# Certification Audit Explained: [Organization name]

> Learning guide that explains, end to end, how accredited certification
> to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 works: accreditation, choosing a
> certification body (CB), audit time, Stage 1, Stage 2, findings, the
> certification decision, the certificate, surveillance, recertification,
> transfers, remote audits and what happens on audit days. It follows the
> rules that ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 and ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024 set for
> certification bodies, written in plain words. Use it to brief top
> management, process owners and interviewees before the first audit.
> Replace every `[bracketed]` value and every row marked *Example*.

<!--
Guidance: How to use this template
- Use it when the organization has decided to seek certification and
  people ask "what will actually happen?". Share it with top management
  at the start of the project, and again with interviewees two to four
  weeks before Stage 1 and Stage 2.
- Fill first: Document control, the "Our certification at a glance"
  table in section 1 (CB, dates, scope reference) and the briefing plan
  in section 14. The explanations can stay as written; edit them only
  where your CB's certification rules differ.
- Main pitfall: treating the guide as the CB's rules. Every CB has its
  own certification agreement, deadlines and terminology within the
  limits of ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO/IEC 27006-1. Where this guide and
  your CB's rules differ, the CB's rules apply.
- Related templates: `isms/certification-body-selection`,
  `isms/stage-1-readiness-pack`, `isms/stage-2-audit-evidence-index`,
  `isms/certification-findings-action-plan`, `isms/certification-cycle-plan`,
  `isms/surveillance-readiness-health-check`, `isms/scope-extension-multisite-plan`,
  `isms/certification-mark-usage`, `isms/isms-worked-walkthrough`.
-->

## Document control

<!-- Guidance: Learning-path documents use LRN-ISMS IDs. Keep this guide under document control like any other ISMS document so briefings use the current version. -->

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | LRN-ISMS-07 |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / Approved / Superseded] |
| Owner | [@isms-manager] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@top-management-sponsor], [@internal-audit-lead] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024; CB rules from ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 and ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024 |
| Certification body | [CB name], accredited by [accreditation body] |
| ISMS scope reference | DOC-ISMS-002 [version] |
| Audience | [Top management, ISMS team, process owners, interviewees] |
| Next scheduled review | [Before each external audit, at least yearly] |

### Approvals

| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISMS manager | [@isms-manager] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Top management sponsor | [@ceo] | [Approved for briefings] | YYYY-MM-DD |

### Revision history

| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 *(Example)* | 2027-02-01 | [@isms-manager] | First draft for the steering committee |
| 1.0 *(Example)* | 2027-03-22 | [@isms-manager] | CB name, dates and briefing plan added after contract signature |
| [x.y] | YYYY-MM-DD | [@author] | [Change] |

## Contents

1. The certification journey at a glance
2. Accreditation: why it matters
3. Choosing a certification body
4. Application, contract and audit time
5. Stage 1 audit
6. Stage 2 audit
7. Findings: how they are graded and answered
8. The certification decision and the certificate
9. Surveillance audits
10. Recertification
11. Transfers, special audits, suspension and withdrawal
12. Remote, multi-site and integrated audits
13. What to expect on audit days
14. Preparing your people
15. Size tiers
16. Common myths
17. Records and evidence
18. References

## 1. The certification journey at a glance

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: give everyone the same picture of the steps and who decides. Questions to answer: who is our CB, when are Stage 1 and Stage 2, which scope will the certificate show? Pitfall: people think the auditor decides on the spot. Auditor check: none; this is internal orientation. -->

Certification is a third-party confirmation that the organization's
information security management system (ISMS) conforms to ISO/IEC 27001
for a defined scope. The organization builds and runs the ISMS; an
independent certification body audits it; a person or committee at the
CB who did not take part in the audit makes the certification decision.
The certificate then lasts three years, with surveillance audits in
between and a recertification audit before it expires.

