Business Case Template (Five-Case Model)
Investment business case: strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management cases, options, NPV/IRR, risks, approvals
Cách dùng: Use when seeking approval and funding for an investment. Write the strategic case and investment objectives first, then appraise options against a do-nothing baseline. The main pitfall is a case with only one real option or untraceable numbers.
Xem trước
Business Case: [Initiative name]
Full business case for an investment decision, structured around the five-case model concepts: strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management. It sets out why change is needed, which option offers the best value, whether it can be bought and afforded, and how it will be delivered. Replace every
[bracketed]value and every row marked Example. This is a document format, not financial advice: have your finance team validate every figure and discount rate.
Document control
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Document ID | [BC-YYYY-001] |
| Initiative | [Initiative name] |
| Stage | [Strategic outline / Outline business case / Full business case] |
| Version | [0.1] |
| Status | [Draft / In review / Approved / Rejected / Deferred] |
| Senior responsible owner | [@sponsor] |
| Author(s) | [@author] |
| Finance reviewer | [@finance] |
| Investment requested | [currency amount, capital and operating] |
| Decision forum | [Investment committee / Board / Steering group] |
| Last updated | YYYY-MM-DD |
Approvals
| Role | Name | Decision | Date | Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior responsible owner | [@name] | [Endorsed / Not endorsed] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Any conditions] |
| Chief financial officer | [@name] | [Approved / Changes requested] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Conditions] |
| Investment committee chair | [@name] | [Approved / Rejected / Deferred] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Conditions] |
| Head of procurement | [@name] | [Commercial route agreed] | YYYY-MM-DD | [Conditions] |
Revision history
| Version | Date | Author | Change summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | First draft of strategic case and long list |
| 0.2 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | Example: Added economic appraisal for three short-listed options |
| 1.0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] | Example: Approved by investment committee with conditions |
Contents
1. Executive summary
[Initiative name] addresses [problem in one sentence]. We assessed [N] options against a do-nothing baseline. The preferred option is [option name], which costs [amount] over [N] years and delivers a net present value of [amount] with a payback period of [N] years.
| Item | Summary |
|---|---|
| Decision requested | [Approve funding of amount for phase 1 / proceed to full business case] |
| Preferred option | [Option name and one-line description] |
| Total cost (whole life) | [amount over N years, undiscounted] |
| Net present value | [amount at r% discount rate] |
| Internal rate of return | [N%] |
| Payback period | [N years, N months] |
| Key benefits | [Top three benefits with measures] |
| Key risks | [Top two risks and their mitigation] |
| Delivery timeline | [Start date to completion date] |
Example: "Replacing the legacy order management system reduces order handling cost by 32% and removes an unsupported platform that carries an estimated 18% annual probability of a major outage. Option 3 (SaaS platform with phased migration) costs 2.4M over five years and returns an NPV of 1.1M at an 8% discount rate."
2. Strategic case
2.1 Organisational overview and strategic context
[Describe the organisation or business unit, its strategy, and the objectives this initiative supports. Reference the plan by name and year, for example "Operations Strategy 2026-2029, objective 3: reduce cost to serve".]
2.2 Case for change
| Aspect | Current state | Problem or constraint | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Process | Orders keyed manually from email into two systems | 11 minutes average handling time; 4.2% rekey error rate | Process audit, March YYYY |
| Example: Technology | Order platform out of vendor support since YYYY | No security patches; outage risk | Vendor notice, IT risk register R-014 |
| [Aspect] | [Current state] | [Problem] | [Source] |
2.3 Investment objectives
| ID | Objective | Measure | Baseline | Target | By when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IO-01 | Example: Reduce order handling cost | Cost per order | 6.40 | 4.35 | Q4 YYYY |
| IO-02 | Example: Remove unsupported platform risk | Critical systems out of support | 1 | 0 | Q2 YYYY |
| IO-03 | [Objective] | [Measure] | [Baseline] | [Target] | [Date] |
2.4 Scope, constraints and dependencies
[State the minimum, intermediate and maximum scope considered. List constraints such as budget ceilings, regulatory deadlines or freeze periods, and dependencies on other programmes.]
