Markdown Editor

Project Management Plan Template

Integrated plan: objectives, governance, scope, schedule, cost and EVM, quality, risk, procurement, change control, baselines

프로젝트 관리전체ISO 21502:2020managementplanmath

사용법: Use after the charter is approved to define how the whole project is run and to baseline scope, schedule and cost. Fill section 1 objectives and the tolerances first, then the baselines. Main pitfall: duplicating subsidiary plans instead of linking them, so numbers drift apart.

미리보기

Project Management Plan: [Project name]

Integrated project management plan that brings together how the project will be governed, planned, executed, monitored, controlled and closed. The structure is aligned with common project management practice and uses ISO 21502:2020 only as a structural reference. Replace every [bracketed] value and every row marked Example.

Document control

FieldValue
Document ID[PMP-PROJECT-001]
Project[Project name] ([project code])
Sponsor[@sponsor]
Project manager[@project-manager]
Version[0.1]
Status[Draft / In review / Approved / Baselined]
Classification[Internal / Confidential]
Related documents[Project charter PC-001, Business case BC-001, RAID log RAID-001]
Last updatedYYYY-MM-DD

Approvals

RoleNameDecisionDate
Project sponsor[@name][Approved / Approved with conditions]YYYY-MM-DD
Steering committee chair[@name][Decision]YYYY-MM-DD
Project manager[@name][Submitted]YYYY-MM-DD
Finance controller[@name][Budget confirmed]YYYY-MM-DD

Revision history

VersionDateAuthorChange summary
0.1YYYY-MM-DD[@name]First draft for review
1.0YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Approved and baselined by steering committee
1.1YYYY-MM-DD[@name]Example: Schedule re-baselined after CR-007 (vendor delay)

Contents

1. Project overview

This section summarises the purpose, objectives and boundaries of [Project name] so that every reader shares the same understanding before reading the management approaches that follow.

1.1 Background and purpose

[Two or three sentences on the business problem or opportunity, the strategic objective it supports and the reference to the approved business case.]

Example: Customer onboarding currently takes 11 working days and 18% of applications are abandoned. The project replaces the paper-based onboarding process with a digital workflow, supporting the 2027 strategic objective "digital first service".

1.2 Objectives

Objectives are written to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART).

IDObjectiveMeasureTargetDeadline
OBJ-01Example: Reduce onboarding cycle timeMedian days from application to account activeFrom 11 to 3 daysYYYY-MM-DD
OBJ-02Example: Reduce application abandonmentAbandoned / started applicationsFrom 18% to below 8%YYYY-MM-DD
OBJ-03[Objective][Measure][Target]YYYY-MM-DD

1.3 Success criteria and constraints

The project is successful when the objectives above are met within the approved tolerances below.

DimensionBaselineTolerance before escalation to sponsor
ScheduleGo-live YYYY-MM-DD+/- 10 working days
Cost[Budget at completion, e.g. 480,000 EUR]+/- 5%
ScopeDeliverables D1 to D6No reduction in Must-have scope
QualityAcceptance criteria in section 7Zero open severity 1 defects at go-live

Key constraints: [regulatory deadline, fixed budget, technology mandate]. Key assumptions are recorded in the RAID log.

2. Governance and organisation

The project is governed through a steering committee that holds decision authority above the project manager's tolerances. The organisation chart below shows reporting lines.

2.1 Roles and decision rights

RoleNameResponsibilitiesDecision authority
Sponsor[@name]Owns the business case, secures funding, chairs escalationsApproves changes beyond PM tolerance
Steering committee[names]Direction, stage approvals, risk acceptanceGo/no-go at each stage gate
Project manager[@name]Day-to-day planning, delivery, reportingChanges within tolerance
Workstream lead[@name]Delivers workstream scope and reports progressTask-level priorities
Independent assurance[@name]Reviews health and complianceAdvisory only

2.2 Lifecycle and stage gates

The project follows a [predictive / iterative / hybrid] lifecycle with the following stages and gates.

StageExit gateGate criteria
InitiationG1 Plan approvedThis plan baselined; funding released
DesignG2 Design approvedSolution design signed off; vendor contracted
Build and testG3 Ready for deploymentUAT passed; operational readiness confirmed
Deploy and transitionG4 HandoverService accepted by operations; hypercare complete

3. Scope management

Scope is defined by the scope statement below, decomposed in the work breakdown structure and accepted deliverable by deliverable.

