Security Operating Procedure Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.37)
Criteria for which activities need a procedure, procedure register, model SOP layout, writing rules, lifecycle, worked SOPs for access provisioning and backup verification
Cách dùng: Use it to set up documented operating procedures for security controls and information processing facilities (A.5.37), then copy the model layout for each procedure. Fill the procedure register first so gaps are visible. The main pitfall is procedures written for the audit that operators never use, test or keep current.
Xem trước
Security Operating Procedure: [Procedure name]
Model template for the written procedures that run IT systems and security tasks, supporting ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 Annex A control A.5.37 (documented operating procedures: written, controlled and reachable by the people who do the work; read the official control text for the exact requirement) and the documented information rules of clause 7.5. Sections 1 to 3 set the rules for deciding which activities need a written procedure, section 4 is the model procedure layout (purpose, scope, prerequisites, steps, verification, rollback, escalation, records), sections 5 to 7 cover writing and control, and sections 8 and 9 give two complete worked Example procedures: user access provisioning and backup verification. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [DOC-ISMS-049] |
| Version | [1.0] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved / Superseded] |
| Owner | [@head-of-it-operations] |
| Approvers/reviewers | [@isms-manager], [@ciso] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
| Standard and edition | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024 (A.5.37, cl. 7.5); ISO/IEC 27002:2022 |
| Next scheduled review | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Procedure register location | [Wiki space or document management library] |
| Documented information register | [DOC-ISMS-028] |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner | [@head-of-it-operations] | [Prepared] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| ISMS manager | [@isms-manager] | [Reviewed] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| CISO | [@ciso] | [Approved] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@head-of-it-operations] | First version with register and two worked procedures |
| 1.1 (Example) | YYYY-MM-DD | [@platform-lead] | SOP-SEC-002 updated after the restore test found a missing checksum step |
Contents
Part 1: Framework
- Purpose and scope
- Which activities need a documented procedure
- Procedure register
- Model procedure layout
Part 2: Writing and control
- Writing rules
- Procedure lifecycle and change control
- Availability, training and use
Part 3: Worked examples
- Worked example SOP-SEC-001: user access provisioning
- Worked example SOP-SEC-002: backup verification
Part 4: Operation
- Size tiers
- Records and evidence
- References
1. Purpose and scope
This framework sets how [Organization name] identifies, writes, approves, publishes, uses and maintains operating procedures for information processing facilities and security activities within the ISMS scope (DOC-ISMS-002). Its aim is that a trained person can perform each critical task correctly, securely and in the same way every time, including out of hours and during disruption, and that the organization can show afterwards that it was done.
It covers procedures for:
- operating systems, platforms, networks and cloud services in scope;
- running security controls (access provisioning, backups, patching, key and certificate handling, log review, vulnerability scanning);
- responding to defined security events where a playbook is not enough
(see
security/soc-playbookfor detection and response playbooks); - handling information and media (secure transfer, disposal).
It does not replace policies (which say what must be achieved) or standards (which set required configurations). A procedure says how a task is carried out, step by step, by whom.
2. Which activities need a documented procedure
Write and control a procedure when at least one criterion applies:
| Code | Criterion | Example activities |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | The activity is performed by several people who must do it the same way | Access provisioning, onboarding of devices |
| P2 | The activity is infrequent and errors are costly | Certificate renewal, key rotation, failover |
| P3 | The activity is needed during disruption or by a stand-in | Restore from backup, emergency access |
| P4 | The activity operates a control named in the SoA or required by contract or law | Backup verification, log review, access review |
| P5 | The activity has caused an incident or nonconformity before | Firewall rule changes after an outage |
| P6 | The activity is handed to a supplier or new team | Managed service onboarding, outsourced support |
Do not write a procedure when the task is fully automated with no human decision (document the automation in the system design instead), or when the tool enforces the steps and keeps the record by itself. Record that decision in the register with the reason.
