Markdown Editor

Customer Satisfaction Programme Template (CSAT, NPS, CES)

Purpose and scope, CSAT NPS CES measures, survey design rules, sample size and margin of error, analysis and reporting, inner and outer loop closure, governance

Customer SuccessStandardISO 10004:2018customersatisfactionprogramme

How to use: Use it to design how you measure customer satisfaction and act on it. Fill the purpose and the decisions the results will drive first, then compute the sample before launch. The main pitfall is reporting scores without closing the loop with customers and fixing causes.

Preview

Customer Satisfaction Programme: [Organization or product]

A programme plan for monitoring and measuring customer satisfaction: purpose and scope, which measures to use (CSAT, NPS, CES), survey design, sampling and margin of error, analysis, reporting and how to close the loop with customers and with improvement actions. Structure aligned with ISO 10004:2018, Quality management, Customer satisfaction, Guidelines for monitoring and measuring (current edition, confirmed in 2023, as checked in October 2026). Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example.

Document control

FieldValue
Document ID[CX-PRG-001]
Version[1.0]
Status[Draft / Approved]
Owner[@customer-experience-lead]
Reviewers[@head-of-support], [@product-analytics], [@data-protection-officer]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD
Next reviewYYYY-MM-DD
Classification[Internal]

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange
1.0 (Example)2026-10-30Customer experience leadFirst programme design

1. Purpose, objectives and scope

ItemValue
Purpose[Example: find and fix the touchpoints that most reduce customer satisfaction and loyalty]
Objectives[Example: raise support CSAT from 84% to 88% by 2027-06-30; cut repeat contacts by a quarter]
Customers in scope[Example: paying business customers, all regions]
Out of scope[Example: trial users, internal users]
Frequency[Transactional: after each event; relationship: twice a year]
Decision owners[Who acts on the results]

2. Measures

MeasureQuestion it answersTypical useScale and score (Example)
CSAT (customer satisfaction)How satisfied was the customer with this interaction or product?After a support case, delivery or onboarding1 to 5; score = share of 4 and 5 answers
NPS (Net Promoter Score)How likely is the customer to recommend us?Relationship survey, twice a year0 to 10; promoters 9 to 10, passives 7 to 8, detractors 0 to 6; score = % promoters minus % detractors
CES (customer effort)How easy was it to get what the customer needed?After support or self-service tasks1 to 7 agreement; score = share of 5 to 7 answers
Open commentWhy did the customer answer that way?Every surveyFree text, coded into themes

Notes on the measures:

  • NPS uses the standard recommendation question on a 0 to 10 scale as published by its owners; Net Promoter, NPS and Net Promoter System are registered trademarks and Net Promoter Score is a service mark of Bain & Company, Inc., NICE Systems, Inc. and Fred Reichheld.
  • Customer effort measures were popularised by Dixon, Freeman and Toman, "Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers", Harvard Business Review, July to August 2010. Write your own statement wording and keep it fixed.
  • Indirect indicators (repeat contacts, complaints, returns, renewal rate) complement surveys and need no extra questions.

3. Survey design

IDSurveyTriggerChannelQuestions
SVY-01 (Example)Support CSATCase closedEmail link, in-appCSAT score, "What is the main reason for your score?"
SVY-02 (Example)Relationship NPSEvery 6 months per contactEmailNPS, reason, "What one thing should we improve?"
SVY-03 (Example)Self-service CESHelp article or task completedIn-appCES statement, optional comment
SVY-[NN][Survey][Trigger][Channel][Questions]

Design rules:

  • Neutral wording; no leading phrases such as "How great was our service?".
  • Label every scale point or both ends; keep scale direction the same in all surveys.
  • Do not ask the same person more than [once every 90 days] across all surveys (survey fatigue rule).
  • Offer the survey in the customer's language and in an accessible format.
  • Staff must not ask customers for a particular score.

4. Sampling and margin of error

Example: relationship survey for N = 2,000 customer contacts, target margin of error 5 percentage points at 95% confidence, p = 0.5.

StepValue
n0 for an unlimited population385 responses
Adjusted for N = 2,000323 responses
Expected response rate20%
Invitations needed1,615 (most of the population, so invite everyone)

With the 400 responses actually received in the Example below, the margin of error for a proportion is about 4.9 points (4.4 points with the finite population correction for N = 2,000). NPS has a wider margin than a single proportion: for 45% promoters and 20% detractors with 400 responses it is about 7.5 points (6.7 with the correction), so the move from +22 to +25 in section 5 is not evidence of change.

Bias checks: compare responders with non-responders by segment, size and region; weight or report separately if one group is badly under-represented.

5. Analysis and reporting

Example results for 2026-H2 (fictional):

MeasureResponsesResultPreviousNote
Support CSAT52084.0% (437 of 520 scored 4 or 5)82.5%Within margin, no clear change
Relationship NPS400+25 (45% promoters, 35% passives, 20% detractors)+22Within margin
Self-service CES30077.0% (231 of 300 agreed 5 to 7)n/aFirst measurement

Top comment themes (Example): slow handover between support tiers (31% of negative comments), unclear invoices (18%), praise for named agents (24% of positive comments).

ReportAudienceFrequency
Dashboard by touchpointTeam leadsWeekly
Programme report with themes and actionsLeadership, management review (compliance/management-review)Quarterly
Customer-facing "you said, we did"CustomersTwice a year

6. Closing the loop

6.1 Inner loop (individual customers)

TriggerActionOwnerWithin
CSAT 1 or 2, or NPS 0 to 6 with a commentContact the customer, listen, agree a fixTeam lead or CSM2 business days
Comment describes a complaintLog it in the complaints processTeam lead1 business day
Promoter who agrees to be contactedThank them; ask about a reference only with consentCSM10 business days

6.2 Outer loop (causes)

IDThemeEvidenceActionOwnerDueResult measure
ACT-01 (Example)Slow tier handover31% of negative commentsAdd warm handover for P2 cases in the escalation policyHead of support2027-01-31CSAT for escalated cases
ACT-02 (Example)Unclear invoices18% of negative commentsRedesign invoice layoutFinance operations2027-03-31Billing contacts per 100 invoices
ACT-[NN][Theme][Evidence][Action][Owner]YYYY-MM-DD[Measure]

7. Governance, ethics and data protection

TopicRule
Consent and lawful basis[Confirmed by data protection officer; record the basis per survey]
Anonymity[State in each invitation whether answers are anonymous, confidential or linked to the account]
Retention[Raw responses kept for N months; aggregated results kept longer]
Incentives[None, or a small charity donation per response; never tied to the score]
Use in targetsScores may be team goals, never a reason to pressure customers

Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO 10004:2018, Quality management, Customer satisfaction, Guidelines for monitoring and measuring (planning, design and development of the process in clause 6). Clause numbers other than clause 6 are not cited because the public table of contents could not be checked in full. All explanations, tables, formulas and examples are original wording and reproduce no text from the standard. As of October 2026 the 2018 edition is current (confirmed in 2023); check for a newer edition before use. Net Promoter, NPS and Net Promoter System are registered trademarks and Net Promoter Score is a service mark of Bain & Company, Inc., NICE Systems, Inc. and Fred Reichheld; this template is not endorsed by them.

Official text: ISO, purchase or licensed access: https://www.iso.org/standard/71582.html (also available from national standards bodies).

Template licence: MIT.

Related templates