Promotion Packet: [name] -> [target level]
Promotion case – level evidence, endorsements
Cómo usar: Promo cases. Map evidence to level expectations line-by-line; committees evaluate scope, not effort.
Vista previa
Promotion Packet: [name] -> [target level]
The case for promotion, built from evidence already produced. Write it so a committee that doesn't know you can evaluate it.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Candidate | @name |
| Current -> target | [level] -> [level] |
| Manager | @name |
| Packet date | YYYY-MM-DD |
Case summary
[Three sentences: what level scope they already operate at, the strongest proof, and why now.]
Level expectations
| Expectation at [target level] | Evidence from this period |
|---|---|
| [scope: e.g. leads cross-team work] | [project + outcome + link] |
| [impact: e.g. org-level results] | [metric moved] |
| [behaviors: e.g. mentors others] | [example] |
Signature work
[Project 1]
- Problem: [what]
- Role: [exactly what they owned vs the team]
- Impact: [numbers]
- Artifacts: [docs / PRs / launches]
[Project 2]
- Problem:
- Role:
- Impact:
- Artifacts:
Peer feedback (quoted, attributed)
"[Specific observation of scope/impact]" – @peer, [role]
"[...]" – @peer, [role]
Gaps acknowledged
[What is not yet at target level and the plan to close it – honesty here strengthens the packet.]
Endorsements
| Sponsor | Level | Statement |
|---|---|---|
| @name | [level] | [why they endorse] |