MBA Formula Sheet Template (Finance, Accounting, Operations, Stats)
50 MBA core formulas in KaTeX: ratios, CVP, TVM, NPV/IRR, CAPM, WACC, DCF, M&M, Black-Scholes, elasticity, CLV, EOQ, newsvendor, queues, regression
How to use: Use it when you prepare for or revise the MBA core and want one place for every formula with its Excel function. Fill the conventions table and your course notation column first, then recompute each mini example before looking. The main pitfall is convention errors: Excel NPV timing, rate per period, nominal versus real.
Preview
MBA Formula Sheet: [Programme, course or exam]
A one-document reference for the formulas of the MBA core: financial and managerial accounting, time value of money, capital budgeting, risk and the cost of capital, valuation, options, microeconomics and international finance, marketing metrics, operations and statistics. Every formula has an ID, KaTeX notation, a notation table, the matching Excel function or formula, a computed mini example and a note on the most common mistake. It is for admitted students preparing for the core, students revising for exams and graduates who want one place to look things up. Each formula was checked against two independent sources (the originating work or a standard textbook, plus a second textbook or official documentation), listed in the verification register in section 13. Source basis: the original papers named in each section (Sharpe 1964, Lintner 1965, Modigliani and Miller 1958 and 1963, Black and Scholes 1973, Merton 1973, Stoll 1969, Harris 1913, Arrow, Harris and Marschak 1951, Little 1961, Gupta, Lehmann and Stuart 2004 and others) and standard MBA textbooks named as further reading; all wording, notation choices and examples are original. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. The companies are fictional: Northfield Outdoor Co., Corvane Robotics and Tallow Creek Medical Center.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [MBA-FS-001] |
| Programme or course | [Core year, term 1 / Corporate Finance / final exam] |
| Learner | [Your name] |
| Exam rules on notes and tools | [One A4 sheet both sides, Excel allowed / closed book, financial calculator] |
| Excel version used for checks | [Microsoft 365 / Excel 2021] |
| Reviewed by | [Study group member or tutor] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Version | [0.1] |
Contents
- Conventions and notation
- Financial accounting and ratios
- Managerial accounting and break-even
- Time value of money
- Capital budgeting
- Risk, return and the cost of capital
- Valuation
- Options
- Economics and international finance
- Marketing metrics
- Operations
- Statistics and regression
- Verification register
- Choosing the right formula
- Self-test
1. Conventions and notation
| Convention | Rule used on this sheet | Watch out |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | is today; cash flows arrive at the end of each period unless stated | An annuity due (payments at the start) is worth times the ordinary annuity |
| Rates | is the rate per period; an annual rate with compounding periods per year gives | Never mix an annual rate with monthly periods |
| Nominal and real | Discount nominal cash flows at nominal rates, real cash flows at real rates | Mixing them is the most common valuation error |
| Percentages | Formulas use decimals () | Percentage points versus percent change (see mba/pre-mba-quant-refresher) |
| Excel signs | PV, FV, PMT follow a cash-flow sign convention: money paid out is negative | =PMT(0.005,120,150000) returns a negative payment |
Excel NPV | Discounts the first value by one full period | Add outside the function: =NPV(r, CF1:CFn) + CF0 |
Excel IRR | Needs at least one sign change; returns one root | Several sign changes can give several IRRs |
| Units | Examples state the currency unit (USD k, USD m) | Keep the unit in every cell label |
| Logs | is the natural log (LN), is LOG10 | Excel LOG(x) defaults to base 10 |
Throughout, is the standard normal cumulative distribution function (NORM.S.DIST(x, TRUE)) and
its inverse (NORM.S.INV(p)).
2. Financial accounting and ratios
F-01 Accounting equation. . Every transaction keeps both sides equal (double entry, formalised by Pacioli in 1494).
F-02 DuPont decomposition of return on equity (developed in practice at the DuPont company in the early twentieth century):
F-03 Return on assets. . Some courses use to remove the effect of financing; state which one you use.
F-04 Liquidity. ; .
F-05 Working capital days and the cash conversion cycle.
