Unit Plan Template (Understanding by Design)
UbD unit plan: overview, standards alignment, three stages, performance task, lesson sequence, assessment calendar, resources
How to use: Use to plan a multi-week unit with backward design. Fill the standards alignment and the summative performance task before sequencing lessons. Main pitfall: standards that are taught but never assessed, or assessed but never taught.
Preview
Unit Plan: [Unit title]
Unit plan template for a sequence of lessons, organised by the three stages of backward design from Understanding by Design (Wiggins and McTighe): desired results, assessment evidence and the learning plan, with standards alignment, a lesson sequence, an assessment calendar and resources. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Unit title | [Unit title] |
| Course / grade | [Year 10 History] |
| Teacher(s) | [@name], [@name] |
| Duration | [4 weeks, 12 lessons of 60 minutes] |
| Dates | YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD |
| Position in course | [Unit 3 of 6; follows "Industrialisation"] |
| Version / status | [0.1, Draft] |
| Last reviewed | YYYY-MM-DD |
1. Unit overview
[Example: "Students investigate why the right to vote expanded between 1830 and 1930 by examining primary sources from reform movements. They consider how ordinary people won political change and apply that analysis to a present-day campaign of their choice. The unit opens with a mock election in which half the class is not allowed to vote."]
2. Standards alignment
| Code | Standard (short form) | Taught in lessons | Assessed by |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: [HIST-10.3] | Explain causes and consequences of political reform | L2-L6 | Performance task; quiz 1 |
| Example: [HIST-10.5] | Evaluate the reliability of primary sources | L3, L4, L7 | Source analysis 1 and 2 |
| Example: [LIT-10.2] | Write an argument supported by evidence | L9-L11 | Performance task |
| [Code] | [Standard] | [Lessons] | [Assessment] |
3. Stage 1. Desired results
3.1 Transfer goals
Students will be able to independently use their learning to:
- [Example: Analyse how a campaign for change builds support, using evidence from sources.]
- [Transfer goal]
3.2 Enduring understandings
Students will understand that:
- [Example: Rights are rarely given; they are usually won through organised, sustained pressure.]
- [Example: Sources reflect the purpose and position of their authors and must be read critically.]
- [Understanding]
3.3 Essential questions
- [Example: Who gets to decide, and how does that change?]
- [Example: How do we know whose account to trust?]
- [Question]
3.4 Knowledge and skills
| Students will know | Students will be able to |
|---|---|
| Example: Key reform acts and dates; main reform organisations | Example: Source a document: author, date, purpose, audience |
| Example: Tactics of constitutional and militant campaigners | Example: Corroborate claims across at least two sources |
| [Knowledge] | [Skill] |
4. Stage 2. Assessment evidence
4.1 Summative performance task
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Goal | Example: Persuade a museum panel which tactic did most to win the vote |
| Role | Historian advising the museum |
| Audience | Museum curators (played by a visiting panel) |
| Situation | The museum is designing a new gallery and can feature one tactic |
| Product / performance | 800-word argument plus a 3-minute oral pitch |
| Standards / criteria | Argument, use of evidence, source evaluation, communication (see rubric) |
4.2 Other evidence
| Evidence | Type | Stage 1 link | Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Source analysis 1 | Formative | Sourcing skill | L4 |
| Example: Knowledge quiz | Formative | Key events and terms | L6 |
| Example: Argument outline with teacher feedback | Formative | Argument writing | L10 |
| [Evidence] | [Type] | [Link] | [Lesson] |
5. Stage 3. Learning plan
5.1 Lesson sequence
| Lesson | Focus | Key activities | Formative check | Homework |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Example: Hook and questions | Mock election; generate questions about voting rights | Question wall | Read background text |
| L2 | Example: Timeline of reform | Build a class timeline; identify turning points | Timeline exit ticket | None |
| L3 | Example: Reading sources critically | Model sourcing with one pamphlet | Sourcing checklist | Analyse one source |
| L4 | Example: Constitutional campaigners | Source stations in groups | Source analysis 1 | Notes |
| L5 | Example: Militant campaigners | Structured debate on tactics | Debate notes | Notes |
| L6 | Example: Consolidation | Retrieval practice and quiz | Knowledge quiz | Revise weak areas |
| L7 | Example: Corroboration | Compare accounts of one event | Source analysis 2 | None |
| L8 | Example: Introduce performance task | Analyse exemplar; co-construct criteria | Criteria check | Choose position |
| L9 | Example: Building the argument | Claim and evidence planning | Outline draft | Draft outline |
| L10 | Example: Feedback and revision | Peer and teacher feedback | Argument outline | Full draft |
| L11 | Example: Pitch rehearsal | Rehearse in triads | Peer feedback | Final draft |
| L12 | Example: Presentation | Pitch to panel; reflect on essential questions | Performance task | Reflection |
5.2 Differentiation and support
[Planned scaffolds, extension tasks, language support and accommodations across the unit. Example: "Graphic organiser for the argument; source texts at two reading levels; an extension source set on campaigns outside Europe."]
6. Assessment calendar
| Week | Date | Assessment | Weight in unit grade | Feedback returned by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YYYY-MM-DD | Source analysis 1 | Formative, 0% | YYYY-MM-DD |
| 2 | YYYY-MM-DD | Knowledge quiz | 15% | YYYY-MM-DD |
| 3 | YYYY-MM-DD | Source analysis 2 | 15% | YYYY-MM-DD |
| 4 | YYYY-MM-DD | Performance task (written and oral) | 70% | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Total | 100% |
7. Resources
| Resource | Type | Lessons | Access / location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Primary source pack (12 documents) | Printed / digital | L3-L7 | [Shared drive link] |
| Example: Textbook chapter 6 | Reading | L2 | Class set |
| Example: Performance task rubric | Assessment | L8-L12 | [Link] |
| [Resource] | [Type] | [Lessons] | [Access] |
8. Unit review
| Question | Notes |
|---|---|
| Share of students meeting the standard on the performance task | [Notes] |
| Standards where results were weakest | [Notes] |
| Lessons that need more or less time | [Notes] |
| Changes for next year | [Notes] |
Standard and licence note
Based on the backward design framework of Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe (ASCD), cited as a reference. The performance task elements follow their widely described goal, role, audience, situation, product and standards prompts, used descriptively. Original text written for this collection; no text or templates are reproduced. Template licence: MIT.
Related templates
Lesson Plan Template (Understanding by Design)
UbD lesson plan: transfer goals, understandings, essential questions, assessment evidence, timed learning sequence, reflection
EducationLesson Plan Template
Lesson – objectives, timed sequence, assessment
EducationAssignment Brief Template
Assignment brief – task, requirements, grading