3. Procedure register
| SOP ID | Procedure | Criteria (section 2) | Controls supported | Owner | Performed by | Version | Last reviewed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOP-SEC-001 (Example) | User access provisioning | P1, P4 | A.5.15, A.5.16, A.5.18 | [@it-service-lead] | IT service desk | 2.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved |
| SOP-SEC-002 (Example) | Backup verification | P2, P3, P4 | A.8.13 | [@platform-lead] | Platform on-call engineer | 1.3 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved |
| SOP-SEC-003 (Example) | TLS certificate renewal | P2, P5 | A.8.24 | [@platform-lead] | Platform engineers | 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved |
| SOP-SEC-004 (Example) | Security log review | P4 | A.8.15, A.8.16 | [@security-lead] | Security analyst | 0.9 | Not yet | Draft |
| SOP-SEC-005 (Example) | Leaver access removal | P1, P4, P5 | A.5.18, A.6.5 | [@it-service-lead] | IT service desk | 1.2 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved |
| SOP-SEC-006 (Example) | Privileged and production access grant | P2, P4 | A.8.2, A.5.18 | [@platform-lead] | Platform lead with security approval | 1.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | Approved |
| [SOP-SEC-NNN] | [procedure] | [codes] | [A.N.N] | [@owner] | [role] | [n.n] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Draft / Approved / Retired] |
4. Model procedure layout
| Part | What to write | Questions it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Header | SOP ID, title, version, status, owner, approver, last reviewed, next review, classification, controls supported | Is this the current approved version? Who owns it? |
| 1. Purpose | One or two sentences: what the procedure achieves and which risk it controls | Why does this exist? |
| 2. Scope | Systems, environments, sites and cases covered and not covered | When do I use this, and when another procedure? |
| 3. Roles | Who performs, who approves, who verifies, who is informed | Who may do each step? Is there segregation of duties? |
| 4. Prerequisites | Access, tools, approvals, tickets, time windows, information needed before starting | Can I start? What do I need first? |
| 5. Steps | Numbered imperative steps, one action each, with the expected result | What exactly do I do, and what should I see? |
| 6. Verification | Checks that prove the task succeeded | How do I know it worked? |
| 7. Rollback | How to undo or stop safely if a step fails | What if it goes wrong halfway? |
| 8. Escalation | When to stop and whom to call, with response times | When is this no longer my decision? |
| 9. Records | What evidence to keep, where, for how long | What proves it was done correctly? |
| 10. Related documents | Policies, standards, other procedures, runbooks | Where is the context? |
Procedure header block to copy:
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| SOP ID | [SOP-SEC-NNN] |
| Title | [Procedure name] |
| Version and status | [n.n, Approved] |
| Owner and approver | [@owner], [@approver] |
| Controls supported | [A.N.N] |
| Last reviewed and next review | YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | [Internal] |
5. Writing rules
- Start each step with a verb ("Open", "Confirm", "Record") and give one action per step.
- State the expected result for every step that changes something, so the operator can notice a failure at once.
- Name roles, not people, and name the exact system or console.
- Put warnings before the step they apply to, not after it.
- Never write secrets, passwords or keys in a procedure. Refer to the vault entry or secrets manager path instead.
- Use the approved terms from the policy set, and the same names as the asset inventory (DOC-ISMS-012).
- Keep commands in code blocks and test them in a non-production environment before publishing.
- Mark decision points clearly with the criteria for each branch.
- Keep each procedure to one start and one end. Split long branches into linked procedures.
- Test each new or changed procedure with a person who has not done the task before, and record the test in the revision history.
6. Procedure lifecycle and change control
| Event | Action | Who |
|---|---|---|
| New activity meets a criterion in section 2 | Add to register, write draft | Activity owner |
| System change alters steps | Update the procedure in the same change request (ops/change-request) | Change owner |
| Incident or audit finding involves the procedure | Review and update within [30] days | Procedure owner |
| Scheduled review | Review at least every [12] months, or [6] months for P2 and P3 procedures | Procedure owner |
| Procedure no longer needed | Retire, keep the last version as a record | Procedure owner |
The ISMS manager checks the register every quarter for overdue reviews and reports the count in the ISMS performance report (DOC-ISMS-081).
