Markdown Editor

Grant Report Template (Interim and Final, Funder Report)

Interim or final funder report: summary, progress vs indicators, outputs, changes, safeguarding, budget-to-actual with variance notes, transfers, declarations

非営利フルFunder reporting practice; 2 CFR 200.308, 200.328, 200.329, 200.344 (eCFR 2026-10-01)grantreport

使い方: Use it when a grant agreement asks for an interim, annual or final report. Fill the financial report and indicator table first from the ledger and the M&E data, then write the narrative that explains them. The main pitfall is renaming objectives or budget lines, or leaving a variance above the agreement's threshold unexplained.

プレビュー

Grant Report: [Project title], [Interim / Final] Report to [Funder]

An interim or final report to a funder on a grant-funded project: summary, progress against objectives and indicators, activities and outputs, changes and challenges, safeguarding and risk, lessons, financial report with budget-to-actual variance explanations, and the declarations and attachments a funder usually asks for. Based on common funder reporting practice; for US federal awards, also on the Uniform Guidance reporting rules in 2 CFR part 200 (sections 200.308, 200.328, 200.329 and 200.344, eCFR text current at 2026-10-01). The grant agreement and the funder's own report form always take precedence: reorder, rename or drop sections to match them. This is a reporting format, not legal, financial or audit advice. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row or passage marked Example.

Document control

FieldValue
Document ID[GRPT-2026-005-I1]
Funder[Funder name]
Grant reference[Award or agreement number]
Programme / call[Grant programme]
Report type[Interim / Annual / Final / Closeout]
Reporting periodYYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD
Report due dateYYYY-MM-DD
Total award[Example: USD 149,600 over 24 months]
Version[0.1]
Status[Draft / In review / Approved for submission / Submitted / Accepted by funder]
Owner[@programme-lead]
Approvers / reviewers[@executive-director, @finance-lead]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD
Classification[Confidential to funder / Public summary allowed]

Approvals

RoleNameDecisionDate
Programme lead[@name][Narrative and indicators confirmed]YYYY-MM-DD
Finance lead[@name][Financial report reconciled to the ledger]YYYY-MM-DD
Executive director or authorised signatory[@name][Approved for submission]YYYY-MM-DD

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange summary
0.1YYYY-MM-DD[@name]First draft
0.2YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Variance notes added after finance review
1.0YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Submitted to funder portal, receipt saved

Contents

1. Summary

[Example: This interim report covers months 1 to 12 of the Family Reading Initiative in [District]. All 60 participating schools received classroom libraries, and 238 of the 240 planned teachers completed the five-day training. At the month 12 midline assessment, 55% of year 3 pupils read at the national benchmark, up from 47% at baseline; the month 24 target is 65%. Structured reading methods were seen in 52% of observed lessons (baseline 9%, target 70% by month 18). Parents reporting weekly shared reading rose from 20% to 31% (target 50%).]

[Example: We spent USD 82,665 against a year 1 budget of USD 84,700, an underspend of USD 2,035 (2.4%). Family reading sessions ran behind plan (171 of 240 sessions) after the partner organisation lost volunteers during the harvest season; a revised schedule and a volunteer stipend pilot are described in section 5. Training costs ran 19% over the line budget because of a fuel price rise, covered by savings in personnel and books. We request no change to the total award. We ask the funder to note the USD 2,035 underspend carried into year 2 for the delayed family sessions.]

2. Grant and reporting basis

ItemValue
Award date and period of performance[Example: YYYY-MM-DD, 24 months, months 1 to 24]
Approved budget[Example: USD 149,600: year 1 USD 84,700, year 2 USD 64,900]
Payments received to date[Example: USD 84,700 (first annual instalment)]
Reporting schedule[Example: interim narrative and financial report at month 12, final report within 90 days of the end date]
Variance rule in the agreement[Example: explain any budget line that differs from budget by more than 10% and more than USD 1,000]
Budget transfer rule[Example: transfers between lines up to 10% of the total award without prior approval]
Special conditions[Example: safeguarding incidents reported to the funder within 72 hours; funder logo on printed materials]
Amendments since award[Example: none]

2.1 If the award is US federal funding

For a US federal award, or a subaward of one, the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR part 200) sets the outer limits for reporting. Read the terms of your award first, because the agency or the pass-through entity sets the actual dates within these limits. As published on eCFR (text current at 2026-10-01):

