Project Communication Management Plan Template
Communication matrix (audience, purpose, channel, frequency, owner), meeting cadence, escalation path, repository and feedback
Як використовувати: Use after the stakeholder register to plan who gets what information and why. Fill the communication matrix first, with a purpose for every row. Main pitfall: many reports and meetings with no stated decision or action for the audience.
Перегляд
Communication Management Plan: [Project name]
Plan for who receives which project information, why, through which channel, how often and from whom, including meeting cadence, escalation path, document repository and feedback. Based on common project management practice. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [CP-PROJECT-001] |
| Project | [Project name] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Owner | [@project-manager] |
| Approved by | [@sponsor] |
| Related | [Stakeholder register SR-001, Project management plan PMP-001] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
1. Objectives
Communication on [Project name] aims to:
- keep decision makers informed early enough to decide before deadlines;
- give affected staff accurate, timely information about what changes for them and when;
- surface risks and issues quickly through a known escalation path;
- keep one source of truth for project documents and decisions.
2. Principles
All project communication follows these principles.
| Principle | What it means in practice |
|---|---|
| One source of truth | Decisions and documents live in the repository; email links to them |
| Plain language | Lead with the outcome and the ask; avoid internal jargon and acronyms |
| No surprises | Bad news is shared as soon as known, with a proposed response |
| Accessible | Documents meet [accessibility standard]; recordings have captions |
| Confidentiality | Commercial and personal data shared only with authorised audiences |
3. Communication matrix
The matrix lists every planned communication.
| ID | Audience | Information | Purpose | Channel | Frequency | Owner | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COM-01 | Example: Sponsor | Status, risks, decisions needed | Decide on escalations within tolerance | Email plus 30-min call | Biweekly | Project manager | Status report template |
| COM-02 | Example: Steering committee | Progress vs baseline, financials, change requests | Approve stage gates and changes | Meeting | Monthly and at gates | Sponsor | Steering committee report |
| COM-03 | Example: Project team | Priorities, blockers | Coordinate daily work | Stand-up (video) | Daily | Workstream leads | Board review |
| COM-04 | Example: Branch staff | What changes, when, training dates | Prepare for the new process | Intranet article, team briefing | Monthly; weekly during rollout | Change lead | Article, slide pack |
| COM-05 | Example: Compliance officer | KYC design, test evidence | Review and sign off | Formal review meeting | At design and test milestones | Business analyst | Review pack |
| COM-06 | Example: Vendor | Plan changes, defects, acceptance | Align delivery | Joint progress meeting | Weekly | Project manager | Minutes and action log |
| [ID] | [Audience] | [Information] | [Purpose] | [Channel] | [Frequency] | [@owner] | [Format] |
4. Meeting cadence
Standing meetings are scheduled as follows.
| Meeting | Chair | Attendees | Frequency and length | Inputs | Outputs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steering committee | Sponsor | Committee members, PM | Monthly, 60 min | Steering report sent 3 working days before | Decisions, actions, minutes within 2 days |
| Project board review | Project manager | Workstream leads | Weekly, 45 min | RAID log, schedule update | Updated RAID log, action list |
| Daily stand-up | Workstream lead | Workstream team | Daily, 15 min | Task board | Blockers raised |
| Vendor progress | Project manager | Vendor lead, tech lead | Weekly, 30 min | Vendor report | Action log |
| [Meeting] | [@chair] | [Attendees] | [Frequency] | [Inputs] | [Outputs] |
5. Escalation path
Issues and decisions that cannot be resolved at one level move to the next within the time limits below.
| Level | Escalate to | When | Response expected within |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workstream lead | Blocker affecting a task | 1 working day |
| 2 | Project manager | Blocker affecting a milestone or another workstream | 2 working days |
| 3 | Sponsor | Forecast exceeds PM tolerance (schedule, cost, scope) | 5 working days |
| 4 | Steering committee | Forecast exceeds sponsor tolerance or benefits at risk | Next meeting or extraordinary session |
The escalation flow is shown below.
6. Document repository
All project documents are stored in [repository name and link]. Naming follows [ProjectCode]-[DocType]-[Number]-v[major.minor], for example DOB-PMP-001-v1.2.
| Folder | Contents | Access |
|---|---|---|
| 01 Governance | Charter, plans, steering packs, minutes | Project team, steering committee |
| 02 Requirements and design | Requirements, designs, decisions | Project team |
| 03 Delivery | Test evidence, release notes | Project team, vendor |
| 04 Change and training | Communications, training materials | Project team, change network |
| 05 Commercial | Contracts, invoices | PM, procurement, finance only |
7. Communication methods and tools
The project uses these tools for the stated purposes only.
| Tool | Use | Not for |
|---|---|---|
| [Email] | Formal notices, approvals | Ongoing discussion |
| [Chat channel] | Quick coordination within the team | Decisions (record them in the decision log) |
| [Video meeting tool] | Meetings, recorded training | Confidential commercial discussions with recording on |
| [Intranet page] | Updates for affected staff | Draft or unapproved content |
8. Feedback and effectiveness
Effectiveness is checked through [a short pulse survey of affected staff each month, attendance and open rates, and questions raised at briefings]. Results are reviewed at the project board meeting and the plan is adjusted.
| Measure | Target | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Staff who know the go-live date and their training slot | At least 90% | Pulse survey |
| Steering pack sent at least 3 working days before meeting | 100% | Meeting log |
| Questions answered within 5 working days | At least 95% | Feedback mailbox |
9. Plan maintenance
The plan is reviewed at each stage gate. Changes are recorded below.
| Version | Date | Change | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved | [@name] |
| 1.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | Example: Added weekly branch briefings for rollout | [@name] |
Standard and licence note
Based on common project management practice for communication planning. This template is original text written for this collection. Template licence: MIT.
Схожі шаблони
Benefits Realization Plan Template
Benefits map, benefit profiles with measure, baseline, target, timing and owner, tracking schedule, dependencies and dis-benefits
Управління проєктамиProcurement Management Plan Template
Make-or-buy analysis, procurement items, contract types, weighted supplier evaluation, timeline, supplier management, approvals
Управління проєктамиProject Management Plan Template
Integrated plan: objectives, governance, scope, schedule, cost and EVM, quality, risk, procurement, change control, baselines