# MBA Interview Preparation Workbook: [Your name, School A interview]

> A preparation workbook for MBA admissions interviews: the main interview formats and what each one tests, a story
> bank mapped to competencies, the common question types written as original practice questions, a practice
> protocol with a scoring rubric, questions to ask your interviewer, and a logistics checklist for virtual and
> in-person interviews. It is for applicants to full-time, part-time and executive MBA programmes who have been
> invited to interview, or who want to prepare before invitations arrive.
> Source basis: research on structured and behavioural interviews (Janz 1982; Campion, Palmer and Campion 1997;
> Schmidt and Hunter 1998) and public descriptions of interview formats on school admissions pages, checked in
> October 2026 and written in our own words. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked *Example*.
> This is a planning aid, not admissions advice. No interview outcome is promised, and no school endorses this template.

<!--
Guidance: How to use this template
- Start the story bank (section 4) before any invitation arrives: it is the slowest part to build and it also feeds your essays.
- When an invitation arrives, fill the school profile (section 2) from the invitation and the school's current instructions, then follow the timeline in section 3.
- Practise out loud, record yourself, and score each mock with the rubric in section 7. Practising silently in your head does not count.
- Prepare stories, not scripts. Interviewers notice memorised paragraphs quickly, and some schools say so in their instructions.
- Never use AI tools or notes during an interview unless the school explicitly allows it. Check each school's rules (section 10).
- Related templates: mba/mba-team-discussion-prep, mba/mba-post-interview-reflection, mba/mba-personal-narrative, mba/mba-goals-essay, mba/mba-why-school-essay, mba/mba-leadership-impact-essay, mba/mba-setback-growth-essay, mba/mba-video-essay-prep, mba/mba-school-research-log, mba/mba-application-tracker, mba/mba-ai-use-policy-check, mba/mba-waitlist-update-letter, career/interview-prep
-->

## Document control

<!-- Guidance: One workbook for the whole season; add one school profile per invitation. Ask a mentor or coach to review the story bank, not to write it. -->

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [INT-2026-01] |
| Applicant | [Your name] |
| Programmes and rounds | [School A, Round 1; School B, Round 2] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / In practice / Interview done] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Reviewed by | [Mentor or coach, for feedback only] |
| Classification | Personal, private |

Contents: 1. Purpose and when to use it; 2. Interview formats; 3. Process and timeline; 4. Story bank and
competency map; 5. Answer structure; 6. Common question types; 7. Practice protocol and scoring rubric;
8. Questions to ask; 9. Logistics; 10. Ethics and AI use; 11. Quality checklist; 12. Common mistakes;
13. Workbook; Sources and further reading; Revision history; Standard and licence note.

## 1. Purpose and when to use it

<!-- Guidance: Read once. The aim is evidence about you, delivered in conversation, not a performance. -->

An MBA interview is the admissions committee's chance to test, in conversation, what the written application
claims. The committee already knows your grades, test score, job history and essays. The interview adds evidence
that paper cannot give: how you think on your feet, how you explain your choices, how you treat the person in front
of you, and whether your stories hold together when someone asks a follow-up question. Most leading programmes
interview by invitation only and do not admit anyone without an interview, so an invitation means you are a serious
candidate, not that you are admitted.

Use this workbook in three phases. In the **build** phase (ideally before you submit your applications) you collect
and test 10 to 14 stories. In the **rehearse** phase (from the invitation to the interview day, usually two to four
weeks) you practise question types and run scored mock interviews. In the **close** phase (the day before, the day
itself and the day after) you check logistics, run a short warm-up, and write your reflection or follow-up with
mba/mba-post-interview-reflection.

The interview rewards the same thing in every format: specific, honest, recent evidence about what you did, why you
did it, and what you learnt. Applicants who prepare well do not sound rehearsed; they sound like people who have
thought carefully about their own experience and can retrieve the right example quickly.