  • Financial reports (2 CFR 200.328): collected no less often than annually and, unless a specific condition applies, no more often than quarterly, using the government-wide data elements approved by OMB (at publication, the Federal Financial Report, SF-425). Annual reports are due no later than 90 calendar days after the reporting period; quarterly or semiannual reports no later than 30 calendar days after it.
  • Performance reports (2 CFR 200.329): the same frequency limits and due dates. Where applicable, the report compares accomplishments with the award's objectives for the period, explains why goals were not met, and explains cost overruns or higher than expected unit costs. Report significant developments between due dates (200.329(e)).
  • Final reports and closeout (2 CFR 200.344): a recipient submits all final reports no later than 120 calendar days after the end of the period of performance; a subrecipient reports to its pass-through entity no later than 90 calendar days after the end of its subaward, or earlier if agreed.
  • Budget deviations (2 CFR 200.308): deviations from the approved budget, scope or objectives are reported under 200.329, and certain changes need prior written approval, such as a change in scope or objectives, a change in named key personnel, or moving participant support costs to other categories. An agency may restrict transfers among direct cost categories when the federal share exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and cumulative transfers exceed or are expected to exceed 10% of the total approved budget (200.308(i)).

Check the current text at https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200 and your award terms before each report. Other governments and most private foundations have their own rules; this section is only one dated example.

3. Progress against objectives

Goal: [Example: children in rural [District] read with comprehension by the end of year 3.]

ObjectiveIndicator IDIndicatorBaselineTarget (date)This periodProgress to targetStatus
OBJ-1 (Example)IND-001% of year 3 pupils at the reading benchmark47%65% (month 24)55% (midline, month 12)44%On track
OBJ-2 (Example)IND-002% of observed lessons using the structured method9%70% (month 18)52% (term 3 observations)70%On track
OBJ-3 (Example)IND-003% of parents reporting weekly shared reading20%50% (month 24)31% (midline sample)37%Behind, see CHG-001
[OBJ-N][IND-NNN][Indicator][Baseline][Target][Value][%][On track / Behind / Achieved]

Worked check for the Example rows: IND-001 (55 − 47) / (65 − 47) = 8 / 18 = 44%; IND-002 (52 − 9) / (70 − 9) = 43 / 61 = 70%; IND-003 (31 − 20) / (50 − 20) = 11 / 30 = 37%. At month 12, half the project period has passed, so IND-001 and IND-002 are on or ahead of a straight line path, and IND-003 is behind.

Narrative per objective. For each objective, write three to five sentences: what changed, the evidence, how confident you are in it, and what explains any gap.

[Example: OBJ-1. The midline assessment tested 768 of the 800 enrolled year 3 pupils (96%) with the same oral reading tool as the baseline, administered by assessors who had not coached the schools. Gains were largest in schools whose teachers joined cohort 1 and so had nine months of coaching. The 20 comparison schools moved from 46% to 48% over the same period, which suggests most of the gain is linked to the project, although the comparison schools were not randomly chosen.]

[OBJ-N narrative]

4. Activities and outputs

ActivityOutput measurePlanned to dateActual to date% of planNote
ACT-1 (Example) Baseline assessmentSchools assessed6060100%Completed month 2
ACT-2 (Example) Teacher trainingTeachers completing 5-day course24023899%2 teachers transferred out of district
ACT-3 (Example) Coaching visitsVisits completed1,7001,62095%Road closures in month 8
ACT-4 (Example) Classroom librariesLibraries installed6060100%
ACT-5 (Example) Family reading sessionsSessions held24017171%See CHG-001
ACT-6 (Example) Midline assessmentMidline report11100%Annex B
[ACT-N][Measure][N][N][%][Note]

Add one or two short case examples if the funder asks for them. Use them only with the written consent of the people involved (and of a parent or carer for a child), remove identifying details, and never use images of children without consent and a safeguarding check.

5. Changes, challenges and corrective actions

IDChange or challengeCauseEffect on objectives and budgetCorrective actionFunder approval
CHG-001 (Example)Family reading sessions at 71% of planPartner lost 14 of 40 volunteers during the harvest season (months 7 to 9)IND-003 behind; USD 1,725 underspend on the partner lineSessions moved to evenings and weekends; volunteer stipend pilot in 10 schools from month 13; 69 sessions rescheduled into months 13 to 18For information; underspend carried forward
CHG-002 (Example)Training costs above budgetFuel prices rose about 30% between budget and deliveryUSD 1,900 over the training line; no effect on outputsCovered by transfers from personnel (USD 1,600) and books (USD 300); cohort 2 travel shared with the district officeFor information; transfer within the 10% limit (section 8.3)
CHG-003 (Example)Coaching visits at 95% of planRoad closures after flooding in month 8Minor; visits concentrated in months 9 to 11Phone coaching used for 6 remote schools during closuresNone needed
[CHG-NNN][Change][Cause][Effect][Action][None / For information / Approval requested]

Approval requests in this report: [Example: none. If a request is needed, state exactly what you ask for, the reason, the budget effect and the date you need a decision.]

