MBA Application Resume Template
One-page MBA application resume: evidence bank, impact bullet worksheet, before and after rewrites, layout, fictional full example, bullet audit, AI rules
How to use: Use it when you build the resume for MBA applications, before the essays. Fill the evidence bank and the bullet worksheet first, then the layout and audit. The main pitfall is listing duties instead of quantified results with a baseline.
Preview
MBA Application Resume: [Your name]
A workbook and model layout for the one-page resume that MBA admissions committees read alongside your essays, recommendations and test scores. It covers what the admissions resume is for, how it differs from a job-search resume, how to write impact bullets with quantified results, leadership and progression, where education, test scores and the additional section go, before and after rewrites of weak bullets, a fully worked fictional example, a bullet audit, a quality checklist and a timeline. It is for applicants to full-time, part-time and executive MBA programmes at leading international schools, and for the friends, mentors and recommenders who review drafts. Source basis: the resume instructions that schools publish on their admissions pages (checked October 2026 and dated below), research on structured evaluation, and common professional resume practice, written in our own words. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example. The example applicant, employers' results and school are fictional. This is a planning aid, not admissions, legal or financial advice.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Applicant | [Your name] |
| Target programmes and rounds | [School A, Round 1 / School B, Round 2] |
| Master version | [v0.4, YYYY-MM-DD] |
| School-specific versions | [School A: v0.4a, YYYY-MM-DD / School B: v0.4b, YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Page and format rules checked | [Per school, with date checked, see section 3] |
| Reviewed by | [Mentor, colleague outside your industry, recommender] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Submitted] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
Contents
- What the admissions resume is for
- Admissions resume versus recruiting resume
- Format rules to check per school
- Evidence bank
- Impact bullets: the bullet worksheet
- Before and after rewrites
- Layout and section order
- Worked example: a fictional full resume
- Bullet audit
- AI use and integrity rules
- Quality checklist
- Common mistakes
- Timeline
- My notes and next steps
1. What the admissions resume is for
An admissions committee uses the resume for three jobs. First, it is a map of your career: employers, titles, dates and the growth in responsibility between them. Readers check that the story in your essays fits the facts on the page. Second, it is evidence of impact: what changed because you were there, how large the change was and how hard it was to achieve. Third, it is a preview of the classmate and the alumnus: leadership, initiative, teamwork, commitment outside work and the range of experiences you would bring to a learning team or case discussion.
The resume is usually read before the essays and often again before an interview. Many interviewers in a "blind" or "resume-only" format have only this page and ask you to walk them through it. That makes it the one document in the application that must stand on its own: a reader who knows nothing about your industry should understand what you did, for whom, at what scale and with what result.
It is not a list of duties. A reader cannot infer your impact from "responsible for inventory planning"; a thousand other applicants held that responsibility. The committee wants the difference you made, which is why every bullet in this workbook starts from a result and works back to the action.
Three questions the page must answer without help:
| Question | Where the reader finds the answer |
|---|---|
| Is this person academically ready for a demanding core curriculum? | Education, quantitative work in bullets, test scores (in the application form, and on the resume if you choose) |
| Has this person grown faster than peers and led others? | Titles and dates, promotions, scope of teams and budgets, leadership bullets |
| Will this person contribute to the class and the community? | Additional section: community roles, languages, international exposure, interests with substance |
2. Admissions resume versus recruiting resume
The page you send to admissions and the page you later send to employers share a format but serve different readers. After admission, career services at most schools ask students to rebuild the resume in a programme format for recruiting, and the recruiting plan in mba/mba-recruiting-plan schedules that work.