F-06 Solvency. ; .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Net income (profit after tax) | |
| , , | Total assets, shareholders' equity, interest-bearing debt |
| , | Current assets, current liabilities |
| , , Inv | Accounts receivable, accounts payable, inventory |
| Cost of goods sold | |
| Earnings before interest and taxes (operating profit) |
Mini example (Example, Northfield Outdoor Co., USD m). Sales 820, COGS 492, EBIT 82, interest 9, tax rate 25%, so pre-tax profit 73 and net income 54.75. Assets 640, equity 300, debt 180, current assets 210 (of which inventory 120), current liabilities 140, receivables 25, payables 60.
| ID | Result | Excel (inputs in named cells) |
|---|---|---|
| F-02 | Net margin 6.68%, asset turnover 1.2812, equity multiplier 2.1333, ROE 18.25% | =NI/Sales*Sales/Assets*Assets/Equity |
| F-03 | ROA 8.55% | =NI/Assets |
| F-04 | Current ratio 1.50, quick ratio 0.64 | =(CA-Inv)/CL |
| F-05 | DSO 11.13, DIO 89.02, DPO 44.51, CCC 55.64 days | =AR/Sales*365+Inv/COGS*365-AP/COGS*365 |
| F-06 | Interest coverage 9.11x, debt-to-equity 0.60 | =EBIT/Interest |
Read it: Northfield's ROE comes mostly from turnover and leverage, not margin; inventory days (89) dominate the cash cycle, which is typical for a seasonal outdoor retailer. As of October 2026, IFRS 18 (replacing IAS 1) applies to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2027 and requires an operating profit subtotal in the statement of profit or loss; operating profit under IFRS 18 is not always equal to the EBIT your course uses, so check its definition (mba/mba-three-statements-card) and the standard on https://www.ifrs.org before you rely on it.
3. Managerial accounting and break-even
F-07 Contribution margin. per unit; .
F-08 Break-even and target profit.
F-09 Margin of safety and operating leverage.
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , | Price and variable cost per unit |
| Fixed costs for the period | |
| Units sold | |
| Operating profit |
Mini example (Example, Northfield tent line). , , , planned volume 16,000 units.
| ID | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|
| F-07 | CM 100 per unit, CMR 40% | =(P-V)/P |
| F-08 | Break-even 12,000 units or USD 3.0m sales; 15,000 units for USD 300,000 profit | =F/(P-V), =(F+300000)/(P-V) |
| F-09 | Profit at 16,000 units USD 400,000; MoS 25%; DOL 4.0 | =Q*(P-V)/(Q*(P-V)-F) |
A DOL of 4.0 means a 10% fall in volume cuts operating profit by about 40% at this volume.
4. Time value of money
F-10 Future and present value of a single sum. ; .
F-11 Effective annual rate. ; with continuous compounding and .
F-12 Ordinary annuity (equal payment at the end of each of periods):
F-13 Growing annuity (first payment at , growth , ):
F-14 Perpetuity and growing perpetuity. ; for .
F-15 Loan payment. .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , | Present value, future value |
| , | Rate per period, number of periods |
| APR, | Quoted annual rate, compounding periods per year |
| , , | Level payment, first payment, growth rate per period |
Mini examples (Example).
| ID | Inputs | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-10 | 10,000 for 5 years at 6% | FV 13,382.26 | =FV(0.06,5,0,-10000) |
| F-10 | 50,000 received in 4 years at 8% | PV 36,751.49 | =PV(0.08,4,0,-50000) |
| F-11 | 12% APR, monthly | EAR 12.6825% | =EFFECT(0.12,12) |
| F-11 | 1,000 for 3 years at 5% continuous | FV 1,161.83 | =1000*EXP(0.05*3) |
| F-12 | 5,000 a year for 10 years at 7% | PV 35,117.91, FV 69,082.24 | =PV(0.07,10,-5000), =FV(0.07,10,-5000) |
| F-13 | = 5,000, = 3%, = 7%, 10 years | PV 39,602.63 | =5000/(0.07-0.03)*(1-(1.03/1.07)^10) |
| F-14 | 2,000 a year at 5%; or 2,000 growing 3% at 8% | 40,000 in both cases | =2000/0.05, =2000/(0.08-0.03) |
| F-15 | 150,000 over 10 years at 6% APR, monthly | Payment 1,665.31 a month | =PMT(0.06/12,120,-150000) |
5. Capital budgeting
F-16 Net present value. . Accept independent projects with .
