markdowneditor

Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment (HARA) + Safety Goals

HARA – SxExC, ASIL, safety goals

ISO & KonformitätStandardiso26262hara

Anleitung: SxExC scoring determines ASIL and everything downstream inherits it. Safety goals need a safe state AND fault-tolerant time – missing FTTI is a common gap.

Vorschau

Hazard Analysis & Risk Assessment (HARA) + Safety Goals

ISO 26262 (automotive functional safety) Part 3 – HARA produces ASIL ratings that drive everything downstream. Structure also maps to IEC 61508 (SIL) hazard & risk analysis.

FieldValue
Item (system)name – defined per Part 3 item definition
Analysis dateYYYY-MM-DD
Teamsafety engineer, system owner

1. Operational situations & hazards

IDHazardous eventOperational situationPossible consequence
HE-01Unintended accelerationhighway drivingcollision at speed
HE-02Brake assist lossemergency brakingextended stopping
HE-03Steering torque faultlow-speed parkingminor collision

2. ASIL determination (S x E x C)

EventSeverity S (0-3)Exposure E (0-4)Controllability C (0-3)ASIL
HE-01S3E4C3D
HE-02S3E2C2B
HE-03S1E4C1A

S: severity of harm · E: exposure probability · C: controllability. QM = quality-managed (below ASIL A) – no safety requirements needed.

3. Safety goals (per ASIL C/D event)

SGEventSafety goal statementASILSafe stateFault-tolerant time
SG-01HE-01prevent unintended accelerationDpower limitedN ms
SG-02HE-02maintain minimum brakingBdegraded brakingN ms

4. Functional safety requirements (derived)

FSRGoalRequirementMechanism
FSR-01SG-01redundant torque monitoringdual-channel compare
FSR-02SG-01safe-state transition ≤Nmswatchdog + cutoff

5. Verification & confirmation

  • Confirmation measures required by ASIL level (independence levels I0-I3 for reviews, testing)
  • Safety case: argument that residual risk is tolerable

Ähnliche Vorlagen