| Dimension | Admissions resume | Recruiting resume after admission |
|---|---|---|
| Reader | Admissions committee, interviewers, often not specialists in your industry | Recruiters and professionals in one target function, such as consulting, banking, product or general management |
| Main question | What kind of leader and classmate is this, and how have they grown? | Can this person do this specific job from day one? |
| Emphasis | Progression, leadership, initiative, values in action, community | Transferable skills that match the target role, technical depth for that role |
| Jargon | Removed or explained in plain words | Target-industry vocabulary is expected |
| Community and interests | Weighted heavily, they show the contribution to the class | Short, used for conversation |
| Education section | At the bottom for most applicants with several years of work | The MBA programme goes at the top, with expected graduation date |
| Format | Each school's rule (see section 3) | The school's standard recruiting format, usually set by career services |
| Length | One page for most programmes | One page, almost without exception |
The two documents should never contradict each other. Numbers that appear in your admissions resume may be checked again in background checks for offers, so every figure you write now must be one you can defend later.
3. Format rules to check per school
Format rules differ by school and can change between cycles. As of October 2026, the official admissions pages showed, for example (check each page before you rely on it):
- MIT Sloan (full-time MBA): a resume of one page at most, in Times New Roman at 10-point size, submitted as Word or PDF, in reverse chronological order with education, work experience and additional information (MIT Sloan, How to apply).
- Yale SOM (full-time MBA): one page, unless you have more than ten years of work experience, in any format or in the school's own template offered in the application (Yale SOM, 2026-2027 Application Guide).
- Kellogg (full-time MBA): no required format or length, with the advice that it should read like a job application resume tailored to a general audience (Kellogg, How to apply, Full-Time MBA).
These examples show why a single master resume is not enough: one school may set the font, another may allow two pages for long careers, another leaves it open. Record each school's rule here.
| School | Page limit | Font or template rule | Sections required | Other instructions | Official page | Date checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example School A | One page | Template offered, optional | Not specified | One page unless more than 10 years of experience | [URL] | 2026-10-28 |
| Example School B | One page | Times New Roman 10 point | Education, experience, additional | Reverse chronological, Word or PDF | [URL] | 2026-10-28 |
| [School] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [URL] | YYYY-MM-DD |
| [School] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [URL] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Where a school sets no rule, use one page. Admissions readers spend little time on each file and a dense second page signals poor prioritisation more often than it adds information. The usual exception is a long career, typically ten years or more, and only where the school allows it.
4. Evidence bank
Collect the raw material for every role before choosing what goes on the page. The bank is also the source for your essays, short answers, recommender brief and interview stories, so build it once and reuse it. The personal narrative workbook (mba/mba-personal-narrative) uses the same rows to find the through-line of your application.
| ID | Role and dates | Situation and stakes | What you did (your actions, not the team's) | Result with number | Baseline and source of the number | Who would confirm it | Leadership or initiative? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV-01 Example | Senior analyst, Northfield Outdoor Co., 2022 to 2024 | 64 stores ran out of top sellers while holding slow stock | Redesigned reorder points and a weekly replenishment review | Lead time 9.5 to 6.2 days, excess inventory USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m | Inventory system, 12 months before and after | Head of retail operations | Yes, led the redesign |
| EV-02 Example | Deployment manager, Corvane Robotics, 2024 to present | Customer sites went live late, delaying revenue recognition | Wrote a pre-install readiness checklist and ran weekly readiness reviews | Average go-live 15 to 11 weeks across 9 sites | Project tracker, first 3 sites versus last 6 | VP Customer Success | Yes, team of 9 |
| EV-03 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| EV-04 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| EV-05 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| EV-06 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
Prompts that surface evidence you may have forgotten:
- What did you build, fix or start that still exists after you left it?
- When were you trusted with something above your title: a client, a budget, a presentation to senior leaders, a hire?
- Which number would your manager quote when explaining why you were promoted or rated highly?
- When did you change someone's mind, with data or persuasion, and what happened next?
- Which people did you train, mentor or manage, and where are they now?
- Outside work, what have you organised, funded, taught or led, and for how long?
- What international or cross-cultural work have you done: markets, teams, languages, relocations?
