Steering Committee Report Template
Steering pack: executive summary, decisions requested, status dashboard, financials, escalated risks, change requests, roadmap
사용법: Use before each steering committee meeting and send it three working days ahead. Fill decisions requested with options and a recommendation first. Main pitfall: a long status narrative that hides what the committee must decide.
미리보기
Steering Committee Report: [Project name] – Meeting YYYY-MM-DD
Report to the project steering committee: executive summary, decisions requested, status dashboard, financials, escalated risks and issues, change requests, roadmap and next meeting. Based on common project governance practice. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project | [Project name] ([code]) |
| Meeting date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Report number | [5] |
| Prepared by | [@project-manager] |
| Sponsor and chair | [@sponsor] |
| Members | [Names and roles] |
| Overall status | [Green / Amber / Red], previous [Green / Amber / Red] |
| Stage | [Build and test, gate G3 due YYYY-MM-DD] |
1. Executive summary
[Three to five sentences on overall status, key achievements since last meeting, the main concern and what the committee is asked to decide.]
Example: The project is Amber. Design was approved and the vendor is building; go-live remains forecast for YYYY-MM-DD, but buffer use has reached 60% after the accessibility change. Cost forecast is 2% over the original baseline, within contingency. The committee is asked to approve CR-009 and to note the escalated vendor staffing risk.
2. Decisions requested
The committee is asked to make the following decisions.
| # | Decision | Options | Recommendation | Impact | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Example: Approve CR-009, extend hypercare by 2 weeks | A: approve (+12,000 EUR); B: reject | A, funded from contingency | Covers the first month-end cycle after go-live | YYYY-MM-DD |
| D2 | Example: Accept residual risk RSK-001 at score 12 | A: accept; B: fund backup developer (+20,000 EUR) | A, with monthly review | Saves 20,000 EUR; slight schedule exposure | This meeting |
| D3 | [Decision] | [Options] | [Recommendation] | [Impact] | YYYY-MM-DD |
Items for noting (no decision needed): [vendor change of account manager; training plan approved by HR].
3. Status dashboard
Status by dimension:
| Dimension | Status | Trend | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | Example: Amber | Worse | M3 forecast +4 days; buffer 60% used |
| Cost | Example: Green | Steady | EAC 488,000 EUR vs BAC 478,500 EUR (+2%) |
| Scope | Example: Green | Steady | One approved change (CR-007) this period |
| Quality | Example: Green | Better | Severity 1 and 2 defects down to 5 |
| Risks | Example: Amber | Steady | One High risk escalated (section 5) |
| Benefits | Example: Green | Steady | Baselines measured; targets unchanged |
Milestones:
| ID | Milestone | Baseline | Forecast | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M2 | Design approved | YYYY-MM-DD | Achieved YYYY-MM-DD | Achieved |
| M3 | UAT complete | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | At risk |
| M4 | Go-live | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | On track |
4. Financials
Financial position at YYYY-MM-DD (EUR):
| Item | Approved budget | Actual to date | Forecast at completion | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost baseline | Example: 435,000 | 241,000 | 444,500 | -9,500 |
| Contingency | 43,500 | 18,000 used (CR-007) | 25,500 remaining | n/a |
| Total budget | 478,500 | 241,000 | 488,000 incl. CR-009 | -9,500 |
Earned value indicators: CPI [0.97], SPI [0.94]. With , the cost forecast is consistent with the line above within [1%].
5. Risks and issues escalated
The following items are escalated.
| ID | Description | Score / priority | Actions taken | Ask of the committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSK-001 | Example: Vendor developers may be withdrawn for another client | 12 (Medium, was 16) | Named-team clause enforced; extra developer added | Accept residual risk (D2) |
| DEP-002 | Example: CRM project needs our data feed earlier than planned | At risk | Options analysed with CRM PM | Confirm priority between the two projects |
| [ID] | [Description] | [Score] | [Actions] | [Ask] |
6. Change requests
Change requests since the last meeting:
| CR ID | Title | Impact | Decided by | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR-007 | Example: Accessibility audit before UAT | +18,000 EUR, +5 days (buffer) | Sponsor | Approved with conditions |
| CR-009 | Example: Extend hypercare by 2 weeks | +12,000 EUR | Committee | For decision (D1) |
| [CR-nnn] | [Title] | [Impact] | [Forum] | [Decision] |
7. Benefits outlook
Expected benefits are unchanged from the business case. Baselines for B1 to B4 were measured on YYYY-MM-DD; the first post-go-live measurement is planned for YYYY-MM-DD.
8. Roadmap
The roadmap for the coming period is:
| Period | Key outcomes | Gate or decision |
|---|---|---|
| Next 4 weeks | UAT complete, training 80% delivered | G3 readiness |
| 4 to 8 weeks | Go-live, hypercare | Go-live decision |
| 8 to 12 weeks | Handover, closure report | G4 and closure |
9. Actions from previous meeting
Status of actions from the last meeting:
| # | Action | Owner | Due | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-12 | Example: Confirm HR release of staff for training | HR director | YYYY-MM-DD | Done |
| A-13 | Example: Agree data feed date with CRM project | Project manager | YYYY-MM-DD | Open, see DEP-002 |
| [A-nn] | [Action] | [@owner] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Status] |
10. Next meeting
The next meeting is on YYYY-MM-DD. Expected decisions: [G3 gate approval, go-live date confirmation]. Pre-reads will be sent by YYYY-MM-DD.
Standard and licence note
Based on common project governance practice for steering committee reporting. This template is original text written for this collection. Template licence: MIT.
관련 템플릿
Project Closure Report Template
Closure: objectives vs outcomes, scope, schedule and cost variances, quality, benefits handover, open items, contracts, archive, sign-off
프로젝트 관리Benefits Realization Plan Template
Benefits map, benefit profiles with measure, baseline, target, timing and owner, tracking schedule, dependencies and dis-benefits
프로젝트 관리Change Request and Change Log Template
Project change request with impact on scope, schedule, cost, quality and risk, options, CCB decision record, change log and flow