7. Availability, training and use
- Publish approved procedures in [the runbook tool or wiki], with read access for every role that performs them and edit access for owners only.
- Keep an offline copy of every P3 procedure (needed during disruption) outside the primary environment, for example an encrypted export stored with the ICT readiness plan (DOC-ISMS-047).
- Link procedures from the ticket templates or alerts that start them, so operators open the right version from the task itself.
- Train each operator before they perform a procedure alone, and record the training in the competence and training matrix (DOC-ISMS-026).
- Operators who find an error stop, follow the escalation step and report the error to the owner. Deviations are recorded in the ticket.
8. Worked example SOP-SEC-001: user access provisioning
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| SOP ID | SOP-SEC-001 (Example) |
| Title | User access provisioning |
| Version and status | 2.1, Approved |
| Owner and approver | [@it-service-lead], [@isms-manager] |
| Controls supported | A.5.15 access control rules, A.5.16 identity lifecycle management, A.5.18 access rights provisioning and review |
| Last reviewed and next review | YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | Internal |
1. Purpose. Grant new or changed access to business systems only when it is approved and matches the role, so that people get the access they need and no more (access control policy, DOC-ISMS-041).
2. Scope. Covers joiners, movers and temporary access to systems connected to the identity provider. Not covered: privileged and production administrative access (procedure SOP-SEC-006, privileged access) and leavers (SOP-SEC-005).
3. Roles.
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Requester (line manager) | Raises the request with the role and business reason |
| Approver (system owner) | Approves access beyond the role baseline |
| Operator (IT service desk) | Performs the steps below |
| Verifier (second service desk member) | Checks a weekly sample of completed requests |
The operator may not approve their own request or a request for themselves (segregation of duties).
4. Prerequisites.
- An access request ticket with requester, user, role, systems, start date and, for temporary access, an end date.
- For joiners: HR record showing a signed contract and completed
screening (
isms/personnel-screening-procedure). - Operator account with the identity administration role.
5. Steps.
| Step | Action | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Open the ticket and confirm the requester is the user's line manager in the HR system | Requester matches the HR record |
| 5.2 | Compare requested access with the role baseline in the access matrix | Each item marked "in baseline" or "extra" |
| 5.3 | For any "extra" item, assign the ticket to the system owner for approval and wait | Approval recorded in the ticket, or request rejected |
| 5.4 | For joiners, confirm the HR record shows screening complete | Screening status "complete" with date |
| 5.5 | Create or update the identity in the identity provider with the role group | User appears in the role group |
| 5.6 | Add approved extra groups. For temporary access, set the expiry date on the group membership | Groups and expiry shown on the user profile |
| 5.7 | Enforce multi-factor authentication enrolment at first sign-in | User status "MFA enrolment required" |
| 5.8 | Send the activation link to the user's manager, never the password | Manager confirms receipt in the ticket |
| 5.9 | Attach a screenshot or export of the final group membership to the ticket and resolve it | Ticket resolved with evidence |
6. Verification. The operator checks that the user's groups equal the approved list. Each week the verifier samples [5] resolved tickets and checks approval, groups and expiry. Results are logged in the ticket queue report.
7. Rollback. If wrong access was granted, remove the extra groups
at once, record what was removed and when, and inform the system owner.
If the wrong person received access, treat it as a security event and
report it (isms/security-event-reporting-procedure).
8. Escalation. Stop and escalate to the IT service lead when the requester is not the line manager, approval is missing after [2] working days, or the request includes privileged or production access. Escalate to the security team at once when access may already have been misused.
9. Records. The ticket with approval, the group membership export and the weekly verification report. Kept in the service desk tool for [3] years.
10. Related documents. Access control policy (DOC-ISMS-041),
onboarding checklist (ops/onboarding-checklist), access review
(ops/access-review), offboarding checklist (DOC-ISMS-053).