## 2. Interview formats

<!-- Guidance: Read the invitation and the school's current instructions first. Formats change from one cycle to the next, so record the date you checked. -->

Schools combine a small number of design choices. Knowing which ones your school uses tells you what to prepare.

| Format choice | What it means | What it tests | How to prepare |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blind | The interviewer has seen only your resume, or nothing at all | Whether you can tell your story clearly from the start | Rehearse a two-minute walk-through of your path, and keep every key fact in the answers themselves |
| Application-based | The interviewer has read your full application, sometimes in depth | Depth and consistency: the follow-up questions go beneath your essays | Re-read your application the day before, and prepare for "why" questions about each choice in it |
| Alumni interviewer | A graduate volunteer, often in your region or industry | Fit with the community, communication, maturity | Expect a conversational style, and prepare informed questions about their experience |
| Admissions officer or staff | A member of the admissions team or board | Calibrated comparison across many applicants | Expect a tighter structure and more probing follow-ups |
| Behavioural | Questions about what you actually did in past situations | Real past behaviour as evidence of future behaviour | Build the story bank in section 4 and practise the structure in section 5 |
| Recorded or timed video | Prompts on screen with short preparation and answer times, no live person | Clarity under time pressure | Practise with a timer and a webcam; see mba/mba-video-essay-prep |
| Group discussion | Several applicants discuss a prompt together while observed | Teamwork, listening, contribution quality | See mba/mba-team-discussion-prep |

**Dated examples of public formats** (as of October 2026, checked on the official pages; formats change, so check
each school's current instructions before you rely on them):

- Harvard Business School's interview logistics page describes a 30-minute interview with a member of the MBA
  Admissions Board, held via Zoom or in person. It says recording is prohibited, AI tools (including transcription,
  summarisation and note-taking apps) may not be used, virtual applicants must be alone in a private location, and it
  asks for a written post-interview reflection within 24 hours, with 300 to 450 words as guidance (see
  mba/mba-post-interview-reflection).
  Source: https://www.hbs.edu/mba/your-interview/logistics
- Stanford GSB describes a structured behavioural interview that focuses on past actions rather than hypothetical
  situations, conducted by a subset of its alumni or by MBA admissions staff; every admitted applicant is interviewed
  first. (The page blocked automated access in October 2026; these details were confirmed from the school's search
  listing, so check the page and your invitation for the current format.)
  Source: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/programs/mba/admission/interviews
- Wharton's interview process page describes an invitation-only Team-Based Discussion: a 35-minute virtual group
  exercise with five or six applicants, details provided well in advance, no assigned role, followed by a 10-minute
  one-on-one conversation with a member of the admissions team in which applicants reflect on the discussion. A
  Wharton story dated 19 October 2026 describes the same core format.
  Source: https://mba.wharton.upenn.edu/interview-process/

**School profile (one per invitation)**

| Field | School A *(Example)* | [School B] |
|---|---|---|
| Invitation received | 2026-10-14 *(Example)* | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Interview date and time zone | 2026-11-05, 09:00 local *(Example)* | [Date, time, zone] |
| Format | Blind, alumni interviewer, 45 minutes, virtual *(Example)* | [Format] |
| Additional element | None *(Example)* | [Group discussion / written reflection / video] |
| Instructions checked on | 2026-10-15, admissions page *(Example)* | YYYY-MM-DD, [URL] |
| AI and recording rules | No AI tools, no recording *(Example)* | [Rule from the school's page] |
| Interviewer (if known) | Alumna, Class of [year], consumer goods *(Example)* | [Name or role] |

## 3. Process and timeline

<!-- Guidance: Use relative dates from the invitation (I) and the interview (D). Put the real dates in your calendar the day the invitation arrives. -->

