# Promotion Packet: [name] -> [target level]

> The case for promotion, built from evidence already produced.
> Write it so a committee that doesn't know you can evaluate it.

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Candidate | @name |
| Current -> target | [level] -> [level] |
| Manager | @name |
| Packet date | YYYY-MM-DD |

## Case summary

[Three sentences: what level scope they already operate at, the
strongest proof, and why now.]

## Level expectations

| Expectation at [target level] | Evidence from this period |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
| [scope: e.g. leads cross-team work] | [project + outcome + link] |
| [impact: e.g. org-level results] | [metric moved] |
| [behaviors: e.g. mentors others] | [example] |

## Signature work

### [Project 1]

- **Problem**: [what]
- **Role**: [exactly what they owned vs the team]
- **Impact**: [numbers]
- **Artifacts**: [docs / PRs / launches]

### [Project 2]

- **Problem**:
- **Role**:
- **Impact**:
- **Artifacts**:

## Peer feedback (quoted, attributed)

> "[Specific observation of scope/impact]" – @peer, [role]

> "[...]" – @peer, [role]

## Gaps acknowledged

[What is not yet at target level and the plan to close it – honesty
here strengthens the packet.]

## Endorsements

| Sponsor | Level | Statement |
|---------|-------|-----------|
| @name | [level] | [why they endorse] |