- Constraints: [for example, capital budget capped at amount in FY YYYY]
- Dependencies: [for example, identity platform upgrade completes by YYYY-MM-DD]
- Stakeholders: [who is affected and who must agree]
3. Options appraisal
3.1 Long list
| ID | Option | Description | Meets objectives? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP-0 | Do nothing | Continue current arrangements | No | Baseline (carried forward) |
| OP-1 | Example: Do minimum | Extend vendor support, patch critical issues | Partially | Carried forward |
| OP-2 | Example: Build in house | Develop a new platform internally | Yes | Discounted: skills gap, 30-month timeline |
| OP-3 | Example: SaaS with phased migration | Subscribe to a SaaS platform; migrate by region | Yes | Carried forward (preferred) |
| OP-4 | Example: SaaS big-bang migration | Same platform, single cut-over | Yes | Carried forward |
3.2 Critical success factors
| ID | Critical success factor | How it is assessed |
|---|---|---|
| CSF-1 | Strategic fit | Contribution to IO-01 to IO-03 |
| CSF-2 | Value for money | NPV and benefit-cost ratio |
| CSF-3 | Achievability | Skills, timeline and supplier capacity |
| CSF-4 | Affordability | Fits within capital and operating budgets |
3.3 Short list
| Option | CSF-1 | CSF-2 | CSF-3 | CSF-4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP-0 Do nothing | Low | n/a (baseline) | High | High | Baseline |
| OP-1 Do minimum | Low | Low | High | High | Not preferred |
| OP-3 SaaS phased | High | High | Medium | Medium | Preferred |
| OP-4 SaaS big-bang | High | Medium | Low | Medium | Possible |
4. Economic case
4.1 Appraisal method
Each option is appraised over [N] years at a discount rate of [r%] agreed with finance. Net present value (NPV) discounts each year's net cash flow back to today and subtracts the initial investment :
The internal rate of return (IRR) is the discount rate at which NPV is zero. Payback is the time until cumulative net cash flow turns positive. The benefit-cost ratio is the present value of benefits divided by the present value of costs.
4.2 Costs by option
| Cost line | OP-1 Do minimum | OP-3 SaaS phased | OP-4 SaaS big-bang |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Initial investment | 150,000 | 900,000 | 780,000 |
| Example: Annual licences and support | 210,000 | 260,000 | 260,000 |
| Example: Internal staff (annual) | 340,000 | 180,000 | 180,000 |
| [Cost line] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] |
| Whole-life cost (5 years, undiscounted) | [total] | [total] | [total] |
4.3 Benefits by option
| ID | Benefit | Type | Measure | Annual value (OP-3) | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BN-01 | Example: Lower order handling effort | Cash-releasing | Cost per order 6.40 to 4.35 | 615,000 | @ops-director |
| BN-02 | Example: Avoided outage cost | Risk reduction | Expected loss avoided | 90,000 | @cio |
| BN-03 | Example: Faster quote turnaround | Qualitative | Days from request to quote | Not monetised | @sales-director |
4.4 Results
| Measure | OP-1 | OP-3 | OP-4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| NPV at [r%] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] |
| IRR | [N%] | [N%] | [N%] |
| Payback | [N years] | [N years] | [N years] |
| Benefit-cost ratio | [N.N] | [N.N] | [N.N] |
Example: With , net annual cash flows of 525,000 for five years and , the present value of inflows is about 2,096,000, so NPV is about 1,196,000 and payback falls in year 2.
4.5 Sensitivity and switching values
[Show how the result changes when key assumptions move. A switching value is the change in one input that would make the preferred option no longer best.]
| Assumption | Base value | Tested range | NPV at worst case | Switching value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Benefit realisation | 100% | 60% to 110% | 230,000 | Benefits fall below 54% |
| Example: Migration duration | 9 months | 9 to 15 months | 870,000 | Over 26 months |
4.6 Assumptions register
| ID | Assumption | Source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS-01 | Example: Order volume grows 4% a year | Sales forecast FY YYYY | Medium |
| AS-02 | [Assumption] | [Source] | [High / Medium / Low] |
5. Commercial case
5.1 Procurement strategy
[Describe the route to market: framework call-off, open tender, competitive negotiation, direct award with justification. State the evaluation approach and timeline.]