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Decide to certify and define scope"] --> B["Choose an accredited CB"]
  B --> C["Application, audit time and contract"]
  C --> D["Stage 1: documentation and readiness"]
  D --> E{"Ready for Stage 2?"}
  E -- "No" --> F["Close areas of concern"]
  F --> D
  E -- "Yes" --> G["Stage 2: implementation and effectiveness"]
  G --> H["Findings answered: corrections and corrective actions"]
  H --> I["Independent certification decision by the CB"]
  I --> J["Certificate issued, three-year cycle starts"]
  J --> K["Surveillance audit year 1"]
  K --> L["Surveillance audit year 2"]
  L --> M["Recertification audit before expiry"]
  M --> J
```

Our certification at a glance:

| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Certification body | [CB name] *(Example: CB selected through DOC-ISMS-090)* |
| Accreditation body | [name], member of the Global ACI MRA (formerly IAF MLA) |
| Scope to appear on the certificate | [scope wording from DOC-ISMS-002] |
| Statement of Applicability version | DOC-ISMS-011 [version] |
| Stage 1 | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Stage 2 | YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD |
| Target decision date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| ISMS contact for the CB | [@isms-manager] |

## 2. Accreditation: why it matters

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain why the accreditation behind a certificate matters more than the logo. Questions to answer: who accredits our CB, for which standard and country? Pitfall: buying a certificate from a body that is not accredited, which customers and regulators then reject. Auditor check: your customers' procurement teams verify the accreditation. -->

Accreditation is the check on the checkers. A national accreditation
body assesses a certification body against ISO/IEC 17021-1 (general
rules for bodies that certify management systems) and ISO/IEC 27006-1
(additional rules for ISMS certification, such as auditor competence and
audit time). An accredited CB is itself audited regularly.

Mutual recognition makes a certificate useful across borders. On
2026-01-01 the International Accreditation Forum (IAF) and the
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) were replaced
by Global Accreditation Cooperation Incorporated (Global ACI). The IAF
Multilateral Recognition Arrangement (MLA) and the ILAC arrangement were
replaced by a single Global ACI MRA. Existing recognition continues.
The IAF mandatory documents used in this guide have been re-issued by
Global ACI (IAF MD 1 as Global ACI-TECH-3-001, MD 2 as TECH-3-002, MD 4
as TECH-3-003 and MD 11 as TECH-3-008; version 1.0 issued 2026-07-10,
in force 2026-08-28, as reported at the time of writing), and legacy IAF
MLA marks remain usable by accreditation bodies and accredited CBs during
the mark transition. Certified organizations generally may not use the
IAF MLA or Global ACI MRA mark, only the CB's own mark under its rules
(`isms/certification-mark-usage`). Check the current
issue and status on the Global ACI and accreditation body websites.

What to check:

1. The CB's accreditation certificate names ISO/IEC 27001 (an ISO 9001
   accreditation alone is not enough).
2. The accreditation body is a signatory of the Global ACI MRA (formerly
   IAF MLA) for management system certification.
3. The accreditation covers the countries and, where relevant, the
   sectors in your scope.
4. Certificates the CB issues can be looked up in the accreditation
   body's register or in the CertSearch database that IAF set up and
   transferred to Global ACI (check its current address).

Unaccredited certificates exist. They may be cheaper and faster, but
they carry no independent assurance and many customer contracts, tenders
and regulators do not accept them.

## 3. Choosing a certification body

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: show what a sound selection looks like. Questions to answer: which criteria matter to us (sector experience, languages, remote audit policy, travel, three-year cost)? Pitfall: comparing the Stage 2 fee only. Auditor check: none; record the decision in DOC-ISMS-090. -->

Choose the CB as a three-year relationship, not a one-off purchase. The
selection template `isms/certification-body-selection` (DOC-ISMS-090)
holds the full method. The main criteria:

| Criterion | What good looks like |
|---|---|
| Accreditation | ISO/IEC 27001 accreditation from a Global ACI MRA signatory, covering your countries |
| Sector and technology experience | Auditors who know cloud services, OT, health or finance, as your scope needs |
| Audit time quote | Days calculated from ISO/IEC 27006-1 and explained, not a round number |
| Three-year cost | Stage 1, Stage 2, two surveillances, travel, annual fees and the recertification compared side by side |
| Languages and locations | Auditors who can interview your people in their working language at your sites |
| Remote audit policy | Clear rules for remote and hybrid audits in line with IAF MD 4 (now Global ACI-TECH-3-003) |
| Independence | No ISMS consultancy to you from the CB or a related body; ask how the CB manages independence and how long it waits after any past link |