5. Impact bullets: the bullet worksheet
A strong admissions bullet answers four questions in one or two lines: what changed (the result), how much (a number with a baseline or a comparison), how (your action, with the specific method), and at what scale (stores, customers, revenue, team size, budget, geography). The order on the page is usually verb, action, scope, result, or result first when the result is the striking part. Either works if the reader can find the number in the first glance.
The long form below separates the four parts. Compress only after every cell is filled.
| ID | Strong verb | Action and method | Scope | Result | Baseline or comparison | Compressed bullet (one to two lines) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-01 Example | Redesigned | Reorder points and weekly replenishment review | 64 stores | Lead time 9.5 to 6.2 days, excess inventory USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m | Prior 12 months | Redesigned store replenishment for 64 stores, cutting lead time from 9.5 to 6.2 days (35%) and excess inventory from USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m |
| B-02 Example | Rebuilt | Demand forecast with seasonality and promotions | 3,200 SKUs | Forecast error 18.0% to 11.5% | MAPE, prior season | Rebuilt the demand forecast for 3,200 SKUs, reducing forecast error (MAPE) from 18.0% to 11.5% |
| B-03 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| B-04 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| B-05 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
How the percentages in the examples were computed, so you can reproduce yours in a spreadsheet:
| Measure | Before | After | Change | Excel formula | Shown on the page as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example Replenishment lead time, days | 9.5 | 6.2 | -34.7% | =(6.2-9.5)/9.5 | "cutting lead time from 9.5 to 6.2 days (35%)" |
| Example Excess inventory, USD m | 4.8 | 3.1 | -35.4% | =(3.1-4.8)/4.8 | "from USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m" |
| Example E-commerce conversion, % | 2.1 | 2.6 | +23.8% relative, +0.5 points | =(2.6-2.1)/2.1 | "from 2.1% to 2.6%" |
| Example Site go-live time, weeks | 15 | 11 | -26.7% | =(11-15)/15 | "from 15 to 11 weeks (27%)" |
| Example Forecast error (MAPE), % | 18.0 | 11.5 | -36.1% relative, -6.5 points | =(11.5-18)/18 | "from 18.0% to 11.5%" |
Rules for numbers:
- Give the baseline. "Cut lead time 35%" invites the question "from what?"; "from 9.5 to 6.2 days" answers it.
- Points versus percent. A conversion rate rising from 2.1% to 2.6% is a 0.5 percentage-point rise and a 23.8% relative rise. Say which one you mean, or show both endpoints and let the reader judge.
- Round honestly. Round once, at the end, and never upward past the true value. 34.7% may become "35%", but not "nearly 40%".
- Attribute fairly. If a team achieved the result, say what you led or contributed ("led a 4-person working group that ..."). Overclaiming is the most common reason an interviewer's follow-up questions go badly.
- Confidential figures. Use ratios, percentages, ranks or ranges instead of absolute amounts your employer would not want published, and keep the version you can explain in an interview.
- When nothing is countable, show scope (who relied on the work), selection (who chose you and why) or persistence (what still runs today). "Selected by the CEO to present operating metrics in Series C diligence" is evidence even without a percentage.
Verb families that read as action rather than duty (choose the one that is true):
| What you did | Verbs |
|---|---|
| Started something | Launched, founded, initiated, piloted, created |
| Improved something | Redesigned, rebuilt, streamlined, cut, raised, accelerated |
| Led people | Led, managed, recruited, mentored, coached, mobilised |
| Persuaded | Negotiated, secured, won, convinced, presented |
| Analysed | Modelled, diagnosed, quantified, forecast, evaluated |
| Was chosen | Selected, promoted, appointed, invited, awarded |
6. Before and after rewrites
Each row shows a weak bullet, what is wrong with it and a stronger version for the same fictional facts.