F-17 Internal rate of return. The rate that solves .
F-18 Payback period. The time until cumulative undiscounted cash flow turns non-negative; interpolate within the year: , where is the first year with non-negative cumulative cash flow.
F-19 Profitability index. .
F-20 Equivalent annual annuity (to compare projects with different lives): .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Net cash flow at time (negative for investment) | |
| Opportunity cost of capital for the project's risk | |
| Cumulative cash flow at the end of year |
Mini example (Example, Corvane Robotics new picking cell, USD k). , then 250, 300, 350, 300, 200 in years 1 to 5, .
| ID | Result | Excel (cash flows in B1:B6) |
|---|---|---|
| F-16 | NPV 67.26 | =NPV(0.1,B2:B6)+B1 |
| F-17 | IRR 12.64% | =IRR(B1:B6) |
| F-18 | Cumulative: -750, -450, -100, 200, so payback 3.33 years | =3+100/300 |
| F-19 | PI 1.067 | =NPV(0.1,B2:B6)/-B1 |
| F-20 | EAA 17.74 a year | =PMT(0.1,5,-67.26) |
The NPV profile below shows NPV falling as the discount rate rises and crossing zero at the IRR (12.64%).
6. Risk, return and the cost of capital
F-21 Two-asset portfolio (Markowitz 1952):
F-22 Beta. .
F-23 Capital asset pricing model (Sharpe 1964, Lintner 1965):
F-24 Weighted average cost of capital (after-tax):
F-25 Unlevering and relevering beta (Hamada 1972, debt beta zero, constant debt): and .
F-26 Modigliani and Miller. Without taxes (1958): and . With corporate taxes (1963) and permanent debt: and .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , , | Portfolio weight, standard deviation of returns, correlation |
| , | Risk-free rate, market risk premium |
| , | Levered (equity) beta, unlevered (asset) beta |
| , , , | Cost of equity, cost of debt, cost of assets, unlevered cost of equity |
| , , | Market values of equity, debt and the firm |
| Marginal corporate tax rate |
Mini examples (Example, Corvane Robotics).
| ID | Inputs | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-21 | = 0.6 and 0.4, = 12% and 7%, = 20% and 12%, = 0.3 | = 10.00%, = 14.20% | =SQRT(0.6^2*0.2^2+0.4^2*0.12^2+2*0.6*0.4*0.3*0.2*0.12) |
| F-22 | Six monthly returns, stock: 4%, -2%, 6%, 1%, -3%, 5%; market: 3%, -1%, 4%, 0%, -2%, 3% | = 1.50 (illustration only: practitioners often use 36 to 60 monthly returns) | =SLOPE(stock,market) or =COVARIANCE.S(stock,market)/VAR.S(market) |
| F-23 | = 4%, = 1.3, MRP = 5.5% | = 11.15% | =0.04+1.3*0.055 |
| F-24 | = 600, = 200, = 6%, = 25% | WACC = 9.49% | =600/800*0.1115+200/800*0.06*(1-0.25) |
| F-25 | = 1.3 at = 1/3 | = 1.04; relevered at = 0.5: 1.43 | =1.3/(1+(1-0.25)*200/600) |
| F-26 | = = 10%, = 6%, = 0.5; separately, = 800 and = 200 | = 12.0% (no tax), 11.5% (tax); = 800 + 0.25 × 200 = 850 | =0.1+0.5*(1-0.25)*(0.1-0.06) |
7. Valuation
F-27 Free cash flow to the firm. .
F-28 Enterprise value by DCF with a Gordon growth terminal value (Williams 1938, Gordon 1959):
F-29 Equity bridge. (net debt = debt minus cash, plus other claims such as preferred stock and minority interests where present); value per share = equity value / diluted shares.