| Process and service | Clear certification rules, findings deadlines, appeal and complaint process, portal for submissions |

Independence matters in both directions. A CB may not offer you ISMS
consultancy, and a consultant who built your ISMS should not present
themselves as linked to the CB. Training that is open to the public is
not consultancy.

## 4. Application, contract and audit time

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain what the CB asks for before quoting and how audit time is set. Questions to answer: how many persons work under our control in scope, how many sites, what complexity factors apply? Pitfall: understating headcount to lower the quote; the CB recalculates at Stage 1 and the plan changes. Auditor check: the CB verifies the application data during the audit. -->

The CB sends an application form. Expect questions on:

- the scope you want certified, the sites and the activities at each;
- the number of persons doing work under the organization's control
  within scope (employees, contractors and part-time staff, counted as
  the CB's rules require);
- the IT environment, outsourced processes, cloud services and
  development activities;
- legal and regulatory requirements that apply;
- other certifications held, for integrated audits;
- any use of consultants.

**Audit time.** The CB calculates audit days from ISO/IEC 27006-1. The
starting point is the number of persons in scope, then adjusted for
business and IT complexity factors (for example, the criticality of
information, the number of IT platforms, outsourcing and in-house
development). The CB must document how it arrived at the number. Any
day count you see in this library is an *Example*, not a rule.

*Example*: Quillmere Analytics Ltd (46 persons in scope: 38 employees
and 8 contractors) received a quote of 1.5 days for Stage 1 and 3.5 days
for Stage 2, 5.0 days in total for initial certification (1.5 + 3.5 =
5.0). Stage 1 was held on 2027-04-12 and 2027-04-13 and Stage 2 from
2027-05-10 to 2027-05-12; `isms/isms-worked-walkthrough` follows the
whole timeline. These figures
illustrate a small SaaS company; your CB's calculation will differ.

**Contract.** The certification agreement binds you to the CB's
certification rules: access to records and people, notification of
significant changes, rules for using the certificate and marks, fees,
confidentiality and the appeal process. Read it before signing, in
particular the findings deadlines and the cancellation terms.

## 5. Stage 1 audit

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain what Stage 1 checks and why it is not a formality. Questions to answer: is every mandatory document approved, has the ISMS produced records, have we completed an internal audit and a management review? Pitfall: arriving at Stage 1 with draft documents. Auditor check: readiness for Stage 2 and the agreed Stage 2 plan. -->

Stage 1 tells both sides whether Stage 2 can go ahead. The CB auditor:

- reviews the documented information the standard requires (scope,
  policy, risk assessment and treatment processes and results, SoA,
  objectives, competence evidence, monitoring results, audit programme
  and results, management review results, nonconformities and corrective
  actions);
- confirms the scope, sites, processes and the persons in scope, and
  checks the audit time is still right;
- checks that the internal audit and the management review have been
  planned and performed;
- assesses your understanding of the requirements, the key risks and the
  controls in the SoA;
- agrees the Stage 2 plan: dates, sites, people and the evidence to
  sample.

Stage 1 is often partly on site, partly remote, depending on the CB and
the scope. The auditor issues a Stage 1 report with areas of concern:
items that could become nonconformities at Stage 2. Close them before
Stage 2. The CB decides the interval between the two stages; it must
leave time for you to act.

Certification bodies usually expect one full internal audit of the ISMS
and one management review before Stage 2 (CB practice, not a clause),
and the ISMS to have run long enough to produce records. Build
the plan around that. Use `isms/stage-1-readiness-pack` (DOC-ISMS-091)
to assemble what the auditor will ask for.

## 6. Stage 2 audit

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain that Stage 2 tests whether the ISMS works in practice, through interviews, observation and samples. Questions to answer: who will be interviewed, which records will be sampled, who guides the auditor? Pitfall: preparing documents but not the people who run the controls. Auditor check: implementation and effectiveness of the whole ISMS and the applicable controls. -->

Stage 2 evaluates implementation and effectiveness. The audit team
follows the plan agreed at Stage 1 and looks for evidence that:

- the clauses 4 to 10 processes run as described, with records;
- risks are assessed and treated as the methodology says, and risk
  owners have approved the treatment plan and accepted residual risks;
- the controls in the SoA operate, tested by sampling (for example,
  joiners and leavers, access reviews, backups and restore tests,