Worked figures (Example) for one month at Quillmere Analytics Ltd: 18 access tickets, 14 within the role baseline and 4 with extra items (14 + 4 = 18). All 4 extra items had system owner approval. The weekly samples covered 20 tickets in 4 weeks, more than the 18 raised, because 2 tickets from the previous month were included; no exceptions found.
9. Worked example SOP-SEC-002: backup verification
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| SOP ID | SOP-SEC-002 (Example) |
| Title | Backup verification |
| Version and status | 1.3, Approved |
| Owner and approver | [@platform-lead], [@head-of-it-operations] |
| Controls supported | A.8.13 information backup |
| Last reviewed and next review | YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM-DD |
| Classification | Internal |
1. Purpose. Prove every week that backups required by the backup policy (DOC-ISMS-061) completed, are protected from change and can be restored with the data age and restore time the backup policy requires.
2. Scope. Covers the production databases, object storage and configuration repositories listed in the backup policy. Not covered: full disaster recovery tests (ICT readiness plan, DOC-ISMS-047) and end-user laptops (synchronised to the collaboration suite).
3. Roles.
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Operator (platform on-call engineer) | Performs the weekly steps |
| Owner (platform lead) | Reviews results, owns failures |
| Data owner | Confirms restored data is usable for the monthly sample |
4. Prerequisites.
- Read access to the backup console and the backup job report.
- Access to the isolated restore environment (no network route to production).
- The current list of protected data sets from the backup policy.
5. Steps.
| Step | Action | Expected result |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | Export the backup job report for the last 7 days | Report lists every protected data set |
| 5.2 | Check that every data set has a successful backup each day as scheduled | No missing or failed jobs |
| 5.3 | Decision: if any job failed or is missing, go to step 5.4. Otherwise go to step 5.5 | Branch recorded in the ticket |
| 5.4 | Rerun the failed job, confirm success, and open an incident if two consecutive runs failed | Job successful or incident opened |
| 5.5 | Confirm the immutability or retention lock is active on the latest backup of each data set | Lock status "enabled" with expiry beyond the retention period |
| 5.6 | Restore one data set, chosen in rotation, into the isolated restore environment | Restore job completes |
| 5.7 | Compare record counts and a checksum of a reference table with the source at backup time | Counts and checksum match |
| 5.8 | Record the time from start of restore to usable data, and the age of the restored data | Both values recorded |
| 5.9 | Delete the restored copy from the isolated environment | Environment empty |
| 5.10 | Enter the results in the backup and restore test log (DOC-ISMS-071) and close the ticket | Log entry with ticket link |
6. Verification. The restored data is no older than the backup interval set in the backup policy for that data set, and the counts and checksum match. Shorter recovery point objectives met by replication or point-in-time recovery are tested under the ICT readiness plan (DOC-ISMS-047), not here. Once a month the data owner opens the restored copy before deletion (step 5.9) and confirms it is usable.
7. Rollback. The procedure does not change production. If a restore is started in the wrong environment, cancel it, confirm that no production resource was overwritten and report a security event.
8. Escalation. Escalate to the platform lead within [4] hours when two consecutive backups of one data set fail, when a lock is not active, or when restored data does not match. Escalate to the ICT recovery manager when the restored data is older than the backup interval.
9. Records. Weekly ticket, job report export and the log entry in DOC-ISMS-071. Kept for [3] years.
10. Related documents. Backup policy (DOC-ISMS-061), backup and
restore procedure (ops/backup-restore-procedure), ICT readiness plan
(DOC-ISMS-047).
Worked figures (Example) for one quarter (13 weeks) at Quillmere Analytics Ltd: 4 protected data sets with daily backups gave 364 scheduled jobs (4 x 7 x 13). 361 succeeded on the first run and 3 failed (361 + 3 = 364); all 3 succeeded on rerun, so no incident was opened. First-run success rate: 361 of 364, or 99.2%. 13 restore samples were performed, one per week; 12 matched in full and 1 restore of the customer database data set failed the checksum comparison because the reference table changed during the backup window (12 + 1 = 13). It was escalated, the job was moved outside the batch window and the next restore of that data set matched.