F-30 Dividend discount model (constant growth). .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Free cash flow to the firm in year | |
| D&A, CapEx, | Depreciation and amortisation, capital expenditure, change in net working capital |
| , | Terminal value at the end of year , perpetual growth rate |
| Dividend expected one year from now |
Mini example (Example, Corvane Robotics, USD m). FCFF for years 1 to 5: 80, 95, 105, 115, 120; WACC 9%; = 3%; net debt 300; 50 million diluted shares.
| ID | Result | Excel (FCFF in C2:C6) |
|---|---|---|
| F-28 | = 120 × 1.03 / 0.06 = 2,060.00; PV of TV 1,338.86; PV of FCFF 393.89; EV 1,732.75 | =C6*1.03/(0.09-0.03), =NPV(0.09,C2:C6)+TV/1.09^5 |
| F-28 | Terminal value share of EV: 77.3% | =PVTV/EV |
| F-29 | Equity 1,432.75; per share 28.66 | =(EV-300)/50 |
| F-30 | = 2.00, = 8%, = 4%: = 50.00 | =2/(0.08-0.04) |
8. Options
F-31 Payoffs at expiry. Call: . Put: .
F-32 Put-call parity (Stoll 1969; European options, no dividends):
F-33 Black-Scholes (Black and Scholes 1973, Merton 1973):
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , | Stock price today and at expiry |
| , | Strike price, time to expiry in years |
| Continuously compounded risk-free rate | |
| Annual volatility of the stock's log return | |
| , | European call and put prices |
Mini example (Example). = 50, = 48, = 4%, = 0.5, = 30%.
| Step | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|
| , | 0.3928, 0.1807 | =(LN(50/48)+(0.04+0.3^2/2)*0.5)/(0.3*SQRT(0.5)) |
| , | 0.6528, 0.5717 | =NORM.S.DIST(d1,TRUE) |
| Call | 5.7408 | =50*NORM.S.DIST(d1,TRUE)-48*EXP(-0.04*0.5)*NORM.S.DIST(d2,TRUE) |
| Put | 2.7903 | =48*EXP(-0.04*0.5)*NORM.S.DIST(-d2,TRUE)-50*NORM.S.DIST(-d1,TRUE) |
| Parity check | = 2.9505 and = 50 - 47.0495 = 2.9505 | =C-P |
9. Economics and international finance
F-34 Price elasticity of demand (Marshall 1890). Point: . Midpoint (arc):
F-35 Profit-maximising markup (Lerner 1934). With constant elasticity :
F-36 Fisher relation (Fisher 1930). ; approximately .
F-37 Covered interest parity. With and quoted as domestic currency per unit of foreign currency:
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , , | Quantity, price, marginal cost |
| Own-price elasticity (negative) | |
| , , | Nominal rate, real rate, inflation |
| , | Spot and forward exchange rates |
| , | Domestic and foreign interest rates for the period |
Mini examples (Example).
| ID | Inputs | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-34 | Northfield jacket: price 40 to 44, units 1,000 to 900 | Midpoint elasticity -1.11 (elastic) | =((900-1000)/950)/((44-40)/42) |
| F-34 | Linear demand at = 40 | Point elasticity -1.00 | =-25*40/(2000-25*40) |
| F-35 | = -3, = 30 | = 45.00, Lerner index 0.333 | =30*-3/(1-3) |
| F-36 | 6% nominal, 2.5% inflation | Real 3.41% (approximation 3.5%) | =1.06/1.025-1 |
| F-37 | = 1.0850 USD per EUR, = 4.5%, = 3.0%, 1 year | = 1.1008 USD per EUR | =1.085*1.045/1.03 |
10. Marketing metrics
F-38 Customer lifetime value (constant margin and retention, infinite horizon; Gupta, Lehmann and Stuart 2004 form, margins received at the end of each period the customer is retained):
If the first margin is received immediately at acquisition, .
F-39 Expected customer lifetime. periods.
F-40 Customer value net of acquisition. ; spend on acquisition only while this is positive.
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Margin per customer per period | |
| Retention rate per period | |
| Discount rate per period | |
| Acquisition cost per customer |
Mini example (Example, Northfield loyalty members). = 120 a year, = 0.8, = 10%, = 150.
| ID | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|
| F-38 | CLV 320.00 (440.00 if the first margin is immediate) | =120*0.8/(1+0.1-0.8) |
| F-39 | Expected lifetime 5 years | =1/(1-0.8) |
| F-40 | Net value 170.00 per acquired customer | =CLV-150 |
11. Operations
F-41 Economic order quantity (Harris 1913):
F-42 Reorder point with safety stock (normal daily demand, fixed lead time): , with .