  vulnerability remediation, supplier reviews, incidents);
- objectives are measured and performance is evaluated;
- internal audit and management review produce actions that are
  followed up;
- people know the policy, their role and how to report an event.

Expect interviews with top management, the ISMS manager, process and
control owners, and a few staff chosen by the auditor. Expect requests
for live demonstrations ("show me the access review for the production
cloud accounts"). Use `isms/stage-2-audit-evidence-index` (DOC-ISMS-092)
to find each record within minutes.

The audit ends with a closing meeting where the lead auditor presents
the findings and the recommendation to the CB. The recommendation is not
the decision.

## 7. Findings: how they are graded and answered

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain grades and the response the CB expects. Questions to answer: what deadlines does our CB set, how are responses submitted? Pitfall: answering with a correction only, without root cause and corrective action. Auditor check: the CB reviews and accepts the plan, and verifies major ones before the decision. -->

| Grade | Plain meaning | What the CB needs before a decision |
|---|---|---|
| Major nonconformity | A serious gap: a whole process is missing or has broken down, or the gap is big enough that the auditor no longer trusts the ISMS to do its job | Correction, root cause and corrective action accepted, and implementation verified (document review or a follow-up visit, as the CB decides) |
| Minor nonconformity | A requirement is not fully met in an isolated way that does not undermine the system | Correction and corrective action plan accepted; implementation checked at the next audit |
| Observation or area of concern | A weakness that could become a nonconformity | No formal response required by most CBs; act on it anyway |
| Opportunity for improvement | A suggestion | Your decision; record it |

Grade names vary between CBs. The CB grades, not the auditee. If you
disagree, discuss it at the closing meeting with evidence, then use the
CB's documented clarification or appeal process.

**Answering a nonconformity.** For each finding provide:

1. the correction (fix the instance found);
2. the extent check (how many other cases exist);
3. the root cause;
4. corrective actions that remove the cause, with owners and dates;
5. the effectiveness criterion;
6. evidence, with document versions and dates.

The CB sets the deadlines. *Example*: 30 days for the plan and 90 days
for evidence of major nonconformities, as set by the CB. A major
nonconformity not closed within the CB's limit can mean repeating Stage
2. Track every finding in `isms/certification-findings-action-plan`
(DOC-ISMS-093) and log it in `isms/audit-findings-register`
(DOC-ISMS-086).

## 8. The certification decision and the certificate

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain who decides and what the certificate shows. Questions to answer: does the scope wording match DOC-ISMS-002, are the sites correct? Pitfall: not checking the draft certificate, then living with a wrong scope for three years. Auditor check: none; the CB's decision maker reviews the audit file. -->

A person or committee at the CB who was not on the audit team reviews
the audit report, the findings and your responses, then decides to grant,
not grant or defer certification. No one can promise certification in
advance, including consultants and the auditor.

The certificate typically shows:

- the organization's name and certified sites;
- the scope (activities, products and services);
- the standard and edition, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (CBs may also reference
  the 2024 amendment);
- a reference to the version of the Statement of Applicability;
- the initial certification date, the issue date and the expiry date;
- the accreditation body mark (where the CB is accredited for that
  scope) and a certificate number.

Ask for a draft and check the scope wording, legal entity name and site
addresses. Use of the certificate and marks follows the CB's rules: see
`isms/certification-mark-usage` (DOC-ISMS-097). A certificate is never a
product certification; do not put the mark on products or test reports.

## 9. Surveillance audits

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain that certification continues through surveillance. Questions to answer: when is surveillance 1 due, which areas will the CB cover? Pitfall: letting the ISMS lapse after the certificate arrives. Auditor check: continued operation, changes, and closure of previous findings. -->

The certificate is maintained by surveillance audits at least once each
calendar year, except in recertification years. The first surveillance
after initial certification must take place no later than 12 months from
the certification decision date. Surveillance audits are shorter than
Stage 2 and cover a sample of the ISMS, but each one typically checks:

- internal audits and the management review since the last audit;
- actions on previous findings, including minor nonconformities from
  Stage 2;
- complaints, incidents and changes to the scope, organization or