6. Participants, equity and feedback

GroupTargetReached to dateNote
Children in years 1 to 3 in participating schools (Example)2,4002,400 enrolled, including 800 in year 3 (768 assessed at midline)51% girls, 49% boys
Pupils with a disability identified by the school (Example)Not set86Large-print books added to 18 libraries
Teachers trained (Example)24023864% women
Families attending at least one session (Example)2,000 by month 241,130Lower attendance in the 12 most remote schools
[Group][Target][Reached][Note]

Feedback and complaints received this period: [Example: 23 feedback items through school suggestion boxes and a phone line, of which 3 were complaints (session times, book language). Session times changed in month 10; local-language books ordered for year 2.]

7. Safeguarding, risk and compliance

  • Safeguarding incidents this period: [Example: 2 concerns recorded; both handled under the safeguarding policy (nonprofit/safeguarding-policy); 1 referred to the local child protection authority; the funder was notified within the 72 hours the agreement requires.]
  • Safeguarding training: [Example: 238 teachers, 6 staff and 26 partner volunteers completed the safeguarding module.]
  • Vetting: [Example: all staff and volunteers in roles with unsupervised contact with children have completed the check level set in the role risk assessment.]
  • Top risks and their status: link to the project risk register (compliance/risk-register).
Risk IDRiskRating last periodRating nowAction
RSK-03 (Example)Volunteer attrition reduces family sessionsMediumHighStipend pilot, evening sessions
RSK-05 (Example)Flooding blocks access to remote schoolsMediumMediumPhone coaching protocol
[RSK-NN][Risk][Rating][Rating][Action]
  • Compliance with special conditions: [Example: all conditions met; funder logo used on 60 library signs.]
  • Audit or monitoring visits: [Example: funder monitoring visit in month 9; two recommendations, both closed.]

8. Financial report

Reporting basis: [Example: accrual basis, figures in US dollars, from the general ledger as at YYYY-MM-DD, reconciled by [@finance-lead].]

8.1 Budget to actual for the period

Budget lineBudget (year 1)Actual (year 1)VarianceVariance %Explanation required?
Personnel (Example)USD 38,000USD 36,400−USD 1,600−4.2%No
Training and coaching (Example)USD 10,000USD 11,900+USD 1,900+19.0%Yes, VAR-01
Books and library kits (Example)USD 18,000USD 17,250−USD 750−4.2%No
Family sessions, partner sub-grant (Example)USD 6,000USD 4,275−USD 1,725−28.8%Yes, VAR-02
Monitoring and evaluation (Example)USD 5,000USD 5,325+USD 325+6.5%No
Total direct costsUSD 77,000USD 75,150−USD 1,850−2.4%
Indirect costs at 10% of total direct costs (Example)USD 7,700USD 7,515−USD 185−2.4%No
TotalUSD 84,700USD 82,665−USD 2,035−2.4%

Sign convention: variance = actual minus budget, so a negative value is an underspend. "Explanation required" applies the Example rule from section 2: more than 10% and more than USD 1,000 on a line.

8.2 Variance explanations

IDLineVarianceCauseEffect on outputsAction
VAR-01 (Example)Training and coaching+USD 1,900 (+19.0%)Fuel and transport prices rose after the budget was set; coaching travel to remote schools cost more per visitNone: 238 teachers trained, 1,620 visitsCovered by savings on other lines (8.3); car-sharing with district coaches in year 2
VAR-02 (Example)Family sessions−USD 1,725 (−28.8%)171 sessions held against 240 planned, at USD 25 per session (USD 4,275)IND-003 behind plan69 sessions rescheduled into months 13 to 18; underspend carried forward
[VAR-NN][Line][Amount and %][Cause][Effect][Action]

8.3 Transfers between lines

From lineTo lineAmountCumulative transfersLimit in agreementWithin limit?
Personnel (Example)Training and coachingUSD 1,600USD 1,60010% of USD 149,600 = USD 14,960Yes
Books and library kits (Example)Training and coachingUSD 300USD 1,900 (1.3% of award)USD 14,960Yes
[Line][Line][USD N][USD N][Limit][Yes / No: approval requested]