3.1 Scope statement

In scopeOut of scope
Example: Online application form for retail customersBusiness and corporate customers
Example: Integration with core banking and identity verification serviceReplacement of core banking system
[Item][Item]

3.2 Work breakdown structure

The WBS and WBS dictionary are maintained in [WBS-001 link]. Every deliverable below maps to a level 2 WBS element and to a named acceptor.

DeliverableWBS IDAcceptance criteriaAcceptor
D1 Process design1.2Approved by operations head; covers all 7 onboarding scenarios[@name]
D2 Digital onboarding platform1.3UAT pass rate at least 95%, no open severity 1 or 2 defects[@name]
[Deliverable][x.y][Criteria][@name]

3.3 Scope validation

Each deliverable is presented to its acceptor with evidence against the acceptance criteria. Acceptance is recorded with a signed acceptance note in the project repository; rejected deliverables return to the owning workstream with a list of gaps.

4. Schedule management

The schedule is developed bottom-up from WBS work packages, baselined at gate G1 and updated [weekly]. Variance against milestones is reported in every status report.

4.1 Milestones

IDMilestoneBaseline dateOwnerGate
M1Plan baselinedYYYY-MM-DD[@pm]G1
M2Solution design approvedYYYY-MM-DD[@lead]G2
M3UAT completeYYYY-MM-DD[@lead]G3
M4Go-liveYYYY-MM-DD[@pm]G4

4.2 Summary schedule

The gantt chart below shows the summary schedule; replace the dates with your baseline.

4.3 Schedule control

Schedule variance beyond [5 working days] on a critical path milestone is escalated to the sponsor. Re-baselining requires an approved change request.

5. Cost management

Costs are estimated per work package and rolled up to the budget below. Actual costs come from [finance system] and are reconciled monthly.

5.1 Budget

CategoryEstimateBasis of estimate
Internal labourExample: 210,000 EUR1,750 person-days at blended rate 120 EUR
External servicesExample: 140,000 EURFixed-price vendor quote Q-2027-14
Licences and infrastructureExample: 60,000 EURThree-year subscription, year one
Training and changeExample: 25,000 EUR12 sessions, materials
Cost baseline435,000 EUR
Contingency reserve (10%)43,500 EURHeld by PM for identified risks
Management reserve[Amount]Held by sponsor for unknowns
Budget at completion (BAC)478,500 EUR

5.2 Contingency rules

Contingency is released by the project manager against named risks in the RAID log and recorded in the cost log. Management reserve is released only by the sponsor through change control.

6. Performance measurement

Performance is measured with earned value management (EVM) at work-package level, using the [50/50] crediting rule. The core indicators are:

CV=EV−ACSV=EV−PVCV = EV - AC \qquad SV = EV - PV

SPI=EVPVCPI=EVACEAC=BACCPISPI = \frac{EV}{PV} \qquad CPI = \frac{EV}{AC} \qquad EAC = \frac{BAC}{CPI}

where PVPV is planned value, EVEV earned value, ACAC actual cost and BACBAC budget at completion.

IndicatorGreenAmberRed
SPIat least 0.950.90 to 0.94below 0.90
CPIat least 0.950.90 to 0.94below 0.90
Milestone slip0 to 5 days6 to 10 daysover 10 days

Example: with EVEV = 200,000, ACAC = 220,000 and BACBAC = 478,500, CPI≈0.91CPI \approx 0.91 and EAC≈526,000EAC \approx 526,000, which is amber and triggers a cost recovery review.

7. Quality management

Quality is planned into each deliverable through acceptance criteria, assured through stage-gate reviews and controlled through testing and inspections. The full approach is in [QMP-001].

DeliverableQuality standardControl activityResponsible
Process designInternal process design standardPeer review and operations walkthrough[@name]
PlatformTest plan TP-001, accessibility WCAG 2.2 AASystem test, UAT, accessibility audit[@name]
Training materialsBrand and plain-language guideReview by two pilot users[@name]

8. Resource management

The team is staffed from [departments] and one external vendor. Resource requirements, RACI and release dates are maintained in [RP-001].

RoleFTESourcePeriod
Example: Business analyst1.0Operations departmentDesign to UAT
Example: Developer3.0VendorBuild and test
[Role][x.x][Source][Period]

Conflicts over shared resources are resolved by the line managers concerned; unresolved conflicts go to the sponsor within [5] working days.