| ID | Before | Problem | After |
|---|---|---|---|
| RW-01 Example | Responsible for inventory planning for retail stores. | Duty, no action, no scope, no result | Redesigned store replenishment for 64 stores, cutting lead time from 9.5 to 6.2 days (35%) and excess inventory from USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m |
| RW-02 Example | Helped improve the website experience, which increased sales significantly. | "Helped" hides your role, "significantly" is not a number | Led a 4-person working group with merchandising and e-commerce that changed product-page stock signals, raising online conversion from 2.1% to 2.6% |
| RW-03 Example | Utilised advanced Python and SARIMAX models to optimise forecasts leveraging cross-functional synergies. | Jargon for a general reader, tool before result, filler words | Rebuilt the demand forecast for 3,200 SKUs, reducing forecast error from 18.0% to 11.5% |
| RW-04 Example | Worked on robot deployment projects for customers. | No scope, no ownership, no result | Lead deployment of autonomous picking systems across 9 customer warehouses (USD 12.4m contract value), cutting average go-live from 15 to 11 weeks |
| RW-05 Example | Team player with excellent communication skills. | Self-assessment without evidence, belongs nowhere on the page | Presented quarterly inventory reviews to the CFO and regional directors |
| RW-06 Example | Volunteer at a climbing club. | Membership, not contribution | Treasurer, Ridgeway Youth Climbing Club (fictional): rebuilt the budget and secured 2 grants that fund 30 free places a year |
| RW-07 | [Your weak bullet] | [ ] | [ ] |
| RW-08 | [Your weak bullet] | [ ] | [ ] |
Two short fragments show the same technique at sentence level (fictional):
- Weak: "I was involved in a number of initiatives aimed at improving operational efficiency in our stores."
- Strong: "Cut replenishment lead time in 64 stores from 9.5 to 6.2 days."
7. Layout and section order
The common layout for applicants with work experience is header, experience, education, additional. Applicants straight from university or with under two years of work sometimes put education first. Follow any section order the school specifies.
| Section | What goes in | Conventions |
|---|---|---|
| Header | Name, city and country, email, phone, optional profile link | No photo, date of birth, marital status or full street address unless a school asks for them |
| Experience | Employer, a one-line description of the employer if not well known, title, city, dates, 3 to 5 bullets per recent role | Reverse chronological. Show promotions within one employer as separate titles with their own dates under one employer heading |
| Education | Degree, institution, year, honours, a GPA only if strong and on a scale the reader understands, notable scholarships | Most applicants place it after experience. Translate grading systems that are not widely known, for example "top 5% of cohort" |
| Test scores | GMAT Focus, GRE or Executive Assessment results | Usually reported in the application form and official score report. If you add them, put them in Education. Some applicants omit them to save space, and many readers expect that. Follow the school's instructions |
| Additional | Community leadership, languages with level, certifications, technical skills relevant to your story, interests with specifics | Short and concrete. "Marathon runner, 3 finishes" beats "running, reading, travel" |
Progression. Readers look for growth: a promotion faster than the usual track, a broader scope, a move to a role with more responsibility. Make it visible with separate title lines and dates. If you changed employers, make the reason for the change readable from the bullets (larger scope, new function, international move) and explain it in the essays or the application form if needed.
Page budget. A one-page resume at a readable size holds about 50 to 55 lines. A useful split for an applicant with five to seven years of experience, used in the worked example:
| Block | Lines | Share of page |
|---|---|---|
| Header | 3 | 6% |
| Experience | 30 | 58% |
| Education | 7 | 13% |
| Additional | 6 | 12% |
| Spacing and headings | 6 | 12% |
| Total | 52 | 100% (shares rounded) |
Shares computed as =lines/SUM(lines). Give the most recent role the most lines: it shows your current level.
Employer descriptions. If your employer is not widely known, add one short italic line under its name: what it does, size and where. The reader cannot judge the scale of "USD 12.4m contract value" without knowing whether the company earns USD 20m or USD 20bn.