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Story bank built (before submission)"] --> B["Invitation received (I)"]
  B --> C["Read the school's current instructions and book a slot"]
  C --> D["Fill the school profile and re-read your application"]
  D --> E["Question-type drills, recorded"]
  E --> F["Mock interviews, scored with the rubric"]
  F --> G{"Last two mocks both 3.5 or more?"}
  G -- "No" --> E
  G -- "Yes" --> H["Logistics check (D-2)"]
  H --> I["Interview day (D)"]
  I --> J["Reflection or follow-up note (D to D+1)"]
```

| When | Task | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Before submission | Build 10 to 14 stories and map them to competencies (section 4) | [ ] |
| I to I+2 days | Book a slot, record the format and rules, add the dates to your calendar | [ ] |
| I+2 to D-14 | Two drills a day on question types (section 6), recorded and reviewed | [ ] |
| D-14 to D-5 | Three to five scored mock interviews with different partners (section 7) | [ ] |
| D-4 | Re-read your application, resume and the school research log (mba/mba-school-research-log) | [ ] |
| D-2 | Logistics check: technology, route, clothing, documents (section 9) | [ ] |
| D-1 | One light run-through of the opening and your questions; sleep | [ ] |
| D | 20-minute warm-up out loud; arrive or log in 10 minutes early | [ ] |
| D to D+1 | Reflection required by the school, or a short thank-you note where appropriate; private debrief | [ ] |

## 4. Story bank and competency map

<!-- Guidance: A story is one specific situation in the last three to five years with a clear personal action. "I usually lead my team well" is not a story. -->

Interviewers draw their questions from a small set of competencies. The list below follows the competencies most
programmes look for, consistent with the competency map used across this library (analytical reasoning, ethical
decision making, communication, leadership and teamwork, global perspective, technology and data). Build at least
two stories per competency so you never have to reuse the same example twice in one interview.

**Competency list**

| Code | Competency | Evidence an interviewer looks for |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | Leadership and influence | You set a direction and others followed, with or without formal authority |
| C2 | Teamwork and conflict | You made a group work better, including when people disagreed |
| C3 | Setback and learning | You failed or fell short, owned it, and changed something afterwards |
| C4 | Ethics and judgment | You faced a real tension between values or interests and chose with reasons |
| C5 | Impact and initiative | You saw a problem nobody owned and changed an outcome you can measure |
| C6 | Analytical problem solving | You structured an unclear problem and decided with evidence |
| C7 | Cross-cultural and global | You worked across cultures, countries or very different backgrounds |
| C8 | Self-awareness and feedback | You received hard feedback and acted on it |
| C9 | Goals and motivation | Your past choices explain your goals and why an MBA now |

**Story bank**

| ID | Short title | When | Situation (one line) | Your action (one line) | Result (with a number if possible) | Competencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STY-001 *(Example)* | Warehouse pilot rescue | 2025 | Robot pilot at a client warehouse missed its throughput target by 30% | Ran night shadow shifts, found a picking-path bottleneck, re-sequenced orders with the client's floor lead | Throughput target met in 6 weeks, contract renewed | C1, C6, C5 |
| STY-002 *(Example)* | The pricing disagreement | 2024 | Two senior colleagues disagreed on a discount policy and the team stalled | Ran a one-hour session where each side built the other's case, then a small test | Test chosen within a week, margin held | C2, C6 |
| STY-003 *(Example)* | Missed launch date | 2023 | I promised a launch date without checking the supplier lead time | Told my manager the same day, reset the plan, built a lead-time check into planning | Launched 5 weeks late, no repeat in two years | C3, C8 |
| STY-004 *(Example)* | Safety report | 2025 | A supplier asked us to sign off a test we had not witnessed | Refused to sign, escalated, offered a re-test date | Re-test passed, supplier changed its process | C4 |
| STY-005 *(Example)* | Mentoring programme | 2024 | New hires from abroad left within a year at twice the average rate | Built a buddy programme with six volunteers | First-year attrition fell from 22% to 12% | C5, C7 |
| [STY-006] | [Title] | [Year] | [Situation] | [Action] | [Result] | [Codes] |
| [STY-007] | [Title] | [Year] | [Situation] | [Action] | [Result] | [Codes] |

