewed by the DPO[@dpo]Section 9, approval recordsSame as SoA
Evidence listed per rowControls operateControl ownersLinked in DOC-ISMS-033Per data/data-retention-deletion-standard
Risk treatment plan entriesPartial and Planned rows are tracked[@isms-manager]DOC-ISMS-013[3] years (Example)
Internal audit results on SoA rowsRows tested independently[@internal-auditor]DOC-ISMS-084[3] years (Example)

Add every evidence record to the control evidence matrix (isms/control-evidence-matrix, DOC-ISMS-033), so internal audit and the certification body can trace each row to proof.

13. Review and maintenance

Review the SoA at least every 12 months and when:

  • the PIMS scope or a role in DOC-ISMS-100 changes;
  • the privacy risk assessment adds, changes or closes a risk that a control treats;
  • a law, regulator guidance or customer contract adds a requirement;
  • an incident, audit finding or management review decision affects a control;
  • a new edition or amendment of ISO/IEC 27701 is published.

14. References

ReferenceEditionUse
ISO/IEC 27701:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/85819.htmlSecond edition, 2025PIMS control sets and SoA requirement
ISO/IEC 27706:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/82894.html2025PIMS certification bodies
ISO/IEC 29100:2024, https://www.iso.org/standard/85938.html2024Privacy principles
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html and https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.htmlCurrentISMS SoA linkage
ISO/IEC 27018:2025, https://www.iso.org/standard/88150.html2025Public cloud PII processors
GDPR, Regulation (EU) 2016/679As amended; check the consolidated textExample mapping in section 10
Related templatesisms/pims-27701-scope-roles, compliance/statement-of-applicability, compliance/gdpr-ropa, compliance/dpia, compliance/data-subject-request-procedure, compliance/personal-data-breach-assessment, compliance/transfer-impact-assessment, isms/cloud-pii-27018-processor, isms/control-evidence-matrix

Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27701:2025, with links to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 and ISO/IEC 29100:2024. The column design, decision rules, labels, example rows and GDPR mapping are original text. No control text, control titles, numbering tables or guidance from ISO/IEC standards are reproduced: control references are placeholders that you fill from the official standard, which you need to implement the requirements. Check the current edition of ISO/IEC 27701 and the consolidated GDPR text before use.

Template licence: MIT.

관련 템플릿