8. Worked example: a fictional full resume
The applicant is Nadia Farouk Lindgren (fictional), with 74 months (6.2 years) of full-time experience at the time of
applying: 23 months as analyst and 19 months as senior analyst at Northfield Outdoor Co., then 32 months as deployment
manager at Corvane Robotics. Months counted with both start and end months included,
=(YEAR(end)-YEAR(start))*12+MONTH(end)-MONTH(start)+1, then =SUM(months)/12 for years.
NADIA FAROUK LINDGREN (Example) Gothenburg, Sweden | nadia.lindgren@example.com | +46 [phone]
EXPERIENCE
Corvane Robotics (fictional), Boston, MA and remote Venture-backed maker of warehouse picking robots, about 600 employees Deployment Manager, Feb 2024 to present
- C1. Lead deployment of autonomous picking systems across 9 customer warehouses (USD 12.4m contract value), cutting average site go-live from 15 to 11 weeks (27%) with a pre-install readiness checklist now used company-wide
- C2. Manage a cross-functional team of 7 engineers and 2 customer-success leads across 3 time zones, with no lost-time safety incidents across all 9 sites
- C3. Built a renewal-risk dashboard the VP Customer Success uses to prioritise 40 accounts, flagging 5 at-risk accounts, 4 of which renewed
- C4. Selected by the CEO to represent deployment operations in Series C investor diligence, preparing the operating-metrics data room
- C5. Mentor 3 junior deployment engineers, 2 of whom were promoted within 18 months
Northfield Outdoor Co. (fictional), Gothenburg, Sweden Outdoor-gear retailer and brand, 64 stores and e-commerce Senior Analyst, Retail Operations, Jul 2022 to Jan 2024
- N1. Led the redesign of store replenishment for 64 stores, cutting lead time from 9.5 to 6.2 days (35%) and excess inventory from USD 4.8m to USD 3.1m
- N2. Rebuilt the demand forecast for 3,200 SKUs, reducing forecast error (MAPE) from 18.0% to 11.5%
- N3. Led a 4-person working group with merchandising and e-commerce that changed product-page stock signals, raising online conversion from 2.1% to 2.6%
- N4. Presented quarterly inventory reviews to the CFO and regional directors
- N5. Promoted after 23 months, ahead of the usual 36-month track
Analyst, Retail Operations, Aug 2020 to Jun 2022
- A1. Automated weekly sales reporting for 64 stores, saving about 12 analyst hours a week
- A2. Analysed returns for 2 footwear lines and traced 22% of returns to one sizing error, fixed in the next season
- A3. Trained 14 store managers on the new replenishment tool before the national roll-out
- A4. Supported the annual budget process for retail operations
EDUCATION
Westbrook University (fictional), BSc Industrial Engineering, 2020 Graduated with distinction (top 10% of cohort); thesis on warehouse slotting, awarded department prize [GMAT Focus Edition: score, YYYY, only if you choose to show it and the school allows it]
ADDITIONAL
- Treasurer, Ridgeway Youth Climbing Club (fictional), 2021 to present: rebuilt the budget and secured 2 grants that fund 30 free places a year
- Languages: Arabic (native), Swedish (fluent), English (fluent), German (intermediate, CEFR B1)
- Certifications: [Certification name, issuer, year; check the current name and status of any certification you list]
- Interests: multi-pitch climbing (lead climber, 40 routes logged), Nordic cooking for community dinners
What this example does well: progression is visible (analyst, promotion after 23 months, a move to a larger scope at a growth company), every recent role opens with a quantified result, leadership appears both in managing people (C2, C5) and in leading without authority (N1, N3), the employer lines give the reader scale, and the additional section shows sustained community contribution rather than a list of hobbies.
What it could still improve: C4 and N4 carry no result, and A4 is a duty. In a final edit, A4 would be cut to make room for a second line on C1, or replaced with a result.