F-43 Newsvendor critical ratio (Arrow, Harris and Marschak 1951):
F-44 Little's Law (Little 1961): , for any stable system in the long run.
F-45 M/M/1 queue (Kendall 1953 notation; Poisson arrivals, exponential service, one server, ):
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , , | Annual demand, cost per order, holding cost per unit per year |
| , , (in F-42) | Mean and SD of daily demand, lead time in days |
| , , | Selling price, unit cost, salvage value |
| , | Cost of understocking and of overstocking one unit |
| , , (in F-44 and F-45) | Average number in system, arrival rate, average time in system |
| , | Service rate, utilisation |
| , | Average number waiting, average wait in queue |
Mini examples (Example).
| ID | Inputs | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-41 | Northfield stove fuel: = 12,000, = 200, = 6 | = 894.43 units; annual cost 5,366.56 | =SQRT(2*12000*200/6) |
| F-42 | = 40, = 8, = 5 days, 95% | = 1.6449, safety stock 29.42, ROP 229.42 | =40*5+NORM.S.INV(0.95)*8*SQRT(5) |
| F-43 | Event jacket: = 80, = 35, = 15, demand N(1000, 200) | CR 0.6923, = 0.5024, = 1,100.48 | =NORM.INV(45/65,1000,200) |
| F-44 | Tallow Creek emergency department: 12 arrivals an hour, 2.5 hours in department | = 30 patients | =12*2.5 |
| F-45 | Tallow Creek triage desk: = 10/h, = 12/h | = 0.833, = 4.17, = 25.0 min, = 0.5 h, = 5.0 | =(10/12)^2/(1-10/12) |
Queue length explodes as utilisation approaches 1, which is why a "fully utilised" service desk is a long-wait desk:
12. Statistics and regression
F-46 Sample mean and standard deviation. ; .
F-47 Standard error and confidence interval for a mean. ; .
F-48 One-sample t-test (Student 1908): , .
F-49 Simple linear regression by least squares (Legendre 1805, Gauss 1809):
F-50 Bayes' rule (Bayes 1763): .
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| , , | Sample size, mean, standard deviation |
| Mean under the null hypothesis | |
| , | Estimated intercept and slope |
| , | Sum of squared residuals, total sum of squares |
Mini examples (Example).
| ID | Inputs | Result | Excel |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-47, F-48 | Northfield online baskets: = 52.4, = 12, = 36, = 50 | = 1.20, = 0.238 (two-sided); 95% CI [48.34, 56.46] | =T.DIST.2T(1.2,35), =T.INV.2T(0.05,35) |
| F-49 | 8 Northfield stores, local ad spend (USD k): 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 28; sales (USD k): 112, 128, 125, 150, 141, 165, 158, 176 | = 3.30, = 82.49, = 0.891, = 6.99, = 0.0004; prediction at = 30: 181.51 | =SLOPE(y,x), =INTERCEPT(y,x), =RSQ(y,x), =LINEST(y,x,TRUE,TRUE) |
The t-test does not reject = 50 at the 5% level; the interval shows the plausible range of the mean basket. The regression slope says each extra USD 1k of local advertising is associated with about USD 3.3k more sales in this sample of eight stores; it is an association, not a causal estimate, and the prediction at 30 lies outside the observed range of (an extrapolation).
13. Verification register
Each formula was compared with two independent sources: (1) the originating work or a standard corporate finance, operations or economics text, and (2) a second textbook or the official Microsoft Excel function documentation. Every mini example was recomputed in Python (numpy 2.5, numpy-financial 1.1, scipy 1.18) and the key Excel formulas evaluated with a spreadsheet engine; results matched to the decimals shown.