  technology;
- the use of the certificate and marks;
- progress on objectives and continual improvement;
- a rotating set of controls, so that the whole SoA is covered across
  the cycle.

Plan the cycle in `isms/certification-cycle-plan` (DOC-ISMS-094) and run
`isms/surveillance-readiness-health-check` (DOC-ISMS-096) about eight
weeks before each visit.

## 10. Recertification

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain that the certificate expires and must be renewed by audit. Questions to answer: when must the recertification audit happen so the decision lands before expiry? Pitfall: booking recertification too late and losing continuity of the certificate. Auditor check: performance of the ISMS over the whole cycle. -->

Before the certificate expires the CB performs a recertification audit,
similar in depth to Stage 2. It reviews the ISMS's performance over the
whole three-year period, the results of surveillance, and changes in
context. Plan it and complete it, including closure of any major
nonconformity and the new decision, before the expiry date. If the
decision comes after expiry, the CB's rules define whether and how
certification can be restored; continuity of the certificate dates is
not guaranteed. Book the recertification audit with enough time for
findings; *Example*: about three months before expiry.

## 11. Transfers, special audits, suspension and withdrawal

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: cover the events outside the normal cycle. Questions to answer: are we thinking of changing CB, are major changes coming? Pitfall: changing CB with open major nonconformities, which blocks the transfer. Auditor check: the new CB reviews the history before accepting a transfer. -->

**Transfer to another CB.** You may move an accredited certificate to
another accredited CB during the cycle. IAF MD 2:2023 on the transfer
of accredited certification of management systems, now re-issued by
Global ACI as Global ACI-TECH-3-002 (check the current issue), describes
the process: the receiving CB carries out a pre-transfer review of the
certificate, the last audit reports, open findings, complaints and the
reason for transfer. Certificates that are suspended, or that have open
major nonconformities, are generally not transferable until resolved.

**Special audits.** The CB can audit at short notice to extend the
scope, to investigate a complaint or a serious incident, after major
changes, or to follow up on a suspension. Tell the CB about significant
changes (legal entity, ownership, scope, sites, key processes) as the
agreement requires. Plan extensions with `isms/scope-extension-multisite-plan`
(DOC-ISMS-095).

**Suspension and withdrawal.** The CB can suspend a certificate when the
ISMS persistently fails, when surveillance or recertification cannot be
carried out on time, or when the organization asks. During suspension
the certificate is temporarily invalid. If the issue is not resolved in
the time the CB sets, the certificate is withdrawn or the scope is
reduced.

**Appeals and complaints.** Every accredited CB has a documented process
for appeals against decisions and for complaints. Use it rather than
arguing at the audit.

## 12. Remote, multi-site and integrated audits

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: explain how the format of the audit can vary. Questions to answer: which parts can be remote, how will sites be sampled, can the audit be combined with ISO 9001 or ISO 22301? Pitfall: assuming a fully remote audit is always allowed. Auditor check: the CB's audit plan states the method for each part. -->

**Remote and hybrid audits.** Information and communication technology
can be used for interviews, document review and screen-shared
demonstrations. IAF MD 4:2025 on the use of ICT for conformity
assessment (issue 3, applicable from 2026-01-30), now re-issued by
Global ACI as Global ACI-TECH-3-003, sets the conditions: the CB assesses the risks, confirms that the technology
and connection work, and plans on-site time where physical controls or
processes need direct observation. Prepare a quiet room, a stable
connection, screen sharing, and a way to show records without sending
copies of sensitive data. Agree in advance what may be recorded.

**Multi-site organizations.** Where several sites run the same ISMS,
the CB may sample sites instead of visiting all of them each year.
ISO/IEC 27006-1 and IAF MD 1:2023 on multi-site organizations, now
re-issued by Global ACI as Global ACI-TECH-3-001, set the conditions: a central function that controls the ISMS, internal audits
of every site, and a sampling plan. Sites that differ in activities or
risk are not interchangeable.

**Integrated audits.** If you hold other certificates with the same CB
(ISO 9001, ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 20000-1, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 42001), the
audits can be combined. IAF MD 11:2023 on audits of integrated
management systems, now re-issued by Global ACI as Global
ACI-TECH-3-008, governs how audit time can be adjusted. Integration saves time when the shared
processes (document control, internal audit, management review,