**Coverage check.** Count the stories tagged with each competency (in Excel, with the codes in column G:
`=SUMPRODUCT(--ISNUMBER(SEARCH("C1",G2:G15)))`). The five example stories cover only C5 and C6 twice; every other
competency has one story or none, so five stories are far from enough. Fill C9 (goals) first, then add a second
story for each of C1 to C4, C7 and C8 (computed in the calc script for this template).

| Competency | Stories *(Example)* | Gap? |
|---|---|---|
| C1 Leadership | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C2 Teamwork | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C3 Setback | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C4 Ethics | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C5 Impact | 2 | No |
| C6 Analytical | 2 | No |
| C7 Cross-cultural | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C8 Self-awareness | 1 | Yes, add one |
| C9 Goals | 0 | Yes, add two |

**Choosing strong stories.** Prefer recent stories (the last three to five years) over university stories. Prefer
stories where you can say what you personally did, in the first person singular, even if the result was a team
result. Prefer stories with a tension: a choice, a risk, a disagreement or a mistake. A story where everything went
to plan shows competence but rarely shows judgment. Keep at least one story outside work (community, family,
sport, a side project) because many interviewers ask about life outside the office.

## 5. Answer structure

<!-- Guidance: Use the structure to organise your memory, not to sound mechanical. The listener should hear a story, not four labelled boxes. -->

Behavioural answers are easiest to follow in a four-part order widely taught as STAR: **Situation**, **Task**,
**Action**, **Result**. Add a fifth part, **Learning**, because MBA interviewers almost always ask what you would
do differently, and it is better to offer it.

| Part | Share of the answer | What to say | Common error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Situation | about 15% | Where, when, who, what was at stake, in two or three sentences | Long background that uses up the time |
| Task | about 10% | What you were responsible for, and why it was hard | Describing the team's task, not yours |
| Action | about 45% | What you did, in order, and why you chose it over the alternatives | "We" throughout, so your role disappears |
| Result | about 15% | The outcome, with a number or a concrete consequence | No result, or a result nobody can check |
| Learning | about 15% | What you learnt and how you have used it since | A generic lesson ("communication is key") |

A good behavioural answer usually takes 90 seconds to two minutes. Stop there and let the interviewer ask a
follow-up; the follow-up is where the conversation happens.

**Before and after (a weak and a strong opening line, fictional).**

- Weak: "I am a natural leader and I have led many projects successfully across the company."
- Stronger: "Last March our warehouse pilot was running 30% below target with six weeks left on the contract, and
  I was the most junior person on the account."

The stronger line gives a time, a number, a stake and a reason the story is interesting, all in one sentence.

## 6. Common question types

<!-- Guidance: These are original practice questions grouped by type. They are not any school's actual questions. Practise the type, not the wording. -->

Interviewers phrase questions in many ways, but most fall into a few types. For each type, the table gives what is
being tested and two original practice questions.

| Type | What is tested | Practice question 1 | Practice question 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Path walk-through | Clarity, logic of your choices | Take me through the decisions that led you to your current role. | Which job move would you make differently, and why? |
| Why an MBA, why now | Motivation, timing | What can you not learn in your current job in the next two years? | What would you do if you were not admitted this year? |
| Goals | Realism, research | Describe a typical week in the role you want five years after graduating. | Which skill gap between you and that role worries you most? |
| Why this programme | Fit, research depth | Which part of the programme would you use in your first month, and how? | Who in the community have you spoken to, and what did you learn? |
| Leadership | Influence, initiative | Tell me about a time you led people who did not report to you. | When did you decide not to lead, and let someone else take over? |
| Teamwork and conflict | Collaboration, maturity | Describe a disagreement with a colleague that you did not win. | Tell me about a team that worked badly and what you did about it. |
| Setback | Ownership, learning | Tell me about a mistake that cost your team something. | What feedback surprised you most, and what changed after it? |