| IDs | Topic | Source 1 | Source 2 | My course reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-01 to F-06 | Ratios, DuPont, CCC | OpenStax Principles of Accounting, Volume 1 (ratio chapter) | Koller, Goedhart and Wessels, Valuation (ROIC and ratio chapters) | [ ] |
| F-07 to F-09 | CVP, operating leverage | OpenStax Principles of Accounting, Volume 2 (CVP chapter) | Horngren-tradition cost accounting text (Datar and Rajan, Horngren's Cost Accounting) | [ ] |
| F-10 to F-15 | Time value of money | Berk and DeMarzo, Corporate Finance | Brealey, Myers and Allen, Principles of Corporate Finance; Excel PV, FV, PMT, EFFECT documentation | [ ] |
| F-16 to F-20 | NPV, IRR, payback, PI, EAA | Berk and DeMarzo | Brealey, Myers and Allen; Excel NPV, IRR documentation | [ ] |
| F-21 to F-23 | Portfolio, beta, CAPM | Markowitz (1952); Sharpe (1964); Lintner (1965) | Bodie, Kane and Marcus, Investments | [ ] |
| F-24 to F-26 | WACC, Hamada, M and M | Modigliani and Miller (1958, 1963); Hamada (1972) | Berk and DeMarzo; Brealey, Myers and Allen | [ ] |
| F-27 to F-30 | FCFF, DCF, Gordon growth | Williams (1938); Gordon (1959) | Koller, Goedhart and Wessels, Valuation; Berk and DeMarzo | [ ] |
| F-31 to F-33 | Payoffs, parity, Black-Scholes | Stoll (1969); Black and Scholes (1973); Merton (1973) | Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives; Excel NORM.S.DIST documentation | [ ] |
| F-34 to F-37 | Elasticity, markup, Fisher, CIP | Lerner (1934); Fisher (1930) | Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Microeconomics; OpenStax Principles of Economics; Krugman, Obstfeld and Melitz, International Economics | [ ] |
| F-38 to F-40 | CLV | Gupta, Lehmann and Stuart (2004) | Farris, Bendle, Pfeifer and Reibstein, Marketing Metrics | [ ] |
| F-41 to F-43 | EOQ, ROP, newsvendor | Harris (1913); Arrow, Harris and Marschak (1951) | Cachon and Terwiesch, Matching Supply with Demand | [ ] |
| F-44 to F-45 | Little's Law, M/M/1 | Little (1961); Kendall (1953) | Hillier and Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research; Cachon and Terwiesch | [ ] |
| F-46 to F-50 | Descriptive statistics, t, regression, Bayes | Student (1908); NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook | academic/stats-formula-sheet and its sources; Excel SLOPE, LINEST, T.DIST.2T documentation | [ ] |
14. Choosing the right formula
Start from the decision the question asks you to support, not from the numbers given. A question that gives cash flows over several years is a time-value question even if it also mentions risk; a question about a single selling season with uncertain demand is a newsvendor question even if it mentions margins. The flow below routes the most common core-course question types to the formula IDs on this sheet.
15. Self-test
- Excel returns 67.26 for
=NPV(0.1,B2:B6)+B1but your classmate's=NPV(0.1,B1:B6)returns 61.14. Which is right and why? - A bank quotes 9% APR compounded monthly. What is the effective annual rate?
- Corvane's levered beta is 1.3 at = 1/3 with a 25% tax rate. What is its beta at = 0.5?
- Why does the WACC multiply the cost of debt by but not the cost of equity?
- In the DCF example, what happens to enterprise value if rises from 3% to 4% (other inputs unchanged)? Give the new terminal value and EV.
- A call and a put on the same stock both have = 48 and = 0.5; = 50 and = 4%. The call trades at 6.20 and the put at 2.79. Is put-call parity violated, and in which direction?
- A retailer cuts price from 40 to 36 and units rise from 1,000 to 1,080. Compute the midpoint elasticity. Did revenue rise or fall?
- With = 120, = 0.8 and = 10%, what retention rate would raise CLV (end-of-period convention) to 480?
- The triage desk's arrival rate rises from 10 to 11 an hour with = 12. What is the new average wait in the queue in minutes?
- In the newsvendor example, salvage value drops from 15 to 0. Does the optimal order rise or fall, and why?
My notes and next steps
| Item | My entry |
|---|---|
| Formulas I still look up | [F-25, F-33] |
| Convention differences with my course | [Course uses average balances for ROE] |
| Flashcards made in mba/mba-concept-flashcards | [Date and IDs] |
| Errors logged in mba/mba-error-log | [Date and short description] |
| Next review date | YYYY-MM-DD |
Sources and further reading
- Arrow, K. J., Harris, T., and Marschak, J. (1951). Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica, 19(3), 250-272.