9. Bullet audit
Mark each bullet Yes or No on three tests. The example audits the 14 bullets in section 8.
| Bullet | Quantified result | Scope stated | Leadership or initiative |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| C2 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| C3 Example | Yes | Yes | No |
| C4 Example | No | Yes | No |
| C5 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N1 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N2 Example | Yes | Yes | No |
| N3 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N4 Example | No | Yes | No |
| N5 Example | Yes | No | No |
| A1 Example | Yes | Yes | No |
| A2 Example | Yes | Yes | No |
| A3 Example | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| A4 Example | No | No | No |
| Share Yes | 11 of 14 = 79% | 12 of 14 = 86% | 6 of 14 = 43% |
Shares computed with =COUNTIF(B2:B15,"Yes")/COUNTA(B2:B15). Leadership at 43% is acceptable here because it
appears in every role, but an applicant aiming at programmes that weigh leadership heavily would strengthen C3 or N2
by naming who they brought along.
Your audit:
| Bullet | Quantified result | Scope stated | Leadership or initiative | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ID] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [ ] |
| [ID] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [ ] |
| [ID] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [Yes/No] | [ ] |
10. AI use and integrity rules
Schools' policies on generative AI in applications differ and change between cycles. As of October 2026, published approaches range from treating essays written by another person or a tool as a violation, through allowing AI for ideas and editing but not for complete responses, to asking applicants to disclose AI use in a short statement. Columbia Business School's application requirements page, for example, permitted generative AI for idea generation and editing but treated generated complete responses as an Honor Code violation (Columbia Business School, MBA application requirements). Check each school's current policy before you rely on it.
Rules that hold under every policy we found:
- You write the resume. Every bullet must describe work you did, in words you would use in an interview.
- Facts are yours to verify. A tool that "improves" a number, a title or a date creates a false statement that you signed.
- Check each school's policy and follow the strictest one that applies to the material you reuse across schools.
- Disclose when asked. If an application asks whether and how you used AI, answer accurately.
- Use tools only where allowed, for example to check grammar or to find inconsistent date formats, and keep a note of what you used them for.
- Never let a tool invent evidence. Generated bullets tend to be generic and inflated, which readers notice and interviewers test.
11. Quality checklist
| # | Check | Done |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Meets each school's page, font and format rules (section 3), with the date checked | [ ] |
| Q2 | Every recent role opens with a quantified result | [ ] |
| Q3 | Every number has a baseline or comparison and a source you can name | [ ] |
| Q4 | Percent and percentage points used correctly | [ ] |
| Q5 | Promotions and progression visible as separate titles and dates | [ ] |
| Q6 | Leadership shown in every role held for more than a year | [ ] |
| Q7 | No jargon, acronyms explained or removed, a general reader understands every line | [ ] |
| Q8 | Dates, titles and numbers match the application form, essays, short answers and recommender brief | [ ] |
| Q9 | Employer description lines added for employers that are not widely known | [ ] |
| Q10 | Test score placement follows the school's instructions | [ ] |
| Q11 | Additional section shows contribution, with duration and specifics | [ ] |
| Q12 | Consistent date format, tense (present for current role, past for earlier ones), punctuation | [ ] |
| Q13 | No spelling or grammar errors after a read-aloud and a read on paper | [ ] |
| Q14 | File named clearly, for example Lastname_Firstname_Resume.pdf, and opens correctly as PDF | [ ] |
| Q15 | AI-use rules for each school checked and followed | [ ] |
| Q16 | One reader outside your industry summarised your career correctly after 90 seconds | [ ] |
12. Common mistakes
- Duties instead of results. "Responsible for" and "involved in" tell the reader nothing about what changed.
- Numbers without baselines. A percentage with no starting point is unverifiable and often looks inflated.
- Jargon and internal names. Project code names, internal tools and industry acronyms block a general reader.
- Hidden progression. Listing only the final title under an employer hides a promotion that would have counted.