| Ethics and judgment | Values under pressure | Tell me about a time you were asked to do something you were not comfortable with. | When did you have to choose between two people's interests? |
| Application-based follow-up | Depth, consistency | (Based on your essay) Why did you leave that project at that point? | (Based on your resume) What would your manager there say was your weakest area? |
| Curveball | Composure, authenticity | What is something you believe that most of your colleagues disagree with? | What would you teach your classmates in a one-hour session? |
| Closing | Interest, preparation | What else should we know about you? | What questions do you have for me? |

**Prepared answers that you do script (lightly).** Three answers deserve close preparation because they appear in
almost every interview: the path walk-through (two minutes), why an MBA and why now (one minute), and the closing
"anything else" (30 seconds, pointing to one thing the interviewer has not yet heard). Prepare these as bullet
points, not paragraphs, and keep them consistent with your essays (mba/mba-goals-essay, mba/mba-why-school-essay).

**Handling a question you did not expect.** Pause for two or three seconds, repeat the core of the question in your
own words if it helps, choose a story from the bank, and say which one you will use ("The example that comes to mind
is from my second year at the logistics firm"). Short silence reads as thought; rushing into a weak story reads as
panic. If no story fits, say so honestly and answer with how you would approach it, then offer the closest example.

## 7. Practice protocol and scoring rubric

<!-- Guidance: Spread practice over several days and mix question types in each session: spaced, mixed practice transfers better than one long session on one type. -->

**Protocol**

| Round | Format | Who | What you do | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Solo drill | You and a camera | Answer six random questions from section 6, two minutes each, record, watch | Notes on length, filler words, missing results |
| R2 | Peer mock, blind | A classmate or colleague who has not read your application | 30-minute interview with follow-ups | Rubric score and two notes |
| R3 | Peer mock, application-based | Someone who has read your essays | 30 to 45 minutes, deliberate follow-ups on weak spots | Rubric score and two notes |
| R4 | Stress mock | A mentor who will interrupt and push | Probing follow-ups, a curveball, a hard closing question | Rubric score and one change to make |
| R5 | Final light run | You | Opening, three stories, your questions | Confidence, not new content |

Use a different partner for each mock if you can. A partner who knows you well will fill gaps in your stories
without noticing; a stranger will not.

**Scoring rubric (score each criterion 1 to 5)**

| Criterion | Weight | 1 (weak) | 3 (adequate) | 5 (strong) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence and specificity | 25 | General claims, no examples | Real examples, some vague parts | Specific, recent, measurable, clearly your action |
| Structure and concision | 20 | Rambling, no clear point | Followable, sometimes long | Clear order, 90 to 120 seconds, stops on time |
| Self-awareness and learning | 20 | Blames others, no learning | Names a lesson | Concrete change in behaviour since, shown with an example |
| Motivation and fit | 20 | Generic reasons | Plausible reasons | Goals and programme choice follow from your story and research |
| Presence and listening | 15 | Interrupts, misses the question | Answers the question asked | Responds to follow-ups, conversational, composed |

Weighted score = sum of (weight times score) divided by the sum of the weights. In Excel, with weights in B2:B6 and
scores in C2:C6: `=SUMPRODUCT(B2:B6,C2:C6)/SUM(B2:B6)`.

| Mock | Date | Partner | Evidence | Structure | Self-awareness | Motivation | Presence | Weighted score | Top fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCK-001 *(Example)* | 2026-10-20 | Peer, blind | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2.60 | Cut the walk-through to two minutes |
| MCK-002 *(Example)* | 2026-10-24 | Peer, application-based | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3.15 | Add numbers to STY-002 result |
| MCK-003 *(Example)* | 2026-10-29 | Mentor, stress | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.80 | Prepare a second setback story |
| [MCK-004] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Partner] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [Fix] |

The stopping rule in the flowchart (two consecutive mocks at 3.5 or more) is a practical target for this
workbook, not a school standard. The score helps you see progress; the notes tell you what to change.