5.2 Required services and outputs
| Requirement | Specification summary | Contract type |
|---|---|---|
| Example: SaaS order platform | Multi-region, 99.9% availability, EDI support | Subscription, 3 years plus 2 |
| Example: Migration services | Data migration and integration build | Fixed price with milestones |
5.3 Risk allocation
| Risk | Client | Supplier | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Platform availability | X | ||
| Example: Data quality before migration | X | ||
| Example: Integration delays | X |
5.4 Payment mechanism and key terms
[Summarise payment milestones, service credits, exit and data return provisions, and any personnel or asset transfer implications. Have the final terms reviewed by legal counsel.]
6. Financial case
6.1 Capital and revenue requirements
| Line | FY1 | FY2 | FY3 | FY4 | FY5 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capital | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [total] |
| Operating | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [total] |
| Savings released | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [total] |
| Net impact | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [amount] | [total] |
6.2 Funding sources
| Source | Amount | Status | Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Capital programme FY YYYY | 900,000 | Allocated | Release on approval of full case |
| Example: Operating budget, IT | 260,000 per year | Requested | Offset by decommissioning legacy licences |
6.3 Affordability gap and impact on accounts
[State any gap between required and available funding and how it will be closed. Describe the expected effect on the income statement and balance sheet, such as capitalised implementation costs and depreciation, as confirmed by finance.]
7. Management case
7.1 Delivery plan
| Phase | Key deliverables | Start | End | Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example: Mobilise | Supplier contract signed, team in place | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | Gate 1 |
| Example: Region 1 migration | First region live, legacy read-only | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | Gate 2 |
| Example: Full roll-out and decommission | All regions live, legacy switched off | YYYY-MM-DD | YYYY-MM-DD | Gate 3 |
7.2 Governance
[Describe the governance structure: senior responsible owner, steering group, project board, design authority, reporting frequency and tolerances that trigger escalation, such as a cost overrun over 10% or a delay over four weeks.]
| Role | Name | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Senior responsible owner | [@name] | Accountable for benefits and the case |
| Project manager | [@name] | Day-to-day delivery within tolerances |
| Benefits owner | [@name] | Tracks and reports benefits after go-live |
7.3 Benefits realisation
| Benefit ID | Measure | Baseline | Target | Measurement date | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BN-01 | Cost per order | 6.40 | 4.35 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] |
| BN-02 | Critical systems out of support | 1 | 0 | YYYY-MM-DD | [@name] |
7.4 Change management, assurance and post-implementation review
[Explain the training, communication and process-change plan. Describe independent assurance points and when a post-implementation review will compare actual costs and benefits with this case.]
8. Risks
Score each risk as likelihood times impact on a 1 to 5 scale, so ranges from 1 to 25.
| ID | Risk | L | I | Score | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RK-01 | Example: Legacy data quality delays migration | 4 | 4 | 16 | Data cleansing sprint before Gate 2 | @data-lead |
| RK-02 | Example: Staff adoption lower than planned | 3 | 4 | 12 | Super-user network, phased training | @ops-director |
| RK-03 | [Risk] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [L x I] | [Mitigation] | [@owner] |
9. Recommendation
It is recommended that [decision forum] approves [option] at a total cost of [amount], with phase 1 funding of [amount] released now and the remainder subject to Gate [N] review on YYYY-MM-DD.
- Conditions: [for example, supplier contract signed within budget]
- Next steps: [for example, issue tender by YYYY-MM-DD]
10. Appendices
- Appendix A: Economic model workbook [link]
- Appendix B: Long-list assessment detail [link]
- Appendix C: Stakeholder consultation summary [link]
- Appendix D: Glossary of terms such as NPV, IRR, payback and switching value
Standard and licence note
Based on common business case practice using the publicly described five-case model concepts (strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management). This template is original text written for this collection and reproduces no text from any official guidance; consult your organisation's investment appraisal rules for mandatory content. This is a document format, not financial advice. Template licence: MIT.
Template liên quan
Business Plan Template
Full business plan: market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), customers, competition, model, go-to-market, financials, break-even, funding ask
Kinh doanhFeasibility Study Template (TELOS)
Feasibility study across technical, economic, legal, operational and scheduling dimensions with scoring, costs, risk and sensitivity
Kinh doanhMarket Research Report Template
Market research report: research questions, methodology and sample size, market sizing, segments, needs, competitors, trends, findings