9. Communications management

Communication is planned per audience in [CP-001]. The core rhythm is:

CommunicationAudienceFrequencyOwner
Status reportSponsor, steering committeeBiweeklyProject manager
Steering committee meetingSteering committeeMonthly and at gatesSponsor
Team stand-upProject teamDailyWorkstream leads
Stakeholder newsletterAffected staffMonthlyChange lead

10. Risk management

Risks are recorded in the RAID log, scored on a 1 to 5 scale for probability and impact, and reviewed [weekly] by the project team and monthly by the steering committee.

Risk score=Probability×Impact(1 to 25)\text{Risk score} = \text{Probability} \times \text{Impact} \quad (1 \text{ to } 25)

ScoreRatingResponse expectation
15 to 25HighResponse plan within 5 days; reported to steering committee
8 to 14MediumResponse plan within 10 days; tracked in status report
1 to 7LowMonitored by owner

Top risks at baseline: Example: RSK-003 vendor capacity (score 16), RSK-007 identity service API changes (score 12).

11. Procurement management

Procurement follows [organisation procurement policy] and is detailed in [PP-001]. Planned procurements: [implementation vendor (fixed price), identity verification service (subscription)]. Contracts are managed by [@contract-manager], who reviews supplier performance monthly against agreed service levels.

12. Stakeholder engagement

Stakeholders are analysed by power and interest in [SR-001]. Engagement levels are reviewed monthly; any stakeholder whose current engagement is two levels below the desired level gets a named engagement action.

StakeholderCurrent engagementDesired engagementAction
Example: Branch network managersResistantSupportiveCo-design workshops, pilot in two branches
[Stakeholder][Level][Level][Action]

13. Issue management

Issues are logged in the RAID log with a priority and owner. Target resolution: priority 1 within [2] working days, priority 2 within [5], priority 3 within [15]. Issues that cannot be resolved within tolerance are escalated following the path in the communication plan.

14. Configuration and information management

Project documents are stored in [repository or tool] with version numbers in the form major.minor. Baselined items (this plan, requirements, designs, test plans) are listed in a configuration register; changes to them require a change request. Records are retained for [7] years in line with [records policy].

ItemLocationOwnerBaseline control
Project management plan[Link]Project managerYes
Requirements specification[Link]Business analystYes
Meeting minutes[Link]PMONo

15. Change control

Any change to scope, schedule, cost or quality baselines is raised as a change request (CR) using [CC-001], assessed for impact within [5] working days and decided according to the thresholds below.

ImpactDecision by
Within PM tolerance (cost under 5,000 EUR, schedule under 5 days, no scope reduction)Project manager
Within sponsor tolerance (cost under 25,000 EUR, schedule under 10 days)Sponsor
Above sponsor tolerance or affecting benefitsChange control board / steering committee

Approved changes update the affected baselines and the revision history of this plan.

16. Transition and closure

The solution transitions to [operations team] after go-live, following a [20]-day hypercare period. Transition criteria: support runbooks accepted, service desk trained, open defects transferred with owners, and service levels met for [10] consecutive working days. Closure activities (lessons learned, contract closure, resource release, archive) are recorded in the project closure report.

17. Subsidiary plans and references

The following documents complete this plan.

DocumentIDVersionLink
Project charterPC-0011.0[Link]
Work breakdown structureWBS-001[x.y][Link]
Project scheduleSCH-001[x.y][Link]
RAID logRAID-001Living[Link]
Communication planCP-001[x.y][Link]
Quality management planQMP-001[x.y][Link]

18. Baselines and approvals

The following baselines were approved on YYYY-MM-DD at gate G1.

BaselineContentReference
Scope baselineScope statement, WBS, WBS dictionarySection 3, WBS-001 v1.0
Schedule baselineMilestones M1 to M4, go-live YYYY-MM-DDSection 4, SCH-001 v1.0
Cost baseline435,000 EUR plus 43,500 EUR contingencySection 5

19. Glossary

TermMeaning
BACBudget at completion: total approved budget for the work
CCBChange control board
EVMEarned value management
RAIDRisks, assumptions, issues and dependencies
WBSWork breakdown structure

Standard and licence note

Structure aligned with ISO 21502:2020, Project, programme and portfolio management: Guidance on project management, used only as a structural reference for the integrated management practices. Content is based on common project management practice. This template is original text written for this collection and reproduces no text from the standard; obtain the standard for its guidance. Template licence: MIT.

관련 템플릿