## 8. Questions to ask

<!-- Guidance: Ask questions you cannot answer from the website, and that fit the interviewer. A good question shows research and genuine interest; a bad one asks for information already published. -->

Most interviews end with your questions. Prepare five and expect to ask two.

| For | Original example question | Why it works |
|---|---|---|
| Alumni interviewer | What did you do in your first year that you would advise a new student to skip? | Asks for personal judgment, not brochure facts |
| Alumni interviewer | How did the network help you, or not help you, in your first career move after graduating? | Invites an honest, specific answer |
| Admissions officer | Which kinds of contribution from students change the classroom most? | Shows you are thinking about contribution, not only receiving |
| Admissions officer | What do students from my industry tend to find hardest in the first term? | Shows self-awareness and preparation |
| Any interviewer | [Your question tied to a specific course, club or initiative you researched] | Shows research depth from mba/mba-school-research-log |

Avoid questions about your own chances, about class profile numbers that are published, and questions that invite
the interviewer to criticise other schools.

## 9. Logistics

<!-- Guidance: Logistics failures are avoidable. Do the D-2 check as if the interview were that day. -->

**Virtual interview**

| Item | Check | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | Installed, updated, logged in with the name shown on your application | [ ] |
| Connection | Wired or strong Wi-Fi; a phone hotspot ready as backup | [ ] |
| Camera and light | Camera at eye level, light in front of you, plain background | [ ] |
| Sound | Headset or earphones with a microphone, tested in a call | [ ] |
| Room | Private and quiet for the full slot; other people informed; follow the school's rules on being alone | [ ] |
| Time zone | Interview time converted and double-checked in your calendar | [ ] |
| Contact | Admissions office email or phone number in case of a connection failure | [ ] |
| Screen | Notifications off; nothing open that the school's rules do not allow | [ ] |

**In-person interview**

| Item | Check | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Route and timing | Route tested, arrival 15 minutes early, buffer for delays | [ ] |
| Documents | Invitation, identification if requested, printed resume only if the school asks for one | [ ] |
| Clothing | Business or business-casual as the school suggests; comfortable | [ ] |
| On campus | Building, room and check-in point known; allow time to find them | [ ] |

**On the day.** Eat beforehand, warm up your voice by telling one story out loud, and spend the last ten minutes
calm rather than revising. Keep water within reach. If something goes wrong (a dropped connection, a late train),
contact the admissions office immediately and calmly; schools handle these situations routinely.

## 10. Ethics and AI use

<!-- Guidance: Check each school's current rules. A rule broken in an interview can end an application. -->

- **Your own words, your own stories.** Every story must be true and yours. Do not exaggerate titles, numbers or
  your role; application-based interviewers check consistency with your file, and recommenders may be asked the same
  questions.
- **AI during the interview.** As of October 2026 at least one school (HBS, logistics page above) states that AI
  tools may not be used in its interview. Treat any AI assistant, note or prompt on screen during a live interview as
  prohibited unless the school explicitly allows it.
- **AI during preparation.** Generating extra practice questions or getting feedback on a recording is a
  preparation choice; check the school's application policy (mba/mba-ai-use-policy-check). Never ask a tool to write
  your answers or stories, and never memorise generated text.
- **Recording.** Do not record a live interview unless the school says you may.
- **Confidentiality.** Respect any request not to share interview content or prompts, including on forums.

## 11. Quality checklist

<!-- Guidance: Run this checklist at D-4 and again at D-1. -->

- [ ] I have checked the school's current interview instructions and recorded the date.
- [ ] I have 10 to 14 stories, at least two for each competency C1 to C9.
- [ ] Each story names my personal action and a concrete result.
- [ ] My path walk-through takes two minutes or less and matches my resume.
- [ ] My "why MBA, why now, why this programme" answers are consistent with my essays.
- [ ] I have run at least three scored mocks with different partners.
- [ ] My last two mocks score 3.5 or more, or I know exactly what to fix.
- [ ] I have five questions to ask, none answered on the website.