10. Size tiers
| Aspect | Small: Quillmere Analytics Ltd (46 staff) | Medium: Quillmere Health Systems (320 staff) | Large: Quillmere Group (2,400 staff, 6 sites) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of security procedures (Example) | About 12, mostly cloud operations and access | About 40, including colocation and managed service operations | Over 150, with group procedures plus site procedures for plants and OT |
| Where they live | Runbook pages in the engineering wiki, linked from alerts | Document management system plus runbook tool | Integrated management system document control shared with ISO 9001 and ISO 22301 procedures |
| Ownership | Head of Engineering Operations owns most; engineers own their runbooks | Service owners per platform, reviewed by the 3-person security team | Site IT and OT leads own site procedures; the security office owns group procedures |
| Testing | Dry run by a second engineer | Dry run plus quarterly sample check by the security team | Dry run, site audits and checks during internal audit |
| Languages | English | English | English plus the local languages of the 4 countries, with one master version |
11. Records and evidence
| Record | Proves | Owner | Location | Retention (Example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure register (section 3) | Procedures are identified for the activities that need them | ISMS manager | This document | Current plus 3 years of history |
| Approved procedures with revision history | Procedures are controlled (cl. 7.5) | Procedure owners | Runbook tool or document system | Current plus superseded versions for 3 years |
| Dry-run and test records | Procedures work as written | Procedure owners | Revision history, tickets | 3 years |
| Operator training records | People are competent to use them | Line managers | Training matrix (DOC-ISMS-026) | Employment plus 3 years |
| Execution records (tickets, logs, test log entries) | Procedures are followed | Operators | Ticketing tool, DOC-ISMS-071 | As set per procedure |
| Review evidence and quarterly overdue report | Procedures are maintained | ISMS manager | ISMS performance report (DOC-ISMS-081) | 3 years |
Set final retention in the documented information register (DOC-ISMS-028).
12. References
| Reference | Edition | Use |
|---|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 + Amd 1:2024, information security management systems, requirements | 2022, Amd 1 published 2024-02-23 | A.5.37, cl. 7.5, and the controls operated by the worked examples |
| ISO/IEC 27002:2022, information security controls | 2022 | Guidance on documented operating procedures |
Official pages: ISO/IEC 27001 https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html, Amd 1 https://www.iso.org/standard/88435.html, ISO/IEC 27002 https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html.
Related templates: ops/sop, compliance/controlled-document,
isms/isms-documented-information-register,
isms/access-control-policy, isms/backup-policy,
isms/backup-restore-test-log, ops/backup-restore-procedure,
ops/onboarding-checklist, ops/access-review,
isms/offboarding-security-checklist, isms/personnel-screening-procedure,
isms/security-event-reporting-procedure, security/soc-playbook,
ops/change-request, isms/control-evidence-matrix.
Standard and licence note
Structure aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (including Amd 1:2024) Annex A control A.5.37 and clause 7.5 on documented information. The framework, model layout, writing rules and the two worked procedures are original wording. ISO/IEC text is not reproduced: control numbers are given with short descriptive labels written for this template, not the official titles or control text. ISO and IEC standards are copyrighted; obtain the official standards from ISO or your national standards body before relying on this template. Check the current edition and amendments before use. This is a documentation format, not certification advice. Template licence: MIT.
Template liên quan
Security Event Reporting Procedure Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.6.8)
Security event reporting: what to report, channels, timing, no-blame rule, triage and hand-off to incident response, reporter feedback, metrics, channel tests
ISMS và ISO/IEC 27001Security Monitoring Procedure Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.8.15, A.8.16)
SOC, MDR or hybrid model, log source register and health, detection use cases, alert triage and service levels, escalation to incidents, metrics
ISMS và ISO/IEC 27001Cloud Services Security Policy Template (ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.23)
Cloud policy for A.5.23: shared responsibility, tiers, due diligence, contract terms, configuration, monitoring, exit, shadow IT, cloud register