corrective action) are genuinely shared.

Check the current issue of each document on the Global ACI website
before relying on it; references in contracts and CB rules may still use
the IAF numbers.

## 13. What to expect on audit days

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: make the day predictable for everyone. Questions to answer: who is the guide, where is the evidence, who joins the opening and closing meetings? Pitfall: interviewees guessing or over-explaining. Auditor check: none; this is how the audit is run. -->

A typical audit day follows the plan the CB sends in advance.

| Time *(Example)* | Activity | Who attends |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00 | Opening meeting: scope, plan, method, confidentiality, finding grades | Top management, ISMS manager, guides |
| 09:30 | Interviews and evidence review by process (for example, risk management, access control, supplier management) | Process owners, ISMS manager as guide |
| 12:30 | Lunch; the auditor reviews notes | Auditor only |
| 13:30 | Sampling and demonstrations (records pulled from live systems) | Control owners |
| 16:00 | Auditor's private review time | Auditor only |
| 16:30 | Daily debrief: issues so far, requests for tomorrow | ISMS manager |
| Last day | Closing meeting: findings, grades, recommendation, next steps | Top management, ISMS manager, process owners |

Guidance for interviewees:

1. Answer the question asked, with what you actually do. "I do not
   know, but I will find out who does" is a good answer.
2. Show records from the real system rather than describing them.
3. Do not offer documents that are not under control.
4. Never alter or create records during the audit to fill a gap.
   Report the gap to the ISMS manager; a correction made openly is
   better than a record that looks back-dated.
5. Ask for clarification if a question is unclear.

The guide (usually the ISMS manager) keeps a log of requests and
promised evidence, and makes sure everything is delivered before the
debrief.

## 14. Preparing your people

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: plan the briefings that make interviews go well. Questions to answer: who will be interviewed, when are they briefed, who checks they can find their records? Pitfall: briefing only managers. Auditor check: awareness (clause 7.3) is tested through ordinary staff interviews. -->

| Audience | Briefing content | When *(Example)* | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top management | Their role at opening and closing meetings, policy, objectives, management review decisions, resources | 4 weeks before Stage 1 | [@isms-manager] |
| Process and control owners | Their procedures, records and where to find them, likely samples | 3 weeks before Stage 2 | [@isms-manager] |
| All staff in scope | Policy, how to report a security event, their key responsibilities, interview etiquette | 2 weeks before Stage 2 | [@isms-manager] |
| Guides | Plan, evidence index, request log, escalation | 1 week before each audit | [@isms-manager] |

Hold a short mock interview for each process owner. Rehearse the record
retrieval: an auditor who waits ten minutes for every sample loses
confidence in the system.

## 15. Size tiers

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: show how the same certification process feels at different sizes. These tiers are the library's working tiers, not official definitions; figures are Example values. Auditor check: audit time and site sampling come from the CB applying ISO/IEC 27006-1. -->

| Aspect | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd *(Example)* | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems *(Example)* | Large or multi-site: Quillmere Group *(Example)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profile | 46 staff (38 employees, 8 contractors), one office plus remote staff, SaaS on one public cloud in two regions | 320 staff, two offices and one colocation suite | 2,400 staff, 6 sites in 4 countries, OT and IT, ISO 9001 and ISO 22301 certified |
| Target | Certificate in 6 months | ISO/IEC 27001 in 10 months, ISO/IEC 27701 the year after | Group certificate in 15 months, phased by site |
| Audit format | Stage 1 largely remote, Stage 2 on site at the office plus remote cloud demonstrations | Stage 1 on site, Stage 2 at both offices and the colocation suite | Integrated audit with ISO 9001 and ISO 22301, site sampling under IAF MD 1 (Global ACI-TECH-3-001), OT sites visited in person |
| Interviewees | Most of the leadership team and several engineers | Process owners, 3-person security team, colocation provider contacts | Site managers, CISO office, OT engineers, local interpreters where needed |
| Coordination | Part-time ISMS manager (0.5 FTE) acts as the only guide | ISMS manager plus one guide per site | Central certification coordinator, a guide per site, daily cross-site debrief |
| Main risk at Stage 2 | Records missing because one person holds many roles | Inconsistent practice between the two offices | Sites at different maturity; a weak site can affect the group certificate |