- Overclaiming team results. Interviewers ask "what exactly did you do?" and the answer must match the page.
- The recruiting resume, unchanged. A resume built for a technical job search buries leadership and community.
- A page and a half. Overflow onto a second page, or a font shrunk below readability, signals weak prioritisation.
- A generic additional section. "Travel, reading, sports" adds nothing; specifics invite conversation.
- Inconsistency across the application. Different dates or numbers in the form, essays and resume raise doubts.
- Unexplained gaps. A gap of several months with no explanation invites speculation; address it in the form or the optional essay (mba/mba-optional-essay).
- Personal data the school did not ask for. Photos, birth dates and family status add risk and no value.
- Generated text. Bullets written by a tool read as generic and may break a school's policy.
13. Timeline
| Relative date | Task | Date |
|---|---|---|
| T-16 weeks | Evidence bank complete for every role (section 4) | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-14 weeks | Long-form bullets drafted (section 5) | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-12 weeks | First full draft and bullet audit (sections 8 and 9) | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-10 weeks | Resume sent to recommenders with the brief (mba/mba-recommender-brief) | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-8 weeks | Outside reader test, second draft | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-4 weeks | School versions, format rules re-checked on official pages | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T-1 week | Final proofread, consistency check against essays and form | YYYY-MM-DD |
| T | Submitted | YYYY-MM-DD |
Send the resume to recommenders early: their letters are stronger when they can see which achievements you are emphasising, and inconsistencies between letters and resume are caught before submission. Your recommenders must still write their own letters; the brief only reminds them of facts.
14. My notes and next steps
| Date | Decision or open point | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| YYYY-MM-DD | [For example: dropped A4 to fit a second line on C1] | [ ] |
| YYYY-MM-DD | [ ] | [ ] |
Interview preparation: practise a two-minute walk-through of the page in reverse chronological order, with one story ready behind each bullet (see mba/mba-interview-prep and mba/mba-personal-narrative).
Sources and further reading
- MIT Sloan School of Management. How to apply to the MIT Sloan MBA program. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/mba/admissions/how-to-apply (checked 2026-10-28).
- Yale School of Management. 2026-2027 Application Guide. https://som.yale.edu/programs/mba/admissions/application-information/application-guide (checked 2026-10-28).
- Kellogg School of Management. How to apply, Full-Time MBA. https://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/admissions/ft-admissions/ft-how-to-apply/ (checked 2026-10-28).
- Columbia Business School. MBA application requirements. https://academics.business.columbia.edu/admissions/mba/application-requirements (generative AI statement as shown in search results, 2026-10-28; check the live page).
- Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P. and Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 241-293. Background on why interviewers probe resume claims with structured follow-up questions.
- Further reading on clear business writing: Williams, J. M. and Bizup, J. Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace (named only).
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | First version from template |
| [0.2] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Name] | [Bullet audit applied, outside reader feedback] |
Standard and licence note
Based on the resume instructions published on the official admissions pages of the schools named above (checked October 2026) and on common professional resume practice. The text, worked example and checklists are original. The template is not affiliated with, endorsed by or produced by any school, and school names are used only to describe their published instructions accurately. Check each school's current instructions before you submit. Template licence: MIT.
Related templates
EMBA Sponsorship Proposal Template
Employer sponsorship business case for an Executive MBA: alignment, costs, NPV, IRR and break-even attribution, cover plan, retention and repayment terms
MBA & Business SchoolEMBA Strategic Project Plan Template
In-company EMBA strategic project: decision-focused scope, value at stake, stakeholder map, hypothesis-driven analysis plan, deliverables, RACI, confidentiality
MBA & Business SchoolMBA Activity-Based Costing Concept Card Template (ABC, TDABC)
ABC card: cost hierarchy, two-stage ABC versus plant-wide rate, time-driven ABC with capacity cost rate and time equations, cost to serve, whale curve