- Bayes, T. (1763). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370-418.
- Black, F., and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637-654.
- Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. Macmillan.
- Gordon, M. J. (1959). Dividends, earnings, and stock prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(2), 99-105.
- Gupta, S., Lehmann, D. R., and Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 7-18.
- Hamada, R. S. (1972). The effect of the firm's capital structure on the systematic risk of common stocks. Journal of Finance, 27(2), 435-452.
- Harris, F. W. (1913). How many parts to make at once. Factory, The Magazine of Management, 10(2), 135-136, 152.
- Kendall, D. G. (1953). Stochastic processes occurring in the theory of queues and their analysis by the method of the imbedded Markov chain. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24(3), 338-354.
- Lerner, A. P. (1934). The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. Review of Economic Studies, 1(3), 157-175.
- Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
- Little, J. D. C. (1961). A proof for the queuing formula: L = λW. Operations Research, 9(3), 383-387.
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
- Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan.
- Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141-183.
- Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
- Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.
- Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442.
- Stoll, H. R. (1969). The relationship between put and call option prices. Journal of Finance, 24(5), 801-824.
- Student (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1-25.
- Williams, J. B. (1938). The Theory of Investment Value. Harvard University Press.
- Microsoft Support. NPV function, https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/functions/npv-function, and Excel functions (by category), https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/excel-functions-by-category (accessed 2026-10-28).
- NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/ (accessed 2026-10-28). Public domain.
- OpenStax (free; CC BY 4.0 or CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 by title): Principles of Accounting, Volumes 1 and 2; Principles of Economics; Introductory Statistics, https://openstax.org/.
- Further reading (by name only): Berk and DeMarzo, Corporate Finance; Brealey, Myers and Allen, Principles of Corporate Finance; Koller, Goedhart and Wessels, Valuation; Hull, Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives; Bodie, Kane and Marcus, Investments; Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Microeconomics; Cachon and Terwiesch, Matching Supply with Demand; Hillier and Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research; Farris, Bendle, Pfeifer and Reibstein, Marketing Metrics.
Answer key
- 67.26 is right. Excel's
NPVdiscounts the first value in the range by one period, so including inside the function discounts the investment a year too: . - (
=EFFECT(0.09,12)). - ; .
- Interest is tax-deductible, so the firm's after-tax cost of debt is lower; dividends to shareholders are not deductible, so the cost of equity has no tax adjustment.
- ; PV of TV ; EV , an increase of about 16% from one point of growth.
- Parity requires ; the market gives . The call is rich relative to the put: sell the call, buy the put and the stock, borrow the present value of (before transaction costs).
- , , elasticity (inelastic). Revenue fell from 40,000 to 38,880.
- Solve : , so .
- , , h, about 55 minutes (up from 25).
- It falls. rises to 35, so , and : each unsold unit now costs more, so the retailer orders less.
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [Your name] | First version from the template |
| 0.2 | YYYY-MM-DD | [Your name] | Example: Added course notation column, removed formulas not allowed on the exam sheet |
Standard and licence note
Based on general financial mathematics, managerial economics, operations management and statistics as taught across MBA core courses, with attribution to the original works listed above; no single standard governs these formulas. The explanations, notation choices, worked examples and layout are original; no textbook text, published case or exam question is reproduced. The template is not affiliated with or endorsed by any business school, publisher or exam body. Check your own course materials for the notation and conventions they require. Template licence: MIT.
Related templates
MBA Activity-Based Costing Concept Card Template (ABC, TDABC)
ABC card: cost hierarchy, two-stage ABC versus plant-wide rate, time-driven ABC with capacity cost rate and time equations, cost to serve, whale curve
MBA & Business SchoolMBA Admit Decision Workbook Template
Deposit and reply deadlines, criteria and swing weights, net-cost and loan comparison with Excel formulas, weighted matrix, sensitivity test, admit-weekend questions, family and visa factors
MBA & Business SchoolMBA AI Decision-Making Concept Card Template
Human in the loop, automation bias, calibration, confusion matrix, precision and recall, cost-based thresholds, A/B tests of AI features, when not to use AI