## 16. Common myths

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: correct misunderstandings early. Pitfall: decisions built on a myth (for example, delaying the internal audit). -->

| Myth | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The consultant guarantees we will pass." | Only the accredited CB decides; nobody can guarantee the outcome. |
| "All 93 Annex A controls must be implemented." | Controls are selected through risk treatment; excluded controls are justified in the SoA. |
| "One nonconformity means failure." | Minor nonconformities are normal; majors must be closed and verified before the decision. |
| "After the certificate we can relax." | Surveillance every year checks that the ISMS keeps working. |
| "Remote audits are always allowed." | The CB decides under IAF MD 4 (Global ACI-TECH-3-003), after assessing feasibility and risk. |
| "The certificate covers the whole company." | It covers only the scope written on it. |
| "We need a 2013 certificate first." | The 2013 edition certificates expired at the end of the transition, 2025-10-31; certify to the 2022 edition. |

## 17. Records and evidence

<!-- Guidance: Purpose: list the records that prove the certification process is managed. Questions to answer: where are CB reports and correspondence kept, for how long? Auditor check: the CB reviews previous reports and actions at each audit. Link to the control evidence matrix. -->

| Record | Owner | Where kept | Retention *(Example)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB selection and contract (DOC-ISMS-090) | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository, contracts folder | Cycle plus 3 years |
| Application form and audit time calculation from the CB | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository | Cycle plus 3 years |
| Stage 1 pack and report (DOC-ISMS-091) | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository | Cycle plus 3 years |
| Stage 2 evidence index and audit report (DOC-ISMS-092) | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository | Cycle plus 3 years |
| Findings action plan and CB acceptance (DOC-ISMS-093) | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository | Cycle plus 3 years |
| Certificate and certification decision letter | [@isms-manager] | ISMS repository, legal | Validity plus 3 years |
| Briefing attendance (section 14) | [@isms-manager] | Training records (DOC-ISMS-026) | 3 years |
| Mark usage approvals (DOC-ISMS-097) | [@marketing-lead] | Marketing repository | Validity plus 1 year |

Map these records to clauses and controls in `isms/control-evidence-matrix`
(DOC-ISMS-033) and list them in `isms/isms-documented-information-register`
(DOC-ISMS-028).

## 18. References

<!-- Guidance: Cite editions exactly; check for newer editions and new Global ACI documents before use. -->

| Reference | Edition and link | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 | https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html ; Amd 1: https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.html | Requirements being certified |
| ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 | https://www.iso.org/standard/61651.html | Rules for CBs: stages, surveillance, recertification, decisions |
| ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024 | https://www.iso.org/standard/82908.html | ISMS-specific CB rules: audit time, competence, multi-site |
| ISO/IEC 27007:2020 | https://www.iso.org/standard/77802.html | ISMS auditing guidance (under revision; check for a newer edition) |
| ISO 19011:2026 | https://www.iso.org/standard/88984.html | Guidance on auditing management systems |
| IAF MD 1:2023, MD 2:2023, MD 4:2025, MD 11:2023, re-issued as Global ACI-TECH-3-001, -002, -003 and -008 | Global ACI v1.0 issued 2026-07-10, in force 2026-08-28; check the current issue | Multi-site, transfer, ICT in audits, integrated audits |
| Global ACI MRA (formerly IAF MLA) | Global ACI and accreditation body websites | Recognition of accredited certificates |

Related templates: `isms/certification-body-selection` (DOC-ISMS-090),
`isms/stage-1-readiness-pack` (DOC-ISMS-091),
`isms/stage-2-audit-evidence-index` (DOC-ISMS-092),
`isms/certification-findings-action-plan` (DOC-ISMS-093),
`isms/certification-cycle-plan` (DOC-ISMS-094),
`isms/scope-extension-multisite-plan` (DOC-ISMS-095),
`isms/surveillance-readiness-health-check` (DOC-ISMS-096),
`isms/certification-mark-usage` (DOC-ISMS-097),
`isms/audit-findings-register` (DOC-ISMS-086),
`isms/isms-worked-walkthrough` (LRN-ISMS-09).

## Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 and with the
certification process that ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 and ISO/IEC 27006-1:2024
set for certification bodies. The explanations, tables and examples are
original. No ISO or IEC text is reproduced; read the official standards
(purchase or licensed access from ISO, IEC or your national standards
body), the current IAF or Global ACI documents and your certification
body's rules before relying on any statement here. Check the current
edition of each standard before use. Certification decisions are made
only by the accredited certification body. This is a learning guide, not
certification or legal advice. Template licence: MIT.