- [ ] Logistics are checked (virtual or in person).
- [ ] I know the school's rules on AI, recording and any post-interview step.

## 12. Common mistakes

<!-- Guidance: Read before each mock. Ask your partner to watch for the two you are most prone to. -->

1. **Memorised paragraphs.** Answers sound recited and fall apart under a follow-up. Prepare bullet points per story.
2. **"We" everywhere.** The interviewer cannot tell what you did. Say "I" for your actions and credit the team for theirs.
3. **No result.** A story that ends at the action leaves the interviewer guessing. End with an outcome and, if possible, a number.
4. **Overlong background.** Half the time goes on context. Keep the situation to two or three sentences.
5. **The same story twice.** Reusing one example for several questions suggests a thin record. Build the bank wide.
6. **A fake weakness.** "I work too hard" signals low self-awareness. Choose a real weakness and show what you do about it.
7. **Inconsistency with the file.** Goals or dates that differ from your essays or resume raise doubts. Re-read your application.
8. **Criticising others.** Blaming a former manager or team reads as low ownership, even if it is true.
9. **Generic school reasons.** Rankings, brand and "the network" do not distinguish you. Name specific courses, people and experiences.
10. **No questions, or brochure questions.** Signals low interest. Prepare questions only an insider can answer.
11. **Ignoring the rules.** Notes on screen, a second person in the room or a recording can breach the school's instructions.
12. **Over-correcting after a weak answer.** One weak answer rarely decides an interview; dwelling on it affects the next three.

## 13. Workbook

<!-- Guidance: Write short answers in bullet points. These prompts feed your story bank and the three scripted answers. -->

1. In two sentences, what do you want the interviewer to remember about you?
   [Your answer]
2. Path walk-through: the four or five decisions that explain your career, each with one reason.
   [Decision 1, reason; decision 2, reason]
3. Why an MBA, why now, in three bullet points.
   [Bullets]
4. Which competency (C1 to C9) is your weakest in the story bank, and which experience could fill it?
   [Answer]
5. What is the hardest question an application-based interviewer could ask about your file, and your honest answer?
   [Question, answer]
6. A real weakness, the evidence that it is real, and what you are doing about it.
   [Answer]
7. Your closing 30 seconds: one thing the interviewer has not heard yet.
   [Answer]
8. After each mock: one thing to keep, one thing to change.
   [MCK-001: keep, change]

## Sources and further reading

<!-- Guidance: School pages change each cycle. Re-check them when you receive an invitation. -->

- Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews.
  *Journal of Applied Psychology*, 67(5), 577-580.
- Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., and Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview.
  *Personnel Psychology*, 50(3), 655-702.
- Schmidt, F. L., and Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology:
  practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. *Psychological Bulletin*, 124(2), 262-274.
- Harvard Business School, MBA interview logistics (checked 2026-10-28): https://www.hbs.edu/mba/your-interview/logistics
- Stanford GSB, MBA interviews (checked 2026-10-28): https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/programs/mba/admission/interviews
- Wharton MBA, interview process (checked 2026-10-28): https://mba.wharton.upenn.edu/interview-process/
- Wharton, "15 Years of the Team-Based Discussion" (19 October 2026, checked 2026-10-28):
  https://www.wharton.upenn.edu/story/15-years-of-the-team-based-discussion/
- Related templates in this library: mba/mba-personal-narrative, mba/mba-team-discussion-prep,
  mba/mba-post-interview-reflection, career/interview-prep.

## Revision history

<!-- Guidance: Add a row after each school's interview with what changed in the workbook. -->

| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | First version from template |
| [0.2] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | [School A profile added, two setback stories added] |

## Standard and licence note

Based on published research on structured and behavioural interviewing and on public descriptions of admissions
interview formats checked on the schools' official pages in October 2026. The text, practice questions, rubric and
examples are original; no school's questions are reproduced, and this template is not affiliated with or endorsed by
any school. School formats and rules change every cycle: check each school's current instructions before you rely on
them. Template licence: MIT.