8.4 Funds received, spent and remaining

ItemAmount
Funds received to date (Example)USD 84,700
Expenditure to date (Example)USD 82,665
Balance held (Example)USD 2,035
Year 2 approved budget (Example)USD 64,900
Year 2 budget plus carried-forward balance (Example)USD 66,935
Share of total award spent to date (Example)55.3% (USD 82,665 of USD 149,600)
Interest earned on grant funds, if any[USD N, and how it was treated under the agreement]

8.5 Match funding and in-kind contributions

SourceCommittedReceived or provided to dateEvidence
District education office, in-kind venues and trainer time (Example)USD 18,000 equivalentUSD 9,400 equivalentSigned timesheets, venue log
[Source][USD N][USD N][Evidence]

9. Lessons and learning

IDLessonEvidenceWhat we will change
LES-01 (Example)Teachers with nine months of coaching gained more than those with threeMidline results by cohortFront-load coaching visits for cohort 2 in months 13 to 15
LES-02 (Example)Volunteer-led family sessions are fragile in the farming seasonSession logs months 7 to 9Plan around the agricultural calendar; test stipends
[LES-NN][Lesson][Evidence][Change]

10. Next period plan or sustainability

Interim report: plan for the next period

MilestoneActivityPlanned dateRevised dateNote
MS-05 (Example)ACT-5 catch-up: 69 rescheduled sessionsMonths 13 to 18Evening and weekend slots
MS-06 (Example)IND-002 target reviewMonth 18Classroom observation round
MS-07 (Example)ACT-6 endline assessmentMonths 23 to 24Same tool and assessors as baseline
[MS-NN][Activity][Date][Date][Note]

Final report: sustainability and closeout

  • What continues and who funds it: [Example: the district education office absorbs coaching from month 25 under the signed agreement.]
  • Assets and their ownership: [Example: libraries remain with schools.]
  • Unspent funds: [amount, and whether returned or reallocated with written approval].
  • Closeout items: final financial report, final performance report, equipment and property records, and any audit the agreement requires.

11. Declarations and attachments

Declaration [Example: I confirm that, to the best of my knowledge, the information in this report is accurate and complete, that the grant funds were spent on the purposes set out in the agreement, and that the financial figures agree with the organisation's accounting records.]

NameTitleSignatureDate
[Name][Executive director / authorised signatory][Signature]YYYY-MM-DD

Attachments checklist:

  • Funder's financial report form (or SF-425 for US federal awards)
  • Ledger extract or transaction listing, if requested
  • Midline or evaluation report (Annex B)
  • Indicator data table with sources and dates
  • Photographs or materials, only with consent and safeguarding check
  • Audit report or management letter, if one fell due in the period
  • Evidence of match funding and in-kind contributions

Final pre-submission checks:

  • Every funder question answered in the order asked, within limits
  • Figures identical in the summary, tables and the financial form
  • Indicator and activity IDs match the proposal and the monitoring and evaluation plan
  • Every variance above the threshold explained in 8.2
  • Approval requests stated separately and clearly
  • Submitted before the due date; receipt saved with this document

12. Glossary and references

TermMeaning in this report
OutputSomething the project delivered, such as a session held or a teacher trained
OutcomeA change in people or institutions that the outputs contribute to
Baseline, midline, endlineMeasurements at the start, middle and end of the project
VarianceActual minus budget for a line and period
Carry forwardMoving an unspent balance into a later budget period with the funder's agreement
Indirect costsShared organisational costs charged as a rate on an agreed base
Pass-through entityAn organisation that receives an award and passes part of it to a subrecipient

Related templates: nonprofit/grant-proposal (the approved plan), nonprofit/monitoring-evaluation-plan (indicator definitions and data sources), nonprofit/theory-of-change, nonprofit/impact-report (the annual public report), finance/variance-analysis, compliance/risk-register and nonprofit/safeguarding-policy.

Standard and licence note

Based on common funder reporting practice (narrative progress against approved objectives and indicators, budget-to-actual financial report with variance explanations, and signed declarations). For US federal awards it also refers to the Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR part 200, sections 200.308 (revision of budget and program plans), 200.328 (financial reporting), 200.329 (monitoring and reporting program performance) and 200.344 (closeout), as published on eCFR with text current at 2026-10-01 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200). Other governments and foundations set their own rules, and the grant agreement always takes precedence. The text is original and paraphrases public law; check the current official version before use. This is a reporting format, not legal, financial or audit advice. Template licence: MIT.

関連テンプレート